are "creative thinking" and “effective communication”. Some samplesof student work are presented, and the outcomes are discussed. This course proved to be verysuccessful in attracting all students (male and female) in both engineering and non-engineeringmajors.IntroductionIn recent years, there has been a growing interest in bridging the gap between science and art.Several organizations have emerged with the aim of promoting the integration of art and science,including Art & Science Collaborations, Inc. (ASCI), International Society of the Arts,Mathematics, and Architecture (ISAMA), and International Society for the Arts, Sciences, andTechnology (ISAST). Academia has also seen an increase in efforts to engage students in coursematerials
serves as an editorial advisory board member of Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, an editorial board editor of Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, an associate editor for the IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine (an international peer-reviewed journal), a handling editor for the Transportation Research Record and is a member of the Transportation Research Board’s Committee on Traffic Flow Theory and Characteristics (AHB 45), where he serves as a paper review coordinator. He has been recognized with multiple awards for his research and teach- ing activities, including the Dwight D. Eisenhower Transportation Fellowship, Gordon F. Newell Award for Excellence in Transportation
value [2]. However, while educatorscommend active learning, their teaching philosophies are still passive in a traditional writtenformat. There is considerable literature on writing a teaching philosophy; nevertheless, there arelimited attempts to develop a visual representation using emerging technologies [1]-[3]. Thisresearch hypothesizes that creating and sharing a visual teaching and assessment philosophy 1empower student success and foster an inclusive learning environment for everyone to learn andscore an “A.”Teaching Philosophy Literature1-What is a Teaching Philosophy?A teaching philosophy is a narrative that uncovers the instructor’s beliefs and valuesabout teaching and learning, often
Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: Effectiveness of Online Web-Native Content vs. Traditional TextbooksAbstractThe sudden eruption of a global pandemic has conveyed enormous changes to college campuses.Universities had to switch suddenly to virtual learning and this shift appears to be here awhile.While different disciplines vary in their degree of ease in adapting quickly to a new mode ofteaching, faculty have to be innovative in using available technology to successfully switch toremote teaching, while keeping or increasing even further the efficiency of conveying the contentof their courses.Faculty at Florida Gulf Coast University teaching “Computational Tools for Engineers,” quicklyadapted to using an online textbook during the fall of
stakeholders in the community of interest and traditionalresearchers offers several benefits [2]. For example, the research can be enhanced by engagingthose invested in the community from the beginning of the research process as well asthroughout. Including these partners allows for important aspects of the research, such as thestudy methods, to be developed with applicability to the community of interest in mind.Similarly, each partner brings their own perspectives and experience to the project, and therefore,can bring their own set of research questions and methods to be considered during the researchdesign. Additionally, the participation of all partners can help refine the techniques used andyield information that is the most useful for the
methods and tools for engineering projects and organizations. Dr. Smith-Colin received her Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, where she simultaneously earned a Certificate in Higher Education Teaching and Learning. Her engineering educa- tion research interests include the formation of engineering identity in underrepresented girls and women, social threats to this identity, and the development of professional skills and systems thinking amongst civil engineers. Dr. Smith-Colin was a 2019 American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE) ExCEED Teaching Fellow.Dr. Jeanna Wieselmann, Southern Methodist University Dr. Jeanna R. Wieselmann is a Research Assistant Professor at
project. In so doing, not only do the students gain awareness of tools professionals use, they also broaden their own understanding of the scope of an actual engineering and construction project.IV.iv.1. Best Practices: Spring 2017After four years of implementing vertical integration activities, a few best practices emerge: • Align projects; Project scopes and components must overlap such that upper- and lower-division students understand the usefulness of their own expertise and the usefulness of the expertise of the students in the other course. • Reward utilization: Students, especially lower division students, need incentives to provide information to, and utilize information from, another
