center, fortransmission and reception of homework, assignments, and other materials; and avideoconferencing PC, to enable group efforts on homework and projects outside of class.The overall project to extend pre-engineering and engineering classes across Kentucky alsoprovides for “faculty associates,” content proficient professionals who will assist in the courseofferings at local sites. This provision offers significant potential improvement over “virtual”courses where limited interpersonal interaction may be available.Training is a key concern of this project. While it should be easier to teach a distance courseafter this update than for the original ITV system, some training must be provided for instructorsto maximize student learning
enhance the hands-on learning process. For example, the library isnot only for books and studying but also equipped with cameras, games, sewing machines,and spaces that engineering students can use to build their prototypes and learn more abouthow they can create a new product with their own hands. This environment is essential forengineering students to learn how to organize the building process and the steps they mustfollow to build a teddy bear. Besides that, other hands-on spaces are offered to students.These spaces are used during their courses, faculty research activities, student club activities,and individual student projects. Therefore, engineering students can find other hands-on areasto conduct their projects if the library is
Bucciarelli21 highlights this issue: “The way we structure our curriculum andteach our subjects all conspire to instill in the student the idea that engineering work is value-free. Object-world work may be, but that is but one part of engineering competence. Whileteaching the “fundamentals” of science and mathematics, and the engineering sciences, remainsnecessary, we must do so in more authentic contexts, showing the uncertainty and ambiguityinherent in problem setting as well as solution, and how social and political interests contributein important ways to the forms of technologies we produce. We ought not as faculty claim, orimply, that solving single answer problems or finding optimum designs, alone, uncontaminatedby the legitimate interests of
for the students to apply and reflect on their developing leadership abilities.Experts in the engineering leadership programs however expressed concern about the ability ofcurrent engineering faculty to deliver effective leadership programs and the difficulties ofidentifying external and suitably qualified staff.Graham et al.’s study also identifies strong themes in engineering leadership education. Theglobal theme was found to be particularly strong within U.S. programs: the ability to workeffectively across cultures in an international sphere was seen by many as an increasingly vitalattribute of an engineer-leader, and is reflected in many of the programs. Another strong themewas student empowerment in their own leadership
standards; recognizing interdependence. Storming Catharsis: questioning due to interpersonal issues; exhibiting emotional responses to tasks; resisting group influences. Norming Focus: overcoming resistance to promote cohesiveness; adopting new standards and roles; expressing opinions within mutual psychological safety. Performing Purposive: exert flexibility in roles to complete tasks; structure supports task completion; team energy is focused on completing tasks.Adapted from [3], [11], [12]Another way to view this model is through the relationships between four aspects ofinterpersonal
Paper ID #17221Title IX and Project Lead the Way: Achieving Equity through All-female Co-horts in Public School SettingsMs. Shawna Fletcher, Texas A&M University SHAWNA L. FLETCHER is Director for the Women in Engineering (WE) Program at Texas A&M Uni- versity. Her primary responsibilities include outreach, recruitment and retention programs for women students and faculty in the Dwight Look College of Engineering. She has been President of the Arizona Promoters of Applied Science in Education (APASE) since 2006. She holds an M.S degree in Bioengi- neering and B.S. degrees in Physiological Psychology and Microbiology
a method that suits a constructivist view of learning in that it gives the students an opportunity to contemplate issues from new perspectives. This is augmented by scaffolding the students regarding how to reflect beyond the mere descriptive form. Reflection assignments have also been used to highlight crucial aspects in the course, e.g. to consider how to act in order to avoid difficulties with cultural differences in the international collaboration on an individual basis.Reflections are also important as a means to help the students cope with unusual educational settings, such as open-ended group projects, and learning goals different from
mnemonic.student critically evaluates the procuredinformation and its sources, and as a result,decides whether or not to modify the initialquery and/or seek additional sources andwhether to develop a new research process.Standard 4. The information literate Knows four types of intellectual property.student understands the economic, ethical,legal, and social issues surrounding the use Understands the difference between commonof information and its technologies and knowledge and not so common knowledge.either as an individual or as a member of agroup, uses information effectively, Understands plagiarism and how to avoid it.ethically, and legally to accomplish a specificpurpose
