a rare opportunity for these students toperform undergraduate research. The research theme for this program is energy: specifically,catalysis, energy storage, and biofuels due to the pronounced expertise in these areas at LSU. Amajor strength of this REU program is the partnership with the LSU Business & TechnologyCenter which provides the REU students with training in technology transfer fundamentals andhow to pitch scientific ideas to non-scientists. In addition to the entrepreneurship training, theprogram offers weekly seminars in ethics, effective presenting, applying to graduate school,industrial safety, and topical seminars related to three main research areas of the programs. Thestudents were assessed individually (weekly reports
Paper ID #21409Integration of Global Competencies in the Engineering CurriculumMr. Eugene Rutz, University of Cincinnati Eugene Rutz is Academic Director in the College of Engineering & Applied Science at the University of Cincinnati. Responsibilities include oversight of eLearning initiatives, working with high schools on engineering coursework, and academic oversight of the Master of Engineering program. Eugene serves as co-PI on an NSF sponsored Math and Science partnership grant and PI on other grants that examine the intersection of instructional technology and learning. Eugene also teaches professional skills
. - ensures whether the model will stand up to the test of real environment. - provides freedom to experiment with more than one variable. - provides best design configuration (shape, size and topology).(4) Rapid PrototypingRapid Prototyping (RP) is a new technology that is a part of the new methodology of integratedproduct development. RP takes information from the 3D CAD database and manufactures solidmodel (prototypes) of the design. One can turn a design concept into a prototype, test it for fitand forms, and even simulate product performance without excessive cost and time of traditionalprototyping. The advantages of RP are the following6: -provides form, fit and functionality requirement. - clear visualization of the
interest in social issues. Page 23.391.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Developing an instrument to assess student’s prior knowledge, and possible interest in public policy courses.IntroductionAwareness and understanding of the public policy process and analysis have emerged as keythemes of undergraduate engineering education. Undergraduate engineering students need toknow this process and analysis to support the current and future regulation of technology.1–3Identification of students’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards public policy is needed
are variously engaged in technical and commercialleadership and possess effective interpersonal skills”13 (Engineering Council, 2011).In addition, the competence and commitment standard defines over 16 characteristics under fivemajor categories including: A. Using a combination of general and specialist engineering knowledge and understanding to optimize the application of existing and emerging technology; Page 23.457.5 B. Applying appropriate theoretical and practical methods to the analysis and solution of engineering problems; C. Providing technical and commercial leadership; D. Demonstrating effective interpersonal
, coding, testing and documentation.The problem-solving facet of the course focused on data analysis and numerical methods.This introductory course has evolved along with the evolving computing environment.As the C language gained in popularity, the language of instruction was changed fromFORTRAN to C; the problem solving focus of the course, however, remained. Since theorigin of the course nearly thirty years ago, the emergence of a plethora of applicationprograms, e.g., P-Spice, MATLAB / SimuLink, Excel, ETAP, SKM Analysis PowerTools and others, has reduced the need for Electrical Engineering Technology Students todesign and implement such application specific computer codes. Their need is to usethese tools to solve engineering problems. The
Page 10.623.2* Award# 0139336 Engineering Graduate Fellows and Master Teachers for Grades 4-5Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright©2005, American Society for Engineering Educationfive seminars (listed in Table 1) were developed to: (1) help broaden teachers’ contentknowledge in science, engineering and mathematics; (2) provide graduate fellows with anoverview of teaching pedagogy and management strategies for 4th and 5th gradeclassrooms; (3) provide an opportunity for graduate fellows and teachers to interact andexchange ideas as experts in their fields, and; (4) provide a forum to discuss howreflective practice should inform education theory
communications technology advances. Thus, the useful lifetime of the TIMSequipment is substantially longer than many other platforms. Figure 1: Photograph of the basic TIMS unit.Each TIMS unit is supplemented with a multichannel digital oscilloscope, an arbitrary waveformsignal generator and a spectrum analyzer. All of the test and measurement equipment isconnected to a PC that enables real time screen captures and electronic laboratory notebook andreport preparation. The TIMS unit also provides a software interface with MATLAB so that datamaybe captured and further processed.Study DesignIn the course of designing the TIMS based Integrated Signals and Systems Laboratory two basichypotheses were posed: 1. A positive laboratory
