would be beneficial to create a short, optional survey to distribute at the endof the extra credit quiz or semester to measure the effectiveness of the module and understandwhat changes can be made to improve it to further encourage early exposure to parallelcomputing topics. The survey would not only serve as a source of data for students’ motivationsfor completing the module and their future course plans in relation to parallel computing, butalso allow them to provide feedback.Difficulty of parallel computing topicsWhen creating the extra credit quiz as an extended learning module for ECE 220, the goal was tomake the barrier to entry low so that as many students as possible were encouraged to learnparallel computing topics early on. Therefore
activities andassignments to the course learning objectives set at the start of the semester is also a key forsuccess, often called backwards course design. Multiple opportunities for assessment paired withfrequent formative feedback allow both students and instructors to assess progress throughout thesemester. Additional insights emerged when considering the response categories holistically. First, newinstructors may be in the best position to implement standards-based grading. Much of the workis in initial course preparation, but can be managed from the outset with effective identificationof objectives and mapping of assignments and rubrics. One potential consequence may be lowerstudent evaluations, but new faculty have room for improvement
distract from covering the core technical content that is so critical for students to learn intheir engineering education. First, it is important to acknowledge that some implementations ofEML activities may have the unintended consequence of diverting the focus away from technicallearning objectives. However, this is not the intent. Successful EML activities and assignmentsshould actually enhance student learning by improving their motivation for learning, imagininghow the technical content can create value, and advancing the ability of students to transfer theirknowledge from a course to real-world applications.For this Digital Logic course, the first step toward moving the course to an EML approach hasbeen to adopt the theme of arithmetic
AC 2012-5464: EXPLORING THE EFFECTS OF ONLINE BLOGGINGON STUDENT PARTICIPATION, QUALITY, AND THE ACHIEVEMENTOF COURSE OUTCOMES IN A FRESHMAN ENGINEERING COURSEMrs. Federica Robinson-Bryant, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Federica Robinson-Bryant is an instructor in Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University’s Freshman Engi- neering Department. She is also a doctoral candidate at the University of Central Florida, studying within the Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Department. Page 25.620.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Exploring the
SI discussion* Percent of students rating SI E = Excellent, G = Good, and A = AverageThe student evaluation analysis indicates that the greater majority of the SI participantsfeel it is a benefit and provides an opportunity to develop effective learning skills. Actualstudent comments on the SI experience are noted below: • The group of students who attended the SI regularly expressed that the SI session did actually help them improve learning of the course material. • The kind of exercises they practiced in the SI session has interested them and they actually learned when they asked questions and worked in small teams. • Sharing with the class has improved their understanding of concepts. • Some students said that
evaluations of SEC I, as well as student design deliverablesin SEC I and II, suggest that the current model for teaching design is effective. Therevised model was first run in the 2005-2006 academic year. Results from student courseevaluations in 2005 SEC I compared favorably to the 2004 SEC I course evaluations. Forexample, to the statement that “this course assisted me in developing multidisciplinaryengineering design skills,” student response (on a scale of 1 = strong disagree to 5 =strong agree) improved from a 3.70 in 2004 to a 4.06 in 2005. Results of the actualtrusses, as based on the 2004 criteria, improved from a mean score of 8.63 in 2004 to amean score of 14.99 in 2005, despite the 2005 cohort having ten instead of thirteen weeksto design
Course Students on Successful Implementation of ClassroomStrategiesThe CalWomenTech college/site completion data provided by the external evaluators and theresults of the ―Survey of Female Technology Course Students‖ administered to women in thetargeted classes across seven of the eight colleges provides evidence that classroom strategies(e.g. learning style, appealing to female interests, a positive classroom environment, etc.) appearto be succeeding in improving retention rates of female (and male) students. This is the first timeas far as the CalWomenTech PI knows that female students in technology courses have beensurveyed on what retention strategies they have experienced in their courses and which ones theyfeel are most helpful. Sixty
