finalgrade, and was assigned at a point in the semester long before final grades would begin to solidify. Giventhat a number of students were also repeat offenders, with one having infractions on all but one MATLABassignment, this seems to indicate a pattern of behavior, rather than an exception.As is often the case, some faculty were reluctant to examine the problem or submit cases to the honorcourt. Objections from individuals ranged from a sense of being unfair to students. “Did we tell thestudents we would submit their code to online resources?” In fact, we had, as this was in the syllabus.Some individuals still felt that students were owed an immediate notification each time they weresubmitted. Other individuals expressed a concern as the cases
GL production, dissemination, and retrieval.Problems often surface around methods of access, collection, description, and long-termpreservation, though these problems manifest in different ways before and after theimplementation of machine-readable catalogs and the rise of the internet [2], [3]. Savić explainshow in the late 1990s, as libraries digitized print collections onto new digital formats like CD-ROMs, they encountered challenges related to the quality of the scanned content as well as long-term preservation issues [4]. The internet then allowed for an explosion in the amount and typeof born-digital GL content produced by an increasing number of entities. This new productionand dissemination landscape, when paired with a lack of
epistemological1,2. There are many contexts forlearning communities in both formal and informal educational settings, but the common theme isthat the students are actively and collaboratively vested in their own learning, which results ingreater student engagement3. Learning communities are well-suited to contribute to the trainingand development of engineers in areas such as teamwork and communication skills, but also incollaborative design, problem solving, ethics, and an understanding of the larger context for theirwork.Undergraduate summer research programs have historically been founded on traditionalpedagogy: instructor-led seminars and faculty-directed research and problem solving, with thelatter often including an experienced graduate student or
different communication contexts), engineering faculty, and engineerpractitioners in the local community, so multiple perspectives are brought to the identification ofstudent needs and the new teaching materials.Comprehensive descriptions of the project and teaching materials can be found elsewhere.4,5,6This paper focuses on a single thirty-minute workshop. Unlike most of the teaching materials,which focus on specific writing skills, this workshop targets student beliefs – specifically,erroneous beliefs that underlie writing weaknesses. The workshop is entitled Three Myths aboutWriting in Civil Engineering Practice.Overview of Workshop Development and UseDuring interviews for the project research, many students expressed the same three
Paper ID #7436Introducing Manufacturing engineering with Kentucky Governors ScholarProgramDr. Jaby Mohammed, Petroleum Institute Dr. Jaby Mohammed is a faculty at The Petroleum Institute, Abu Dhabi, UAE. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial engineering from University of Louisville (2006), Masters in Industrial engineering from Uni- versity of Louisville (2003), and also a master’s in Business Administration from Indira Gandhi National Open University (2001). His research interest includes advanced manufacturing, design methodologies, six sigma, lean manufacturing, and enterprise resource planning. He previously taught at
Brazilian universities by expanding the educational and researchexperience of U.S. and Brazilian students through a structured exchange program. We proposeto expand the program by leveraging on the long-term educational and research alliances alreadyin place among faculty members at the partner universities. Page 22.919.22. Senior Capstone Design Project Class and our Prior International ExperienceThe Department of Mechanical Engineering curriculum is capped with a one-year senior designproject in which the students will bring together their technical knowledge working in teams todesign and implement products or systems under the sponsorship of an
this question. I am less concerned witharriving at a final “correct” answer. Remember, bringing in additional authoritative sources ishighly encouraged, including technical articles, videos, etc.. if you can find them. It would bewise to log in to KF several times per day during the course of this week to keep the ideasadvancing.”The New York Times OpEd piece referenced in the instructions20 makes the case for why thiskind of work and thinking is important in real world settings and was included to providemotivation for this approach. The note containing the initial question, originating from a studentin the class, is shown in Figure 3. This second KB episode was distinct from the first in tworespects. First, it was a relatively higher stakes
