Green Fund committee. His research interests are in Systems Engineering & Architecture, Complex systems, Systems testing and Application of Entropy to Complex Systems. Email: sakundi@miners.utep.eduDr. Richard Chiou, Drexel University Dr. Richard Chiou is Associate Professor within the Engineering Technology Department at Drexel Uni- versity, Philadelphia, USA. He received his Ph.D. degree in the G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. His educational background is in manufacturing with an emphasis on mechatronics. In addition to his many years of industrial experience, he has taught many different engineering and technology courses at undergraduate and graduate levels
Paper ID #45544Defining your Why: Cultivating Identity and Belonging through Coaching onCommunicationDr. Andrea T Kwaczala, Western New England University Andrea Kwaczala is an associate professor at Western New England University in the biomedical engineering department. She teaches Biomechanics, Product Development and Innovation, Senior Design and Prosthetic and Orthotic Devices. She also teaches in the 1st year program.Andrea Davis, Western New England UniversityDr. Heidi Ellis, Western New England University Heidi Ellis is a Professor in the Computer Science and Information Technology department at Western New England
in the engineering Ph.D. student research experiences that are“purposeful, instrumental, directed at achieving a particular end” [23], the main differentiatingcharacteristic is the type of equipment experiences that students obtain during their researchwork. Three types of equipment characteristics are evident in the literature. The first type isstudents who primarily rely on computer modeling and simulation in their research. The secondtype is students who primarily rely on test facilities and equipment for physical experiments intheir research. The third type is students who have limited reliance on equipment beyondcommon computers and information technology in their research.When looking at the experiences of engineering students who
, “Caring in Education,” The Encyclopedia of Informal Education. 2005.[8] C. Dweck, “Carol Dweck Revisits ‘Growth Mindset’” Education Week, vol. 35. pp. 20–24.[9] K. C. Wood, H. Smith, and D. Grossniklaus, “Piaget's Stages of CognitiveDevelopment,” Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology,University of Georgia, 2001.[10] H. Burns and K. Lesseig, “Infusing Empathy Into Engineering Design: Supporting Under-represented Student Interest and Sense of Belongingness,” 2017.[11] L. Katehi, G. Pearson, and M. A. Feder, Engineering in K-12 education: understanding thestatus and improving the prospects. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2009.[12] “Classroom Resources,” Teaching Tolerance. [Online]. Available:https
AC 2012-5232: EXPLORING IF AND HOW KNOWLEDGE OF A HU-MANITARIAN DISASTER AFFECTS STUDENT DESIGN THINKINGRyan C. Campbell, University of Washington Ryan Campbell is pursuing his doctorate through the University of Washington Graduate School’s inter- disciplinary Individual PhD (IPhD) program, in which he combines faculty expertise in the College of Engineering and the College of Education to create a degree program in the emerging field of engineering education. Campbell earned his M.S. in electrical engineering from Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea, and his B.S. in engineering science from Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, Colo. Camp- bell’s research interests include engineering education, ethics
includes application of AI for project management, sustainability and data center energy.Mr. James Jay Jaurez, National University Dr. Jaurez is a dedicated Academic Program Director and Associate Professor in Information Technology Management at National University where he has served since 2004. Dr. Jaurez is also a FIRST Robotics Head Coach since 2014 and leads outreach in robotiNelson Altamirano, National University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Application of Data Analysis and Visualization Tools for US Renewable SolarEnergy Generation, its Sustainability Benefits, and Teaching In Engineering Curriculum Ben D Radhakrishnan, M.Tech., M.S
looking beyonddesign education in a single discipline to design education as an entity unto itself mayprove supportive of necessary changes in preparing future designers. Engineers can learnfrom other disciplines and vice versa about ways to improve design education. Abeginning step in this task is establishing an awareness of common practices andexperiences in design.The research was guided by the following questions:• How do designers within and outside of engineering experience design similarly?• What themes emerge from these experiences that could facilitate common ground?BackgroundDesign scholars over the years have proposed a variety of definitions for design. Cross4identified design as an ill-defined problem. Visser6 argued that design
Paper ID #18491TAMUS LSAMP Project: 25 Years of Success - Finding and ImplementingBest Practices for URM STEM StudentsDr. Samuel Paul Merriweather, Texas A&M University Dr. Samuel Merriweather currently serves as the Texas A&M University System Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (TAMUS LSAMP) Associate Director through the Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station (TEES), a TAMUS member. He obtained bachelor and master of science degrees in industrial engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology and a PhD in industrial engineering at Texas A&M University.Dr. Harriet A. Lamm, Texas
