-12 prospects is dwindling due to population demographics and lower interest in traditional education programs. 5. Interest in Industry is being overshadowed by concerns for the environment, the promise of e-business, Apps, etc. 6. Due to concern about college costs there may be a community perspective community prospective that student needs upskilling or retraining; but at the same time many are unlikely to want and/or afford a 2- or 4-year traditional degree. 7. There is misconception about the depth and breadth of on-demand learning (i.e. Ted-X, YouTube Videos, LinkedIn learning, etc.)The college-zone 1. There isn’t enough current faculty with I4.0 skills to fill the curriculum requirements. 2. Existing
development net- work (ePDN), a new initiative dedicated to preparing teachers to engage their students in STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) through the use of NASA-developed learning materials and resources. She also serves a the lead evaluator on several NSF-funded Noyce Scholarship programs. She has direct experience leading or contributing to evaluations of leadership, and STEM-related innovations.Dr. Tamra Williams Ogletree, University of West Georgia Page 25.1312.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 The Impact of Participation in VEX Robotics
thesciences (WS).When asked to indicate the various reasons why students chose their respective major, it wasdetermined that women were generally more concerned with their positive impact on society(53.3% WE; 50.0% WS; 22.7% ME) while men were much more concerned with earningpotential (40.0% WE; 44.4% WS; 77.3% ME). Many more WS reported having chosen theirmajor as the fulfillment of a lifelong goal or dream compared to both males and females inengineering (13.3% WE; 56.3% WS, 27.3% ME). A list of the top reasons for having chosenone’s major, subdivided into the responses of WE, ME, and WS, is shown in Figure 7. Figure 7. Reasons why WE, WS, and ME chose their respective major.When analyzing responses from WE, WS, and ME regarding current
design. Redefining the problem allows for innovative ideas toflow, taking off from the current inside-the-box thinking. Students who have been involved inthis on-going project have gained experience in multiple non-technical soft skills such ascommunication, time management, problem-solving, and the ability to benefit from constructivecriticism. The status of the project sits in the middle of testing our latest prototype which utilizessprings as a mechanism to make the speed bump more dynamic. The idea is to have themechanism impact fast vehicles while having no impact on vehicles abiding by the speed limit.1. Introduction Ever since the first means of speed reduction were implemented their designs haveremained unchanged and have
Learning (PBL), that seeks to improve areasof persistent communicative challenge for an engineering student population. Presenting resultsof lab scores and student surveys, this paper demonstrates engineering students’ improvedabilities to present information and convey meaning more precisely. As a result, this paperargues that a PBL approach to designing a technical writing and communication class offersengineering students exposure to and mastery of situated, professional, and STEM-specificwriting and presentation tasks. Qualitative and quantitative student feedback is also discussed,showing the positive impact the course has on engineering, lab based courses as well as students’positive perceptions of the course for preparation of professional
of gamification in highereducation, and is increasingly being used to increase student engagement and motivation [8].Gamification uses aspects of game design to engage students and motivate action, with the goalof promoting learning. Gamification does not necessarily use an actual game, but rather gamedesign elements such as specific rules, reward systems, rapid feedback, and competitive elements[9]. To address the challenges of building course community and instructor-student rapport, acourse Bingo sheet was developed. One impetus of creating the bingo sheet was to help theinstructor learn student names. It also had secondary goals of motivating attendance of an 8 amlecture section and to help student development by increasing course and
Engineering CollegeAbstractNationally almost half of the students receiving baccalaureate degrees in science and engineeringcomplete part of their education at a community college, and this statistic is expected to increasewith the rising costs of attending a four-year public institution. The demographics of almost allfour-year engineering programs fail to align with U.S. Census data for women and under-represented minorities. Community colleges, on the other hand, serve a high number of thesestudents. Programs designed to support community college student transition and graduationfrom four-year engineering programs will naturally increase the pipeline of diverse studentsentering the workforce.This paper will review the impacts of two National
, MSSUPPORT, MSGUIDE, MSAPPROACH, MSINSPIRE, POST.The girls’ data records were randomly truncated in each year to match role model N =211 forfurther analysis using Excel and JASP to determine whether and to what degree role models’attitudes had an impact on girls’ engagement in engineering and technology. There was nostatistical difference in the reliability of the two sets, but data were easier to manipulate and itminimized confounding significant correlations due to extremely large sample sizes.Although a high school student session was added to the event in 2015, the post-event survey didnot include either the role model items or the pre- and post-event interest items until the 2018event (N = 110, α = .88), HSLISTEN, HSSUPPORT, HSGUIDE, HSAPPROACH