memorization. Standardized testsproved particularly damaging to open-ended engineering design thinking where students mustformulate questions, design experiments, interpret unexpected results, and make new and novelconnections and observations [8].In addition to internal and external barriers described above, the political organizational structureof high schools selects against engineering courses. According to Foster, state-mandated sciencecourse enrollment necessitates several science faculty organized into a science department atmost schools. A lone high school technology or engineering instructor may be loosely tied to theschool’s science department, but this person usually does not possess enough political leverageto advocate strongly for their
and the use of rehearsal strategies. In comparison toother undergraduates, freshman also reported having a greater confidence in reading. While moreresearch is needed at the classroom level to understand individual student differences, the MSLQdoes appear to provide insight for caring faculty using a learner centered approach to teaching.IntroductionSolving engineering student learning and retention problems requires adoption of proveneducational practices1. Major investments of the National Science Foundation, US Department ofEducation, and other agencies have been directed toward understanding issues and identifyingsolutions to student learning and retention. As summarized by Svinicki2 at the First AnnualMeeting of the Center for the
beginning were found to be Learning Styles andMotivation. Most end reflections focused on Time Management-Balance and Study Habits. Thisstudy helps elucidate what students think about when they reflect on themselves as learners andcould be used by faculty to increase student motivation or ease student concerns. Future studiescould investigate how student responses to these reflection prompts relate to their outcomes inthe course or try to better understand students’ reflections through interviews or focus groups.References[1] M. D. Marsolek and N. E. Canney, “Facilitating Habitual Reflection in Students - Application to an Engineering Capstone Project,” 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), E ire, PA, USA. 2016.[2] J.A
Page 23.140.6valuable, as students learned that their open-ended systems could very well be strongly nonlinear– and not well served by DOE unless they carefully confined the range of their input parameters.Reflection and future implementationsWe feel that starting to adapt our upper level measurements lab around the theme of “metrology,measurement quality, and design of experiments” has served us well. Continuing this processwill make the course more recognizable to employers as something valuable, and will make iteasier for students and faculty to convey its value to others. This “metrology/quality” approachto a measurements lab brings together the “win” in experimental techniques with the “win” inrelating them directly to issues relevant to
maturing discipline. We hope tofind the common threads and core concepts of digital logic to better frame these ongoingdiscussions and provide a core conceptual framework.3 A Fresh Analysis of the Digital Logic Delphi Study In this section, we reanalyze the results of the digital logic Delphi study of Goldman et al.in an attempt to identify the core conceptual framework of digital logic2. Unlike the originalintent of the Delphi study, we are not concerned about the difficulty of acquiring certain conceptsor skills but only about the importance of each concept or skill. To begin our new analysis, we sorted the list of topics from the Delphi study and lookedfor a convenient breaking point in the data (See Table 1). This process led us
other institutes and dissemination efforts will madefor the upcoming semesters. A second comprehensive assessment cycle is to be completed at theend of the second year. Current data from faculty reviewers and students has indicated that thecontent and format of the modules has been very conducive to the learning of new concepts.Likewise, the faculty of the concerned courses have expressed a very positive impression of theusefulness of the ComEx studios, which have also facilitated student participation in researchthrough developmental activities and usage, the Core ComEx in particular, in the preparation for Page 24.471.9specific simulation
expertsversus novices in classical problem solving domains such as chess2 as well as in physics3,4.Another important area highlighted by Bransford, et al. was the experimental evidence that whilestudents may have acquired knowledge in previous learning it is not always accessed whenneeded5,6. This inability to access applicable knowledge in a wide variety of domains wasmentioned as early as Whitehead7 who used the term “inert knowledge” to describe this type ofknowledge. Additional work seemed to indicate that traditional educational methods tended toproduce knowledge that remained inert.8 These concerns led researchers to propose alternative instructional methods thatattempted to create macro-contexts for students in order that knowledge
EducationDoctorate in Instructional Design. All of these factors would be vital in getting a new programgoing. Twenty-eight students were enrolled in the first two classes in the fall of 1999.Curriculum Development:While a curriculum had been developed for the program proposal, the Engineering TechnologyDepartment felt that someone with expertise in the fire service arena should revise thecurriculum so that it would be as beneficial as possible to the students. Professor Kimble beganthe revision in the spring of 2000. Interviews for the second faculty member were ongoing and itwas decided to wait until the second faculty member was on board to finalize the curriculumrevision. Dr. Marc Janssens was hired in the summer of 2000. Marc came to UNC Charlottewith