department faculty that included internal and external feedback on the previousstructure. The paper documents the process implemented to help address several programspecific accreditation criteria and objectives. Key criteria addressed include demonstrating theability to work on design projects, to work on teams, to communicate effectively, to manageresources, and to work on complex projects. The paper documents details regarding the coursebackground, course content, course administration and management (including schedules,deliverables, and grading considerations). It describes the methods used to form student teams,select projects, roles of faculty and client advisors / mentors, specific expectations of the studentteams. Instruments used to
. Copies of the three project reports are availablefrom the authors1,2,3.B. Learning ObjectivesUpon completion of this course the student should be able to: 1. Work effectively as a member of an interdisciplinary project design team, bringing unique skills perspectives and background not shared by all team members, and using information provided outside the student’s own background to complete the design. 2. Carry out a sports facility design including the evaluation of considerations such as economics, ethics, societal, environmental impacts, and constructability. 3. Write a project report that is of a quality commonly found to be acceptable in the engineering profession. 4. Orally present the results of an
metals,ceramics, and polymers used in medical devices. The FDA, patent law, and ethicalconsiderations are also part of the course material. Structural Aspects of Biomaterials has beentaught for nearly a decade and in this timeframe, the course has evolved from a survey course toa course with emphasis on project-based learning, interdisciplinary problems, communicationand interpersonal skills, and outreach teaching.At the beginning of the semester we presented the following learning objectives: at the end ofthis skills lab, students will be able to...Technical Communication and Teamwork ≠ operate and communicate effectively on a multi-disciplinary team with a variety of learning and personality styles. ≠ effectively communicate
ACM/IEEE International Con- ference on Hardware-Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS), the ACM/IEEE Design Automation and Test in Europe Conference (DATE), the IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS), and the International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services (UBICOMM). He is an inventor on one US patent. He has coauthored five textbooks on VHDL, Verilog, C, C++, and Java programming. His recent textbooks, published with Zyante, utilize a web-native, interactive, and animated approach that has shown notable increases in student learning and course grades. He has also received multiple awards for Excellence at the Student Interface from the
year history. The prerequisites forCVEG 4494 are Basic Soil Mechanics, CVEG 3133, Introduction to Environmental Engineering,CVEG 3243, Transportation Engineering, CVEG 3413 and either Concrete Design, CVEG 4303or Steel Design, CVEG 4313. Senior Design has two three-hour meetings per week, which are acombination of lecture and design studio. This course has routinely been rated by students overits entire 17 year history as one needing improvement. Common complaints like: “more timeand effort are focused on making pretty plans than on real design”, no real data is available fordesign”, “our group was not technically prepared for the design”, or “the scope of the design wastoo big for one semester” were repeated every semester. At the same time
process simulation tools areincreasingly becoming an essential tool in the design and manufacturing of complex systems. Ourtask as educators in the engineering realm is to prepare students to be more effective in a globalcontext as well as to be able to respond to today’s challenges, giving them the essentialcompetencies for global engineering work. We will present the contribution of learning-by-discovery industry-integrated ET curriculum to competency-based education in sustainablemanufacturing and green energy. In this presentation, the integration of Material Selection as wellas Moldflow and SolidWorks plastics tools in traditional manufacturing processes course ispresented. SolidWorks plastics Standard brings easy-to-use injection molding
of the parameter(s) on which to conduct the sensitivity analysiscan be considered as an indirect measure because the most relevant information is that whichprovides the best prediction of the most critical parameter (i.e., the parameter that will have thegreatest impact on the decision criterion). The online environment also tracks the informationresources visited by the student teams and the time of visitation. Data collected from a largeengineering economy course are used to evaluate the effectiveness of these assessment methods.IntroductionMaking good engineering decisions is a critical skill for every engineering discipline. Thecomplexity of decision making is tied to multiple criteria which can often be in conflict. Largevolumes of
State University (BS) and Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (MS and Ph.D.). His inter- ests include Space, manufacturing, reliability, economic analysis, and renewable energy. He is a registered professional engineer in Colorado and a casual employee of the Aerospace Corporation.Dr. Nebojsa I. Jaksic, Colorado State University, Pueblo NEBOJSA I. JAKSIC earned the Dipl. Ing. degree in electrical engineering from Belgrade University (1984), the M.S. in electrical engineering (1988), the M.S. in industrial engineering (1992), and the Ph.D. in industrial engineering from the Ohio State University (2000). He is currently a Professor at Colorado State University-Pueblo teaching robotics and automation courses
