, including (a) technicalcompetency; (b) legal knowledge including technical vocabulary and legal procedures; and (c)interpersonal skills including the ability to communicate technical information to the people fromnon-engineering background. However, the student survey results indicated that many studentslack such skills and there is a pressing need to teach them those skills in graduate programs.Additionally, the results highlighted that only 4 out of 72 ACCE institutions which consist of5.6% of the accredited degree programs offered courses that are related to forensic engineering.With growing concern for climate change impact and deterioration of infrastructure such asbridges and buildings, the workforce demand for forensic engineers is expected
of CNC maching education at the Faculty of Technology”, New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 7(1), pg 84-91, 2020 [7] T. Morimoto, K. Tania, N. Delson, and C. L. Sandoval, “Assess Experiential Learning Outcomes”, in Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education, virtual conference, 2020 [8] W. D. Vian and N. L. Denton, "Laboratory Project Determining the Effect of Process Types on the Mechanical Properties," American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 [9] B. G. Emiroglu and S. Sahin, "Analysis of Students' Performances during Lab Sessions of Computer Networks Course," Educational Technology & Society, vol. 16(3), pp. 329
teacher responses to the focus groupechoed many concerns and frustrations heard many times over. The workshop fulfilled a short-term need in an extraordinary time, and while the workshop showed promise for improvingteachers’ engineering self-efficacy, such formats will likely never take the place of in-personworkshops. There is simply no substitute for in-person interactions and the energy associatedwith cooperative learning environments. However, there may be benefits to mixed approachesor asynchronous formats that utilize the technologies so many learned to use during the past year.First, the virtual format could be used for follow-up meetings and short refresher sessions toefficiently help teachers problem shoot issues that arose during
Paper ID #34481Development and Validation of the Draw-an-Engineer and Applications ofMathematics and Science Instrument (Work in Progress)Dr. Rebekah J. Hammack, Montana State University Rebekah Hammack is an Assistant Professor of K-8 Science Education at Montana State University. Prior to joining the faculty at MSU, she served as an Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellow in the Di- vision of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings at the National Science Foundation. She holds a BS in Animal Science from The Ohio State University, a MS in Animal Science from Oklahoma State University, and a PhD in
Committee (GEC), composed of faculty members whorepresent our diverse program offerings, responsible for overseeing which courses satisfy SBOErequirements for general education. We also have a set of University Learning Outcomes (ULOs)centered on the principles of “know, do, become”. Initial response from the GEC in November2018 to our proposal for ENGR 180 designated as FC was that Engineering lacked the expertiseto design a course rooted in communication theory. Our proposal, along with two other proposalsfrom Communication and Sociology, was eventually approved by the GEC. Our proposal waseventually not approved in December 2018 at the Provost level due to concerns about staffingand financial resources required to accommodate our first-year
Paper ID #12689When Your Best Is Not Good Enough: Building On Lessons Learned in theSolar Decathlon Competition to Create Housing that is Actually AffordableDr. Edwin R. Schmeckpeper PE, Norwich University Edwin Schmeckpeper, P.E., Ph.D., is the chair of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction Management at Norwich University, the first private school in the United States to offer engineering courses. Norwich University was the model used by Senator Justin Morrill for the land-grant colleges created by the 1862 Morrill Land Grant Act. Prior to joining the faculty at Norwich University, Dr
projects of real relevance,improved performance in traditional measures of learning, increased proficiency in relevant “softskills” such as communication, and an increased sense of civic involvement[2]. The communitypartner also benefits from the experience, through both the fruits of the student work and theincreased exposure to the partner’s mission[3].In the fall of 2016, a collaboration was begun between Br. Lawrence Machia (the monk whospearheads the maple syrup production effort) and the Engineering Science program of SaintVincent College. The goals of this collaboration are as follows: 1. Strengthen the connection between the relatively new Engineering Science program and the greater campus community, including the monastic
