Professor in the J Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. Areas of expertise and interest in- clude biomedical and mechanical system design, electromechanical systems, computer-aided engineering analysis, and mathematical modeling of physiological systems. Before joining Texas A&M, worked in in- dustry settings to develop various biomedical technologies, ranging from acute neonatal care to long-term space exploration.Dr. Carlos R. Corleto P.E., Texas A&M University BS, MS, PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University. Experience includes 20 years in industry as a lab director, technical manager and engineering advisor, 8 years of academic experience at
Paper ID #6092Transforming Undergraduate Curriculum for Green Plastics ManufacturingTechnologyDr. Spencer Seung-hyun Kim, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST) Dr. Spencer Kim is an associate professor in Manufacturing, Mechanical Engineering Technology/Packaging Science Department (MMET/PS) at RIT and serves as associate director of American Packaging Corpo- ration Center for Packaging Innovation at RIT. He previously worked in the semiconductor industry. Dr. Kim, as a PI or co-PI, received grants and sponsorships from NSF, SME, SPE, universities, and industries. In 2009, he was nominated for the Eisenhart Award for
Teaching Finite Element Analysis in Undergraduate Technology Curriculum Ali R. Moazed, Richard Roberts, Xiaobin Le, Anthony Duva Session: Tools, techniques, and best practices of engineering education for the digital generationI. AbstractTypically, FEA courses are offered at a graduate level, covering the theoretical basis with littleor no effort to apply this technology to real problems. In some institutions, this course is offeredto seniors, but the content is also mostly theoretical. At Wentworth, we have designed an FEAcourse based on our industrial experience which could be labeled “Applied Finite ElementAnalysis”. This paper describes the methodology followed in the development of this course,along
AC 2008-1393: ENHANCEMENT OF AN ENGINEERING CURRICULUMTHROUGH INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCESPrashanth Jayaraman, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Prashanth Krishna Jayaraman is a graduate student in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. He is currently a Graduate Teaching Assistant in the Department of Engineering Education and helps in teaching the hands on activities of the EngE 1024 course. He is the President of the International Association for the Exchange of Students for Technical Experience at Virginia Tech. He holds a Bachelor's degree in Computer Science and Engineering from Anna University (Chennai, India).Vinod Lohani, Virginia
adhesion to physiological surfaces. In addition, she maintains an active research program in curriculum development with a focus on workforce development. She is also the 2007 recipient of the ASEE Sharon Keillor Award for Women in Engineering Education.Taryn Bayles, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Taryn Bayles is a Professor of the Practice of Chemical Engineering in the Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Department at UMBC, where she incorporates her industrial experience by bringing practical examples and interactive learning to help students understand fundamental engineering principles. Her current research focuses on engineering education, outreach and curriculum
Paper ID #27493Construction Curriculum of the Future: Changes and ChallengesDr. Ihab Mohammad Hamdi Saad P.E., Northern Kentucky University Dr. Ihab Saad is Professor of Construction Management and an alumnus of the University of Kentucky in Lexington where he received his Ph.D. in 1996 from the department of Civil Engineering and Construc- tion. He has over 25 years of experience in the construction industry primarily in the civil/construction project management area. Dr. Saad received his Bachelor of Science and Master’s degrees in Civil En- gineering from Cairo University in his native country Egypt in 1984, and 1993
Paper ID #26771Incorporating Engineering Standards Throughout the Biomedical Engineer-ing CurriculumDr. Sarah Ilkhanipour Rooney, University of Delaware Sarah I. Rooney is an Assistant Professor and Director of the Undergraduate Program in the Biomedical Engineering department at the University of Delaware, where she seeks to bring evidence-based teaching practices to the undergraduate curriculum. She received her B.S.E. (2009) and M.S.E. (2010) in Biomed- ical Engineering from the University of Michigan (Ann Arbor) and her Ph.D. (2015) in Bioengineering from the University of Pennsylvania.Dr. Jeannie S. Stephens-Epps, Terumo