with faculty: faculty accessibility and responsiveness,faculty research connections to coursework and career, and academic effects of student-facultyresearch interaction on students. Across these benefits, what appeared to work to support studentacademic and career development are explicit connections between research participation andexpectations for performance in the undergraduate classroom, graduate school programs, and theprofessional field of engineering. The information that faculty shared with students throughresearch project development facilitated building capital for course, career, and graduate schoolsuccess. Finally, the results that we observed for students across engineering fields held forstudents in mechanical
in execution time offered by reconfigurable computers over typical desktop computers. Dr. Gloster has also conducted research in the area of technology-based curriculum development, distance education, and VLSI design for testability. Dr. Gloster has taught courses on digital system design, ASIC design, microprocessor system applica- tions, FPGA-based system design, and VLSI design for testability (using VHDL/Verilog). He has served on the program committee and as session chair for several international conferences. He received best paper and presentation awards for a paper presented at the International Conference on Computer Design and has received numerous fellowships and distinguished awards. Dr. Gloster holds
successfulprofessional practice.2,3 To fulfill this requirement, educators have developed team-orientedprojects and activities in engineering courses that help enhance and cultivate these skills.To work effectively in teams, students must master collaborative skills including efficientsharing and processing of information, collaborative problem solving, communication andconflict resolution among others. While some technologies have been found to supportcollaboration, they can also add a layer of complexity to the virtual team interaction. It has beensuggested that most existing engineering programs don’t fully incorporate the opportunity forstudents to master technology-supported teamwork as a core element of the curriculum.4,5 Inaddition, courses that use team
AC 2009-96: WOMEN ENGINEERS IN ADVANCED ACADEMIC POSITIONS(WEAAP)Priscilla Nelson, New Jersey Institute of TechnologyTheresa Hunt, New Jersey Institute of Technology TBDCherrice Traver, Union CollegePamela Eibeck, Texas TechZulma Toro-Ramos, Wichita State UniversityCheryl Schrader, Boise State UniversityMary Roth, Lafayette Collegedelcie durham, University of South Florida Page 14.1377.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Women Engineers in Advanced Academic Positions (WEAAP): Effecting Change in Higher EducationAbstractContemporary issues plaguing higher education and inhibiting the growth of engineeringcolleges are numerous and
Education, 94(4). Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.28. McClusky, H. Y. (1963). The course of adult life span. In W. C. Halenbeck (Ed.). Psychology of Adults.Washington, DC: Adult Education Association.29. Merriam, S.B., Caffarella, R.S., & Baumgartner, L.M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide.(3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.30. Morgan, L. A. (1998). Glass-ceiling effect or cohort effect? A longitudinal study of the gender earning gap forengineers from 1982 to 1989. American Sociological Review, 63(4), 479-493.31. National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Engineer Girl. Retrieved July 15, 2008, fromhttp://www.engineergirl.org/32. National Science Foundation. (2005). Women
antimicrobials, creating effective learning environments, and science, engineering and technology educa- tion for K-12.Dr. Enrique Palou, Universidad de las Americas Puebla Professor Palou is Director, Center for Science, Engineering, and Technology Education as well as Dis- tinguished Professor and Past Chair, Department of Chemical, Food, and Environmental Engineering at Universidad de las Americas Puebla in Mexico. He teaches engineering, food science, and education re- lated courses. His research interests include emerging technologies for food processing, creating effective learning environments, using tablet PCs and associated technologies to enhance the development of 21st century expertise in engineering students, and
all along my advisor was an Page 15.2.10 engineering professor, and I took this engineering path and I realized that I really liked that. I mean, I didn‟t know I was gonna be an engineer from the time I was growing up, no I didn‟t… So it was like an iterative process. I grew into it. (62:4)Although this student took courses in a number of disciplines to try them out, her comment that“all along my advisor was an engineering professor” seems to imply that the advisor had aninfluence in the student‟s decision. Again, the student‟s interest (if not background) in math andscience brought her to the threshold of engineering