relevant organizations (e.g.UNICEF and The American Red Cross) and personal interviews with faculty and students whohave had contact with Third World countries. One of the most interesting aspects of the project was the opportunity the students had touse new technologies. Although the use of solar power for battery charging is not novel, wewere able to take advantage of some of the new forms of construction. Specifically, we used thethin film photovoltaics for our lantern. LEDs (Light Emitting Diodes) are also not a newtechnology but the development of white LEDs gave us the opportunity to construct anextremely efficient lantern that would provide many hours of light on a single battery charge.Below we provide a technical description of the
-longengineering design experience early in their academic career by participating in capstone designcourses for graduating seniors; (4) to strengthen existing faculty relationship with NASA Ames,and establish new collaborative relationships among two-year and four-year engineering faculty,and NASA Ames Research Center; (5) to increase the number of academically preparedcommunity college students transferring to four-year institutions as engineering majors; (6) toimprove academic success of engineering students from underrepresented groups by providingacademic support and mentoring; and (7) to increase the number of minority students pursuingadvanced degrees in STEM fields.Summer Intern Project DescriptionFor the second year of the project in summer 2012
simulating workingfor an engineering manager in industry as a newly-hired engineer. They used their webpagesetup and rubrics to monitor the design process. They also reported that they had to develop andchange their rubrics over time, as experience showed that new considerations arose over time.Sealy 17 published examples of the rubrics they used for assessment of ABET Program Outcomes(a) and (b). His department spent a great deal of time talking about the workload necessary toproperly implement the assessment process. They, as are most programs, were concerned that anassessment method which causes an undue burden on faculty would not be successful in the longrun. They felt the use of standardized rubrics across the program helped lessen the
] G. Panther and H.A. Diefes-Dux, “Instructor adaptability and the course complexity typology as tools for faculty development,” in Proc. Australasia Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf., Sydney, Australia, Dec 2022.[11] D. Bobbett, G. Panther, and H.A. Diefes-Dux, “Detecting dimensions of significant learning in syllabi using a course change typology,” in Proc. ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo., Baltimore, MD, USA, Jun 25-28, 2023, https://peer.asee.org/43009[12] ABET, “The value of accreditation,” ABET.org. Accessed: Jan 24, 2024. Available: https://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/ABET-Issue-Brief-The-Value-of- Accreditation.pdf).[13] ABET, “Engineering change: A study of the impact of EC2000,” ABET.org
an exact representation of the realsystem and be misled. More authentic learning situations, when available, can help to addressthis problem. By using a physical device in a carefully designed lab environment theseimperfections can be fruitful sources of discussion and learning.The potential difficulties in using these devices in instructional design are also real. Since ITstudents do not typically have a circuit design background they are unfamiliar with and evenfearful of the issues raised by connecting sensors and actuators to a computing platform. Theseconcerns are addressed in the Common Concerns section later.FrameworkThese considerations lead to the following framework bring proposed. Teaching with hardwarein IT requires that the
students’ abilities toconduct individual research projects, improving students’ abilities to work in an interdisciplinaryenvironment, improving students’ abilities to utilize computer-aided tools and laboratoryfacilities, and improving students’ communication skills. The issue of whether or notunderrepresented students participated will be decided through a longitudinal study. It is safe tosay that the program was a great success.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was funded in part by the NSF’s REU program and in part by theOpportunities for Undergraduate Research Experiences program. This research would not havebeen completed had it not been for the fantastic work and support of all university faculty, staff,and graduate students who
Paper ID #44887Case studies offer opportunities for us to show the ”real world” ofengineering and science in the classroomDr. Susannah GAL, Wentworth Institute of Technology Associate Dean Dr. Susannah Gal has an undergraduate degree in Chemistry and Biochemistry and her PhD in Biochemistry. She has held academic positions at institutions in New York, at Penn State Uni- versity, and at the University of The Bahamas in Nassau and served as a program officer for the National Science Foundation before joining Wentworth Institute of Technology in January 2023. Her research has included work in plant enzymes, DNA computing, DNA
