design and implementation ofa first-year design course; integration of design in Aerospace, Architectural, Electrical and CivilEngineering; the design and construction of a new networked, heterogeneous platform computerlab dedicated to undergraduate design courses; an undergraduate teaching intern program; and aworkshop to help faculty better understand student experiences in engineering classrooms.The design and implementation of a first-year design course for all Penn State engineeringstudents was the largest single project undertaken as part of the ECSEL efforts at Penn State. Itrepresented a tremendous challenge not only because of the number of first year students, nearly2000, but also because they are taught on 19 different campuses. The
independent modes of grasping knowledge, and intention andextension as independent modes of transforming experience.2, 3 According to the Kolb’smodel, in order to learn something from the experiment (which is distinguished as thetransformation phase for constructing new knowledge through the experimentation),requires that the information first be grasped or depicted.2 In their work, Abdulwahedand Nagy2 prove that if an insufficient amount of attention is paid to pre-lab studentactivities during instructed and close-ended laboratory sessions, then the studentsprimarily grasp information about the experimental procedures. However, they onlypartially grasp the theory that underlies the laboratory procedure. During his specificteaching experience, the
remain academic, difficult to implement, and notfeasible unless preceded by a number of specific steps borrowed largely from theworld of business. These steps include: “Rethink” students–faculty future roles beyond the egocentric model building with the precept that the ideal educational output and the ideal student is one just like me! Widen the discussion and seek feed back from past and present students, research sponsors, and/or industrial clients. Identify customers’ needs on two fronts, their future manpower needs, and the support services that they are likely to require (e.g. technical consultation, applied research, testing, monitoring, setting standards, etc.), now and in the future. Reorganize internally in order
valuable in other countries or by international employers operatingwithin their own country or region. One of the world’s regions where engineeringeducation is rapidly evolving, and becoming increasingly international is: the ArabGulf Region ((Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, andOman) which faces significant challenges as it seeks to meet the demands on theengineering profession in the years to come. Engineering faculty in the Arab GulfRegion, and the young in particular, need to expand their technical knowledge anddevelop new competencies to further their technical professional development andkeep up with modern approaches to teaching and learning. This paper explores waysto effective professional development of
international employers operatingwithin their own country or region. One of the world’s regions where engineeringeducation is rapidly evolving, and becoming increasingly international is: the ArabGulf Region ((Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, andOman) which faces significant challenges as it seeks to meet the demands on theengineering profession in the years to come. Engineering faculty in the Arab GulfRegion, and the young in particular, need to expand their technical knowledge anddevelop new competencies to further their technical professional development andkeep up with modern approaches to teaching and learning. This paper explores waysto effective professional development of Region’s engineering educators to enablethem
understands. These issues areintrinsically internal to the extent that they can not be characterized without obtaining feedback from theindividual. We view these two sides of our framework as complementary data sources. Students’epistemological comments tell us about the effect of the pedagogical reforms, and pedagogical reformstheoretically affect students understanding and beliefs. Both sides of the framework are therefore necessaryto provide a comprehensive understanding of any course or curriculum reform.”In Table 3, the label/code of ‘pedagogy’ captures student comments regarding the course topicsand objectives and classroom issues. Data within the pedagogical framework relate to issuesexternal to the student. In contrast, the codes under
AC 2007-939: ASSIGNING CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENTS TO CAPSTONECOURSE TEAMSVincent Drnevich, Purdue University Vincent P. Drnevich, P.E. is a professor of civil engineering at Purdue University since 1991. He was Head of the School of Civil Engineering from 1991 to 2000. Prior to that, he was on the faculty at the University of Kentucky. He served as Chair of the Civil Engineering Division of ASEE. He is Fellow and Life Member in the American Society of Civil Engineers, a Fellow of ASTM International, and active in the National Society of Professional Engineers.John Norris, Purdue University John B. Norris is a Doctoral Candidate at Purdue University's Krannert Graduate School of
