. This study should have broad-based applications for other educators within the domains of SMET education, particularly thoseinterested in courses designed for Liberal Arts majorsI. Introduction The primary purpose of teaching is to facilitate student learning. However, many traditionalteaching methods have clearly been shown to encourage passive rather than active learning [1],and passive learning hinders comprehension and long-term retention of important concepts.Students in traditional classrooms acquire most of their knowledge through classroom lecturesand textbook reading, but good teaching involves a great deal more than simply pouringinformation into their heads. Students do not enter the classroom with a tabula rasa. They bringtheir
at UIUC, Joseph earned an MS degree in Physics from Indiana University in Bloomington and a BS in Engineering Physics at UIUC.Ms. Allyson Jo Barlow, University of Nevada, Reno Ally Barlow graduated with her Doctoral Degree in Civil Engineering from Oregon State University, where she fused her technical background with her passion for education; her doctoral research focused on the exploration of student engagement from multiple methodological standpoints. Now she works as a Postdoctoral Scholar at University of Nevada Reno, expanding her knowledge of the field through work on faculty-faculty mentorship modes. Her research interests include student cognitive engagement and teacher best practices for in-class and
of the 8th grade teachers were contacted by the Page 23.909.4Strength of Materials professor through a campus contact with the Science in Motion program,whichoperates as part of Elizabethtown College’s Center for Community and Civic Engagement.Science in Motion provides a mobile lab with science equipment beyond the budget of mostschools along with science teaching support. At that point, the professor and 8th grade teachersarranged the logistics of the visit, and brought the other 8th grade science teacher on board. This outreach experience was awarded an internal faculty grant of $1000, but the totalcost of the experience was only
its contribution toa more thorough approach to problem definition. This paper explains the concept of tagmemicsand demonstrates its application in solving an engineering problem (the creation of a better crashtest due to deaths and injuries caused by air-bag trauma in front-end crashes) through Page 26.1456.2comprehensive tagmemic analysis.Background on Tagmemics Theory and MethodologyThe beauty of tagmemics for engineering educators is both its simplicity and its complexity. Themethodology provides a framework for classifying phenomena but is far more than a meretaxonomizing device. Within the intersections of the grid (Table 1) are contained
representative jobdescriptions, literature reviews, and other reports. This initial list was consolidated through aseries of SIG meetings and events throughout 2008 and 2009; thus, here are the attributes thatemerged through this process: Engineering Science Fundamentals o Mathematics (including statistics) o Physical and Life Sciences o Political and Socio-economic Sciences o Information Technology - Digital Competency Engineering o Understanding of Design and Product Processes o Understanding of Product Life Cycle Development o Effective Teamwork/Common Goals o Possess a Multi-Disciplinary, Systems Perspective o Maintain Focus with Multiple Project Assignments Context in which Engineering
-learning reflection for engineering. In E. Tsang & American Association for Higher Education (Eds.), Projects that matter (pp. 64-75). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.6. Reynaud, E., Duffy, J. J., Barrington, L., Kazmer, D. O., Tucker, B. G., & Rhoads, J. L. (2012, June). Engineering faculty attitudes towards service-learning. Paper presented at the 119th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX.7. Pierrakos, O., Bielefeldt, A. R., Duffy, J. J., Mcvay, S., Paterson, K., Swan, C. W., & Zilberberg, A. (2012, June). Faculty survey on learning through service: Development and initial findings. Paper presented at the
Paper ID #43141Addressing Societal Challenges through Graduate-level Community-engagedDesign Projects (Traditional Research Paper) ˜ George Mason UniversityDr. Samuel A Acuna, Samuel Acu˜na is a research professor in the Department of Bioengineering at George Mason University. He is a biomechanical engineer interested in rehabilitation engineering and human-centered product design. He develops new technologies to address movement disorders that develop after injury, such as stroke, amputation, or traumatic brain injury. He is particularly interested in solving engineering problems for the hospital &
answering individual/groupquestions as needed. Throughout the course of the semester, students would complete a project(in teams) and three examinations. Mid-March 2020, however, COVID-19 forced AE 30 to moveto an online modality. A synchronous online class format was adopted for AE 30 for theremainder of the Spring 2020 semester. In the online class format, students joined a synchronousclass meeting for lecture and another one for lab through the videoconferencing software Zoom.Office hours also became an online Zoom meeting. Instead of walking around lab to answerquestions, the instructor and the few students that attended lab would talk through questions as agroup via Zoom. In the online environment, students were able to share their computer
