Software Process: Applying Industrial-Strength Methods in Engineering Education Mark J. Sebern, PhD, PE Milwaukee School of Engineering sebern@msoe.edu www.msoe.edu/se/AbstractImproving productivity and quality in software development is one of the major concerns of thesoftware engineering discipline, as software systems grow to millions, and soon billions, of linesof code. Productivity and defect density levels that are considered very good today will beinadequate to keep up with this future growth. As a result, software development professionalsand
exactly what's what was a big issue, especially because I didn't do that very well at the beginning.This passage shows a hard-won lesson, one that could only come from an extended immersion inthe daily practice of research. 4 For many of the students, this experience of research increased their sense of belongingto the field. For some, this experience of constantly learning, of being exposed to new ideas andtesting out new approaches, fed their eagerness to go into graduate school. Others expected todislike research as being too abstract and disconnected from daily life but found they loved theday-to-day work of designing
of students in introductory materials engineering classes. Most recently, he has been working on Project Pathways, an NSF supported Math Science Partnership, in developing modules for a courses on Connecting Mathematics with Physics and Chemistry and also a course on Engineering Capstone Design.Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University Amaneh Tasooji is an Associate Research Professor in the School of Materials at ASU and has been teaching and developing new content for materials science and engineering classes and laboratories. She has developed new content and contextual teaching methods from here experience as a researcher and a manager at Honeywell Inc. She is currently working to develop
Paper ID #15805Teaching the Internet of Things (IoT) Using Universally Available RaspberryPi and Arduino PlatformsProf. Gary J. Mullett, Springfield Technical Community College Gary J. Mullett, a Professor of Electronics Technology and Co-Department Chair, presently teaches in the Electronics Group at Springfield Technical Community College (STCC) located in Springfield, MA. A long time faculty member and consultant to local business and industry, Mullett has provided leadership and initiated numerous curriculum reforms as either the Chair or Co-Department Chair of the four tech- nology degree programs that constitute the
Engineeringand Science Professors (AEESP), Environmental & Water Resources Institute (EWRI) and ASEE. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Lessons Learned: Adoption of ASCE BOK3 Student Outcomes Consistent with ABET 1-7Abstract:Following its fall 2018 ABET visit, the Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology’sDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering identified the coming release ofASCE BOK3 and the new ABET 1-7 student outcomes as an opportunity to reviewand revise their program’s student outcomes. All of the faculty members took partin the process of identifying the fit of the BOK3 outcomes with ABET 1-7, ABET civilengineering program criteria, and institute student outcomes. The result was
heard if the speaker knows about gangs and street life andis able to really talk to where these students live. Such a faculty member can immediately gettheir attention. The students are then willing to listen to some information about engineeringbecause they are interested in and respect the individual delivering the message.Each four-year school working with community colleges should learn about the students in theirCC to be better able to talk to the students about their concerns and to draw their attention toengineering and computer science. The best advertisement for engineering and any particularfour-year college is to have engineering role model students who are alumni from the CC beingvisited come and speak to the CC students. The
participation andflipped classrooms to creating new knowledge. This charge is within the reach of ConstructionManagement faculty, as we strive to better prepare our students for an industry where eachproject is different, with unique requirements and resources, site-specific constraints, varyingsupply chains andConstruction management is a profession where success is measured by the ability of anindividual to stand on his or her own. In this profession, each project is different, with uniquerequirements and resources, site-specific constraints, and varying supply chains. Personnel andclients tend to change from one project to the next. These challenges demand skills far morecomplex than can be acquired by rote memorization. In short, in this profession
role of leadership and culture in process improvement. His research is supported by the NSF and industry and has received numerous national and international awards. He is an elected Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Management and serves as an Associate Editor for both the Engineering Management Journal and Quality Approaches in Higher Education. Prior to his academic career, Schell spent 14 years in industry where he held leadership positions focused on process improvement and organizational development.Dr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University Bryce E. Hughes is an Assistant Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University, and affiliate faculty member with the Montana