reporting. She also has taught at two major universities and has expertise in educational methods, curriculum, and instruction.Mrs. Jill Lynn Weber, The Center for Research and Learning Jill Weber is a graduate of the University of Nebraska and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Com- munication Studies and English. After graduation, Jill moved to the Seattle area to pursue a career with AT&T Wireless where she worked as a Project Manager in Information Technology as well as in the Mar- keting group, and was a corporate trainer for new hires. During her time at AT&T, Jill was in charge of managing large cross-company project teams and several large technology projects. In 2005, Jill expanded her skills as a
Paper ID #9597A Study of Feedback Provided to Student Teams Engaged in Open-EndedProjectsDr. Laura Hirshfield, Oregon State University Laura Hirshfield is a Post-Doctoral Scholar at Oregon State University. She received her B.S. from the University of Michigan and her Ph.D. from Purdue University, both in chemical engineering. She is cur- rently doing research in the engineering education field, investigating technology-mediated active learning in a chemical engineering curriculum. After her post-doc, she plans to pursue a career in academia.Ms. Jaynie L. Whinnery, Oregon State University Jaynie Whinnery is a graduate
American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Adult Undergraduate Engineering Student ExperienceAbstractEfforts to remain competitive internationally in engineering and technology require thatengineering departments train a diverse set of talented students. One aspect of student diversitythat is often overlooked is student age. Adult learners are an important source of futureengineering professionals, and it is critical that these students are supported through degreecompletion. Because relatively little research has focused on adults as a special populationamong engineering students, this study aims to elucidate adult engineering studentexperience. Qualitative interview data was chosen as the means to collect rich information
minorities who were routinely excluded from social networkswhere informal mentoring relationships traditionally developed.1,2 This is especially critical intraditionally white, male-dominated environments, such as technology and engineering.Further, Web technologies create an ideal way to dialogue and document critical processes inmentoring relationships. Mentees and mentors should work together in a collaborative fashion todevelop a living mentoring agreement that manages expectations for the relationship, and Webtechnologies help them accomplish this. In Open Mentoring®, mentees draft an outline thatincludes areas of exploration, general goals, relational boundaries, and time issues such asfrequency of meeting and anticipated duration for the
as fast.” Monitors also go through technical analysis and routinerevision7. Cane, an entrepreneur in audio technology, has gone through multiple revisions of hisproduct. In one revision Cane mentioned “the original one had a switch but people wereforgetting to turn it off and it was wasting the battery.” Because of this issue, Cane’s groupmodified the device to automatically turn off and on when different devices were plugged in. Amonitor must also know how to reduce information overload and focus on what the team shouldbe doing8. Ruben mentions that the “design is solid” and there aren’t any flaws in the artifact;therefore, the team is going to focus on adding more features as opposed to adjusting the design.C. DirectorSome Makers express
the quantitativemeasures and link knowledge about the engineering design process to participation in thiscourse. Due to its structure and the amount and type of data, this investigation is preliminary andinformal in nature. Tasks such as rigorous, systematic comparisons to outcomes from othercourse sections would be part of a more formal research design.The paper is organized as follows: information on the course under study, ENGR 1620, isprovided and the three main engineering design process models used in my sections are brieflydescribed. The design challenges are explained in detail. Student performance on the trackeditems listed above is described and analyzed, conclusions drawn, and directions for future workoutlined.ENGR 1620 Course
Paper ID #19429Enhancing Student Meaning-Making of Threshold Concepts via Computa-tion: The Case of Mohr’s CircleMr. Hayden William Fennell, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Hayden Fennell is a Ph.D. student in the department of Computer and Information Technology at Pur- due University. He holds an M.S.E. degree in Materials Science and Engineering from Johns Hopkins University and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of South Carolina.Prof. Genisson Silva Coutinho, Instituto Federal de Educac¸a˜ o, Ciˆencia e Tecnologia da Bahia Genisson Silva Coutinho is a Ph.D. student at the School of Engineering