analysis library fornatural language processing called TextBlob [Lor2019]. TextBlob does part-of-speech tagging,noun phrase extraction, sentiment analysis, and classification. For sentiment analysis, TextBlobconsiders sentiment over the range of -1 (negative) to +1 (positive). Furthermore, TextBlob alsoquantifies the perceived subjectivity of words over the range of 0 (objective) to +1 (subjective).Both AFINN and TextBlob use their lexicons to determine the overall sentiment of a text sampleby averaging the sentiment of individual words. Neither approach tries to account for degreemodifying words or negation.Going beyond simple valance, Bradley and Lang created a normative emotional rating Englishwords in their ANEW 2017 lexicon [Bra2017
learning model as “active (learn by trying thingsout …) or reflective (learn by thinking things through …).” 7 Chen et al. have used guidedreflection in an introductory engineering design course in the context of “Folio Thinking, acoached process of creating learning portfolios and supporting reflection.” 8 Feest and Iwugoused reflective learning logs in a graduate program in Water and Environmental Management. 9All of these authors report success in meeting learning objectives in a cost-effective way usingreflective learning as one of their strategies. Clearly, reflective learning can be applied at almostany level in higher education or professional practice in a wide variety of fields.We identified two benefits to using guided reflection to
students. The Cyber Discovery model goes beyond project-based curricula that simply instructs teachers on how to deliver a project. Rather, the modelutilizes project-driven curricula that empowers teachers with the fundamentals to teach STEMand encourages the use of projects to drive the fundamentals home. These lessons and the otherskills developed through the program can later be applied in the classroom. High Schoolteachers are encouraged to provide feedback throughout this process, as they know theirstudents’ capabilities and interests best.Additionally, workshops serve as an opportunity for the university faculty and the high schoolteachers to collaborate and to develop a mentoring relationship. The mutual respect and spirit ofcollaboration
/docs/Biomedical_research_wgreport.pdf.[5] E. L. Boyer, Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Lawrenceville, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.[6] G. E. Walker, C. M. Golde, L. Jones, A. C. Bueschel, and P. Hutchings, The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century., Vol. 11. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.[7] K. O’Meara, “Graduate education and community engagement,” New Dir. Teach. Learn., no. 113, pp. 27–42, 2008.[8] C. Wendler et al., “Pathways through graduate school and into careers,” Educ. Test. Serv., pp. 1–54, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED531250.pdf.[9] C. Kim-Prieto, H. L. Copeland, R. Hopson, T
45I The Office of Attorney 45I(A) Admission to Practice 45k11 Practitioners Not Admitted or Not Licensed 45k11(2) Acts Constituting Practice of Law in General 45k11(3) k. Drafting or Preparation of Documents. Most Cited Cases An attorney, licensed to practice law in the state of Ohio, aids in the unauthorized practice of law when he or she assists non-attorneys to market or sell living trusts. Code of Prof. Resp., DR 3-101(A).31The headnotes are placed at the front of each case in a West Reporter. The headnote is alsoreferenced in the text of the case itself. In the above example, a [4] will be found somewhere inthe text of the case itself, indicating that
Paper ID #12047Building Piece by Piece: Teaching Engineering Leadership through Inte-grated ModulesDr. Clinton Stephens, Iowa State University Dr. Clinton M. Stephens is a lecturer for leadership education with the Carrie Chapman Catt Center for Women and Politics at Iowa State University. Currently, Stephens coordinates the Catt Center’s burgeon- ing leadership program and teaches classes in leadership development including CLPS 322, ”Leadership Styles and Strategies in a Diverse Society.” Stephens continues his research and dissemination work that focuses on student leadership development, specifically assessing
teachers to theproject. Next, the Dean of Undergraduate Academics provided an introduction to NYU-Poly.Moreover, the director of an outreach center discussed NYU-Poly’s diverse array of educationaland outreach activities geared towards the K-12 educators. Finally, an Associate Dean ofUndergraduate Admissions discussed various opportunities for teachers to enhance theirstudents’ educational experiences through lab tours, college credits, etc. Following the Welcome Breakfast, the teachers were introduced to the participatingengineering research labs and lab safety. In addition, experimental demonstrations of a variety ofeducational and research projects were given to stimulate teachers’ interest in the RET summerworkshop. Finally, teachers