and Society” isused as a general introduction to the college of engineering, while also addressing socialchallenges and the values of problem solving from a multidisciplinary approach, by using thehuman centered design process. A team project based course, students are presented andencouraged to explore prototyping skills such as solid modeling, basic programming skills,electronics, sensors, data acquisition, power tools, and 3D printing [3]. It was clear that whatever an introductory engineering program’s structure, its success andoverall impact was dependent on the successful integration of multidisciplinary information andprinciples. This is for the intended purposes of providing first year students with the knowledgeto make an informed
changing in recent times. On one hand there is the tendency to present to students situations where they will bechallenged by having to deal with a topic or application that is not usually understood as directlink to their classwork. On the other hand, there is the tendency to have more project sponsorsfrom outside the academic environment. Both tendencies have been created with the intention ofpresent real life situations to the students, and there have been growing pains, but such practicesare gaining acceptance6.The EDT program. The project was the capstone project for two students in the EngineeringDesign Technology (EDT) program. Senior design projects are a two-semester sequence wherestudents bid on projects proposed by faculty members, and
molecular diagnostics, polymer science and engineering, along with advanced manufacturing technologies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Flipped Laboratories in Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringAbstractImportant learning objectives for experiential, or hands-on, courses include (1) development ofskills pertaining to statistical experimental design and analysis of data, (2) utilization of standardoperating procedures (SOPs), and (3) understanding and employment of laboratory safetyprocedures. As the complexity of laboratory equipment increases, so does the length of writtenSOPs and safety considerations. Furthermore, students are often asked to follow these writtenstandardized documents
minor in Biomedical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and she received her Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the California Institute of Technology. Prior to joining Illinois, Dr. Imoukhuede completed a postdoctoral fellowship in Biomedical Engineering at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. Her research interests are at the interface of Systems Biology and Angiogenesis with applications to Breast Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease.Jennifer G. Cromley, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 The Intersecting Identities of Women in EngineeringIntroductionThe inequities that plague our society are
students’ writing and givingthem the opportunity to revise and resubmit will improve their writing performance [20].In one study on improving technical writing, Suraishkumar, introduced a structured approachthat faculty could use to improve students’ technical writing skills. This approach emphasizesthat students need to: (1) have the requisite knowledge or information to start writing; (2) askthemselves some leading questions such as, what is the main idea that I need to communicate?(3) write down the points they want to cover; (4) order the information in a logical manner; (5)link sentences and paragraphs using tools such as transition words. They assessed theeffectiveness of giving this instructional approach to students and observed
participating in the panel will have abetter idea of the various pathways and checkpoints necessary to achieve their goals. They willthen be able to make their own informed decisions as they attend to their careers.Bibliography1. ASEE Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges, 2003 Edition. http://www.asee.org/about/publications/profiles/index.cfm.2. Women's Science: Learning and Succeeding from the Margins, Eisenhart, M.A. and Finkel, E. The University of Chicago Press, 1998.3. The Woman Scientist: Meeting the Challenges for a Successful Career, Yentsch, C.M. and Sindermann, C.J. Plenum Press, 1992.4. "Breaking into the Guild Masters Club: What We Know about Women Department Chairs at AAU
engineeringexperience comprising field-specific information sessions, panel discussions, team andleadership building, hands-on activities, all focusing on a complex, multi-disciplinary project.The CURIE 2000 project was a water quality management problem that highlighted technical,social, political, and economic aspects of “real life” engineering. The project was created anddelivered by a graduate student in Civil and Environmental Engineering, with support from fiveundergraduate Program Assistants who facilitated the group interactions and provided socialmentoring for the girls. The challenges and rewards of such an ambitious project were plentiful.The CURIE experience not only increased the girls’ awareness of the opportunities and technicalchallenges in
Page 6.417.1 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationdesign across all four years, was an extremely critical component to create practice-readygraduates. Pressure from the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) andthe state of Arizona’s articulation policies, although minor factors, complemented this belief andinspired innovation. Essential components in enabling the innovation in engineering educationto begin included faculty buy-in and ownership, tolerance and/or support from administrators,identification of key leaders, garnering support for counting involvement toward
