-economic disparities, inadequate K-12 preparation, and social isolation[8-9]. Studies have shown that these students often experience lower self-efficacy and a weakersense of belonging, which can negatively impact their persistence in engineering programs [10-11]. According to researchers, well-structured first-year seminar courses permit students toexperience a better transition from high school to college, understanding the new expectationsand work demands, developing time-management and study skills, particularly for students atrisk [12]. Besides, small group seminars facilitate the interaction with faculty and peers creatinga community of support leading to a better outcome of persistence and performance [13]. First-year seminars offer also an
of 60 members who reviewed the previous standards and developed thecontent for the new standards, and b) a steering committee which consisted of 17 members whoreviewed the items developed by the content committee and provided feedback. Three of themembers on the steering committee served as liaisons between the steering and contentcommittees to help communicate concerns and provide clarity about any feedback. Each selectedcommittee member was approved by the State Board of Education.During June and July of 2020 the committees met over a series of online meetings. First theyreviewed research-based articles on standards along with other standards and frameworkdocuments compiled by PDE, such as A Framework for K–12 Science Education: Practices
Introduce new ideas prepared do their best Contribute to making Raise contentious issues in a Openly express opinions meetings effective constructive way Solicit input before Promote constructiveDo their fair share of the work proceeding brainstorming Adopt suggestions from other Deliver their work on time Actively listen to teammates members Accept feedback
/News/OnlineNewsRoom/NewsReleases/tabid/6596/articleid/1216/ohi o-epa-issues-2017-encouraging-environmental-excellence-awards.aspx ● Write a 3-4-page report including the following sections: o Summary of each article in your own words. o Reflection ▪ Your impressions, potential impact of this news / development. ▪ Potential application of the efforts highlighted in your articles to other industries or to society in general. o Consider the following scenario: You are a major stockholder in a company whose stock dropped after posting earnings of only $1.20 per share. In her quarterly report, the CEO acknowledged that earnings would have been $2.50
were brought on with a careful attention towards their training at an intense, 2 weekworkshop. As course evaluation data came in and a comprehensive teachers’ manual and otherinstructional materials were developed, concern about teacher effectiveness was alleviated andthe ENGR 102 HS workshop was condensed to 5 and then 4 days each summer.ENGR 102 HS Teacher Qualifications and EffectivenessTeacher qualifications and effectiveness are an important metric for program success. NewHigher Learning Commission (HLC) guidelines issued in early 2016 call for all adjunct/dualcredit instructors to have a master’s degree in their field as a minimal requirement [7]. The HLCguidelines focus on dual credit programs and outline a few exceptions to the
consistentwith the evaluations the students obtained from the faculty for those semesters. Most of therespondents who stated in both answers that their teams had struggled, described issues withteam communication and role responsibilities. However, this sample size is also too small todefine a correlation with role assignments and rotations. Future analysis is needed to providefurther insight on any correlation between student perceived success, their opportunities for roleplacement and their individual performance.ConclusionThis work aims to promote strategies that increase student interest in team engagement within acollaborative and inclusive environment. The results support the idea that students in generalbenefit from rotating roles to maximize
is anexclusion criteria. In Architecture, students learn to code assembly language, binaryrepresentation of instructions, issue path, cache organization, multi-issue, and parallelism (SIMDand loop unrolling). Students gradually improve a processor given new knowledge. In AI,students discuss inference in formal logic (propositional logic, fuzzy logic, probability theory),machine learning (neural networks), and constraint satisfaction (genetic algorithms, evolutionarystrategies, and genetic programming). Students have less time to understand a concept beforemoving on to a new one due to the variety of topics. Unlike Architecture, AI is more: abstract,math-based, and compares algorithms via computational cost. Informed consent for the surveysis
and heavily dependent on our mobile phones to maintain immediate contact with family,friends, and colleagues. We often store information in our mobile phones and later randomlyretrieve such information as needed. Contact information stored in our mobile phone is used fora variety of purposes beyond making a phone call, and serves as an important general purposedata source. The “Smart Phone Book Search” project addressed the specific issue of when amobile user, suddenly without his/her phone, needs important contact data stored in the phone.How can such a user retrieve the desired information from another accessible mobile phone? Asolution to this problem was proposed and implemented by the students in this new Mobile App. Proceedings of