Page 23.599.9research experience. This finding is consistent with prior research about students’ motivationsfor undergraduate research,3,11,18,20,21 and is a reflection of students’ practical concerns aboutexploring options and preparing for future careers (whether in research, academia, or industry).The post-experience survey revisited several of these issues as part of a larger examination ofstudents overall impressions of the summer research experience. Students were asked to indicatetheir level of agreement with a series of value statements about the summer experience using afive-point Likert scale (Strongly Agree=1, Agree=2, Neutral=3, Disagree=4, StronglyDisagree=5). Table 7 summarizes students’ responses to these questions in the post
. Theexperimental and simulation facility which is being developed will be used mainly for the thirdcourse, “Experiments and Simulations in Particle Technology” which is intended for upper-levelundergraduates and first-year graduate students, but will also become an integral part of othercurriculum activities. This paper describes the equipment and the experiments that are beingdeveloped for this purpose, and will also describe the faculty and student experiences with a trialcourse (Experiments in Particle Technology) that is offered during Fall 1996 semester by the firstauthor.1. IntroductionParticle technology is concerned with the characterization, production, modification, flow,handling and utilization of granular solids or powders, both dry and in
Paper ID #38106Thinking Critically about Critical Research with MilitaryUndergraduates in Engineering EducationAngela Minichiello (Assistant Professor) Angela (Angie) Minichiello, Ph.D., P. E., is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education and Adjunct Faculty in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Utah State University. Her research employs asset-based frameworks to improve access, participation, and inclusivity across all levels of engineering education. Angie engages with qualitative, mixed-method, and multi-method approaches to better understand student experience for the ultimate purpose of
been an increase in support of medical practicessuch as abortion and healthcare access, the elimination of the death penalty, and theimplementation of stricter gun laws (Tavernise et al., 2019).Virginia Today According to the 2020 Census, White, Black, and Hispanic residents have become thethree dominant racial demographics in Virginia. The youth and young adults have reclaimedtheir power and are shifting the culture and politics away from far-right conservatism (Census,2020). Each racial group experiences unique social issues that are targeted from the macro (i.e.:state-government) and meso (i.e.: high learning institutions) levels. For example, the low-socio-economic White people living within the Appalachia Mountains of Virginia
standards.Through a mixed-methods approach, the study sought to understand how and why standards arerequested, obtained, and accessed for use by Engineering Researchers (faculty, postdocs,students, and staff) at various institutions. The secondary objective of the study was to help FSULibraries develop a Standards acquisition policy as part of their collection development duties.This study began with the creation of a spreadsheet of academic ARL Libraries and identifyingthose with Engineering programs and their librarians. The authors explored institutional websitesto ascertain if they supported any type of engineering program, only using freely available publicinformation. The FSU Institutional Review Board approved this study, with the ID:STUDY00000673
by (1) integrating new student orientation with math assessment and learning, (2) linking STEM faculty educational training with STEM freshman learning communities and with orientation, and (3) integrating and expanding, based on research best practices, existing programs such as learning communities, undergraduate research, and faculty development. The program targets all first year students for success and is expected to have a significant impact on at-risk students. Students at-risk for not earning or completing a STEM degree include those who are underprepared in math, those with financial need, Hispanic students, women, and students with low self-efficacy.”The grant was motivated by significant
Paper ID #45940WIP: Developing Accessible University-Industry Pathways for Civil EngineeringStudents with DisabilitiesDr. Andrew L Gillen, Northeastern University Andrew L. Gillen is an Assistant Teaching Professor at Northeastern University in the First Year Engineering Program and an affiliate faculty member to Civil and Environmental Engineering. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech and B.S. in Civil Engineering from Northeastern University.Dr. Cassandra McCall, Utah State University Dr. Cassandra McCall is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Utah State