Learning (INSPIRE) at Purdue University. Dr. Cardella earned a B.Sc. in Mathematics from the University of Puget Sound and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering at the University of Washington. At the University of Washington she worked with the Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT) and the LIFE Center (Learning in Informal and Formal Environments). She was a CASEE Postdoctoral Engineering Education Researcher at the Center for Design Research at Stanford before beginning her appointment at Purdue. Her research interests include: learning in informal and out-of-school time settings, pre-college engineering education, design thinking, mathematical thinking, and assessment research. Dr. Cardella is
learning style preference with a great deal of variability in those scales.Student Survey Results and Focus Group DiscussionsThough midterm surveys, students indicated how they thought the instructor could help studentlearning. These responses provided insight into student learning styles. Two themes emergedfrom the student responses. One theme was that “real world examples,” “more hands on stuff,”and “more practical stuff” would enhance their learning. The second emerging theme was thatthe students thought more examples, as indicated by responses such as: ". . . more examples . ..," and ". . . do more problems/examples," would help learning. These responses seemed toindicate that the students preferred to perceive new information by sensing.Focus
education foryears. Particularly in its global program, junior students go abroad to complete intensivetwo-month academic projects (so called IQP: Interactive Qualifying Project) atinternational locations. They work in small, multidisciplinary teams with local agenciesand organizations to address open-ended problems that relate technology and science tosocial issues and human needs [3,4,5]. In recent years, it has been extended to seniorprojects (so called MQP: Major Qualifying Project), providing students the opportunityto deal with technical disciplinary problem and solutions in a global background.In the China Project Center of WPI, it has been explored to integrate the three dimensionaleducation components into a comprehensive project practice
manufacturing engineering and especially on reconfigurablemanufacturing.The internet is making a strong presence in every aspect of human life and is no longer used forthe sole purpose of research and games. Now, the internet is also being used as a teaching toolwhere a variety of information is within the reach of a mouse click. Utilizing the advancementsin technology, the PMSP is currently developing internet-based interactive tutorials that will playan important role in classroom as well as after school activities. In addition, being an excellentresource for learning about manufacturing engineering, the internet based tutorials will engagestudents with their animation and interactive capabilities. They are also essential for distancelearning
Session 2609 Exploring an Electronic Polling System for the Assessment of Student Progress in two Biomedical Engineering Courses Robert J. Roselli, Sean P. Brophy Department of Biomedical Engineering / The Learning Technology Center Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN 37235AbstractMonitoring students' understanding as part of course lectures has the potential to increase studentengagement, facilitate modification of instruction so it targets learners’ needs, and increasestudents’ overall learning of the course materials. Classroom Communications Systems (CCS)provide
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and international expertise in early childhood policy and research methods. Her current research focuses on developmental engineering, early education antecedents of engineering thinking, developmental factors in engineering pedagogy, technological literacy and human-artifact inter- actions. She is a member of Sigma Xi Science Honor Society and in 2009 he was awarded the prestigious NSF CAREER Award.Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has de- grees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of
with the actual equipment needed for digital signal processor(DSP)-based controller implementation, andd. allow students to demonstrate their implemented controllers on both educational and industrialhardware. Page 4.430.2II. Laboratory Equipment: Hardware and Software The key requirement driving the laboratory setup to service the various courses that willbenefit from this lab (see below) is to have an open, integrated controller development platformthat allows plant modeling, analysis, control design, system simulation, controller implementationand control verification. Such a platform has emerged only recently because of the
students with disabilities the least confident.Qualitative resultsAggregate themes emerged for each open-ended item. Overall, students recognized departmentalefforts to create equitable and inclusive environments, including sharing resources andpromoting events featuring speakers from minoritized identities; events hosted by studentorganizations serving those with minoritized identities; and research, professional networking,and other technology-related opportunities.However, students also reflected on the need for more proactive approaches to creating andfostering inclusive computing environments within their department (e.g., curriculaconsiderations, addressing the underrepresentation of gender and ethnoracial identities, andconsistent provision