[31]. Anxiety impacts students' abilityto maintain attention and concentration across various formats of evaluations [32]. Also, anxietycan have consequences such as damaging students’ confidence which affects their performance,so new learning methods must be developed to guarantee academic success and improve themental health of students [33]. In addition, a relationship can be noted between emotionalintelligence and academic performance, so if a student obtains high scores on emotionalintelligence tests, they can be expected to have better management of his or her emotions andrecovers more quickly from the stress of an exam [34]. There is some concern regarding the wayin which the evaluations are taken, since in the case of evaluations that
initiated by the service-learning coordinator at UD. The overall technical goal of thisproject was to design and repair a climbing wall on a challenge course at a Buckeye Trails GirlScout camp. The health and sport science students participated in this project as the “primecontractor” to the Girl Scout organization. The mechanical and aerospace engineering studentsserved as the engineering design firms competing to be the subcontractor for this project.Students from the two disciplines were required to communicate with one another throughout thesemester. Additionally, students from both disciplines were required to interact withrepresentatives of the Girl Scout organization, retailers, student organizations, faculty membersand other professionals
corresponding key stakeholders. Thestudents develop appropriate specifications and begin the initial design process, ending the yearwith several potential design solutions. As sophomores, these same students are led by juniorsthrough the embodiment phase. During this phase, a design is selected from the alternativesproduced the prior year, the design is finalized, and then implemented.The seminar features the design project which promotes the intellectual growth of the scholars,but the seminar also provides for the professional and personal growth of the scholars. Eachsemester 50% of the time is reserved for the design component, while the remaining time is spenton activities which nurture professional and personal growth. Additional details concerning
. Bryman 7 suggests that more attention be paid to the writing of mixed methods articles,going a step further to suggest that the “fundamental issue of the degree to which mixed methodsresearchers genuinely integrate their findings has not been addressed (p.8).” A study byengineering education researchers in 2009 discussed the ways that engineering educationresearchers could utilize educational research methods 8. Their results indicate that engineeringeducation researchers could address their methods and evaluation criteria for their methods moreexplicitly. If engineering educations researchers are to maximize the impact of the data theycollect, we argue that quantitative and qualitative data must be both integrated and reported in a
a significantpart of the dissertation research. However, engagement of university administration, buy-in andlarge time investment from faculty, development of industrial connections, and continuous long-term financial dedication from industrial partners are needed for P3 program. Establishing thePAtENT program might be more accessible, though it is assumed that students will be workingon faculty members’ research projects that show promise to be patentable or closer tocommercialization. Therefore, these programs require a challenging re-design of PhD educationand multiple stakeholders actively working to build the new structure, and/or a research topicthat is close to commercialization, which might not be an option for all students and
recordings were beneficial for optimizing schedules and for reinforcing new concepts. Interms of teaching, some in-class demonstrations were not possible, however, effort is being made to aidthis through the development of augmented reality experiences. Students seemed more stressed(observed order of magnitude increase in email volume) with the imposed online teaching. Academicintegrity was a concern for high-stakes exams without some form of proctoring. The use of low-stakesassessments eased some of the students concerns and anxiety, but increased workloads for bothstudents and instructors.In terms of teaching tools, some students found it difficult to navigate and use the software but seemedquick to pick up on it. Before the beginning of the term
over twenty years experience designing and supporting learning environments in academic settings. Her research has been funded by the National Science Foundation (an Ethics in Science and Engineering project to develop frameworks for developing ethical reasoning in engineers, and a Cyberlearning project to develop collaborative design environments for engineers), and by corporate foundations, the Department of Homeland Security, the College of En- gineering, and the Purdue Research Foundation. She has been recognized as the inaugural Butler Faculty Scholar, a Faculty Fellow in the CERIAS institute, a Service Learning Faculty Fellow, Diversity Faculty Fellow, and recipient of the Violet Haas Award (for efforts on
