of change of habits of mind, particularly in regards to sustainability and the use of cyber-infrastructure to sensitively and resourcefully provide access to and support learning of complexity. Page 25.44.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 A First Step in the Instrument Development of Engineering-related Beliefs QuestionnaireAbstractAcquisition of new knowledge, skills, and dispositions is recognized as a process of change,largely influenced by learners’ beliefs (i.e. domain-specific beliefs, epistemological beliefs, andontological beliefs) and the richness of their
activity exposurechallenge through the implementation of new educational science procedural standards thatincorporate engineering thinking such as SEPS (Scientific and Engineering Practices Standards).The challenge is that K-12 (high school focus) is still very siloed, so a difficult roll-out [1], [2].Some colleges are implementing pre-course trainings to help incoming students better preparefor college, such as summer bridge courses and pre-course preparation sessions [3], [4], [5], [6].These tend to focus on a particular topic and typically do not explore interdisciplinary elements[7], [8].Extracurricular student organizations and clubs are assembled to foster student engagement ofspecific topics. These are often student run with limited faculty
beyond their considerations for selecting an appropriateeducational institution, to address also their decision criteria for an engineering disciplinethat is suitable to their individual interests and abilities. The importance of this goal isunderscored by the recent finding that about half of the 60% of the current freshman classwho have identified initially the major of their choice, were no longer confident in theirprior decisions three months later, after attending the orientation seminars on specificundergraduate programs offered by the college.I. Introduction One major problem that prospective new students seem to face in today’sinformation age is how to utilize effectively the overwhelming amounts of data availableto them
Session 2666 Evaluation and Refinement of a Restructured Introduction to Engineering Design Course Using Student Surveys and MBTI Data Daniel D. Jensen Department of Engineering Mechanics, United States Air Force Academy Capt. Michael D. Murphy Department of Engineering Mechanics, United States Air Force Academy Kristen L. Wood Distinguished Visiting Professor, United States Air Force Academy, and June and Gene Gillis Endowed Faculty Fellow in Manufacturing, Department of
fromproduct design, business, and marketing in a way that more closely represents the process as itoccurs in practice.4-7 In addition, it may provide design educators with an assessment tool forstudent learning as it provides an opportunity to compare initial, mid, and final versions of the ICduring the course of a capstone design project. The IC may also help design teams focusattention on critical issues that can determine the success of a new design and to recognize theinterconnection and overlap between the various technical and non-technical issues related tosuccessful product development. Another potential strength of the IC for use in a capstone designcourse is the “at-a-glance” view of the critical components that must be considered
training futureengineers to be more capable problem solvers. At different times and schools, the success ofmulti-disciplinary senior capstone teams with different approaches have produced variableresults. Because design is multi-realizable, no single or simple method can be adopted for allengineering schools.For some special circumstances, or new situations, in our College of Engineering, we have nowcombined two courses, the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Senior Capstone Design(MAE 4980) and the Engineering College Senior Capstone Design (ENGR 4890) into one class,with the same instructor from Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering. Our ENGR 4890 studentscome from Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, from Computer Science
Director of Graduate Studies with a secondary faculty appointment in the Gender, Sexuality, and Women’s Studies Program at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. DeAngelo studies social stratification, investigating how social inequities are produced, maintained, and interrupted. Currently her scholarship focuses on access to and engagement in faculty mentorship, the pathway into and through graduate education, and gender and race in engineering. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 “But something's off": Belonging Experiences with Peers for Transgender & Gender Non-Conforming (TGNC) Undergraduate Engineering StudentsIntroductionThis empirical research brief describes a study