10graduate students), 32 teachers, 7 university faculty members, and the Fellow facultyadvisors, a technology web designer, a Grant Coordinator, an Evaluation Fellow andan Oversight Committee. The grant is currently in its fourth year, with 8 graduateFellows, and similar staffing, and has approved funding for continuation of anadditional five years. This paper discusses the impact of Project STEP on theFellows, teachers, and students in its first three-and-a-half years.The teachers and Fellows have worked in teams to design, develop, and implementhands-on activities and technology-driven inquiry-based projects, which relate to thestudents' community issues, as vehicles to authentically teach STEM skills. Activitieshave been incorporated into lessons
engineering and the other on astronautical engineering. This projectaimed to unite the two subjects and introduce a goal-oriented design project for each subject: amodel rocket and a hand-thrown glider. Both projects featured a final report designed toemphasize different communication skills. The model rocket project required students to submita narrated video presentation that included video of their rocket’s flight, analysis of theirtrajectory, and various images and videos collected during the design and construction phases ofthe project. For the glider project, the student teams were required to submit a written technicalreport detailing design decisions, construction, and flight performance. Prior to the changes,students wrote similar written
communityengagement would likely be a one-way benefit for the student team, and this worked against thevalues the team had identified.The weekly activity plan was as follows:• Week 1: kick-off week. This focused on getting to know each other, a technical scavenger hunt, project/team values (Figure 2), team capability and aspirations using a 16-point rubric (Figure 3), breaking into sub-teams for mission and systems design, project management, impact and communications/engagement, a team charter and systems engineering management plan (SEMP), universal design for learning concepts and accommodations, and planning the next 4 weeks of work.• Week 2: identifying mission needs and establishing connections. This entailed “just-in-time” training in
the instructor well. One-third said it was more difficult than expected. Studentsliked the communication in the classroom highlighting the introductions, the relaxed and activeatmosphere, and interaction between teacher and students. About half the class cited Englishlanguage problems as a challenge. Some students admitted that they had forgotten some materialfrom the previous circuits class so had trouble with the in-class problems. Reflections from theinstructor, assistant instructors and administrators showed that the teaching method wasappealing to the students and that the students were able to actively participate in the activelearning activities.IntroductionActive learning is well established as an effective pedagogy in many parts of
for the course is brieflydescribed, followed by a description of student feedback on their learning experiences andmentor satisfaction. The benefits and drawbacks of working on projects for the University aredescribed and contrasted with projects for communities, industrial clients, and municipalities.Although each project provides a unique experience and perspective, the greatest benefit ofUniversity projects is the accessibility and frequency of contact between mentors and students.Although political and stakeholder buy-in may be difficult to achieve from all parties in order toimplement student designs, the benefits of these projects make it worth pursuing future projectswith the University.BackgroundA significant design experience in the
profession. Informal exitsurveys and follow-ups with alumni regarding writing exercises will better gauge efficacy of thecurriculum.Possible future work spawned by these assignments includes research from the outcomes ofstudent writing and undergraduate involvement in selection of topical areas. One goal of anauthor is the publication of student work in the university newspaper, further establishing studentengagement in public discourse. Industry leaders implore for professionals to act as advocates ofpublic policy and creators of a national infrastructure plan.7 The achievement of this objectivecan only be reached through the impact of the recent graduates who recognize the importance ofpublic discourse/community engagement and will be advocates
to transform into virtual or hybrid environments. There is an urgentneed to investigate methods and activities that build communities on post-pandemic urbancommuter campuses. However, there is limited literature on post-pandemic community building,particularly on urban commuter campuses of minority-serving institutions.In this work, we developed an approach to engaging first-year commuter students in ourdepartmental learning community on an urban commuter campus. We linked two introductorycourses, Computer Science I (CS I) and Computing Foundations, with joint-curricular andextracurricular activities offered by sophomore, junior, and senior students from student clubsand a service-learning program. Informed by the situated learning theory