, and is the IEEE Chair of the Computer Chapter of the Southern Alberta Section.Dr. Mahmood Moussavi, University of Calgary Dr. Mahmood Moussavi is currently a faculty member of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, at the University of Calgary. He has over 25 years research and teaching experience in different areas of software engineering and information technology, and he has served over 12 year as Director of the Software Engineering at the above-mentioned department. His general research interest and expertise are summarized as follows: Software engineering education Software design and architecture Data mining and database managementProf. Laleh Behjat P.Eng., University of Calgary Dr Laleh
. She is the recipient of the NSF CAREER Award, the NASA Early Career Faculty Award, the AFOSR Young Investigator Award, the ONR Young Investigator Award, and was named to the 2015 Forbes 30 under 30 list.Prof. Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University Nathan Mentzer is an assistant professor in the College of Technology with a joint appointment in the College of Education at Purdue University. Hired as a part of the strategic P12 STEM initiative, he prepares Engineering/Technology candidates for teacher licensure. Dr. Mentzer’s educational efforts in pedagogical content knowledge are guided by a research theme centered in student learning of engineer- ing design thinking on the secondary level. Nathan was a former middle
presented her work at annual conferences of ASEE, WEPAN, and CEIA, and published in the Journal of Engineering Education, the Journal of Language and Social Psychology, the Journal of Applied Social Psychology, the European Journal of Social Psychology, and the European Review of Social Psychology.Laura L. Pauley, Pennsylvania State University Laura L. Pauley, Arthur L. Glenn Professor of Engineering Education and professor of mechanical engineering, joined the The Pennsylvania State University faculty in 1988. From 2000 to 2007, she served as the Professor-in-Charge of Undergraduate Programs in Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering. In 2003, Laura received the Penn State Undergraduate
that the time could be used more effectively by working homework problems. The remaining 23 students had positive comments. The most common word was “challenging,” which in retrospect was not surprising given the wording of the question. Other adjectives ranged from “awesome” to “the bee’s knees.”The rubric was a success from all viewpoints. Grading laboratory reports was much less of anannoyance for me. I feel that I spent less time grading the reports, although I have no data toverify this claim. Also, I had a very small number of discussions with students about how pointswere awarded; there were no issues concerning consistency of the grade among students. Ibelieve that the rubrics
thisexperience will be discussed in detail.Introduction The recent boom in biomedical and biotechnology programs has necessitated new bio-based experiments in the engineering curriculum. At Oklahoma State University, two newcourses have been developed in the School of Chemical Engineering to integrate the biologicalconcepts. These two courses a) Introduction to Biomedical Engineering and b) BioprocessEngineering are offered as electives for students in the senior year. In addition, to providehands-on experience with the few concepts discussed in each course, two new experimentsa) bioreactor design for the conversion of renewable resources and b) dialysis experiment for theclearance of creatinine, have been added into the second Unit Operations
action include:• They overlook the need to educate students in other engineering disciplines concerning cross-disciplinary DSP topics, and• It does not address the real issue of increasing the talent pool from which we as DSP educatorscan draw our students.The idea that DSP isn’t just for EEs anymore is an outgrowth of the realization that topics suchas data acquisition (with the subsequent data analysis) and feedback control are vital to mostengineering disciplines. Academically, this can be seen from the trend of EE courses for non-EEsthat are migrating away from the traditional DC and AC Circuit Theory type courses towardscourses that include a significant coverage of Signals and Systems.While the idea of increasing the talent pool from which
AC 2012-5048: REDESIGNING BME INSTRUCTIONAL LAB CURRIC-ULA USING PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING AND BACKWARD DESIGNDr. Barbara Burks Fasse Ph.D., Georgia Institute of Technology Barbara Burks Fasse is a Senior Research Scientist in the Department of Biomedical Engineering (BME) at Georgia Tech. Fasse studies the efficacy and value of student-centered learning initiatives, specifically problem-based and project-based learning, in classrooms, instructional labs, and undergraduate research experiences. She joined the BME faculty in 2007 following ten years in Georgia Tech’s College of Com- puting, where she was a member of the NSF-funded ”Learning By Design” problem-based learning cur- riculum development and research project
