of light byreflection and Brewster’s law5. When a polarized beam propagates through a transparent plasticof thickness t, where X and Y are the directions of principal strains at the point underconsideration, the light vector splits and two polarized beams are propagated in planes X and Y.If the strain intensity along X and Y is ε1 and ε2, Brewster established that the relative change inindex of refraction is proportional to the difference of principal strains or: (n x − n y ) = K (ε 1 − ε 2 ) (1)Where n is the index of refraction. The constant K is called the strain-optical coefficient andcharacterizes a physical property of the material. It is a dimensionless constant usuallyestablished by calibration and may be considered
most utilized for cheating [9]. Because of the ubiquity of wireless networks, modern cellphones providefunctionality beyond simple Short Messaging Services (SMS), through many social apps. There are various methods of academic cheating, including techniques inside and outside the classroom. The use ofpaper-mill websites (sites in which anonymous authors can be paid to produce academic papers) was found to haveincreased 200% from 1997 to 1998 [10]. Students have also been found using their cellphones to communicate withone another during proctored exams (sometimes by sending images) and to listen to recorded notes in their headphones,in addition to using their calculators to store formulas, among numerous other clever strategies [11]. In a
institution had the financialmeans to create, build and sustain an engineering program. These studies revealed both the needand the necessary resources to develop an engineering program. The next step was the hiring ofa Dean of Engineering to develop the curriculum plans, seek approval from the regional accredit-ing body (SACS) by way of a substantive change, and securing approval through the university’scurriculum committee, recruit students, and hire faculty to deliver the courses.Adding engineering is not free of impact on other disciplines. Additional students are recruited tothe university and they need to take specific math and science courses, as well as take courses tosatisfy the general education core. This potentially requires additional
her two years in that role, she was successful in raising significant public and private funds, including a $5 million grant from Google to develop a data hub highlighting the unique needs and challenges of Black women in STEM, the largest ever grant of this kind from Google, and a $4.2 million Racial Equity in STEM Education grant from the National Science Foundation focused on the undergraduate of experiences of Black women in STEM. Prior to her work at Spelman, she served as Associate Director of School and Community Engagement at the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC) at Georgia Tech, where she led K-12 school and district partnerships. Dr. Pearson holds a Bachelor of
needed to besuccessful engineers.Outcomes for Objective D: Students will be introduced to the following issues through theirundergraduate education in this department and will gain:D-1 an ability to work in teams to solve multi-faceted problemsD-2 an ability to understand and contribute to the challenges of a rapidly changing societyD-3 an understanding of ethical and societal responsibilities of professional engineersD-4 an understanding of the need for lifelong learning and continuing professional educationThe department educational objectives also relates to ABET's Criterion 3 a-k “Program Outcomeand Assessment"1. The relationships are summarized in Table 1.Outcomes Assessment ProcessThe program outcomes are mainly achieved through the
representation to the leaky pipeline andthat with time representation would improve. 13Despite faculty struggling to connect with the concept of STEM identity, many citated ways in whichthey promoted student STEM identity outside the classroom, be it in their research labs, throughservice experiences with K-12 students, through individual mentoring which nearly all participantsspoke of with great pride as making a difference for the few women persisting through an engineeringundergraduate major, and through advising their local chapter of the Society of Women Engineers.Faculty also reported encouraging students to attend office hours, form peer study
longer belong to the class or are connected to theirclassmates. As a result, class attendance also dropped to unpreceded levels.Active learning is defined as in-class work by students that goes beyond simply listening to theinstructor and taking notes [6]. Students can be involved in tasks as simple as answering a simplequestion to more involved exercises that require the students to reflect on their learning and thepresented contents [7]. Varying content delivery method, which includes using active learningexercises, every 10–15 minutes of the lecture time was suggested to retain students' attention [8].In traditional classrooms, active learning was proven to increase student learning, problem-solvingskills, engagement, and interest in the
to explore alternative expressions in order to understandgender dynamics. Wright 12 proposes to create a tolerant environment towards differentsexualities. Wright 12 and Chan 11 show how exclusion based on sexuality occurs for both menand women and suggest looking at a research problem that moves beyond the discrimination ofwomen. Smith 17 proposes that addressing gender and feminizing the environment may helpeliminate hegemonic masculinities through values such as care and patience.These two research approaches—one which suggests changing work conditions and the otherthat suggests changing the culture—are different. The first argues that the construction cultureexcludes based on sex while the second argues that exclusion occurs based on