college. Faculty play a key role in cultivating cultures ofinclusion in STEM, and must be provided with information, resources, and technological tools thatadvance equity and inclusion from a student-centered perspective. The aims of the series are toprovide faculty with nine 3-hour sessions that explore access, diversity, equity, and inclusion (yearone,) and classroom observations, and workshop co-facilitation (year two). This WIP is focusedon a research question that investigates the impact of year one. Faculty that completed the firstyear of the professional development series were invited to participate in a 90-minute qualitativeinterview focused on answering the following research question, “What is the impact ofparticipation in the
://peer.asee.org/revealing-the-invisible-conversations-about-isms-and-power-relation s-in-engineering-courses.[18] B. Momo, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, J. A. Mejia, and S. M. Lord, “Broadening the engineering canon: How Culturally Responsive Pedagogies can help educate the engineers of the future,” Murmurations Emerg. Equity Educ, vol. 2, pp. 6–21, 2020.[19] B. Khan, C. Robbins, and A. Okrent, The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2020. National Science Foundation, 2020.[20] J. Miller, Engineering Manhood: Race and the Antebellum Virginia Military Institute. Lever Press, 2020.[21] S. Hacker, Pleasure, Power and Technology: Some Tales of Gender, Engineering, and the Cooperative Workplace. Routledge, 2017.[22
Cincinnati. Whitney also works with the Emerging Ethnic Engineers (E3) Program. She teaches Calculus 1 during the Summer Bridge program and instructs Cooperative Calculus 1 during the school year. Continuing with her commitment to community involvement, Whitney has previously served on the Na- tional Executive Board for the National Society of Black Engineers, a student-managed organization with more than 30,000 members. She served as the Planning Chairperson for the 2013 Annual Convention and is currently an advisor for the Great Lakes Region. Dr. Gaskins the President of the Sigma Omega graduate chapter of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc. She is also a member of the Society of Women Engineers, the Women’s Alliance
and recruit Qataris toward STEM-related education and careers.The need is great: Some industry leaders estimate that Qatar’s national demand for citizens intechnical professions is more than double the available workforce — Qatar’s national populationis estimated at approximately 300,000 citizens.1 This demand does not account for rapidlyemerging needs in defense and national security as Qatar invests in high-tech defense systemsand weapons; government ministries are actively recruiting Qatari engineers and scientists tosupport deployment, maintenance and oversight of these technologies. As a result, there has beena need to introduce Qatari youth to new notions of the diverse range of engineering disciplinesand to highlight their significance
,” Theory into Practice, vol 52, pp 9-21, 2013, doi: 10.1080/00405841.2013.795437.2 E. Mechlova and M. Malcik, “ICT Changes in Learning Theories,” 10th IEEE International Confer- ence on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications, Slovakia, Nov. 8-9, pp. 253-262, 2012.3 F. K. Fink, “Integration of engineering practice into curriculum-25 years of experience with problem based learning,” FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011, pp. 11A2/7-11A212 vol.1, 1999, doi: 10.1109/FIE.1999.839084.4 J.C. Perrenet, P.A.J. Bouhuijs, and J.G.M.M. Smits, “The Suitability of Problem-based
expected from similarservice learning projects in other engineering courses.IntroductionThe societal context of engineering has been gaining a lot of interest in engineering educationforums in the US and around the world. Pascail1 contended that engineers must work and thinktechnical and human problems through together, without separating these two spheres.Ravesteijn et al.2 emphasized the engineers must acquire the ability to understanding socialdynamics of technology and to communicate facts, values and emotions on different levels.Santander Gana and Trejo Fuentes3 viewed technology as a human practice and a social activitythat develops as a result of various intrinsically-woven socio-cultural circumstances. EngineersAustralia4 and many new
manufacturing the designed part but often to a limited numberof students because of a low equipment to student ratio. In addition, the complexity of operatinga Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine and the time needed to develop the skills tooperate the machine is prohibitive in a single semester course. However, the advent of additivemanufacturing systems such as 3D printers have changed the landscape of Computer AidedDesign and Manufacturing.3D printing is a revolutionary emerging technology that has profound geopolitical, economic,social, demographic, environmental, and security implications 5. 3D printing, or fusion depositionmodeling (FDM), can be considered as disruptive technology. As opposed to subtractivemanufacturing, where material is cut