, industrial engineering, and computer science, robotics can now play acentral role in the education of students in these disciplines. A critical obstacle to this goal,however, is the lack of familiarity that students in each discipline have for the other fields ofstudy, making a thorough understanding of overall robotics design principles quite difficult.This paper presents a model for multidisciplinary cooperation that alleviates this problem andelevates robotics to a potentially pivotal position in engineering education.I. IntroductionRobotics provides a comprehensive view of an integrated, fully engineered system. It affords aview of information processing from the microprocessor level up through the applicationsoftware, and it illustrates the
Session 3286 Add Sizzle to Your Electronics Curriculum Charles Moore Arkansas State Technical InstituteI. IntroductionThis paper, of particular interest to the new educator in a two-year electronics program, presentsinnovative classroom and laboratory techniques which have proven to enhance student learningand interest. Technology students, often kinesthetic learners, may not learn easily from lecturesbut respond well to alternative methods and will listen if their interest is piqued by an element offun or sizzle.II. Improving Classroom AttitudeSince attitude
environment. They gain knowledge and communication skills with technicalcolleagues and partners by conducting meaningful project, working in teams, and developing leadershipskills in a multi-cultural environment. Unlike most US students who study abroad, the students in the center become immersed in the localculture as they tackle important problems for sponsors and experience different education system andlearning style.2 Extension of WPI Practice on Project-based Engineering EducationWith China emerging as the US’s most important trading partner, the importance of preparing engineersin both countries to work with each other is becoming an important priority. The WPI/HUSTcollaboration, which involves mutual visits at both the undergraduate and
and remote students required exploration ofsecure, easy-to-use network schemes that meet the requirements of a university network securitypolicies. We discussed the challenges faced in our efforts. We present a case study where thedescribed hands-on exercises are used in a joint listed senior/graduate level course at a publicresearch university in the US. The case study course is cross listed for both Computer Science (CS)and Electrical Engineering (EE) majors. We present the results of an informal user experiencesurvey for the students who performed our hands-on exercises. I. Introduction:Critical infrastructure organizations have been experiencing a technological transition for theirdevices from Industrial Control Systems (ICS) to CPS [1
environment. They gain knowledge and communication skills with technicalcolleagues and partners by conducting meaningful project, working in teams, and developing leadershipskills in a multi-cultural environment. Unlike most US students who study abroad, the students in the center become immersed in the localculture as they tackle important problems for sponsors and experience different education system andlearning style.2 Extension of WPI Practice on Project-based Engineering EducationWith China emerging as the US’s most important trading partner, the importance of preparing engineersin both countries to work with each other is becoming an important priority. The WPI/HUSTcollaboration, which involves mutual visits at both the undergraduate and
Design Thinking activitiesand Engineering Thinking activities. Early on they redefine the scope of the project from a carcopilot of 2020 towards something dealing more acutely with information processing, andtowards the goal of having a preproduction prototype at the end of the course, even outsourcingsome of the fabrication of parts.For Project B, taking the same approach of coding the team’s activities according to their self-reported design and development of the design process, coding those nodes connecting the linesit can be seen that the gross representation of the design is much different. The student team forProject B spent a lot of time benchmarking existing technology as well as drawing uponstoryboards of possible experiences. Over the
learningand visualization, to provide students with improved formative feedback and review of thelearned concepts despite challenges of increased class sizes. The study expanded on the previousresearch by allowing for direct observations of students’ interactions with the learning object.The results were consistent with the framework developed by Felder and confirmed previousclaims that multimedia add support for learners whose needs are not addressed by traditionalinstruction, while being also effective in addressing preferences of other types of learners.IntroductionLearning Object Developed for the StudyOne of the emerging trends in instructional technology is to focus on modular learning objectsthat can be shared among many users through online