various aspects such asstudent recruitment, funding allocation, and public perception [3]. It is crucial for a university toinvestigate retention to understand the reasons behind student departures. Retention rates amongcollege students are frequently employed as a metric for gauging institutional accountability andsuccess. Moreover, these rates are increasingly utilized as a basis for allocating resources.Gaining insights into the factors that influence college student retention has become imperativefor institutions of higher education. The ongoing issue of low graduation rates among students inengineering programs remains a significant cause for concern within the higher educationlandscape. Many students drop out early in their undergraduate
was used tosignificantly grow the infrastructure of the University’s outreach program. It was also used tolaunch a series of new programs and events for students and teachers. In addition, some of thefunding was used to subsidize expenses associated with the residential camps.All SEMS outreach events are currently oversubscribed and significant wait lists are a commonby-product of the program. At the present time the authors will be working on several initiativesas part of the enhancement of the program. These initiatives include the following:The School of Engineering, Mathematics, and Science is a young school with 35 faculty andstaff. While the facilities are exceptional, they are small and the examination of the capacity ofthe school is a
to “stimulate,train and direct the new generation of entrepreneurs from all different departments in MIT”. In thismodel, all programs are developed through the capital, faculty and alumni from Business School andManagement School, and Entrepreneurship Education Center takes charge of planning and runningthe whole program (Mei, 2008).[13] Similarly, presently three models of entrepreneurship educationare widely practiced in China’s colleges and universities: First, the model of specializedentrepreneurship education focusing on entrepreneurial practice and the cultivation of entrepreneurialcapacities. This model is often implemented through curricular and extracurricular activities, such asdisciplinary competition, entrepreneurial training
academic sector. Butprobably more relevant to this study, MacPherson2 suggested that ‘why might geographicalfactors play a role in the academic-industry relationship and why is a focus upon SMEsjustified?’ is left to be answered in further research opportunities.MacPherson2 suggests policy implications that may be of interest to economic developmentagencies in the USA and elsewhere. MacPherson2 suggests that prime locations reside within2hr driving time from major campuses. This would imply a need for industrial zoningpolicies that reflect the location of a region's main transportation hubs and highways.MacPherson2 proposes a second policy issue which concerns the fate of 'peripheral' firms thatfind themselves 'out of the loop'. Across the three
interms of being able to produce graduates who are exceptionally competent, who “think likeengineers” using standard processes, and who adapt easily to new technical challenges. Whendesigning our curriculum, we are concerned with what an exceptionally competent engineerought to know about a range of disciplines and methods. Due to our unspecialized major,students take only one required introductory course that addresses “mechanics” or mechanicalengineering. For many years, this one course consisted of half-courses in dynamics and instrength of materials that were joined in a one-semester “mechanics” course, which meant a Page 9.341.4
, Page 11.828.9or otherwise consider these issues in accomplishing their experimental work. 8 In concert with the hands-on experiment, students were shown a five liter bioreactor witha jacketed heater and controllable agitator during the laboratory tour. Explanations were givenabout how those bioreactors work. Reexamining these factors after their experimentsemphasized the differences and similarities between the two-setups, and the need for engineeringdesign of equipment.8. Problems and Recommendations At the end of the module, a general discussion was initiated by asking questions about thecomments and concerns the students had regarding their experiences during the module
Fundamentals and Radiation Monitoring, will be implemented in thefive community colleges during the Fall 2007 semester. The remaining courses will be implemented inthe colleges during the Fall 2008 semester. Thereafter, they will be offered on a rotating basis at each ofthe community colleges. Beginning in the fall 2007, we will conduct summative evaluation on thelearning environments.During the summer, 2007, faculty members who are hired to teach in these programs will attend trainingsessions design to enable them to implement and support this new curriculum. Faculty members willalso be supported by a Teaching Guide that will contain suggested teaching methods, references toadditional materials, and sample assessment items.References1. Jonassen, D.H