Section Conference,March 30-31, 2007.[3]- Internal documents about the Electromechanical Engineering Faculty Committee structure: It is an eleven-member interdisciplinary and interdepartmental committee.[4]- Wentworth Course Catalog: http://www.wit.edu/prospective/academics/catalog.html[5]- Blackboard: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackboard_Learning_System, Nov. 2010.[6]- An Analysis of Trends in Online Education by Nancy Levenburg, The Technology Source Archives at theUniversity of North Carolina, February 1999[7]- The Art and Science of Education: Pedagogy Includes Technology by Glenn Ralston, The Technology SourceArchives at the University of North Carolina, February 1999, November 1998[8]- Assessment Boot Camp by Colleen Carmean, The
from an ‘answer-giver’ alone to a problem-architect” (Kulackiand Vlachos, 1995), and “the laws of politics are replacing the laws of nature as the principalfactor establishing the feasibility of many engineering projects” (Augustine, 1996). “In the average engineering project, the first 10 percent of the decisions made effectively commit between 80 and 90 percent of all the resources that subsequently flow into that project. Unfortunately, most engineers are ill- equipped to participate in these important initial decisions because they are not purely technical decisions. Although they have important technical dimensions, they also involve economics, ethics, politics, appreciation of international
projects were asked to complete weekly “audio diary” entriesresponding to discursive verbal prompts posed to them during bi-weekly visits by a student-researcher. Youth apprentices were given control of the recording devices, and each recorded“audio-diary” session lasted three to five minutes taking place one-on-one, away from the rest ofthe group. Individual sessions were organized around a selected “set” of prompts (see Table 1.).The student-researcher was able to complete between two and five sessions per visit. Promptswere generally organized around three types themes 1) comprehension of sustainability and/orwicked sustainability problem contexts 2) perspectives on learning (hands-on, schooling, groupactivities, etc.) and 3) interest in or
Session 2247 2005 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE Engineering Technology Division Curriculum Development in Mechanical Engineering Technology See You in the Funny Pages: Attempting to Rectify Student’s Long-Standing False Intuitions of Engineering Science Francis A. Di Bella, P.Eng.ABSTRACTPresent and future engineering technology students have been in a long standing,subliminal educational environment that is effecting their intuition as regards the physicallaws of science and engineering. That environment consists of
studies on human computer interactions and the ways in which technological innovations are changing how we function in the world. Since graduation, she has founded her own business with her husband, helped to start the Diversity & Inclusion department at the U.S. Olympic Committee, and lead the offline member engagement strategy as the Director of Community & Events for Levo, a startup that provides professional resources to young women.Leslie Light, Colorado School of Mines Leslie Light is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Engineering, Design, and Society Division at the Colorado School of Mines, and the Director of the Cornerstone Design@Mines program. She received a B.S. In General Engineering, Product
the end of each semester.There are several reasons for giving these tests, one, faculty have asserted the hypothesis that thesubject LO knowledge is gained through student work in other [non IPRO] courses and that theIPRO courses are unnecessary as general education requirements and two, faculty maintain thatexposure to two IPRO courses is unnecessary as whatever needs to be learned about the LOsis/can be absorbed in one 3 credit course rather than two 3 credit courses.Our first goal for the research is to measure what students actually comprehend about theLearning Objectives. Our second goal is to evaluate how much LO knowledge the non IPROdepartments provide students before/outside the IPRO courses. Next we want to learn if IPROstudents
Session 2155 Issues Driving Reform of Faculty Reward Systems to Advance Professional Graduate Engineering Education: Differentiating Characteristics Between Scientific Research and Engineering D. A. Keating,1 T. G. Stanford,1 J. M. Snellenberger,2 D. H. Quick,2 I. T. Davis,3 J. P. Tidwell,4 D. R. Depew,5 G. R. Bertoline,5 M. J. Dyrenfurth5 A. L. McHenry,6 D. D. Dunlap,7 S. J. Tricamo8 University of South Carolina 1/ Rolls-Royce Corporation 2 / Raytheon Missile Systems 3 The Boeing Company 4/ Purdue University 5 / Arizona State University East 6
