without actually building/manufacturing the products is a major challenge. Virtual Manufacturing meets the abovechallenges by providing the capability, in essence, to continue manufacturing in the virtual worldof the computer. Through the use of distributed manufacturing modeling and simulation, VMenables the enterprises to evaluate the producibility and affordability of new product and/orprocess concepts with respect to risks, their impacts on manufacturing capabilities, productioncapacity, and cost.Virtual Manufacturing is one of the key technologies that allow going beyond the assumptionsdriving the old acquisition strategies. It provides the following fundamental changes: VM canbe used to “prove out” the production processes, resulting in
-305. 11. Sanchez, K., Magana, A. J., Sederberg, D., Richards, G., Jones, G., & Tan, H. (2013). Investigating the Impact of Visuohaptic Simulations for Conceptual Understanding in Electricity and Magnetism. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA. 12. Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Salkind, G. W., Bolyard, J., & Suh, J. M. (2013). Effective choices and practices: Knowledgeable and experienced teachers' uses of manipulatives to teach mathematics. Online Journal of Education Research, 2(2), 18-3313. Olympiou, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Blending physical and virtual manipulatives: An effort to improve students' conceptual understanding through science laboratory
Learning Community on student affiliation andengagement within the Tagliatela College of Engineering and the university as a wholethroughout the duration of the undergraduate degree study, and examines the effects of LivingLearning Communities on establishing student in-groups and out-groups among undergraduatestudents based on residence status (Living Learning Community, General Residential,Commuter) and the perceptions of Living Learning Communities at a small private university.Data was collected through the use of student surveys, including 135 engineering studentresponses representing students who participated in the LLC and those who did not. This papersummarizes the methods and findings of this study, and will discuss the implications of
(b) an ability to design and conductappropriate experimentation, analyze experiments, as well as to analyze andand interpret data, and use engineering interpret datajudgment to draw conclusions7. an ability to acquire and apply new (i) a recognition of the need for, and anknowledge as needed, using appropriate ability to engage in life-long learninglearning strategies.Now included in criterion 5(b): aminimum of 45 semester credit hours (orequivalent) of engineering topics (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills,appropriate to the program, consisting and
. Theinterrelationship among the challenges within the categories is explored through the use of acausal loop diagram. The paper discusses feedback loops in such a system diagram, the potentialleverage points, and effective strategies to address some of the identified challenges forintegration of sustainability into engineering education.IntroductionInterest in integration of sustainability into engineering education has steadily advanced in thelast decade. This trend has been observed in the rising number of courses relating tosustainability taught at the university level, funding for related research, the number ofpublications on the subject, and faculty hires in this area. In a survey conducted several yearsago1-2, it was found that of 270 university faculty
emphasis can be put on interactive sessions4.2.1.2 Preparing and Delivering the LecturesPreparing the lectures was a great experience for me in terms of deciding how much to presentand where to break the course to include hands-on activities and interactive sessions. Eachlecture was to be delivered by myself and Dr. Wood. In addition, Dr. Schmidt was to present theexact same lecture to his section. As a result, after preparation, I discussed each lecture withboth faculty, so that they would be comfortable presenting the material. This was a very helpfulexercise for me both in terms of understanding what is reasonable to present in a 50-minutelecture, and in terms of talking through my lectures before delivering them.In our section, the lectures
://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165[8] C. Raffel et al., “Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer.” arXiv, Jul. 28, 2020. Accessed: Apr. 03, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10683[9] K.-W. Chang, V. Prabhakaran, and V. Ordonez, “Bias and fairness in natural language processing,” in Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP): Tutorial Abstracts, Hong Kong, China: Association for Computational Linguistics, Nov. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://aclanthology.org/D19-2004[10] E. Mayfield et al., “Equity beyond bias in language
science education for elementary education majors. As a former elementary teacher, her research and teaching interests are centered around improv- ing elementary students’ science and engineering learning and increasing teachers’ use of effective STEM instruction in the elementary grades. With the increased emphasis on improved teaching and learning of STEM disciplines in K-12 classrooms, Tank examines how to better support and prepare pre-service and in-service teachers to meet the challenge of integrating STEM disciplines in a manner that supports teach- ing and learning across multiple disciplines. More recently, her research has focused on using literacy to support scientific inquiry, engineering design, and STEM