and applications. Theory into practice. 2006 Nov 1;45(4):368-77.[21] Irwin D, Liu N. Encoding, decoding, packing and unpacking via agnation: Reformulating general knowledge into disciplinary concepts for teaching English academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2019 Nov 1;42:100782.[22] Lea MR, Street BV. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in higher education. 1998 Jan 1;23(2):157-72.[23] Lillis T, Scott M. Special issue of Journal of Applied Linguistics: New directions in academic literacies. J Appl Linguist. 2008;4(1).[24] Coffin C, Donohue JP. Academic Literacies and systemic functional linguistics: How do they relate?. Journal of
the Summer session and during the Fall semester of 2021. Ultimately, the newcourse design was fully adopted and was taught by 7 instructors to approximately 400 students in17 sections during the Spring 2022 semester. With minor refinements to the course syllabus andproject after the Spring 2022 semester, the content for ME 220 has stabilized and will continue tobe taught with these meaningful design experiences. A critical piece of the redesign is a new finalproject that is centered on a design-build-test experience that is accessible to all students, no mattertheir background or intended major. In this paper we will briefly discuss the previous course andhow it has been modified to better address the institutional outcomes. We collected
,” Eng. Stud., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2016.1155593.[16] M. Ahmed, T. J. Muldoon, and M. Elsaadany, “Employing Faculty, Peer Mentoring, and Coaching to Increase the Self-Confidence and Belongingness of First-Generation College Students in Biomedical Engineering,” J. Biomech. Eng., vol. 143, no. 121001, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1115/1.4051844.[17] E. Liptow, K. Chen, R. Parent, J. Duerr, and D. Henson, “A Sense of Belonging: Creating a Community for First-generation, Underrepresented groups and Minorities through an Engineering Student Success Course,” in Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2016, p
journal Advances in Engineering Education, is chair of the Materials Division of ASEE, and is program chair of the Educational Research and Methods divisions of ASEE.Lynne Slivovsky, California Polytechnic State University Lynne A. Slivovsky, Hood Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering (Ph.D., Purdue University, 2001), has led service-learning initiatives both within the College of Engineering and across the university at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. In 2003 she received the Frontiers In Education New Faculty Fellow Award. Her work in service-learning led to her selection in 2007 as a California Campus Compact-Carnegie Foundation for the
the way inclusion is culti- vated in engineering through the implementation of novel technologies and methodologies in engineering education. Intrigued by the intersections of engineering education, mental health and social justice, Dr. Coley’s primary research interest focuses on virtual reality as a tool for developing empathetic and in- clusive mindsets among engineering faculty. She is also interested in hidden populations in engineering education and innovation for more inclusive pedagogies.Katreena Thomas, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Katreena Thomas is a graduate student at Arizona State University in the Engineering Education Systems and Design Doctoral program. She is a member of the
defiantly a learning curve for the faculty and unfortunately notall are interested in exploring new methods of instruction. It greatly simplifies instruction whenall the students are working with the same tools. For example, previously I would have to covergraphing using a spreadsheet utilizing several different programs. Now all the student haveExcel, so I only have to cover one program and how to use it.I did not approach using the laptop to make the courses Web-based or do away with thetraditional lecture or lab. Instead I tried to incorporate the laptops into the course so that thestudents would see the laptops as a tool that they could use in the course to their advantage.From the course evaluations several of the students had positive
race and gender [4]–[6] haveall been attributed to attrition and persistence. While some studies offer recommendations foraddressing this issue [7]–[9], attrition remains complex, with many different factors that affecteach individual’s decision.Graduate student well-being has become an increasing concern in many different disciplines asattrition rates are indicative of underlying issues, such as mental health or departmental culture notaccounted for in external indicators of success such as GPA. In many studies on attrition, thestudent’s relationship with their advisor and student socialization have been used as factorsrepresenting well-being [10]–[13]. Castello et al. [2] found that, among doctoral studentsconsidering leaving their program
Engineering Education, 2006 Learning through Service: Analysis of a First Semester, College-Wide, Service-Learning Course1. AbstractService-learning is a pedagogy which strives to integrate student learning with communityservice. In an engineering context, service-learning provides a project-based experience in whichstudents are confronted with real clients and problems, often of immediate need. In the context ofcourse development, however, many engineering faculty seem to feel that service learning isinfeasible in technical and/or large engineering courses, and that the overhead and opportunitycosts associated with service learning exceed the benefits received by students.This paper contemplates two years of service