Integrating Ethics Across the Civil Engineering Curriculum Cara J. Poor, PhD, PE, Abigail Chase, and Mehmet Inan, PhD, PE Shiley School of Engineering, University of PortlandIntroductionWith the rapid advancement in technology, it is imperative that students think critically aboutethics, particularly for civil engineers that work on public infrastructure and buildings. Therecent failures with Flint, Michigan lead-contaminated drinking water, the pedestrian bridgecollapse in Florida, VW emissions coverup, and others have highlighted the need for students tounderstand the overall implications of their actions or inaction. The American Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE) and National Academy of
2006-1929: BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT IN THE ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMMichael Bramhall, Sheffield Hallam University Mike is Head of Learning, Teaching and Assessment at Sheffield Hallam University's Faculty of Arts, Computing, Engineering and Sciences. He is also the Associate Director of the UK Centre for Materials Education at Liverpool University. Mike is the Editor of the British Journal of Engineering Education.Steve Lawson, Leeds Metropolitan University Steve Lawson is an Assistant Dean and Head of School for Economics and Human Resource Management, at Leeds Business School, with responsibility for over fifty academic and admin staff. Steve previously worked at Sheffield
three years of the curriculum. Inthe first two classes, typically taken in the second and third years, the goals are to learn the basicdesign tools and manufacturing techniques for building biomedical devices, such as a rotatingcell culture bioreactor. In the process, students learn how to use a variety of tools and equipmentin the student machine shop, including computer aided design software, a 3-D fusion depositionmodeler, laser cutter, mill, lathe, and a variety of hand and power tools.The third design course is taken in the fall of senior year, and it is taught in conjunction with arequired class in control systems. This gives students a chance to apply the theoretical materialthat they are simultaneously learning in control systems. For
concentration within an "Engineering" track that is the same as thefoundation tracks of Electrical and Computer Engineering and MechanicalEngineering but differs in the realization and specialization phases (years 3 and 4) ofthe curriculum. All students will have a minimum grounding in entrepreneurship butwill be able to tailor their programs to secure an in-depth education in the area. In2002, results from offering "Business Basics" to the incoming class will guide ourcurriculum development for the latter years. Ultimately, we anticipate creating adistinctive graduate who will combine the very best learning in engineering with in-depth knowledge of entrepreneurship.Can You Try this at Home?The portability of the curriculum being designed at Olin
Session 1526 Real Chemical Reactions Vertically Integrated Throughout the Curriculum Robert P. Hesketh, Kevin Dahm, Stephanie Farrell, Mariano Savelski and C. Stewart Slater in Chemical Engineering, and Robert Newland in Chemistry Rowan UniversityAbstractAt Rowan we are putting into practice an emphasis on hands-on experiments throughout the cur-riculum. We are attempting to employ an inductive learning style, in which students first con-duct an experiment and visualize relationships; then they learn the related theory; and finallythey design experiments in the engineering clinics.The
curriculum, Rarely did practicing engineers recommend more engineering in the engineering curricula. Rather, most of the engineers emphasized more instruction on client interaction, collaboration, making oral presentations, and writing, as well as the ability to deal with ambiguity and complexity.Taken together, survey and interview data shows the value of broad skills in problem-solving,communication, computing, data analysis, and life-long learning. Even surveys of MEs,specifically, do not reveal any particular technical topics as being of particular significance. Thesesurvey findings are in general agreement with the consensus understanding of major engineeringorganizations.Textbooks and handbooksMarket forces cause handbooks
– particularly engineering students – need a background in innovation processes, as wellas real-world connections and experiences, to help develop their innovation instincts.The College of Engineering (CoE) in collaboration with the Walton College of Business(WCOB) at the University of Arkansas is addressing these needs by developing a scalable,repeatable, applied innovation curriculum through a multi-discipline, multi-college academicinnovation track. Starting as freshmen, engineering students will be partnered with businessstudents to focus on innovation principles and processes, while incorporating classroom contentwith hands-on experiences and internships to focus on new product development. Students fromboth colleges learn why innovation matters