absence of a College ofEducation, and given an institutional culture prioritizing scholarly research, institutions such asGeorgia Tech often do not have a long history of systemic faculty involvement in the K-12educational community. However the current national focus, initiated by public fundingagencies such as the National Science Foundation, encourages academic scientists and engineersto shoulder some of the responsibilities for the quality of science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM) education at the K-12 level, and to do this by developing university-K-12“partnerships.” Unfortunately, given the vast cultural differences that exist between universitiesand K-12 schools, these partnerships too often flounder, never managing to
, diversity, equity, and inclusion, Asian American Studies, Critical Mixed Race Studies, engineering ethics, and pop culture.Dr. Qin Zhu, Virginia Tech Dr. Zhu is Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Affiliate Faculty in the Department of Science, Technology & Society and the Center for Human-Computer Interaction at Vir- ginia Tech. Dr. Zhu is also serving as Associate Editor for Science and Engineering Ethics, Associate Editor for Studies in Engineering Education, Editor for International Perspectives at the Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science, and Executive Committee Member of the International Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum. Dr. Zhu’s research interests include
Paper ID #11985ESTABLISHING SUSTAINABILITY COMPONENT IN AN ENGINEER-ING DESIGN COURSEDr. Jaby Mohammed, The Petroleum Institute Jaby Mohammed is a faculty at The Petroleum Institute, Abu Dhabi, UAE. He received his PhD in Indus- trial Engineering from University of Louisville (2006), masters in Industrial Engineering from University of Louisville (2003) and also a master’s in business administration from Indira Gandhi National Open Uni- versity (2001). His research interests include advanced manufacturing, design methodologies, six sigma, lean manufacturing, and engineering education. He previously taught at Indiana Purdue
scheme, and we believe this new method for GPAcalculation could provide greater accuracy in judging students’ competency while enhancinginterest in their coursework. Using course data from undergraduate students at our institution, aswell as results from an attitudinal survey (n = 152), this research explores the academic andmotivational effects of these grading systems.LiteratureUndergraduate GPA captures or is a proxy for: content mastery, academic motivation, self-worthand self-esteem, future job potential [3] - [5], and many other non-cognitive or affective factors(conscientiousness, grit, etc.). These motivational factors are also affected by issues such asgrade inflation [6] or a student’s drive to achieve greater grade differentiation
collaboration between faculty and graduatestudents in the College of Engineering and the College of Humanities fosters anatmosphere whereby students learn technical, engineering science throughcommunication. Specifically, students are required to give oral presentations, writetechnical reports and proposals, and work in teams in an effort to hone interpersonal andleadership skills. With respect to oral presentations, students give formal teampresentations in several different, required courses. The audience ranges from the courseprofessor and graduate teaching assistants only, to the entire class of 60 plus students. Allpresentations are video-taped. Students are then required to meet with a communicationconsultant to view their video-taped
,even when the tools they use cut out such considerations. This foundation allows us to thenexplore ethical considerations vertically throughout their careers as engineering students.Therefore, we urge educators to consider the possibility of developing integrated courses thatallow students to connect the intellectual rhetorics of inquiry developed in freshman Englishclasses with their engineering classes so that students can truly appreciate and comprehend theimportance of ethics in their future professional lives.IntroductionIn the past several years, ethical concerns have become a central focus of the public and newsmedia, creating a new awareness of the ethical implications of decisions we make in ourprofessional and private lives. This
Page 10.277.1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationdeveloping their own writing program within the engineering department3,4. In all cases, thewriting personnel are usually graduate students from writing programs or writing professionals.Drexel University is one of three schools nationwide with a comprehensive cooperativeeducation program. The results of a 2000 coop employer survey indicating that only 54% ofDrexel students received high ratings on their written communications skills brought the matterUniversity-wide attention. A task force of 15 faculty members concerned with student
with dynamics and vibrations. of several buildings. They created one of the earliest multi-Dynamics and vibrations are yet extremely complex subjects and dimensional building models and studied its performance on ademand costly laboratory resources. Since the faculties ofengineering in these universities are new, there are no shaking table. During the 1940s an impact table for simulatinglaboratories for dynamics and vibrations yet. It was obvious that, earthquake ground motions was used to study the mechanicalwithout laboratory work, the students were not able to performance of large shear