Shaping the Self-Efficacy Beliefs of First-Year Engineering Students: What is the Role We Play? Mica A. Hutchison, Deborah K. Follman, and George M. Bodner Purdue UniversityAbstract Numerous studies have linked undergraduate students’ interests, performance, andretention in science and engineering fields to self-efficacy. The research also suggests thatfemale science and engineering students have poorer self-efficacy beliefs, those beliefs abouttheir capabilities to perform the tasks necessary to achieve a desired outcome, than do their malecounterparts. This study is aimed at identifying factors related to students’ self-efficacy beliefsduring
motivation, non-academic competencies, and commitmentto STEM disciplines.14 Other scholars argue that service learning opportunities enhance students’engagement through, and well beyond, the college experience.15Research on SCB learning experiences in engineering suggests similarly robust studentoutcomes, as well as other engineering-specific learning outcomes mandated by theAccreditation Board of Engineering and Technology (ABET). For example, Ropers-Huilman etal. found that SCB learning experiences promote students’ ability to (a) design systems to meetreal-world needs, (b) perform on multi-disciplinary teams, and (c) communicate their workeffectively.16 Other studies of service-learning experiences in engineering suggest participantsdevelop a
student progresses through their classes, internships, and collaborations, they may begin torecognize that many engineering problems have multiple viable solutions. However, their evolvingunderstanding might be challenged by their experience in courses, like thermodynamics, where problems areoften framed to have deterministic answers and definitive correctness [4]. These contrasting experiences couldlead the student to develop complex and multifaceted epistemic beliefs, such as distinguishing betweenengineering work and engineering education, or assigning a specific role to authority figures in shaping theirunderstanding of “correct” approaches to engineering [5], [6]. In the context of engineering education, this issuetakes on particular
modulation formats FSK and PSK.The paper concludes with recommendations for additional and more advanced communicationexperimentation.IntroductionSoftware Defined Radio1,2 (SDR) offers a powerful alternative to conventional communicationsystem design. In conventional design, specially-built hardware is implemented to performcommunication for a particular, radio-specific modulation scheme, usually over a limitedfrequency range. In contrast, SDR systems offer much more flexibility by implementing themodulation/demodulation functionality in software. Connected to the antenna through an RFmixer is a high-speed ADC/DAC (for receiver/transmitter, respectively) such that the SDRprocesses the communication signals using DSP algorithms implemented in
Science Foundation Engineering Education Program for fundingthis research through Innovations in Engineering Education, Curriculum, and Infrastructure(IEECI) grant (Award number 0935202).Bibliography1. World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, 1987.2. Davidson, Cliff I.; Matthews, H. Scott; Hendrickson, Chris T.; Bridges, Michael W.; Allenby, Braden R.; Crittenden, John C.; Chen, Yongsheng; Williams, Eric; Allen David T.; Murphy, Cynthia F.; and Sharon Austin. “Adding Sustainability to the Engineer’s Toolbox: A Challenge for Engineering Educators.” Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, pp. 4847-48503. Vest, Charles. “Context and Challenge for Twenty-First Century
(born1454) 5, Maria 2.13 Clearly, Caterina had become intimate with someone, most probablyAccattabriga, by 1453, one year after Leonardo’s birth. Furthermore, by his second year,Leonardo had a sibling, Piera. With Piera (and probably Accattabriga) in the picture, thepresumed solitude of Leonardo and his mother no longer holds much beyond a year.VI. Individual researchStudents demonstrated a real love and talent for gathering, assimilating, and evaluatinginformation. They enjoyed the freedom of researching a topic they had personally chosen andthen presenting it to the class by any means that would effectively convey content in amemorable way. Students took ownership of two major topics in the class—Leonardo’spaintings and his inventions. For the
plugin in the Eclipse IDE.[14] As our students were well experienced with both Java and Eclipse, the development of anAndroid app as a course project was a popular choice. We still needed a short period of“Android boot camp” to get teams up to the point where they were proficient enough to jump offto developing their own apps, but teams got through this period quickly.The next challenge after selecting a course project is, “Who gets to be the customer?” Unless thecourse is fortunate enough to have an external customer, the instructor typically assumes thisresponsibility. In Scrum, this role is played by the Product Owner. The Product Owner is thesource of user stories and is responsible for defining the priority of implementation andacceptance