pedagogical skills to incorporate DEIJ in the coursesthat shines a light on issues without it remaining siloed in the minds of students. Decision makerswithin the university may only see the importance of having DEI committees with nocommitment for change. Therefore, it is important to have the support of departments to ensurethe scope of incorporation is not just limited to one or two courses, but help to change the viewof students as well as professors towards a more just society. Montoya discusses how much ofthe community-based work is often ‘carried out by underrepresented minority faculty’. Thiswork is often not rewarded and ‘invisible’. It is important for tenure committees to recognize thiswork.The “tacked on approach” to teaching social
. Page 12.1499.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Training Internationally Responsible EngineersIntroductionWith engineering increasingly becoming an international discipline, engineering training willrequire students to understand and work with different cultures, peoples, practices, ethics andparadigms. Organizations such as Engineers for a Sustainable World (ESW) and Engineerswithout Borders (EWB) are just two organizations that are bringing sustainable developmentissues into the classrooms through the formation of chapters at universities. Krishna S. Athreya,director of ESW, explains that the goal of ESW is to “educate a generation of engineers to havegreater understanding of global issues and the ways
hurdle for faculty. Active learning approachescan mitigate these issues by encouraging active participation from the learners. Active learning,often linked with traditional in-person classes, can be successfully integrated into online or blendedlearning environments through various strategies [3]. These include structured discussions, grouptasks, and nurturing a collaborative environment beneficial to learning. Incorporating activelearning into discussions, assignments, and assessments can support effective student engagementin online or blended courses.Active learning can be defined as the process of "seeking new information, organizing it in a waythat is meaningful, and having the chance to explain to others" [4]. Studies have
not help students learn to be effective teammembers [8]. A significant challenge is that team members do not communicate effectively tosupport others [9]. Communication, expectations, and effort issues can lead to negative teamexperiences. Studies have found that these unfavorable encounters can result in studentspreferring to work alone despite recognizing the importance of developing teamwork skills [10]or even devaluing teaming altogether [11].Students need structure and faculty guidance to learn teamwork skills [9]. However, engineeringfaculty often lack training in teaching teamwork and may not have received that trainingthemselves [11, 12]. There is limited instruction on how to teach teamwork and a lack ofsystematic focus. Even with
@onu.edu, l-schafer.2@onu.eduBackgroundEvery year, students, especially first-year students, have difficulty navigating Ohio NorthernUniversity’s campus and struggle to find the buildings where their classes are held. While thereare solutions that currently exist, such as campus signage, Google/Apple Maps, the OhioNorthern University Mobile App/University Website, and new student orientation tour events, noapproach has adequately resolved the issue; causing the problem to reoccur every year for newstudents. The primary issue with the competing solutions is that they either do not havemobile-friendly functionality, require the student to have a good memory/understanding ofcampus, or do not contain university-specific information, such as landmarks
individual to self teach10, and to a larger extent changingteaching methods4,11.The aforementioned studies have not specifically addressed the impact of curriculum reductionon programming and numerical analysis skills. Therefore, the objective of this study is to informthe development of engineering curricula with regards to the skills associated with numericalanalysis and programming. Students not exposed to numerical methods may find it difficult tocomprehend the importance of model parameters and the output of the ISS software. To addressthese concerns, the authors reviewed the coursework at Texas Tech University to assess thecoverage of numerical methods and programming topics in the civil engineering degree programand assessed student mastery
constellation ofmentors as elements that support the success of our Scholars.3.1 MentoringMentoring is traditionally a relationship in which an experienced person provides technical,career, and psychosocial support to a less experienced person [1]–[3]. Technical insights mightinclude problem-solving, approaching internships/jobs, interacting with faculty members, orlearning the unwritten rules of an organization. Career-related functions could includesponsorship, supporting visibility, providing ideas, feedback and suggestions, and protectionagainst risks [4]. Additionally, psychosocial issues might include work-life balance, respondingto discrimination, being confident, coping with disappointment, or growing as a person.Regarding engineering, a number