challenges, ones that relate tonorms and expectations in the research community as well as the broad social impact ofengineering research. In recent years, leading organizations such as the National ScienceFoundation (NSF), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Academy ofEngineering (NAE) have made significant efforts to promote ethics training for graduateresearchers. In spite of these concerted efforts, few sustainable models for incorporatingethics in graduate engineering programs have been described in the literature. Asdesigners of ethics education programs, we argue that considerable progress can beachieved through engaging and empowering our users—the engineering faculty memberswho teach graduate courses and advise graduate
AC 2008-2413: SERVICE LEARNING: COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL VALUESTHAT ENGAGE UNDER REPRESENTED GROUPS INTO THE STEM PIPELINELeslie Wilkins, Maui Economic Development BoardIsla Young, Maui Economic Development Board, Inc. ISLA YOUNG: Ms. Young joined the MEDB Women in Technology Project in December 2003. She serves as a Program Manager working with students, educators, industry leaders, and the community. She serves as the Hawaii statewide coordinator for Project EAST profiled in this paper. She holds a baccalaureate degree in Business and Information Systems form the University of Phoenix. Email: isla@medb.org
event and the robotics workshop) impact your integration into the department community? • How did use (or not use) the Discord server (where the ACM, ACM-W, and CSI channels) impact your integration into the department community? • Did you use the C03A Lab? Why or why not? If you used the C03A Lab, did you find it helpful or not? If helpful, in what ways? If not, please explain why.We created both the adapted CSOC Survey and the reflection survey on Qualtrics andadministered them virtually to CS I students. The adapted SCOC survey was administered at thebeginning of the semester before implementing our approach and then again at the end of thesemester after implementation. The reflection survey was
including coordinating community service for engineering students. • Presenter for the Greensboro Area Mathematics and Science Education Center (GAMSEC) Summer Program • Speaker/presenter at various K-12 institutions. Professor Alford currently teaches Introduction to Engineering Design and Ethics as well as Statics and Mechanics of Materials. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 After School Matters: Expanding the time to engage Minority Middle School Girls in STEM through Informal learning outside of the classroomAn increase in the diversity of the U.S. pipeline for students entering STEM fields is significantlyneeded. This is especially true for minority and female students
, and communicate large sets ofdata. These opportunities represent a promising new approach to engagement that fits with theexisting service model. One obstacle exists, however: that most of our researchers work in labenvironments that are inaccessible to outsiders. Even for those that don’t work in secure labs,the interactions between a principle investigator (PI) and his/her students occur in a settinglibrarians do not typically have access to; in order to continue to develop services thatmeaningfully support engineering and textiles researchers, it was necessary to get behind the“closed doors” of the research lab.Literature ReviewEngineers’ reticent use of libraries has received a thorough examination throughout the literature.In previous
including communications, energy, medicine, transportation, and many other areas.A quantitative technology forecast will include the study of historic data to identify one of or acombination of several recognized universal technology diffusion or substitution trends. Rates Page 15.725.3of new technology adoption and rates of change of technology performance characteristics takeon common patterns. The discovery of such a pattern indicates that a fundamental trajectory orenvelope curve has been found and that reliable forecasts then can be made.The quantitative forecasting techniques are, to use the words of mathematician and theoristGregory Bateson4
], a study comparing curriculumof various agricultural and biological engineering programs [2], and finally a study that presentedchallenges and successes reported by sophomore agricultural and biological engineering students[3].The overall goal of our work is to understand student perception of community in the context ofthe department’s academic programs, and identify strategies to build community among studentsto positively impact student retention and student success in team-based learning environments.In the context of our department, past efforts to improve student success in the ASMT programhave primarily focused on the first-semester orientation class that has a heavy emphasis onstudent success activities. This has resulted in