relate to the outcomes of their work7. Inparticular, they recommend using perspective-taking as users to discover the complexity of theunderlying socio-technical system of use6. This attention to empathic communication isunderutilized in engineering education as a way of building core professional communication Page 26.871.2competencies. While the construct of empathy is complex, Levenson and Ruef’s9 definition(quoted in Walther et al.6) includes three essential qualities: 1) the cognitive knowing of whatanother person is feeling, 2) the emotional feeling what another individual is feeling, and 3) theact of responding to another’s experience with
Session 1793 The Novel Use of Green Engineering Concepts in Teaching Separations C. Stewart Slater, Robert P. Hesketh, Mariano Savelski, Stephanie Farrell Rowan University Department of Chemical Engineering 210 Mullica Hill Road Glassboro, NJ 08028-1701Abstract Green engineering concepts can be creatively and effectively integrated into the teachingof courses in separation processes. Through the
Berkeley Institute of Design. She served as Chair of the Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate in 2005-06, having served as Vice Chair during the 2004-05 academic year. She has served in a number of other administrative positions at UC Berkeley including Associate Dean of Engineering and Faculty Assistant to the Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost in Educational Development and Technology. She also served as Director for Synthesis, an NSF-sponsored coalition of eight universities with the goal of reforming undergraduate engineering education, and con- tinues as PI for the NEEDS (www.needs.org) and the (www.smete.org) digital libraries of courseware in science, mathematics, engineering and technology. She has
This work is partially supported by the National Science Foundation through grant numberDUE-9950723 under its Division of Undergraduate Education's Course, Curriculum andLaboratory Improvement program.Bibliography1. URL: http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/EHR/DUE/programs/ccli/; NSF Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement Page 6.926.7(CCLI) program.Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2001, American Society for Engineering Education2. URL: http://www.mathworks.com/; The MathWorks: Developers of MATLAB and Simulink for TechnicalComputing.3. URL: http
markets. He was responsible for L-3 Wescam’s largest defense programs. Oscar worked at the Canadian Forces Department of National Defense failure analysis lab, where he was the Canadian Project Officer for an international program on F/A-18 bonded repair, and prior to that, a Research Engineer at the Canadian Space Agency. Oscar designed and qualified space flight hardware for a space experiment for Space Shuttle Flight STS-52 in 1993. Earlier in his career Oscar led the design and development of products employing composite materials at Owens Corning Canada and contributed to the development of novel production machinery for the footwear industry with Bata Engineering. Oscar earned a Master of Applied Science
medical systems,games, family environments, natural habitats, traffic control, military battlefields and elsewhere.This sub-discipline needs to be included in embedded computer system education. Includingboth theoretical and applied aspects in a technology course is challenging but possible.This article summarizes the essential concepts and application domains of mesh networking andthe challenges and opportunities of teaching this topic. It also describes practical methods ofincluding both theoretical and applied elements in an embedded systems course for upper-division technology students.IntroductionEmbedded systems have grown over the past several years to take advantage of increasingprocessing power and memory in smaller and lower power
include being a founding member and officer in the Central Texas Electronics Association; past chairman of IBM’s Materials Shared University Research Committee; Ph.D. Recruiting Coordinator for IBM’s Systems Technology Division; and executive sponsor for 3M division’s student programs. He has published and presented widely in areas of surface science, electronic materials and processes, project management, and industry/university relations. He holds 4 patents and has received awards for excellence in technical innovation (IBM), technical authorship (IBM), teaching (University of Colorado), and scholarship (National Science Foundation). Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Regional
and relentlessly pursuing new opportunities to serve that mission, • Engaging in a process of continuous innovation, adaptation, and learning, • Acting boldly without being limited by resources currently in hand, and • Exhibiting heightened accountability to the constituencies served and for the outcomes created.”9A further effort to delineate those traits that are used by entrepreneurial engineers identifies the Page 25.366.4following four broad categories of working abilities: “Engineers … have four defining attributes: working insights into technical fundamentals