mechanisms through which the physical fidelity impacted theresults. In this follow-up study, the researchers sought to understand why students demonstratedsignificant differences in proficiency between conditions and whether these differences wererelated to the physical fidelity of learning environment. Semi-structured interviews wereconducted to understand the experience of participants in the different learning environments. Apurposeful sample of 20 participants was recruited for the study. Analysis involved coding thetranscribed interviews, developing dimensions and properties for these codes and then generatingthemes related to the effects of the physical fidelity of the learning environment. The studyidentified differences in the level of
considerationswhen working towards developing solutions to problems. In addition, a theme discussed was thatcreative solutions may be considered to be not as effective and/or realistic, and may be more risky.The data and results of this project provide insights for educators in the engineering field toincorporate domain of knowledge or experience that would help to support college engineeringstudents' engineering problem-solving, and to help students work toward solutions that are bothcreative and that will work.Introduction and Rationale Individuals choose to pursue a degree in higher education to establish a foundation for theirfuture careers. Therefore, the design of engineering curriculum at the college level needs to providestudents with the
90% of the responses agree that they“did not notice the error”; in other words, they were unable to report those errors. Based on thesurvey questionnaire administered at the end of the guided PCR code sessions, we alsodiscovered that some students thought the checklist needed clearer guidelines as some ofstudents abandoned it mid-way and used an ad-hoc approach. This is not surprising but doesinform how improvements can be made to the checklist. In the future, to help students makebetter use of the checklist, we will make the steps more specific, and provide training or atraining document on guided PCR.Research Question 2 (RQ2): What is the effect of guided PCR on students learning ofprogramming concepts in CS2 course?Observation 5
student assessment and reflective data, this paper takes a deep dive into lessonslearned, work required, comparisons of didactic approaches, and how students’ assessmentschanged. The first author relates how he, as an old dog and set in using his unlearned teachingmethods, had to learn new tricks in order to survive as an effective instructor during a pandemic.The Quality Matters and the RISE courses prepared the instructor for better online course man-agement, especially for the hybrid fall 2020 term. But the hours required for course managementincreased >10-fold for the fall term over the course as it was previously offered.BR200 used a highly effective interactive synchronous exercise to get naive students fired upabout the biomedical
, 3) Design slides that increase effectiveness of communication anddelivery of content, 4) Interact in teams to design slides and present topics. Table 1: Weekly Schedule for Technical Communications Course WEEK LECTURES DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT Week 1 Changing the Conversation Journal on Pair up and make 4-5 slides on theme Changing (no guidance) prep 4 min team the Conversation presentation Week 2 Presentation Planning and Rubric PRESENT 1 Presentation Review – Feedback & help on
processing, was introduced Page 14.481.2by the authors in [1]. This process was originally motivated by the ABET accreditationteam visit, a few years back, for the Computer Engineering Technology (CET) programand it was based on the program assessment at Purdue university introduced in [6] and[7]. Since then, the implementation of the program assessment has been adjusted andrevised to improve the assessment process and to incorporate various course assessmenttools. In this paper, detail course assessment metrics omitted in the program assessmentpaper [1] are explained. Notice that all revised and improved course assessment metricsin this paper are incorporated
thatwould make them successful in the workplace and in their careers. In contrast to 2009, nostudent expressed the work not to be challenging, or that they could have learned the material online. We did receive a significant number of comments that the course helped improve thestudents’ writing skills, over 5% made specific comments to that effect. Aggregate course scoresin 2009 were 3.5-4.0, on a 1-5 scale. In 2014-2015 aggregate scores were 4.0-4.5. In otherareas, students commented that their critical thinking skills had improved in the course and nowaverage 4.2 in student responses. All students rated their ability to compete for a job and work inthe US on average as 4.3. In addition, we received some useful suggestions, for example, wereceived
traditional written exams, conductedin the context of a course assessed almost entirely through standards-based grading. We look atthe nature of the exams and standards-based rubrics and how they were implemented,communicate the lessons learned, and demonstrate how the other standards-based gradedelements of the course interact with the exam to provide a more complete picture of studentachievement.Purpose, Motivations, and SettingThe Purdue University First-Year Engineering (FYE) program is a foundational course seriesundertaken by all beginning students seeking entry into an engineering program. The FYEprogram, which sees an annual throughput in excess of 1500 students, is continuously seekingways to improve the efficiency and efficacy of student