images of white malesas successful engineers.20 This representation is problematic for everyone concerned andreinforces schemas that serve to engender implicit bias and marginalize the diverse contributorsneeded to solve the challenging problems of the 21st century.Importantly, these biases do not imply that engineering, or all engineering faculty are racist, orsexist (though both sexism and racism persist). Instead, they point to the ways in whichengineering is ‘raced’ white and ‘gendered’ male. To fully understand these two terms, however,it is valuable to think about gender and race from a more theoretical point of view than what wehave come to learn as “common sense.”Connell21 provides a clear treatment of the discussion of gender as
requirements.Effective policies and methods to recycle solar generation equipment and circular economy includethe following: - Both Federal and State governments should take steps now to address this issue. This can include the development of innovative technologies for effective recycling of this new and emerging industry. A special branch within EPA could be set up to manage this solar equipment recycling and prevent future dump sites that may become big risks for ground water and environment. - Aluminum metal refining takes more energy than steel, manufacturers of solar panels should be designing standard size panels and for reuse, thus reducing energy consumption for the solar equipment. They also should be
Research Foundation.34. Branoff, T. & Wiebe, E. (2008). Face-to-face, hybrid, or online?: Issues faculty face redesigning an introductory engineering graphics course. Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, retrieved from http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=788335. Scales, A.Y., & Petlick, J.H. (2004). Selecting an appropriate statistical test for research conducted in engineering/graphics education: A process. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Retrieved from http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper- view.cfm?id=19987.36. Sheskin, D.J. (2004). Handbook of parametric and
can be certain that many similar interdisciplinary transportation programs existwith varying levels of connection between the disciplines both programmatically and in theclassroom.University of Wisconsin-Madison Approach: The Transportation Management and PolicyProgramHistory of TMPTeresa Adams, Program Chair and champion of the TMP program, explains, “We looked ateducational needs in this area and discovered that they go beyond just civil engineering.Technical issues are part of it, but the context in which we deliver transportation systems haschanged dramatically, so now we’re concerned with the environment, social justice, politicalissues and the not-in-my-backyard syndrome.” 1Teresa Adams along with other faculty at the University of
problem-solving. New York, NY: Berkly Books.28. Willerman, M., & MacHarg, R. (1991). The concept map as an advance organizer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 705-711.29. Kinchin, I. M. (2000b). Concept mapping in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 61-68.30. Poole, D., & Davis, T. (2006). Concept mapping to measure outcomes in a study abroad program. Social Work Education, 25(1), 61-77.31. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569-600.32. Williams, C. G. (1998). Using concept maps to access conceptual knowldege of function. Journal of Research in
researcher, biomedical and mechanical engineer, and national leader in transforming undergraduate engineering education. She has served as founding faculty of two brand new engineering programs (the first at James Madison University) and served on several national roles across ASEE, ABET, AAAS, NSF, KEEN, etc. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Educating the Whole Engineer: Leveraging Communication Skills to Cultivate Ethical Leadership CharacterABSTRACT - Effective communication skills are fundamental to the practice of engineeringand thus essential to engineering education. In this paper, we highlight how effectivecommunication skills can also become a vehicle to
, Page 26.1326.2interested in pursuing academic careers, and one of the benefits the program offered to them wasthe opportunity to gain new experience and perspectives that would be helpful for theseaspirations.The author-researcher in this study participated in this program in the academic yearimmediately preceding her candidacy in a doctoral program. She had previous experience ineducation, having worked as an adjunct faculty member at a community college, and hadparticipated in a variety of outreach activities through professional societies such as the Societyof Women Engineers (SWE) during the portion of her professional career preceding graduatestudy. After participating in this program, she discontinued posting in the blog and did not
technical fact from fiction and to serveas ambassadors to the public at large on energy issues than our next generation of engineers?1.1. Course DescriptionIt is this very question that prompted a new engineering course in energy conversion at theUniversity of Minnesota Duluth - open to seniors and graduate students in three engineeringmajors: Chemical (ChE), Electrical and Computer (ECE), and Mechanical and Industrial (MIE)Engineering – tailored to measure awareness and then shape it through lecture, individual andgroup assignments, invited speakers, and research papers and presentations. The course wasdesigned to provide the students with exposure to the same three facets of the engineeringdiscipline that drive energy decisions in the real-world