ethical responsibility, participation in professional organizations, and service (g) an ability to communicate effectively developed through report writing and in- class presentations (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, sustainable, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice (l) an ability to apply the fundamentals of civil engineering to the analysis of an existing project component (m) an
problem and determining tractable pieces through whichprogress can be made. In working toward solutions, multiple questions need to be addressed;multiple forms of activity need to be undertaken; and multiple forms of data generation,gathering, and analysis need to be undertaken. The complex, ill-defined nature of the problemspromotes the distribution of problem solving activities across a community of researchers.The introductory course in biomedical engineering engages second semester freshmen or firstsemester sophomore teams of eight with three different kinds of interdisciplinary problems overa fifteen-week semester. (See problems from fall 2011 at the end of paper). Variations of theseproblems are repeated each semester. The problems are
deductive, passive presentation of material[3, 4].This work in progress aims to address these problems by exposing students to IBL instruction atthe earliest possible point in engineering curriculum. By using IBL instruction in Introduction toEngineering courses, students will learn the skills necessary to move beyond passive, transmission-based learning, and will engage in inductive learning opportunities from their first semester incollege.BackgroundInquiry-based approaches are a form of inductive teaching that emphasize the student’s role in thelearning process [5]. During class time, students are empowered to explore concepts, ask questions,and share ideas. Instead of the instructor lecturing to passive listeners about the material. A
smartphone's location, which can be used for a variety of purposes such asmaps, tracking, and location-based services.A special feature of these physical data recorded by the internal sensors, however, is that theycan be used beyond their actual purpose with the help of additional programs, so-called apps.This makes it possible to carry out both qualitative and quantitative experiments in a widerange of subject areas, especially in physics. Smartphones thus represent small, transportablemeasurement laboratories. The project presented in this paper focuses on the latter point, inwhich the sensors installed in smartphones are used to carry out quantitative experiments. Themain advantages of the devices are to be exploited, which are reflected in their
for rich depth in thedescription of engineering research values through the natural salience afforded by introductioninto a new community and profession. To begin to answer these questions, we interviewed fiveengineering graduate students engaged in research in a Gen-4 ERC. We found that on thesurface, students communicated a good understanding of the overall values and goal of the ERC,aligned with them, and felt as though they were making a difference in the world. However, forsome, there were experiences of tension and friction with their own personal and long-term goalsand values. Additionally, discussion of certain values seemed performative for some students(namely topics of diversity, equity, and inclusion), and potential
Support Organizations (ESOs), many of which are initiated by localuniversities/governments as enterprise centers.Recent studies have developed a more positive awareness of educating people inentrepreneurship and eventually how to become entrepreneurial. It has been determined that 1)potential entrepreneurs can be encouraged through university-based entrepreneurship programs2) entrepreneurship within an established definition can be taught and 3) entrepreneurial alumni Page 11.1189.4do succeed and they themselves provide further insights and educational materials fordissemination in the classroom.21, 22, 23 Studies by Wolfe, Adkins and Sherman,24
understand why studentsmigrate out of AE to other STEM majors. Students from a large Midwestern university in theU.S. narrated their institutional experiences during their time in the major and their reasonsleading to the decision to migrate to other STEM majors. The qualitative data along withschematic descriptions from the interviews were studied through the lens of Tinto’s model ofinstitutional departure. Qualitative analysis reveal that students migrate to other engineeringmajors because their interest in AE dwindled primarily because it constrained their careeroptions or that a getting a job in AE industry is very difficult due to the low number of jobsavailable. The latter sentiment, while untrue, is being fueled by the misrepresentation of