experiences in each of the projects. While there havelong been both formal and informal systems in place to help faculty develop and improve projectadvising skills, each advisor takes his or her own approach to the work schedule, feedback to thestudents, and expectations.When the faculty developed the project system, a clear set of educational goals was stated.These goals were translated into assessable undergraduate learning outcomes (ULOs) in 2004, asfollows:All graduates of WPI will: 1. have a base of knowledge in mathematics, science, and humanistic studies. 2. have mastered fundamental concepts and methods in their principal areas of study. 3. understand and employ current technological tools. 4. be effective in oral, written and
weekly and stored in Canvas Studio that could be streamed to thestudents on demand. The students could either view these lectures during the class time in thecourse schedule or at some other time workable for them in the same week. Offering suchflexibility could avoid the potential conflicts between the original class schedule and students’altered schedules during the public health emergency period. The video lectures were preparedusing a versatile note-taking app S Note that supports integration of multimedia files. The appruns on an Android tablet. The lectures presented on the tablet were recorded by a screenrecording app x-Recorder in the mp4 format that can be streamed online. Examination scores inthe on-demand course were compared with
Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Collaboratively Developing an Introductory Infrastructure Systems Curriculum:The One Water ModuleIntroductionThe 21st century water challenges posed by decaying infrastructure, climate change, andurbanization cannot be solved by technology and engineering alone. In this context, successfulengineering decisions concerning the water infrastructure must be informed by an understandingof environmental, social, and political impacts and constraints. The future environmentalengineers tasked with tackling these 21st century challenges are ill-served by a 20th centuryeducation that presents technical systems in isolation and does not address the design andoperation of infrastructure as a
bridging the gap between theory and practice.Dr. Humberto Reinoso, Mercer University The majority of my professional careers has been in clinical practice. My passion for nursing educa- tion has evolved as healthcare demands on the practitioner, patient, and community have become more complex. As a dual certified Family Nurse Practitioner and Emergency Nurse Practitioner I care for in- dividuals throughout the lifespan. My PhD and current research interest focused on the silent epidemic of viral hepatitis. As a Clinical Assistant Professor and the Graduate Clinical Coordinator at Georgia Baptist College of Nursing of Mercer University, I am able to combine my passion for clinical practice and education of future Advance
justice education. In M. Adams, L.A. Bell & P. Griffin (Eds.). Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 35-66). New York, NY: Routledge.Iivari, N. (2018). Using member checking in interpretive research practice. Information Technology & People, 31(1), 111-133.Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2007). Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place. New York, NY: Routledge.McNicoll, P. 1999. Issues in teaching participatory action research. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(1): 51–62.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]Roegman, R. (2018). Seen, unseen, and unforeseen dangers: What a White emerging scholar learned
diversifying the engineering environment, moreunique perspectives can be represented and provide new innovations and ideas. Anunderstanding of what students value within work experiences can help industry recruitmentefforts towards female engineering students. It can also help to inform instructors of courseactivities that may be implemented into the classroom so that academic and industry experiencescan be made sense of together. This study looks to inform recruitment strategies into engineeringin academia and industry.Lichtenstein and colleagues found that "internships that provide candidates with workexperiences in industry can be important for building professional networks that increaseaffiliation with engineering and thereby encourage
Paper ID #30007Operationalizing Jonassen’s Design Theory of Problem Solving: Aninstrument to characterize educational design activitiesDr. Ada Hurst, University of Waterloo Ada Hurst is a Continuing Lecturer in the Department of Management Sciences at the University of Waterloo. She has taught and coordinated the capstone design courses in the Management Engineering program since 2011. She also teaches courses in organizational theory, technology, and behaviour. Her research falls in the areas of design cognition and processes, engineering design education, and gender issues in STEM disciplines. She is interested in
next time it is taught. If the course is the first in asequence, or is a foundation course, providing the instructor(s) of the follow-on course(s) withthis information should further enhance learning.Yet, with all the effort that has gone into concept inventories, to date, there is not a commonlyaccepted definition of what they are, nor is there one agreed on method for developing them7.However, some common aspects of concept inventories have emerged. By necessity, they arealmost all multiple-choice instruments. In addition to the correct answer, a well-designed CI willuse distractors as possible answer choices. These distractors are typically determined throughpilot testing and cognitive interviews (i.e., verbal protocols) where the