systems design and fabrication experiencenot readily available through the usual academic curriculum. S3FL’s approach is to enhancespace systems engineering education by coupling classroom knowledge with practicumexperience involving real engineering design, analysis, test, fabrication, integration, andoperation of actual flight vehicles and payloads. Through a continuous learning process and byadapting to new challenges, S3FL has sustained itself despite the difficulties of accommodatingan increasing number of student members. S3FL has also been able to maintain effective projectleadership and technical expertise despite student turnover as well as to secure external support.The paper discusses the methods and strategies adopted by S3FL to
graduating [6]. Students can meet therequirement through terms abroad, international internships, international design projects, mini-terms abroad, or other experiences. According to their website, 69% of their 2007 engineeringgraduates had at least one international experience that involved travel while the remainingstudents satisfied the requirement in a manner not involving travel. It is clear from the way therequirement is presented that the college’s intent is to ensure that all students eventually meet therequirement in a manner involving travel to a foreign county.Other engineering schools are currently placing a strong emphasis on international programs andstudy abroad opportunities. Virginia Tech for example, has established an
SNA studies is the problem of reference ambiguity – references to an entity (areal-world individual) varying from the entity’s identity (the real-world individual’s correctname). Eliminating reference ambiguity is traditionally completed through entity resolution (ER)[13]. However, we are not aware of any studies in engineering education which have applied ERto raw interaction data. Rather, our literature searches show prior studies avoid referenceambiguity by focusing on simplified social environments, like single classrooms or onlinedomains, where researchers can consistently collect accurate interaction data [14]–[16]. While these small-scale studies provide valuable insights on engineering students’networks, they neglect a
2014 ASEE Zone IV CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGSStudent Success Developing Diverse Engineers for a Changing World through Engineeringis Our Success Pedagogy April 24 – 26, 2014 │ Long Beach, & Practice CaliforniaASEE Zone IV: Pacific Northwest, Pacific Southwest, and Rocky Mountain Organization website: www.asee.org Conference website: www.csulb.edu/coe/2014-asee-zoneiv Host Institution website: www.csulb.edu/coe Editors Lily Gossage (California State Polytechnic University
, owner, architect,construction manager and contractor, to provide the best overall experience for thestudent. The site experience extends beyond construction. It can teach the student theroles of the owner, architect, construction manager and contractor in a real environmentand with real challenges.Bibliography1. Boyer, Ernest L. and Mitgang, Lee D., Building Community: A New Future for Architecture Education andPractice, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 19962. Ching, Francis D. K., Building Construction Illustrated, van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York,19963. Ching, Francis D. K., Architecture: Form, Space and Order, van Nostrand Reinhold Company, NewYork, 19984. Keane, Mark and Keane, Linda, Architecture: An
Advising:Prescriptive academic advising generally focuses on courses to take, the meeting ofprerequisites, staying on track, etc. It is normally a stiff, formal process that is definitelyessential but may miss the mark in addressing the needs of many a student.Developmental advising is a different way to consider and render advisement. Based on theauthors’ observations, every day faulty members impart knowledge in the classroom tostudents and try to teach them how to think through the critical elements of a problem anddiscern the appropriate material/formulas to utilize in order come to the best solution for agiven situation. In essence, these faculty members are helping students learn by layering thecurricula in such a way that the student’s knowledge base
increasing the understanding of engineering and technology among K-12, undergraduates who were not engineering or technology majors, and the citizenry. Thesecomprised K-12 STEM initiatives, success stories from faculty who established generaleducation courses and other initiatives on engineering and technology topics for non-engineeringstudents at their respective institutions, and reports developed in conjunction with nationalbodies and associations through study and focus groups with the over-arching objective being topresent the need for technological and engineering literacy as a positive and beneficial initiative.The hoped-for outcome was that those who experienced this initiative, regardless of its context,would be enjoined as advocates for