project solution.IntroductionA recent pilot study by Jensen [1] indicated the effectiveness of a collaborative educationalstrategy introducing first year students to systems thinking, social responsibility andsustainability in civil and architectural engineering projects. The first-year term project wasmotivated by program faculty concern that upper level students lacked confidence during theideation phase of their projects. This was noted when students acted as development teams oncomprehensive, collaborative projects such as the culminating major design experience. Inparticular, the steps involving gathering community-based information and prioritizing goals waschallenging for the students. This paper expands on the pilot study in assessing the
education includes issues concerning gender. Selecteddata for women shows that they are underrepresented in engineering disciplines (e.g., proportionof bachelor’s degrees in engineering, tenured/tenure-track appointments on U.S. engineeringfaculties, and employed as engineers) [2]. Although that is the case, other studies found thatbasically both of them have equal opportunity to participate. Eccles and Harold argued thatgender-based level participation is not due to biological reason; rather it is triggered byindividual's perception, task value, and participation [26]. Schreuders, Rutherford, Cox, andMannon in their study found that in general there was no gender difference for biological andagricultural engineering [28]. Limited studies have been
STEM areas, faculty development, research-based activities, evaluation tools and technology, and gender issues in STEM education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021A study of gender differences in career choice in STEM disciplines: the case of Chilean studentsAbstractHistorically, women's participation worldwide in STEM disciplines has been lower than men'sparticipation. Related literature recognizes that the engineering area is one of the most segregatedoccupations gender-wise. According to the OECD, the percentage of women who enroll in theirfirst year in STEM disciplines does not exceed 19.8%. In Chile, the number of students
, particularly those that are structured to havemixed male and female participants, helps recruit females into STEM fields [28]. One study onworking in pairs in a computer science lab revealed that students working in pairs are more self-sufficient, better programmers, and more likely to pass the course with a C or better [29]. An in-depth study addresses concerns with retention in STEM fields. The program implemented aProfessional Development Program (PDP) to train faculty how to teach labs with the goal ofincreasing retention of all students. The authors of the study argue that deliberate steps must betaken to ensure labs are inclusive to all [30]. But carefully constructed activities can achieveequitable educational outcomes.The two conclusions state
engineering problems, including fluids, geotechnical, and structural problems. She is a CEE faculty mem- ber since January 2010 and she was also member of the faculty of Universidad Simon Bolivar, Venezuela, for fifteen years.Dr. Lili Steiner, Florida International University I design and implement education solutions that are efficient, effective, and scalable. Specifically, I focus on the development of meaningful learning innovation from discovery and design through production and deployment. My research and experience have shown that a full-cycle approach is the most effective way to deliver value. Because of this, I work on full-cycle, full-scale projects. Conceptually, this means that I’m involved in every
amongall the organizations involved in their development. SAE is also has a major concernwith education in these technologies and, in particular, ensuring that a sufficientnumber of engineering students are familiar with these technologies and capable ofworking in these areas when they graduate. The SAE also has an interest in promotingthe understanding and use of the new technologies to the general public. Theseinterests of SAE are all addressed in the IGVC.The Department of Transportation's Interest in the IGVCThe U.S. Department of Transportation is concerned with many of the same things asthe automotive industry, but has somewhat more focus on the transportationinfrastructure. It, too, has a major interest in safety. With respect to
project failure where there had been no process-check to receive whatshould have been clear warning signs, reflected on the importance of having a culture wherepeople can be honest with themselves, raise concerns with managers, and learn fromorganizational mistakes. “Deliver me the bad news as early as possible, and don't kid yourself"(Hui 456-459). As a result of the project failure, the company set up a dedicated qualityassurance team. It reports directly to the CEO, has authority to call off a project where there areconsiderable challenges, and manages a rigorous program of progress check and risk control.However, bringing about cultural change can be a major challenge unto itself, often requiringtime, patience, and buy-in from others on the
, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2006.0030[15] T. Wyatt & S. Oswalt, “Comparing mental health issues among undergraduate and graduate students,” American Journal of Health Education, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 96–107, 2013.[16] J. Bloom, A. Propst Cuevas, J. Hall, & C. Evans, “Graduate students' perceptions of outstanding graduate advisor characteristics,” NACADA Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 28- 35, 2007.[17] J. Posselt, “Normalizing Struggle: Dimensions of Faculty Support for Doctoral Students and Implications for Persistence and Well-Being,” The Journal
TechnologyOnline, Spring 2002. < http://www.nap.edu/issues/18.3/p_wulf.html>2. Splitt, Frank. “Too Few Generalists: A Problem for Engineering Education.” 1986.3. Mitra, Amitava. Fundamentals of Quality Control and Improvement. NY: Macmillan Publishing Company(1993): 43-44.4. “Programs That Really Work”; U.S. News and World Report; September 23, 2002: 104. Page 8.973.135. Advisorteam. “The Temperament Sorter” 1998-2002. “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”6. Bates, Marilyn and David
is one of the most important metricsthat measures the success of this grant. With this as the central goal, the co-investigators ofthis grant at Radford University’s Artis College of Science and Technology (ACSAT)developed a new leadership program in STEM called Elites (Emerging Leaders inTechnology, Science and Mathematics). Elites was designed to address a fundamentalweakness in the college: very few STEM students used to acquire internships, go to graduateschool, participate in undergraduate level research, or, as anecdotal evidence from facultyexperiences as advisors suggests, even develop a resume by the time they reach their senioryear. In fact, among the 2011-12 STEM graduates from the University, the official numbersindicate that
12.1432.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 The Impact of “Special Needs” Projects on Student LearningAbstractThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) identifies design as animportant element of the engineering curriculum. The faculty at the University of Tennessee atChattanooga believes the concepts and principles of design are as fundamental to undergraduateengineering education as are those tools and topics traditionally thought as fundamental (such asmathematics, physics, chemistry, statics, and dynamics). One of the benefits of design is thehands-on activities or Project-Based Learning application it brings to the classroom. ABET alsostates that engineering programs must demonstrate that their
intervention programs. This line of research also seeks to understand the nuances and complexities of participation and persistence in these fields and develop new models for explaining such phenomena. Her secondary research strand focuses on the participation and achievement of Black students and professionals in higher education. She is the PI or co-PI on several grant-funded research projects including the national Black Doctoral Women Study (BDWS), the Women in Engineering Study (WIES), and Bulls-Engineering Youth Experience for Promoting Relationships, Identity Development, & Empowerment (Bulls-EYE PRIDE).Dr. Jonathan Elliot Gaines, University of South Florida Jonathan E. Gaines is faculty in the Mechanical
technology) that answers the question “How?”. Even if we have know-how, we still have to face the societal concerns when many other factors and questions come intoplay before undertaking a new project: whether, what, why, when, whom, where, and how much.If technopreneurship becomes all technique and technology, it will make us more materialisticignoring that we are human beings. If there is very little understanding of the higher humanpurposes that the technology is striving to serve, we will become victims of our own creation. Inthe spirit of providing service to the community, we must decide what is to be done to developnew products and services, cut costs, increase productivity, turn waste into environment-friendlyproducts or assure its safe
responsibility to address societal problems [10] and, relatedly, to educate future engineers onsocial issues and social responsibility. Engineers are critical in the design and experience ofeveryday life; therefore, it is crucial for engineering students to be exposed to social and culturaldifferences and to be encouraged to adequately reflect upon the social impact of their work [10].Not only do engineers need to understand the needs of a diverse customer or client base but thereare also the broader concerns of “public welfare” which include concerns of privacy, socialjustice, and access and equity [10].Despite the broader nod to the importance of this aspect of engineering curriculum, somequestion if engineering education packages social concerns as
;one-on-one instruction in the lab over extended lectures. Those pedagogical values are reflectedin Technology Education teachers’ beliefs found in this study.Juxtaposing the data from this study with the three earlier studies allows us to identify somedemographic trends noted earlier, and point to some new directions. The Technology Educationteaching workforce has been gradually becoming more diverse, likely the result of significantnumbers of baby-boomer white male teachers retiring concurrent with gradually increasingnumbers of women and minority faculty entering and remaining in the profession. Overall, thefield is still dominated by white men, but the increasing percentage of female and minorityteachers in Technology Education is