not in land locked states, or are too expensive to implement. We have addresses these issues inour state by remanufacturing and re-sourcing the parts used by SeaPerch , making it more affordable forschools, and by developing a curriculum that promotes STEM by explicitly having learning objectives thathighlight STEM complements such as: functions, variables, arrays, and Booleans, computational thinking,basic circuitry, hydrodynamics to name a few.Study The following is a technical breakdown of the program, as it exists at present. Last year weimplemented our ROV efforts at 10 schools with approximately 300 students. Our efforts included 1.)Purchasing and providing each school the sufficient ROV kits to cover the number of students who
Session 2553 Teaching Design Skills in the Freshman Engineering Curriculum M. Nabil Kallas, Renata Engel, and Dhushy Sathianathan Division of Engineering Design and Graphics The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802 With the mission of introducing engineering early in the undergraduate curriculum, the freshmanengineering course has developed the following goals: (1) Introduce an engineering approach for problem-solving through team projects; (2) Demonstrate the importance of graphical, oral, and written
2006-378: INFUSING THE MATERIALS ENGINEERING CURRICULUM WITHSUSTAINABILITY PRINCIPLESKatherine Chen, California Polytechnic State University KATHERINE C. CHEN is an Associate Professor in the Materials Engineering Department at Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo, CA. She received her bachelor degrees (in Chemistry and Materials Science & Engineering) from Michigan State University, and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. At Cal Poly, she teaches numerous materials engineering courses and labs.Linda Vanasupa, California Polytechnic State University Linda Vanasupa is a professor in the Materials Engineering Department at the California Polytechnic State
mechanics and structural analysis. He received a BS in Civil Engineering from the University of Dayton, a BS in Computer Science from Western Kentucky University, and an MS in Civil Engineering from Cleveland State University. Page 11.1157.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Student Engagement Across the Civil Engineering CurriculumAbstract Engineering students at our university experience a project-based curriculum and workon many community projects during their academic careers. The civil engineering program hasbeen able to engage students from freshmen to seniors in projects that
new criterion, the options, in order of superiority, are Option 2, Option 3, Option 1 andOption 4 equally undesirable. The inclusion of monetary considerations associated with thepotential need for additional faculty has resulted in the emergence of Option 2 as the mostdesirable option.In addition to curriculum development decisions, the method was used to determine the coursecontent in curriculum. The Technology Management Program had a course, named Introductionto Engineering Design that mainly focused on computer aided design (CAD) and computationalanalysis tools. More specifically, the course was developed around sketching theory andconventions as well as the use of a CAD software. After a series of discussions, the decision wasto keep
AC 2007-293: A MODEL CURRICULUM FOR SERVICE SYSTEMSENGINEERINGLeonard Bohmann, Michigan Technological UniversitySheryl Sorby, Michigan Technological UniversityDana Johnson, Michigan Technological UniversityKris Mattila, Michigan Technological UniversityJohn Sutherland, Michigan Technological University Page 12.65.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Model Curriculum for Service Systems EngineeringAbstractOver the past 100 years, the US economy has evolved from one based primarily in the goods-producing sector (agriculture, manufacturing, and mining) to the service sector. Today theservice sector accounts for more
several. The technology beingnew, students are often misled by an incomplete understanding of the subject--understandingBIM as an acronym for 3D design, rather than appreciating BIM as a process of sharing andsimulating information. Teaching BIM as a process versus a single software package is acommon issue that may be effectively addressed through a stepped progression of smallerpackets of information spread in different courses throughout the curriculum, so called ‘verticalintegration.’ Vertical integration of curriculum supports a comprehensive understanding of asubject and the means and methods that form its core. Further, vertical integration of curriculumhelps students retain knowledge from year to year as repeated exposure to a subject
, journals and funded projects. Engineering curricula are crowded, however, and leave little room for new courses. Beginning with the “writing across the curriculum” movement in the 1980’s, the literature reveals that many disciplines have mounted “across the curriculum” movements. These include writing, mathematics, critical thinking, citizenship, ethics and other fields. Given crowded engineering curricula, an “across the curriculum” approach is a logical means to address the need to add entrepreneurial thinking without adding additional courses. Measurement tools are a critical requirement to assess the efficacy or any curriculum intervention. This is especially true when dealing with a new and