level onBloom’s scale. These include: 1. Restate the six fundamental canons of the NSPE Code in order to demonstrate knowledge of a code of engineering ethics. 2. Identify the ethical issues in an engineering case study. 3. Design a strategy to manage a situation where an employee/subordinate commits an ethics violation. 4. Identify all potential consequences of an ethical infraction. 5. Recognize the requirement of personal responsibility with regard to striving to be a well- prepared, technically competent engineer by the time of graduation. 6. Explain the foundations of the code of engineering ethics as stemming from the notion that all human beings share a common human nature and as such, it is
. Dr. Loshbaugh taught in CSM's EPICS program, for which she developed extensive course and faculty-support materials, and designed and implemented a leadership course and overseas summer field session. She has recently been appointed to develop a diversity plan for CSM, and has experience in international education, corporate training and coaching, and academic editing.Brittany Claar, Colorado School of Mines Heidi G. Loshbaugh is an Assistant Research Professor in the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education at Colorado School of Mines. She is also the Associate Director for CSM's Center for Engineering Education. Within the CAEE, Dr. Loshbaugh has been responsible for
is Deputy Head of the Dept. of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, NY. He earned a B.S. degree from USMA in 1979 and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from Lehigh University in 1989 and 1991. A registered Professional Engineer in Virginia, he serves as a member of the ASCE Educational Activities Committee and is a former Chairman of the ASEE CE Division. Page 12.1457.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The Remote Classroom – Asynchronous Delivery of Engineering Courses to a Widely Dispersed Student Body
areas include stormwater management and green infrastructure, urban water, extreme floods, urban impacts on the water cycle and climate, and the water energy-nexus. Dr. Burian is active in numerous professional societies including the American Society of Civil Engi- neers (ASCE), American Water Resources Association (AWRA), Water Environment Federation (WEF), American Geophysical Union (AGU), American Meteorological Society (AMS), and American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). He is currently the co-Director of Sustainability Curriculum Develop- ment at the University of Utah and the chair of the ASCE Rainwater Harvesting technical committee. He is a registered professional engineer in Utah.Whitney A Lutey
Session 3261 The Social Consequences of Design: PBL Workshops for Undergraduate Researchers Lee Ellen Harper The University of Maryland In Summer 2003 the Institute for Systems Research (ISR), a permanent institute of theUniversity of Maryland, within the A. James Clark School of Engineering, and National ScienceFoundation Engineering Research Center, piloted two day-long workshops on “The SocialConsequences of Design: Requirements and Trade-Offs in Large-Scale Engineering Projects,”for the first 15 participants in
, Page 24.775.2 philosophy, and mathematics.Literature ReviewIntroductionThere has been much thought given to the role, the importance, and the state of the Humanitiesand the Social Sciences within education in general, and even engineering education inparticular, as evidenced by the variety of books, journal articles, blog posts, and conferencepapers on the topic. A review of the literature, then, will help place the present paper in itshistorical, intellectual, and international context. This review will address first the need for theHumanities and the Social Sciences (to be abbreviated “HSS” below), and then theimplementation and integration of HSS2 within engineering curricula.The Need for Humanities and Social Sciences in EngineeringThe
Session 3592 Gender Equity and Engineering: A Review of Education Policy And Research Since 1964 Sheryl Greenwood Gowen, Alisha A. Waller Georgia State UniversityAbstractThe civil rights and women’s movements have created profound and lasting changes in theeducation and employment opportunities of many United States citizens. Yet despite thesechanges, equality for marginalized groups has yet to be fully realized. In this paper, we willexamine how the passage of civil rights legislation has
dramatic adjustment, teams are asked to pull together forthe project. Likewise, capstone leadership and project advisors each play an essential role inmentoring and leading by example. In addition, much has been written on the value ofcommunication in capstone [3]–[5] , and this is exceptionally important in changing times.Finally, a key source of innovation opportunities inherent in capstone involves being able tosuccessfully cope and pivot in the face of challenges and unanticipated setbacks. [6] While themain scope of this initiative is delimited to client relationships and project deliverables, each ofthese primary factors are woven into this work.Understanding Capstone Challenges in the Virtual Setting. Projects in engineering serve as away