;M University provides a setting for the emergence of scholars, leaders, thinkers, andother contributors to society. AAMU is located in Huntsville, Alabama, which is knowninternationally as a center of aerospace and defense technology. Huntsville is consideredas a leader in high-tech research, engineering services, information systems design and inthe manufacturing of computing equipment, telecommunications, space vehicles androcket propulsion. It is the home of more than 50 Fortune 500 companies. Theseindustries and government agencies require a large number of qualified engineers in theareas of manufacturing and propulsion.The Mechanical Engineering (ME) program at Alabama A&M University started in1997, as a result of a desegregation
of suchimportance, that engineering programs seeking accreditation must be able to prove that ethics istaught.1 Page 23.1251.2This responsibility to society becomes more pronounced as our nation looks to engineering toaddress areas of renewable energy, sustainability, clean water, and even urban infrastructure.2However, the students within our program are not required to take a specific engineering ethicscourse. This places our students at a disadvantage if they are not able to consider the ethicalquestions that emerge from protecting the existing environment and resources, from increasingthe efficiency of existing processes, and from
Leaders of Tomorrow - A Leadership Development Program for Engineering Students at the University of Toronto Doug Reeve, Annie Simpson, Veena Kumar, Emma Master, Dave Colcleugh and Greg Evans Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering Ian Simmie and Deanne Fisher Office of Student Affairs University of TorontoAbstractLeadership development is an important, emerging component of student experience inthe Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Toronto. Leaders ofTomorrow started in 2002 in the Department of Chemical Engineering and
knownair pollutants such as pesticides, legionella, and volatile organic compounds (VOC). The generalmessage has been that prevention is better than cure. EPA’s program of Indoor airPlus Homeswas introduced and discussed. Pros and cons of the emerging air cleaning technologies, such asionizers, electrostatic precipitators and UV germicidal irradiators were discussed. Students werechallenged to validate the product specifications of commercial air cleaners. It was found thatcommercial suppliers often claim to cover 4-5 times the floor area than their products are provento cover in EPA sponsored studies.7. HVAC: Principles and PracticesStudents in this course were familiar with the principles of refrigeration and had an introductionto psychrometric
Paper ID #11544Ethics Education as Philosophical History for EngineersDr. Daniel J. Biezad P.E., California Polytechnic State University Daniel J. Biezad is professor emeritus in the aerospace engineering department of the College of Engi- neering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly). He received the B.S. in electrical engineering from the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT-1966), the M.S. in astronautical engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT-1972), and the Ph.D. in aeronautical and astronautical engineering from Purdue University (1984). He has received the
research opportunities. Themultidisciplinary team approach the program adopted for RET projects was designed to highlightthe importance of integrating knowledge, skills, and processes from science, technology,engineering, and mathematics to achieve successful innovations. The program’s specific focuson rural applications was intended to create new integrated STEM curricula in rural schools thatdemonstrate STEM applications to real world issues familiar to rural students and to highlightpotential benefits to rural communities.ITS-RET research experiences were designed to allow participants to take ownership of theirresearch work. After project orientation with their mentors, each research team submitted aproject work plan at the end of the first
is viewed as aneffective approach to developing scientific, mathematical, and technological talent and creativity(Nowak and Plucker, 1999). PBL means learning is student-centered with teachers acting primarilyin the role of facilitators (COSI, 2004; Samford University, 2004; San Diego State University,2004). Students are encouraged to actively work with material and turn to the teacher for advice,mentorship, and answers to specific problems instead of being a passive recipient of lectures. As aresult, students assume greater responsibility for their own learning and are free to engageproblems as deeply as they like. Further, students work in small groups to develop multiplesolutions to problems. In this fashion the students are able to learn
by the researchers’ using response frequencies, andinterrater reliability was established through extended discussions to reach 95% agreement.Interpretations were formulated collaboratively and key findings were summarized. Qualitativemethods of analysis involved multiple stages of identification of interrelationships amongcategories and information derived from phenomenology with elements of grounded theory [31].Grounded theory involves constant comparison of data with emerging categories to maximizesimilarities and differences between constructs. In the first phase, open ended responses wereopen coded by noting emerging ideas. These codes included participant perspectives on strengthsand weaknesses in their roles as students, satisfaction