establishes a structured roadmap for future implementation and validation. Planned pilot testingand stakeholder feedback collection will assess the framework’s effectiveness in improvingengagement, skill acquisition, and curriculum adaptability. Future research will explore itsscalability to other engineering disciplines, ensuring broad applicability beyond the INFOCOMMsector. This proposal lays the foundation for a data-driven, adaptive approach to lifelong learningin engineering education by providing a structured heuristic model for curriculum planning.IntroductionThe swift advancements in Industry 4.0 technologies and the advent of Industry 5.0 signify aprofound transformation in technological innovation and its application across diverse domains
to examine what they do and why they do it, and theyneed to examine the learning process itself. With a better understanding of learning and learners,faculty will be better able to design instruction to enhance student learning.Second, faculty development ought to be consistent with the ways in which faculty learn. And, asit turns out, faculty learn in ways similar to students. Just as course content cannot simply be"given" to students through lecture, so too, new insights into pedagogy cannot simply be "given"to faculty in "sit-and-get" workshops. Faculty, like students, learn by reading, experiencing,reflecting, and collaborating with others. If change in practice is to become a reality, then facultyneed to be given the opportunity to
2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, paper AC 2009-304.9 W. Akili, Integrating practical experience in a geotechnical/foundation engineering class: The role of the adjunct faculty, proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, pp. 8423-8436.10 S. Nasrazadani and R.A. Mirshams, Teaching heat transfer through industry participation, proceedings of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, paper AC 2007-832.11 K. McManus, The effects of integration of industry faculty into a construction management postgraduate coursework program in the Australian environment
their students. The students demonstrated adeeper understanding of engineering fields and their applicability to real-world issues. Four yearslater, this program is an ongoing initiative co-hosted by DREAAM and The Grainger College ofEngineering. This partnership received supplemental GIANT funding to increase accessibility tothe design projects through an online activity repository and expansion to partner with a Latin-serving community organization, Cena y Ciencias. More recently, this team has been awarded$124,500 in additional grant funding from the Chancellor’s Call to Action to address Racial &Social Injustice. The expanded effort seeks to implement Saturday STEM classes for K-12families and a new STEM night program for K-6 families
and their so- lutions. Her research also involves working with educators to shift their expectations and instructional practice to facilitate effective STEM integration. Tamara is the recipient of a 2012 Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) for her work on STEM integration with underrep- resented minority and underprivileged urban K-12 students. Page 24.805.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Introducing an Instructional Model for “Flipped Classrooms” -Part (II): How Do Group Discussions Foster Meaningful Learning
where the challenges were qualitatively similar formen and women. In the interviews, gender was salient with regards to time-managementchallenges, and beyond that, gender-based challenges were overtly evident in women’sdiscussion of belonging in their workplace. Finally, though women in the participant poolmentioned leadership as a challenge more often, there seemed to be few qualitative differencesbetween the way men and women discussed those challenges.That women face potentially gender-based challenges in the engineering workplace negates thecommon premise of engineering skills as non-socially-bound and individualistic. Ultimately, theinvestigation of these unique challenges and experiences of women engineers helps educatorsand students
conjunction with a one-hour classroom lecturein mechanical engineering. A slightly modified version of this approach could easily be tailored toall levels of the mechanical engineering programs, as well as to other engineering programs.This particular laboratory’s development process began by writing a successful proposal foroutside funding in order to create a hands-on physical experimentation laboratory. After thelaboratory was established, the next step involved developing and conducting instructedexperiments in which a key issue was to find a challenging phenomenon related to mechanicalengineering with a high potential for further development and exploration beyond theInstrumentation and Measurements class – not closed ended only experiment. One
, in which we haveexperimented and refined the process through which we train our students to develop, refine andupdate their IDPs. Over the five years of the grant we have continually adapted and iterativelymodified the IDP course assignments based on students’ feedback and course reflections. Thispaper discusses the evolution and implementation of our updated IDP process, that includes pre-IDP activities aimed at envisioning a future self, discussions of program timelines andmilestones, the hidden curricula and challenges with recent alumni, career exploration activitiesto inform the IDP, seminar and panel discussions on the pathways and challenges tointerdisciplinary careers, developing a network of mentors, near peer advising by students a