students participating in international education experiences remains small,there is a particular concern for the preparation of career researchers.In response, U.S. universities are experimenting with new curricular methods, including thedevelopment of international programs designed for STEM students, to foster the development ofskill sets necessary for successful international research collaboration. However, sparse researchexists that comprehensively assesses globally focused outcomes associated with such efforts, andthe simple question remains: Are international programs for STEM students effective in meetingthese goals?In this paper, we compare the experiences of students participating in two Research Experiences forUndergraduates (REU
reflection. The morning sessionsfocus on deepened content, taught by engineering faculty modeling pedagogical “best practices”.This was followed by teachers going through the section of the curriculum that paralleled thecontent lesson, including hands-on activities and the online module. In the afternoon sessions,the teachers applied their new found technical and pedagogical knowledge as they taught thecurriculum to students enrolled in the Upward Bound program. While teaching, the teacherswere videotaped and observed. After the lesson each day, the teachers reviewed videotapes andhighlighted what went well and what needed improvement. Together, the teachers and PDfacilitators provided constructive criticism on how to improve the delivery of the
number ofqualified and capable STEM professionals in the United states to meet this need [10, 11, 12, 13].Specifically, for the semiconductor industry, four main themes were identified as their biggestchallenges for attracting new talent and retaining existing skilled staff. These were “1) a shortage ofstudents pursuing a STEM education; 2) lack of awareness of the industry and its vital importance inour everyday lives; 3) talent recruitment and retention issues partly because of the big, wildly popularconsumer-facing companies; and 4) more restrictive immigration policies” [6].Beyond the development of interdisciplinary curricula, there are other opportunities that may provideoptions to dramatically increase the quality and quantity of students
variables.Psychologists first used FA to understand the factors underlying the construct of intelligence. Itis often used to support theory and develop new social and behavioral science instruments tomeasure variables that cannot be directly observed. The end goal of FA is to establish constructvalidity, which is critical to developing quality assessment tools. [1] Construct validity refers tothe degree to which a test or measure assesses the underlying theoretical construct it issupposed to measure. For example, construct validity addresses the issues of whether anintelligence test measures intelligence or a test of motivation measures actual motivation.A construct is a complex variable that cannot be measured directly. Instead, its existence isinferred through
engineering applications are the focus of thispaper.New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) is an inner city, urban institution located inNewark, New Jersey with a social, economic, and academically diverse student bodyconsisting of approximately 5800 undergraduate and 3000 graduate students. NJIT has along history of outreach programs for elementary through college level students. The Centerof Pre-College Programs had its origins with faculty in the Department of ChemicalEngineering and Chemistry. The Center offers initiatives and programs designed to increaseeducational opportunities for inner-city youngsters, and to improve the quality of educationat the elementary and secondary grades in the City of Newark, and its environs.24 Since
thehumanities with technical and scientific knowledge so that the deeper issues that characterize the separationsbetween, and the common ties linking, the ‘two cultures’” [3, pp. 3]. These approaches highlight the role ofhumanistic and liberal arts education in engineering education in developing creativity, capacity for insight,originality, and a holistic view of challenges posed by technology.Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are becoming the “new norm in several industries” [4, para. 2]. This creates aneed to integrate humanistic approaches in engineering education in fields participating in the development of AIsystems. As Dignum reminds us, “the impact and consequences of an AI system reach further than the technicalsystem itself, and as such
Page 5.338.1are increasingly stressing integrated design problems in response to the current engineeringpractices in industry.There is some concern that the U.S. educational system is ill prepared to meet the challengesarising from these changes in engineering practice. For example, the overwhelming majority offormal student-faculty contact hours in engineering education remains based on the in-classlecture. The weaknesses of the traditional lecture as the prime source of academic learning, havehowever become clear.1-3 Specifically, many feel that the exclusive use of lectures can create apassive learning environment that reinforces any pre-existing “teach me” attitudes in students.4Ongoing research in educational methods at WPI5 has also