and final paper (SOs 2 and 3) (rubricsfound in the Appendix). SO 1 is evaluated through a midterm and final exam where students arerequired to recreate 3D models based on Engineering Drawings, and SO 4 is evaluated throughethics presentations where they explore the ethics of emerging engineering technology. Repeatedassessments are also designed to encourage a growth mindset in students.ConclusionThe application of bio-inspired design to our Introduction to Engineering Design course has hadan overall positive impact on the course flow and student development. Students have an easiertime deciding on their projects because of the limitation of bio-inspired design which gives themmore time for redesigning their models and testing procedures
crucial role in improving program retention and academic success. Theseissues are particularly prominent in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) fields, where many students opt to change majors due to difficulties in their programs.Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool for predicting student outcomes andhas the potential to revolutionize education. By leveraging AI, we aim to develop a frameworkthat utilizes historical student data to predict future outcomes. The predictor dataset usedincludes demographic and educational performance information of students in the Aerospaceand Mechanical Engineering (AME) program at The University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP).The majority of the AME student population in this
Paper ID #44721A Preliminary Study on the Impact of Lower-Division Mathematics Courseson Student Success in EngineeringDr. Umut Can Cabuk, San Diego State University Umut Can Cabuk received his B.Sc. degree in electronics engineering from Bursa Uludag University (Turkey) in 2012, his M.Sc. degree in information technology engineering from Aarhus University (Den- mark) in 2015, and his Ph.D. degree at the International Computer Institute of Ege University (Turkey), where he also worked as a research assistant. He is currently continuing his post-doc studies at San Diego State University (USA). His research interests include
engineers in our study described as “the big picture,” or theability to effectively speak, write, and interact with audiences who were outside of their specificdiscipline, work group, or focus. Our second theme centers on an engineer’s willingness andself-motivation to initiate communication with others and to seek out resource informationthrough informal interactions. Finally, the third theme involves the ability of engineers to listencarefully to others in order to do their best work and achieve results that are valued by theirstakeholders (clients, managers, co-workers).Understanding these three themes can inform more authentic and engaging ways of teachingengineering students. Teaching improvements are needed, as one interviewee put it, because
Access: The New ERAof Engineering. This project is a multi-university collaborative that includes partners from TheUniversity of Arizona, Georgia Institute of Technology, and The University of CaliforniaSandiego, and aims to promote equitable attainment of engineering degrees by utilizing data-driven interventions across multiple universities. Engineering education has long struggled withbarriers to equity, particularly among marginalized, low-income, and first-generation students.By leveraging student performance data, curricular structures, and demographic information, thiscollaborative will create targeted interventions that improve retention, academic success, anddegree completion in engineering.Guided by Kotter’s Change Model (KCM), the
. Vorvoreanu, and K. Madhavan, “Using visualization to derive insights from research funding portfolios,” in IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 35(3), 91-c3, 2021.[2] L. Shaulska, L. Yurchyshena, and Y. Popovskyi, “ Using MS power BI tools in the university management system to deepen the value proposition,” in 2021 11th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT), pp. 294-298, IEEE, September 2021.[3] M. D. Tamang, V. K. Shukla, S. Anwar, and R. Punhani, “Improving business intelligence through machine learning algorithms,” In 2021 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Engineering and Management (ICIEM), pp. 63-68, IEEE, April 2021.[4] R. Heyard and H. Hottenrott, “The value of
and ground. His team deployed a bomb finding robot named the LynchBot to Iraq late in 2004 and then again in 2006 deployed about a dozen more improved LynchBots to Iraq. His team also assisted in the deployment of 84 TACMAV systems in 2005. Around that time he volunteered as a science advisor and worked at the Rapid Equipping Force during the summer of 2005 where he was exposed to a number of unmanned systems technologies. His initial group composed of about 6 S&T grew to nearly 30 between 2003 and 2010 as he transitioned from a Branch head to an acting Division Chief. In 2010-2012 he again was selected to teach Mathematics at the United States Military Academy West Point. Upon returning to ARL’s Vehicle