anthropology of science and engineering mentioned earlier. But our goals go beyond description. Our larger aspiration is that the collection and publication of such materials can aid in a critical enterprise—one through which conventions and norms are deliberately and continually subject to challenge and refinement. In both cases—as description and as critical enterprise—the international supplement is intended to support pedagogic goals of breadth, balance, and the consideration of foreign perspectives in developing courses, syllabi, and instructional materials. In thinking about ethics, many non-‐specialists will select from a variety of collections
factor of .707.” The most common incorrectresponse, given by between 42% and 56% of students, was that the amplitude of the voltagewould be unchanged. Once again, most of these responses did not contain explicit justificationsfor why the amplitude would remain at 2 V. The few justifications provided were quite varied;for example, one student who incorrectly used the 3dB frequency argued, “The cutoff frequencyfor this filter is 1/2π(10 k)(16 n) = 994.7. Since the input voltage has frequency 1 kHz, the signalwill get through.”A total of four students (approximately 5%) correctly indicated a +45° phase shift of the outputsignal with respect to the input signal, all of whom supported their answer with mathematicalcalculations. For example, one
paper, the following research questions were addressed: 1. What role do flexible employer policies have in retaining members of the group in the engineering workforce? 2. What experiences with bias did group members report? 3. How can work-life balance be enhanced for engineers who are also mothers?Furthermore, as the survey itself was conducted through a Facebook social networking group,some understanding of the importance of social networking can be evaluated to determine how itis valuable to the members of the group.MethodsThis document is a review of existing data and research done by others. Its purpose is to providea summary of the current understanding of the use of social media to support the retention ofengineers in the
importance of grounding ethics instruction in the livedexperiences of engineering professionals. Studies using Critical Incident Technique(CIT) have illuminated the role of organizational culture, stakeholder engagement, andmoral conflict in shaping ethical perspectives (Hess, Strobel, & Brightman, 2017). Thesefindings suggest that effective ethics education should go beyond theory to engagedirectly with the practical and relational dimensions of engineering work (Huff & Frey,2005).In response, this study investigates how doctoral students at the Thayer School ofEngineering conceptualize ethics and apply ethical reasoning in both academic andprofessional contexts. Employing a mixed-methods approach—through surveys andinterviews—this research
instructor’s (or thestudent’s!) imagination. We highlight three applications as case studies of video analysis within ourlaboratory program. These case studies include a vertical loop in a popular roller coaster, a HMMWV(High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle) frontal crash test, and two charged hanging pith balls inelectrostatic equilibrium. We summarize instructor and student survey data in an attempt to address theefficacy of video analysis as observed through the execution of these three case studies.Introduction The United States Military Academy Department of Physics teaches calculus-based NewtonianMechanics to over 900 third-class cadets (cadets in their second year of study) each fall and teachescalculus-based Electricity and Magnetism
instructor’s (or thestudent’s!) imagination. We highlight three applications as case studies of video analysis within ourlaboratory program. These case studies include a vertical loop in a popular roller coaster, a HMMWV(High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle) frontal crash test, and two charged hanging pith balls inelectrostatic equilibrium. We summarize instructor and student survey data in an attempt to address theefficacy of video analysis as observed through the execution of these three case studies.Introduction The United States Military Academy Department of Physics teaches calculus-based NewtonianMechanics to over 900 third-class cadets (cadets in their second year of study) each fall and teachescalculus-based Electricity and Magnetism
andeasily implemented activity so as to facilitate adoption by other faculty. Results showmeasurable increases in first year engineering students’ ability to understand the impactof engineering solutions in a global and societal context. It is vital that the education oftoday’s engineers expand beyond mere technical competence to include the criticalthinking abilities more broadly associated with technological leaders and technologicallyliterate citizens. Considerable work has been done to develop the concepts ofengineering and technological literacy as appropriate for the education of all students. Atthe same time less attention has been given to examining if individuals trained asengineers actually possess a broad understanding of technology and
construction sector has also shared in these employment gains. Youngarchitects and engineers are moving easily into entry-level jobs. More seasoned professionalswith two to five years of experience are in greater demand.14 At every level, architects andengineers in search of opportunity are blessed with positive choices rather than the mere survivaloptions of just a few years ago. Many firms are more focused in their search for people withexcellent client repoire and good communication skills, and are taking more care with theinterviewing process. Faculty with first hand knowledge of these trends can advise theirstudents of how to search for a career opportunity as opposed to just looking for a job. They canalso help their students through the