well. Our department has set as anobjective that our students understand the interconnections between the seeminglydisparate subjects they study in college. This objective includes not only theirengineering topics such as thermodynamics, mechanics, and control theory, but alsowhat they have learned in their core curriculum classes such as writing and presentationskills, ethics, and, history.With these goals in mind, we set out to modify a traditional laboratory exercise indynamic system control to serve new purposes. In the past, we have used the classicclosed loop control of a dc servo motor to provide students with hands-on experience inPID control and control system tuning as is commonly done in courses in dynamicsystem modeling and control
issues embedded in aframework of concern for the welfare of other people. Care is a necessary component ofsuccessful group work and is thus related to effective engineering design by the researchers, asengineering frequently depends on multi-disciplinary teams.This paper presents the findings of a collaborative study that explored stereotypes and how thesemight be addressed. In particular, it discusses:1) if previous research describing the presence of gender stereotypes among both male andfemale students about the engineering profession as non-caring and non-collaborative issupported in this study, with a particular focus on upper elementary school age children;2) if male and female students have similar or varying views/stereotypes; and3
Education, 2025Performance Unveiled: Comparing Lightweight Devices Testbed and Virtual Machines for Edge ComputingAbstractTechnological innovations are accelerating across fields like engineering, IT, environmentalscience, and agriculture, the convergence of education & research has emerged as a vital andconcerning issue. Although the research in areas such as edge computing holds a lot of potentialfor real-world applications, its integration into engineering education remains marginalized dueto lack of curriculum alignment, lack of resources for faculty training, and industry-academiadisconnect. This study bridges the gap by investigating the suitability of hands-onexperimentation with edge computing frameworks to enhance
complexity and scale of the types of problems engineers solve[1]. Students’capability of working effectively in engineering teams is cognizant among employers in industrywho seek to hire new talent into their organizations [2]–[4]. One of the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) student outcome criteria is to have the ability to functioneffectively in high performing teams. This requires universities to better prepare students withteamwork skills and to incorporate teamwork as an important part of engineering curriculum [5]In today’s world of engineering, companies are shifting towards working in larger team sizes dueto the complexity of solving engineering problems [6]–[8]. Engineering programs need to findways to effectively
graduate school7. Undergraduates who participate insummer or semester-long research experiences report positive effects such as: “thinking andworking like a scientist”, clarification/confirmation of career plans (including graduate school),and enhanced career/graduate preparation5.Despite these benefits, however, becoming involved with research early in their undergraduateprogram can be difficult for students8. One study suggests that compared to upperclassmen, a muchlower percentage of first-year students consider themselves to be engineers, and the discrepancybetween males and females who consider themselves engineers is the largest among first-years9.In addition, faculty members are reluctant to include new undergraduates in their
Paper ID #38157Forming Cognitive Connections: Desktop Learning Modules,Structural Analysis Software, and Full-Scale StructuresDavid Brian Dittenber (Associate Professor, Civil Engineering) Prior to joining the civil engineering faculty at Cedarville University in 2020, Dr. Dittenber taught at his alma mater, LeTourneau University in Longview, Texas, for seven years, serving as an associate professor and chair of civil engineering. His areas of specialization are structural and materials engineering, as well as engineering education. He believes that being a Christian and a civil engineer is an exciting pairing, as
. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Question of Units: Bothersome Details or Keys to Understanding?IntroductionThe proper treatment of physical units is a pervasive problem in engineering education. Thesporadic and uneven coverage of units throughout the typical engineering student’sundergraduate experience can result in graduates who, in spite of having learned key engineeringprinciples, can still stumble over units conversions and cancellations. When faced with a newproblem, even the best students can lose sight of conceptual issues as they become overwhelmedby concern about how units will be dealt with in the determination
semester. In the classroom, the instructor utilized themultimedia aspects of the courseware to reinforce concepts of deflection, bending, and axialloading. Informal classroom feedback about the courseware was initially negative. Students Page 7.341.2found the software a waste of class time, citing that they were more interested in solving required “Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”homework examples. Another issue was that the instructor had difficulty integrating thecourseware into the