Sciences (CEAS), the pilot community for this program. Threeobjectives guided our planning: (1) create a sense of community and belonging; (2) engagestudents intellectually with faculty in the discipline; and (3) promote career development asintertwined with the academic experience. Note that prior to this initiative, no college-wide orinstitution-wide orientation for graduate students existed; we created a new program with noroadmap beyond the literature review. Paramount to the achievement of our objectives was support from the College and theacademic departments within. Funding was secured through the dean’s office to pay for a GraduateProgram Assistant to coordinate logistics, communication, and social activities. Each
research interests include hybrid concentrating photovoltaic systems, energy system life cycle assessment, renewable energy product development, and active learning.Mr. Eugene Joseph Werner Jr., GAI Consultants, Inc. Eugene Joseph Werner, Jr., is a recent graduate of Robert Morris University, May 2011. He is currently working for GAI Consultants in the Mechanical/Electrical Department and is a member of ASME. Page 25.1380.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 TurboFlow - Integrated Engineering Design through an Energy Efficient Building
gaps in knowledgebetween science, technology, engineering, and math is a desire most teachers have. Usingunique ways to introduce information to their students through labs, and demonstrations, is a taskproviding teachers the opportunity to utilize their creativity. This demonstration is an example ofways in which teachers assists their students in making connections between advances in STEMand everyday life activities. This demonstration will also help students understand theimportance of the collaboration between different disciplines. The technique discussed in thispaper is one that is utilized by scientists and engineers to design new materials with newfunctionality that assists doctors in repairing tissue in the human body. One
takes the form of evidence-based reasoning (as opposed to being rooted inopinion or without reference to evidence). The recently published Framework for K-12 ScienceEducation: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas identified eight key practices inscience and engineering.3 One of those, “Engaging in Argument from Evidence,” is described asfollows for engineering: In engineering, reasoning and argument are essential for finding the best solution to a problem. At an early design stage, competing ideas must be compared (and possibly combined) to achieve an initial design, and the choices are made through argumentation
Dr. Immekus is professor in the Department of Educational Leadership, Evaluation, and Organizational Development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Fostering Sustainable Waste Management Education through Undergraduate ResearchAbstractApproximately 7.6 billion tons of industrial waste are generated in the United States each year,among which only 30% of the waste stream is currently recycled. Whereas the remainderaccumulates in landfills, posing a significant environmental challenge. To better promotesustainability, it is essential to equip the next generation of researchers with the knowledge andskills required for effective waste reduction, reuse, and recycling.Through this ongoing NSF NSF
Design of Experiments into Undergraduate Heat Transfer Laboratories,” Proceedings of 1993 ASEE Conference, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaigne, IL, June 1993.2. Fox, R. W., and McDonald, A. T., Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 4th edition, John Wiley & Sons, 1992.3. Fee, B., and Meszaros, A., “Development and Analysis of Flow Through Converging and Converging- Diverging Nozzles,” ME 830L lab report, June 1997.4. Skurich, M., and Crown, K., “Series/Parallel Pumping System,” ME 830L lab report, June 1997. Ganesh V. KudavDr. Kudav holds a Ph.D. (1988) in Mechanical Engineering from Texas Tech University. He is an AssociateProfessor of Mechanical Engineering at Youngstown State
, integrative learning is defined as anand critical thinking skills are vital to the success of an understanding and a disposition that a student builds across theengineer. The goal of the engineering educator is to help curriculum, from making simple connections among ideas andstudents strengthen these abilities and guide them through the experiences to synthesizing and transferring learning to new,continuous processes of inquiry. Inquiry-Based Learning complex situations within and beyond the campus.[9] Ainvolves questioning, investigating (analyzing data), creating model for assessment of integrative learning, the Integrative(synthesizing data into information), communicating
Paper ID #24662Catalyzing Engineering Student Identity Development through an Indepen-dent Design ProjectMr. Kalen Kahn, U.S. Military Academy Kalen Kahn is a Cadet at West Point in his 3rd year of Mechanical Engineering.Lt. Col. Brian J. Novoselich, U.S. Military Academy Brian Novoselich is an active duty Army Lieutenant Colonel currently serving as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy (West Point). He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in 2016. He holds Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in mechanical engineering from The