Session 2563 Manufacturing Enterprise Company: Integration of curriculum and industry Scott Danielson, Russel Biekert, Alvin Post, Scott Almen, Norbert Richter Arizona State University East / OmniMount Inc.AbstractHistorically, Manufacturing Engineering Technology curricula offer courses on a semester basiswith limited connections between subjects. Individual course requirements restrict studentproblem-solving experiences and students are often unable to synthesize material from differentcourses when solving multifaceted problems. This paper describes the Manufacturing
Session 3549Photogrammetry Instruction in a Civil Engineering Technology Curriculum. Dr William H. Sprinsky Pennsylvania College of TechnologyAbstractAt the Pennsylvania College of Technology, we feel that tools of project design and managementsuch as Geographic Information Systems (GIS) should be taught along with the more usualsubjects in a Civil Engineering Technology curriculum. Such a tool is Photogrammetry, wherethe actual image of the ground, ortho-rectified to remove distortion, due to lens irregularities,film distortion and primarily to displacement of image because of elevation
Session 1232 An Integrated Engineering Curriculum - A Case Study John Palmer, Allen Grum, Marjorie Davis, Helen Grady, Clayton Paul Mercer University School of Engineering Macon, GeorgiaI. IntroductionMercer University was established in 1833 as primarily a liberal arts institution. Currentenrollment in all schools of the university is approximately 6500. The School of Engineeringwas established in the fall of 1985 and currently enrolls 420 undergraduates. The school offers afour-year undergraduate degree of Bachelor of Science in Engineering with specialties inBiomedical
Session 3263 A Successful Masters Curriculum in Quality Engineering Robert G. Batson Department of Industrial Engineering University of AlabamaINTRODUCTIONQuality engineering as a job title in industry existed well before any 4-year degree or mastersprograms were created in U.S. universities. By 1985, there were eight colleges that provided a 4-year degree program in quality1 . However, universities have continued to be reluctant to establishnew 4-year degree programs in specialized areas such as
suggests guidelines for further improvement. Theauthor also tries to provide some guidelines that pertain to assessment data gathering. Finally, theauthor describes how to grade holistically and utilize the same data and results to generate anassessment bar chart that can provide useful information for continuous quality improvement.Introduction Over the past several decades, the computer classroom has slowly evolved andemerged as a standard matrix for interdisciplinary dialogue. Further, it is of notable importancethat this dialogue is not just between the instructor and the learner, but it is also between thelearners themselves. Another interesting observation is that the learners are spread acrossdisciplines and across continents
AC 2011-2611: ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM ANDHVAC SYSTEMS CAPSTONE DESIGNAhmed Cherif Megri, University of Wyoming Dr. Ahmed Cherif Megri, associate professor of architectural engineering at the University of Wyoming (UW), teaches several HVAC and energy courses. Dr. Megri is also teaching a course titled ”Compre- hensive Performance of Building Envelope and HVAC Systems” for Summer School at UW, and ”Smoke and Fire Dynamics” during summer session at Concordia University, Canada. His research areas include airflow modeling, zonal modeling, energy modeling, and artificial intelligence modeling using the support vector machine learning approach. Prior to his actual position at UW, he was an assistant
Technology-Enabled Content in Engineering Science Curriculum Eugene Rutz, Virginia Elkins, Joyce Pittman, Max Rabiee, and Richard Miller University of CincinnatiAbstractEngineering technology technical courses often have both lecture and accompanying laboratorysessions. The laboratory assignments reinforce the understanding of the topics studied during thelecture sessions. A planning grant was awarded from the National Science Foundation throughtheir Bridges for Engineering Education Program to develop technology-enabled content inengineering science courses. Content was developed to appeal to a variety of learning styles andto support student-centered learning. This paper will describe the
Session ____ Incorporating Biotechnology in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum Nada M. Assaf-Anid and Helen C. Hollein Chemical Engineering Department Manhattan College, Riverdale, NY 10471Abstract: The projected growth of the biotechnology industry in the coming decades warrantschanges in traditional chemical engineering curricula. To meet this new challenge, ManhattanCollege has implemented curriculum changes that aim at preparing graduates to meet thedemands of the food and pharmaceutical industry with a basic knowledge of biology andbiochemistry for