at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
importantly for our concerns about the ways that engineeringeducation shapes young peoples’ identities,6 it establishes that one is worthy of engineering onlyif one is willing to work extraordinarily hard and to sacrifice experiences and basic pleasures thatare ordinary to other college students. In our analysis, the difficulty becomes a defining criterionof worth in its own right, rather than difficulty in service of some other functional purpose, likesolving an important, challenging problem.We begin with a segment from a first year student at Mountain Tech, describing concisely one ofthe sorting mechanisms8 that in her view is a necessary component of engineering’s meritocracyof difficulty. In this student’s view they, the unnamed faculty
communication technologies inindustrial, commercial, and consumer products. Accordingly, there is an increasing concernabout the security issues related to wireless products. The integrated systems of wirelesscommunication and embedded systems technologies using smart protocol design makes thesecurity concern easier to work with and broadens the applications in various areas. Thefollowing are examples of the more common applications of the growing list of wirelesstechnology applications today. • Building and Home Security • Cordless Phones • Garage Door Opener • Baby Monitor • Medical Monitoring
significant number of students fail to maintain crucial mathematical skills,impacting their success in physics. Notably, concerns have arisen from engineering majors whoexpress displeasure in being required to take math classes as part of the engineering curriculum.While math and engineering professors may find this objectionable, it is a reasonable concern,given that mathematics is often taught as an abstract discipline, and students need to grasp itsrelevance to their future roles as engineers.To address this issue, we have initiated the development of an Integrated Curriculum, startingwith two pairs of courses: MATH 140 (Calculus with Analytic Geometry I) paired with PHYS211 (General Physics: Mechanics), and PHYS 212 (General Physics: Electricity
Offering (2017):Our pilot course was offered in 2017 as a 1-credit seminar that met weekly for about two hours.A typical class period is summarized in the following outline: 1) VTS Exercises (15 min., starting Week 6): Instructor facilitated a class discussion of a selected image or two (building on an initial VTS workshop of Week 5). 2) Introduction & Activity (50 min.): Instructor or guest speaker introduced a topic, laid out a dilemma/issue/conflict, and (maybe) made recommendations. Then, students read a relevant article or watched a relevant video, reflected on what they read or watched, and jotted down some notes/ideas for an essay. 3) Discussion (50 min.): Students discussed the issue in small
undergraduate researcher at the Clemson University Institute for Engaged Aging. Here, she works under the SHARRP Lab’s Dr. Lesley Ross and Dr. Christine Phillips on studies involving healthy aging. Outside of research, she works as a certified nursing assistant and is currently training to be a registered behavioral technician in order to perform ABA therapy for children diagnosed with Autism. As a student hoping to pursue a future career in the medical field she enjoys being able to see how these studies directly affect those who participate in them. She believes that seeing participants take something new away from a research study is a reward in and of itself. After graduation from Clemson, she plans to attend medical
outcomes: 1. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. 2. An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. 3. A knowledge of contemporary issues. 4. Demonstrate the ability to apply probability and statistical methods to naval architecture and marine engineering problems.The contribution of the Ship Structures course to demonstration of these outcomes is subjectivelyevaluated in periodic course reviews involving all program faculty. In addition, numericalstudent performance on specific assignments and exams in the
±1.08% of the same group like sciences [1]. The twosubjects are heavily intertwined and a deficiency in one will lead to difficulties in learning theother; this is especially prevalent at the college or other post-high school level of education.As evidence of these higher-level difficulties, a survey of students in an undergraduate levelrobotics course at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute was conducted. It was found that at least 27%of students who did not drop the course felt inadequately prepared for the prerequisitemathematics involved. At the University of North Dakota, the faculty recognized similar issues,but in the programming and circuitry realm. To combat this, they introduced a project in theirIntroduction to Electrical Engineering