(and more familiar) subjects like mathand reading2.CS education is a part of STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) education. TheNational Science and Technology Council’s Committee on STEM Education put forth a report in2018 to outline a federal strategy for STEM education. This report notes that, “The character ofSTEM education itself has been evolving from a set of overlapping disciplines into a moreintegrated and interdisciplinary approach to learning and skill development. This new approachincludes the teaching of academic concepts through real-world applications and combines formaland informal learning in schools, the community, and the workplace. It seeks to impart skillssuch as critical thinking and problem solving along with
Hill, R. J. (2012). Impact of hybrid instruction on student achievement in post-secondary institutions: A synthetic review of the literature. Journal of Instructional Research, 1(1), 49–54.Leasure, A. R., Davis, L., and Thievon, S. L. (2000). Comparison of student outcomes and preferences in a traditional vs. world wide web-based baccalaureate nursing research course. Journal of Nursing Education, 39(4), 149–154.Little, D. (1996). Freedom to learn and compulsion to interact: Promoting learner autonomy through the use of information systems and information technologies. Taking Control: Autonomy in Language Learning, 203–218.Maeroff, G. (2003). A classroom of one: How online education is changing
history and significance of the transportation industry and all modes of travel • career opportunities in public and private sector transportation, with an emphasis on emerging and new occupational requirements for the new millennium • various transportations modes, including public transit, automobiles, buses, vans, trains, airplanes, as well as freight, rail, ports, waterways, and pipeline with an emphasis on intermodalism • advanced technology and intelligent transportation systems, including aviation and space technology • career options in transportation design, engineering, planning, and research The overall composition of the program, along with the evaluations
focuses on students from the University of California-Irvine, theresources and emerging themes discussed can be used to inform other engineering programsacross the country.Note on TerminologyEngineering education researchers continually use different terms to refer to Latin Americans fora variety of valid reasons. When studying this population, tensions between the English, Spanish,and Portuguese languages and histories clash when trying to encompass the population under oneumbrella term. The best term to use is that with which participants identify [29]. In the case ofthis study, one of our participants identifies as non-binary, making Latiné the most appropriateterm. Individuals in the LGBTQ+ community deal and cope with unique hostilities in
information on virtually any topic available to billions of peopleacross the globe. Advancements in affordable screens and devices enabled high quality images,animations, and high-definition video on topics from entertainment to household repairdemonstrations. Specifically in higher education, these technological advancements are changingthe traditional 20th century textbook and lecture courses into active student instruction [1].Undergraduate students entering engineering programs in the 21st century may also be exposedto interactive instruction and are inclined to prefer digital technology for instruction [2]. Thesestudents categorized as the “Net Generation”, “Millennial students”, or “digital natives” have aninclination for learning through
[6], the first step was to redefine the course goals andmake them measurable. The definition of relevant course goals requires identifying what contributionsto the program outcomes are expected. Such information is available in the Academic Learning Compactfor each of the programs. In these, I found that it is expected that the course introduces students to thefollowing Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) for most of the programs in the Business School [7]: 1. Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of elements of economics, financial accounting, marketing, operations management, organizational behavior, business law, information technology, business statistics and social responsibility. 2. Demonstrate
that programsmeet and surpass the standards necessary for technical fields; and that programs are “leading theway in innovation, emerging technologies and anticipating the welfare and safety needs of thepublic”9. One of many papers written that discusses the designing and teaching of courses tosatisfy ABET regulations was presented by Richard M. Felder and Rebecca Brent10. Topics suchas ethics and technical skills are readily available, but there is room for growth in the area of lifeand soft skills for engineering graduates. As far back as 1998 where Duyen Q. Nguyen wrotethat engineering careers remain technical but are shifting towards soft-engineering due to themultidisciplinary nature of the changing workplace11. The two areas he included