indicated empathyor acknowledging the perspectives of the speakers. Notes like “guy is genuinely concerned”reflected some understanding of the message. It is possible that the shorter clips shown in thesenior course detracted from deeper engagement.Another learning goal in the professional issues course was to identify aspects of sustainability incivil engineering projects and the ethical requirement to strive for sustainable development incivil engineering projects. One month after the in-class listening exercise associated with ethics,a second listening exercise was integrated into the unit on sustainability. After presenting thelearning objectives for the day, students were asked to use a course response system to identifythree key elements of
result of a group activity, a significant amount of subjectivity isrequired in assigning grades. Usually neither engineering students nor faculty aresatisfied with this situations. Peer reviews8 are often used to aid in the distribution of thegroup grade. Projects can be divided into group and individual components,9 but thisapproach usually requires more work for the instructor. Of course, individuals maysimply be assigned their group grade. The Current PhilosophyThe major changes listed above are due primarily to our contention that one semester isnot enough time to initiate and complete a meaningful project, let alone introducingsignificant new material. (In 1995 approximately half of the project oriented
investigators on this project. These collaborators allow for peer review anddebriefing (Creswell & Miller, 2000) as we analyze the data together and each provide our ownperspective on the results (I am a “traditional” engineer by background, one of my collaboratorsis a social scientist and the other is an engineering faculty member who has worked in the fieldof educational research for several decades). The sampling of multiple participants also allowedfor each to provide contributions to the same themes as the interview protocol was so heavilygrounded in the chosen conceptual framework that examining each a-priori theme in the light ofevery participant was embedded into the research process.3.4 Limitations of StudyIn addition to the issues with
faculty/department Learning organization -Where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning how to learn together
AC 2007-2988: ENGINEERING 100: AN INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERINGSYSTEMS AT THE US AIR FORCE ACADEMYLynnane George, U.S. Air Force Academy Lynnane George is Deputy Head of the Department of Astronautics at the US Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs. As Deputy, she leads 28 faculty teaching 17 courses to thousands of students yearly. She is also Academic Year 2006 - 2007 course director for Engineering 100, an introductory freshman engineering course taught by 24 instructors to 1222 students. She also teaches courses in engineering and orbital mechanics. Lynnane George earned her commission in the Air Force from ROTC at the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1988 with a BS degree in
Session 1630 A Repeated Measures Design for Assessment of Critical Team Skills in Multidisciplinary Teams Robert S. Thompson Colorado School of MinesIntroductionTeamwork education has become increasingly important over the last decade. In 1996, theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), the sole agency responsible forthe accreditation of engineering programs, approved new standards for accreditation reviews.The new standards, Engineering Criteria 2000, require programs to demonstrate specific skills.One specific criterion is the need to demonstrate
unstructured-use continuesto be the predominate configuration in classrooms because of the time requirements forinstructors to learn instructional technology and the time requirements for modifying lectures10, 11.2.2. Importance of Attention for LearningOne possible explanation for the difference in learning between structured-use and unstructured-use computer-infused classrooms is that structured-use encourages student attentiveness.Distraction and inattentiveness are significant concerns for educators as attention is afundamental requirement for learning. Understanding students’ in-class computer usage and itsimpact on their attention is crucial since attention is a critical element of the learning process.Robert Gagne’s Conditions of Learning
Paper ID #6972Student Perceptions of Tactile and Virtual Learning Approaches: What CanWe Learn from their Viewpoint?Dr. Kathy Schmidt Jackson, The Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence Dr. Kathy Jackson is a senior research associate at Pennsylvania State University’s Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence. In this position, she promotes Penn State’s commitment to enriching teaching and learning. Dr. Jackson works in all aspects of education including faculty development, instructional design, engineering education, learner support, and evaluation.Dr. Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkDr
, 2023 Determining the Efficacy of K-12 and Higher Education Partnerships (Evaluation)Abstract Engineering students and professionals in the United States do not reflect the country’sdemographics. Women and minority students remain largely underrepresented. To help diversifythe STEM pipeline, it is essential students are exposed to and engaged in STEM active learningexperiences in K-12. This is especially effective when post-secondary institutions partner withK-12 schools. Establishing the partnership can be challenging as the institutions must havecongruous objectives, determine who is responsible for what, and define success similarly. Toaddress this set of issues, a program partnership rubric was
action item for this CLO inthe next cycle. It should be noted here that the faculty member graded this question with minimallatitude for partial credit. The majority of the credits were either full (or close to full) points orzero. There were 51 students at Midterm Exam II and 50 at the Final Exam (one student did nottake the final exam).It should be noted that the construction program successfully completed a reaccreditation visitusing the SLO assessment structure demonstrated in this paper. Although ACCE does notcomment on individual SLO assessment procedures, SLO #5 and #19’s continuous assessmentprocesses and documentation were not noted as a concern or weakness.SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONSThis paper consists of two examples of direct measurement
Engineering Rouzbeh Tehrani, John J. Helferty, Mohammad F. Kiani, Won H. Suh, and Evangelia Bellas Temple University, Philadelphia r.tehrani@temple.edu, helferty@temple.edu, mkiani@temple.edu, whs@temple.edu, evangelia.bellas@temple.eduAbstract - A new model has been designed and improving students’ experience with engineering education.implemented for the Introduction to Engineering course Traditionally, such introductory courses were considered asat Temple University. In the past, the course was run as a personal courses where faculty designed teaching materialslarge lecture style and various topics were covered, such from scratch, possibly to
voluntary for students, there is variability in thePLTL set-up in terms of student attendance.9The current project implemented a learning model that blends the best features of the SI andPLTL frameworks. In this paper, this new learning approach is described, adjustments made toaccommodate coordination and logistic issues are explained, and the impact on studentperformance is presented.Description of Enrichment SessionsEnrichment sessions (ES) are required 75-minute small group sessions facilitated byundergraduate ES Leaders. These sessions are not optional and appear on the student’s schedulewhen they register for engineering sections of the course. These sessions are intended to developcollaborative problem solving skills and to provide students
. Interestingly, however,people responsible for recruiting women may be failing to ask key questions that are atthe center of feminist theorizing. Namely, whether and how it is possible to definewomen as a homogenous group and if we ought to.23 Many feminist philosophersinterrogate this issue carefully because they are concerned about the implications of suchclassifications. For example, if we agree that there is an innate or biological basis that allwomen share, the traits that women presumably possess can easily be used to justify ornaturalize unequal power dimensions in society that impact women’s opportunities andsocial standing. Today gender scholars largely reject determinist or essential claims basedon biology, and make distinctions between sex as
the Boeing Welliver Faculty Fellow in 2006. His research interests include DSP/Communication/Control algorithms development, and implementation using FPGA and digital signal processors. He has pub- lished more than 100 research papers on Signal Processing, Communications, Controls, and Smart Grids. Dr. Yeh is a professional engineer in Electrical and is the recipient of five NASA Tech. Brief and New Technology awards from the NASA, the inventor’s award and other awards at the Aerospace Corpora- tion, the Northrop Grumman Excellence in Teaching award, College of Engineering, CSULB, 2007, the Distinguished Faculty Scholarly and Creative Achievement Award, CSULB, 2009, Outstanding Professor Award, CSULB, 2015, IEEE
things, the survey results showed that industry is satisfied with BSME hires’technical fundamentals but sees the greatest weakness of BSME hires as being “Practicalexperience—how devices are made and work” and communication skills. Broadly, Vision 2030established the following goals for ME degree programs: 1. Greater innovation and creativity 2. More flexible curricula 3. Richer practice-based experience for students 4. Stronger professional skills for students 5. Technical depth specialization 6. Greater diversity among students and faculty 7. New balance of faculty skills 8. Enhance mechanical engineering technologyNote that most of the goals regarding curriculum are broad and that specific technical content isnot a