Asee peer logo

Board 392: Support Teacher Course Development through TeachEngineering Standard

Download Paper |

Conference

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 23, 2024

Start Date

June 23, 2024

End Date

June 26, 2024

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Topic

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Page Count

11

DOI

10.18260/1-2--46978

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/46978

Download Count

73

Paper Authors

biography

Weihang Zhu University of Houston

visit author page

Dr. Weihang Zhu received his Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from North Carolina State University and MS and BS in Mechanical and Energy Engineering. Currently he serves as Professor and Program Coordinator for the Mechanical Engineering Technology program in the Department of Engineering Technology, with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cullen College of Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, Texas. His research expertise areas include engineering education, design and manufacturing, automation and robotics, machine learning/deep learning, computational optimization, and mariner and offshore safety.

visit author page

author page

ROBERTO G DIMALIWAT

author page

Peter Weber University of Houston

biography

Dua Chaker University of Colorado Boulder

visit author page

Dua Chaker is a Senior Project Engineer at TeachEngineering- a free online collective of K-12 STEM resources – within the National Center of Women & Information Technology at the University of Colorado Boulder. Dua graduated summa cum laude from the University of Colorado Boulder in 2013 with a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering. With a career spanning over a decade, Dua has been an integral part of the TeachEngineering team since 2011. She leads the planning and execution of special projects aimed at evaluating and aligning educational standards to curricula, ensuring the delivery of high-quality STEM lessons and activities to K-12 educators nationwide. She currently manages the publication process, guiding authors to submit and publish high quality resources. Dedicated to advancing engineering education, Dua has co-authored several academic papers and presented at numerous conferences, including the National ASEE and NSTA Conferences.

visit author page

author page

Christy Miller University of Houston

Download Paper |

Abstract

One of the requirements for a teacher participant in a National Science Foundation (NSF) Research Experience for Teachers (RET) site is to convert the knowledge from the research experience into K-12 course curriculum. This motivates the teacher participants to actively think about how to convert the university research knowledge into something understandable by K-12 students. Each teacher needs to play a more active role in participating and drilling down into the research to effectively create new materials, rather than as a watcher or bystander of research activities. The course development usually needs to follow some curriculum standards such as Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) in many states and Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) in Texas. NGSS is too general to provide useful guidance for detailed course module development. TEKS is very detailed in each course’s requirement, but teachers need to find their own ways to meet these requirements. NSF RET solicitation recommends the use of TeachEngineering.org (TE) template as the standard for course module development and distribution. Therefore, TeachEngineering template has been used by the teachers in our RET sites in the past few years. However, the acceptance rate of our teacher’s submission to TeachEngineering.org is consistently low (about two out of 12 teachers in each cohort can complete), even though a $1,800 incentive course fee is offered for each successful submission. Teachers cited various reasons for not completing the submission: too busy / no time, too much trouble, cannot find a good topic, very long review cycle, miscommunication (never got emails), no clue on how to revise when the first submission was declined, etc. A teacher needs to be highly self-regulated and persistent to complete this submission process. As such, a set of interventions was taken to improve the submission success rate starting from 2022. The actions include: 1) coordinate with TeachEngineering.org about shortening the review cycle time; 2) improve communications (make sure emails are not blocked by local school districts or go into a spam folder); 3) invite the TeachEngineering director to give an introductory talk to teachers at the beginning of the RET summer program; 4) recruit an experienced master teacher to provide more detailed guidance; and 5) follow up by the professors to ensure the course module quality. As a result, the submission success rate has been improved. Six out of the 12 teachers in summer 2022 have published their TeachEngineering course modules with a few more in the pipeline. Two teachers in the summer 2023 cohort have already published their course modules. One course module excerpt is provided as an example in this paper.

Zhu, W., & DIMALIWAT, R. G., & Weber, P., & Chaker, D., & Miller, C. (2024, June), Board 392: Support Teacher Course Development through TeachEngineering Standard Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--46978

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015