have significant early positive impact on their freshmen studentsthat lasts beyond their college years.IntroductionET programs offer a variety of entry level courses aimed at preparing freshmen students for thechallenges they are expected to face in their college years and perhaps beyond. Such courses mayor may not be offered for a credit. Many of these course are developed to satisfy the Criteria forAccrediting Engineering Technology Programs1, especially Criterion 3: Students Outcomes (h, I,j and k) that state: h. an understanding of the need for and an ability to engage in self-directed continuing professional development; i. an understanding of and a commitment to address professional and ethical
Paper ID #41200Board 392: Support Teacher Course Development through TeachEngineeringStandardProf. Weihang Zhu, University of Houston Dr. Weihang Zhu received his Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from North Carolina State University and MS and BS in Mechanical and Energy Engineering. Currently he serves as Professor and Program Coordinator for the Mechanical Engineering Technology program in the Department of Engineering Technology, with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cullen College of Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas. His research expertise areas include
].Other competencies include ethics, professional judgement, and an understanding of practicalityand constructability, all of which have a critical impact on real-world engineering design. Mostimportantly, students must understand how these competencies fit into the complex nature ofdesign and the difficult choices that often must be made to satisfy design criteria and developsolutions in realistic conditions. Thus, to best prepare graduates for work, engineering educationprograms must incorporate authentic design experiences into their curricula, providing studentswith opportunities to think through real-world scenarios using a holistic set of competencies thatgo beyond technical knowledge alone.The purpose of this study was to understand how
to these programs is needed to create and foster existing interest thatcould lead to STEM careers. Additionally, it has been shown that student’s interest in STEMbegins decreasing in middle school, thus hindering the pathway to a STEM career. Through thisprogram, we aim to increase access to STEM fields by exposing elementary and middle schoolstudents from low-income and underrepresented (UR) communities to STEM career pathwaysthrough hands-on activities and continued mentorship. The activities will be offered incollaboration with community partners (e.g., YMCA, Big Brothers Big Sisters) to facilitatestudents’ engagement in STEM beyond the classroom. By offering this program, we aim to (1)inspire continued interest in STEM and (2) strengthen
Paper ID #21954Empowering Underrepresented Groups to Excel in STEM Through ResearchSprintsMr. Daniel Christe, Drexel University Daniel Christe has research interests at the nexus of mechanical engineering, materials science, and man- ufacturing centering on predictive design for functional fabrics that ”see, communicate, sense, and adapt”. Daniel holds a Master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering, and an undergraduate degree in Materials Science, both from Drexel University. Daniel splits his time between Drexel University and Elsevier, where he is a STEM Learning Strategist responsible for designing integrative
through targeted K- 12 STEM outreach experiences.William Davis Ferriell W. Davis Ferriell is a doctoral student in Biomechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Davis graduated from Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology with a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering. His discipline-specific research focuses on computational design methods. His engineering education-based research focuses on methods for increasing participation in engineering and the assessment of instructional approaches.Kristin Frady Kristin Frady is an Assistant Professor at Clemson University jointly appointed between the Educational and Organizational Leadership Development and Engineering and Science Education Departments. Her research focuses on
school level welcoming to students with a variety of interests beyond computer skills? Isthe environment welcoming to students who are new to cybersecurity?Furthermore, we should also recognize that many of the competitors of cybersecuritycompetitions will not pursue cybersecurity in post-secondary school. Therefore, understandingthe characteristics of these students would also be helpful in building a pipeline to cybersecuritycareers from K-12 schools.We believe that if cybersecurity competitions, especially at the high school level, could addressthese observations, not only would the students who are currently “good cybersecuritycompetitors” benefit through the cultivation of a broader set of skills, but the competitions wouldopen new pathways