underrepresentedgroups in STEM fields [19]–[23], and experience in meeting the needs of the local communityby maximizing the capabilities of the host institutions.In 2016, eSEM was established to extend the impact of this program by creating a NetworkImprovement Community focused on STEM achievement in minority males. The project hasfocused on the early stages of collective impact; generating ideas and dialogue and initiatingaction. This includes activities such as identifying stakeholders and establishing working groups,planning the community and identifying resources, reaching out to potential partners, andcollecting data to establish metrics.Planning ActivitiesDuring the first year, eSEM project partners engaged in activities for planning, developing
assessed activity byestablishing clear criteria using rubrics for all evaluated activities.Last but not least, by using accessibility features in all the course elements, we were able tosuccessfully target a diverse student population and benefit the learning community as a whole.This paper will also provide the highlights and the rationale behind the selection of theseeducational technology tools and determine how they foster quality course delivery. To bestillustrate course impact on students, we qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed data collectedfrom four different sources, some of them for four consecutive terms regarding grades, students’perception, and developed skills.IntroductionDynamics is a core course in engineering and is usually
activist stance.8, 9, 10, 11An activist stance is being posited as useful for engineering education because of the possibilitiesto (1) focus on “humanistic” aspects of engineering; (2) increase knowledge throughparticipatory action learning; and (3) allow students to engage meaningfully in the futures oftheir communities. “Humanistic” engineering integrates the humanities and social sciencedisciplines with the technical aspects of engineering, to highlight impacts of engineering designson people and systems.13, 14, 15 Just as importantly, it may draw students into engineering whomay not be attracted to traditional engineering education through its focus on meaningfullyaddressing community needs.Beyond just incorporating engineering’s social
Paper ID #27784Student-Created Podcasts in the Engineering Communication ClassroomDr. Harly Ramsey, University of Southern California I teach Advanced Engineering Communication to upper division engineering students at the University of Southern California. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Student-Created Podcasts in the Engineering Communication ClassroomAbstractIn most early research on the use of podcasts in advanced education, students are consumers ofpodcasts that are often recorded lectures. However, recent scholarship analyzes the educationalvalue of student-generated
Comunity Development Department at Fuss & O’Neill. Equipped with a Bachelor’s degree in civil engineering and Master’s degree in land and real estate management, she plans to focus her professional career on sustainable and human-scaled urban design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Beyond the Capstone: National Competition and Community Engagement in A Timber Bridge Senior ProjectIntroduction A capstone course is an integral part of Civil Engineering (CE) undergraduate education.It requires graduating students to apply knowledge and skills gained from courses in a CEcurriculum in a design that mimics 'real world' projects. The scope and level of detail in
. Entrep., vol. 12, no. 1, Art. no. 1, May 2017, doi: 10.24908/ijsle.v12i1.6664.[2] C. Swan, K. Paterson, and A. R. Bielefeldt, “Community Engagement in Engineering Education as a Way to Increase Inclusiveness,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 357–372. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.023.[3] C. I. Celio, J. Durlak, and A. Dymnicki, “A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Service-Learning on Students,” J. Exp. Educ., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 164–181, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1177/105382591103400205.[4] M. Natarajarathinam, S. Qiu, and W. Lu, “Community engagement in engineering education: A systematic literature review,” J. Eng. Educ., vol
against an expected drop in level of engagement forsome students. Average student engagement, as measured by responses to in-class pollingexercises remained constant between Fall 2019 and Fall 2020, and it appears that more studentswere able to maintain a 100% participation rate in the remote context, though there is significantvariation in engagement within the class.We seek input from the engineering education research community on this work-in-progressstudy. We especially invite a discussion about how to make sense of survey results in dramaticallydifferent teaching contexts.IntroductionThe rapid shift to remote instruction in Spring 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic had broad,immediate, and lasting impacts on college students. In a very short
of experts that supervises the design and construction of a multibillion-dollar project to protect the City of Venice from floods. Page 15.1199.2© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Terrascope Youth Radio: Engaging urban teens in a unique university-community partnershipAbstractTerrascope Youth Radio (TYR) is an NSF-funded program in which undergraduate engineeringand science students at MIT mentor local urban teens as the teens produce radio/audioprogramming on environmental topics. The interaction has been remarkably fruitful, both for theteens and for the undergraduates. The