engineeringeducators. In the past, our role in lifelong learning was primarily offering courses and degreeprograms for practicing engineers through continuing education and on our campuses. NowEC2000 demands that we prepare engineering students to engage in lifelong learning. Whilethis demand on faculty and curricula to prepare students for lifelong learning is new, thesignificance attached to lifelong learning, and in particular continuing education, within theengineering profession is not.Lifelong learning in engineering has been recognized as critical for decades. The Final Report ofthe Goals Committee on Engineering Education, written in 1968, contained a discussion of theimportance of lifelong learning [1]. In 1978 the theme of the ASEE Annual Conference
, “Student Motivations and Barrierstoward Online and In-Person Office Hours in STEM Courses,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 21, no.4, p. ar68, 2022, doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-03-0048.[5] L. Granger, W. Parker, and L. Bottomley, “Work-in-Progress: Introduction of aComputational TA Role to Support Undergraduate Training in Computational ThinkingStrategies for Chemical Engineering Applications,” 2024 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Proc., 2024,doi: 10.18260/1-2--48547.[6] S. Wdowik and K. Michael, “International offshore students’ perceptions of virtual officehours,” Campus-Wide Inf. Syst., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 212–221, 2013, doi:10.1108/10650741311330393.[7] Y. Gao, K. Ilves, and D. Głowacka, “OfficeHours: A System for Student SupervisorMatching through Reinforcement
engineering pedagogy, technological literacy, and human- artifact interactions.Prof. P. Suresh C. Rao, Purdue University, West Lafayette Suresh Rao is the Rieth Distinguished Professor of ecological engineering in the School of Civil En- gineering at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue 13 years ago, Rao was on the faculty for 25 years at the University of Florida. His research and educational interest span a broad spectrum of trans-disciplinary themes at the intersection of how human societies alter natural landscapes, and how multitude of ecological adverse impacts cascade through complex coupled systems. He teaches multiple courses with emphasis on application of sustainability and resilience concepts to better
its applications towards K-12 and college-age students’ experiences in organized sports and physical activity, as well as belonging in college-aged students.Dr. Brian Scott Robinson, University of Louisville Brian Robinson is an Associate Professor with the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the University of Louisville. His primary research focus is in Engineering Education, with highest interest in first-year (and beyond) engineering retention & the effects of value-expectancy theory on student persistence.Dr. Thomas Tretter, University of Louisville Thomas Tretter is professor of science education and director of the Center for Research in Mathematics & Science Teacher Development (CRIMSTED) at
-ended survey questions, students appreciate that theprogram exists, but may not have felt a need to connect with their mentor during the firstsemester. More data are needed to determine the long-term benefits of the program, but initialindications suggest this program is beneficial and will continue beyond the current academicyear.1. Introduction and BackgroundThis work in progress describes a new peer mentor program for first-year mechanicalengineering students at the University of Utah. The Department of Mechanical Engineering is thesecond largest department within the College of Engineering, with about 900 undergraduatestudents declared in the major. The peer mentor program was initiated to address the highattrition rate in the major, which
percentage of Project Summaries that addressedcategory 1. Increase public scientific literacy AND category 2. Increase public engagement w/S&E were 32%.Quantitative FindingsFindings from the Project Summaries examined revealed that 37 percent of Principal Investigatorswere proposing to increase scientific literacy (category 1) through alternative avenues, whichincluded workshops, K-12 course material, open source material, practitioner magazines orintended to add new material to their curriculum on a subject not traditionally taught at theirrespective institutions, to name a few. While all examined Project Summaries stated that theywould disseminate their work via journal publications and conference proceedings, the majority,63 percent, only
contributions and being acknowledged on a broader scale within and beyond theiracademic communities.Identity (Re)-construction and Shifts in MindsetBoth sites’ students discussed the processes of identity reconstruction and shifts in their mindsetspursuing interdisciplinary work and research. Particularly, they emphasized how their personaland professional identities have evolved and re-shaped through exposure to other fields. Studentshave shared how they have adopted a new lens, mindset, or set of values. For example, at theU.S. site, Emily explained: [Interdisciplinary education] involves [a shift of] mindset to listen to other disciplines’ research. it’s not important about the level of understanding... but it is more to work with other