procedures are left to future work.6. ConclusionThe study presented in this paper has shown that practice effects are not present when using theimplemented mental model instruments and accompanying scoring rubrics. However, results alsosuggest potential issues with student fatigue while completing the task as they move through thethree products. Results were inconclusive on whether or not the toilet example has a significanteffect on students’ understanding of how to complete the given task. Finally, large sample sizesallowed for a closer look at students’ system abstraction in regard to product complexity throughcomponent inclusion/exclusion that showed surprising results across both student groups. Thishas evoked interesting new research questions
new doors and to change Literature review perceptions of my race/ethnicity, religion, gender, or sexual Page 26.506.11 orientation 7 To create positive impact on campus /community Literature review Number Items Source 8 To follow encouragement from advisors and faculty members Literature review 9 To fulfill my personal interests and benefits Literature review 10 To
experimentation, analyze and draw conclusions, and acquire andapply new knowledge as needed [5]. Again, communication, problem-solving, teamwork, lifelonglearning, and professionalism are emphasized here too.MotivationAs faculty and experienced industry professionals, we have a strong sense of the foundational skillsrequired to succeed in the engineering design domain. At times we delightfully align with ourstudents. At other times, we detect gaps in what we know is required versus what students believe isneeded when identifying “what it takes” to develop as a successful design engineer of high character.A typical undergraduate curriculum starts with Cornerstone and culminates with the Capstoneexperience aiming to foster a growth and solution-oriented
most important examples ofreference listings are given in the checklist, and a complete presentation is available in the styleand standards manual. Even cursory attention to this section should ensure a report with adequatecitations and reference listings. The next section is concerned with some specific issues in technical writing. The mostimportant topics here are on significant digits and units. Students are reminded to report onlysignificant digits in text and tables. Unfortunately, instruction on the importance of significantdigits and on how to identify them seems to have become unfashionable or at best inconsistent.The general rules are presented here, but some significant additional classroom instruction isalways necessary, even
, and E. Schott, “Diversity in Engineering Technology Students”, in 2019 CIEC, 2019. New Orleans, LA. https://peer.asee.org/31497[57] M. Uddin and K. Johnson, “Faculty Learning From the Advisors for Students’ Retention and Persistence to Graduation”, in 2019 CIEC, 2019. New Orleans, LA. https://peer.asee.org/31508[58] L. Craig, “SUNY Canton: Instructional Technology to Stimulate, Enhance, and Attract Students in the Engineering Technology Field”, 2019.[59] C. Cioc, N. Haughton, C. Wojciechowski, and S. Cioc, “Using Peer Assisted Learning in an Engineering Technology Course”, in Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Sciences, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics (STEAM) and Education, Honolulu, HI
. Page 22.748.83. Demonstrate world and local knowledge: An ability to understand the major currents of global change and its implications and demonstrate knowledge within a global and comparative context. Demonstration of world and local knowledge includes familiarity with history, geography, government, market, and public policy issues around the world and in several target countries along with an understanding of the workings and close linkages of the global economy to promote critical and creative thinking concerning the current global challenges6, 8, 17, 26, 28, 30, 31. Demonstration of world and local knowledge also includes a broad knowledge of the world coupled with specific knowledge of target countries, which provides
then approved for further study based on a written proposal. The termpaper project composed of several parts: (i) Proposal – a brief introduction to the chosen topic,and a persuasive discussion on the urgency and need of the topic supported by data on itsbenefits to cost, healthcare, quality of life, society, etc. Topics were required to be at theinterface of physiology and transport phenomena, (ii) comprehensive survey of literature, (iii)critical analysis of literature information – this was students’ original work comparing, critiquingand interpreting literature information, deriving their own conclusions, identifying deficienciesand proposing improvements, and (iii) analysis of ethical concerns and regulatory issues relatedto the
Session 2230 Teaming in Engineering Design Courses Wallace Fowler The University of Texas at AustinAbstractThe ability of new engineering graduates to work in teams is a skill that is highly valuedby industry. It is reported by campus interviewers and engineers at NASA and inindustry that students who have had experience in working in teams as undergraduatesmore readily adapt to the industry environment and usually advance faster than studentswho have no teaming experience. Teamwork exercises can be integrated into all levelsof the undergraduate experience, but the primary