2006-1521: HOW ENGINEERING STUDENTS LEARN TO WRITE: THE SECONDYEAR OF THE ENGINEERING WRITING INITIATIVE AT THE UNIVERSITYOF TEXAS AT TYLERLucas Niiler, University of Texas-Tyler LUKE NIILER is an Associate Professor of English in the Department of Languages and Literature at the University of Texas at Tyler. He received his BA degree from Gettysburg College and his MA and Ph.D. from the State University of New York at Buffalo.David Beams, University of Texas-Tyler DAVID M. BEAMS is an Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at the University of Texas at Tyler. He received his BS and MS degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in and the Ph.D. from the University of
. Prior to joining the Department of Engineering faculty at East Carolina University, he served on the faculty of the Department of Neuroscience at the University of Florida College of Medicine. In addition to his academic appointment, Dr. Bedenbaugh serves as Chief Technology Officer for Cranial Medical Systems, Inc. Page 15.105.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 A Team-Based Nerve Cuff Simulation Project in a Third Year Foundations of Biomedical Engineering CourseAbstractA nerve cuff simulation group project was used to introduce first semester juniors to
Shealy is an assistant professor in the Charles E. Via, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and principal faculty member in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction at Virginia Tech. He received his doctorate from Clemson University. His research is broadly focuses on judgment and decision making for sustainable infrastructure. This includes engineering education for sustainability. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Bridging Engineering and Psychology: Using an Envision Gold Certified Project to Teach Decision Making for SustainabilityAbstract The objective of this research is to help engineering
AC 2011-1256: DEVELOPING THE GLOBAL BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERTHROUGH A 12-MONTH INTERNATIONAL UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCHEXPERIENCE IN THE U.S. AND CHINABarbara Burks Fasse, Georgia Institute of Technology Barbara Burks Fasse is an educational psychologist and senior research scientist in the Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech. Dr. Fasse studies the efficacy and value of student-centered learning initiatives– specifically Problem-Based and Project-Based Inquiry Learning– in classrooms, in- structional labs, and undergraduate research experiences. She joined the BME faculty in 2007 following ten years in Georgia Tech’s College of Computing where she was a member of the NSF-funded Learning By Design
virtual workshop team focused on building a community of educators passionate about expanding their knowledge concerning diversity, equity, and inclusion in engineering education. Her most recent accomplishment was being recognized as one of seven AAC&U 2019 K. Patricia Cross Scholars based on her commitment to teaching and learning and civic engagement. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 “Blessing in Disguise”: Understanding the Racialized and Gendered Experience of a Black Woman’s Pathway in an Interdisciplinary Engineering ProgramThis research paper examines the experiences of a Black woman, Simone
one conversational participant undertakes toinstruct another concerning some topic of relevance to the situation at hand.We used the concept of the teaching sequence as an analytic tool for exploring how cooperativelearning is accomplished in student engineering groups. We would expect that in such groups,students would take on (and be permitted by others to take on) teacher and student roles indialogue according to the particular distribution of knowledge and technical expertise in thegroup. We sought to determine how engineering student groups managed teaching sequences as Page 4.210.2they accomplished their work together, and how gender and
personal connections they may notshare with a more senior mentor. Near-peer mentors are often perceived as more in tune with thestruggles of their mentees [1] and more approachable than an individual who identifies as an“expert” scientist [2]. Examples of near-peer mentoring relationships in academia include anupper-level student and a first-year student, an undergraduate student and a graduate student, or agraduate student and a new faculty member. Near-peer mentoring can positively affect both the mentor and the mentee. Studentmentees have stated that they feel more comfortable asking a near-peer mentor for academic helpthan they do a professor [3] and believe access to near-peer mentors promotes success in theircoursework [4]. Students
have moved many times due to my parents being in the military. While I didn’t enjoy being uprooted every year, moving exposed me to the many different cultural dynamics that were present across the United States. This ignited my appreciation for differences and my passion for people and social justice. My passion for people and their stories allowed me to start a podcast on behalf of my major to talk to students, faculty, and advisory board members. I also grew up in church, where I learned what it meant to serve from a young age. I am now the manager of my church’s café, as college and all-nighters to finish projects have turned me into a self-proclaimed coffee connoisseur. I try to lead everything I do with a
LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (2010).10We are aware of at least one other instance of implementing ASCE 7,11 and two instances ofimplementing the AISC code12,13 in introductory MoM, but the majority of instances occur inadvanced structural analysis or design courses. Many educators rightly raise questions as to whether commercial software and designcodes (i) are too advanced for use in introductory MoM and/or (ii) offer occasions to bypassnecessary theory and hand calculation.3,4,5 As our project is in its early phase, we do not yetknow what lessons we will learn that might edify these concerns. However, our approach isoptimistic and is developed with care to anticipate such issues in advance. With respect toquestion (i), one
within this group. They turn to the community forguidance on navigating workplace issues, exploring new job opportunities, coping with layoffs,addressing childcare concerns, managing spousal dynamics, and sharing insights into their dailylives. The authors, one of whom is an 'engineering mom,' posit that such support networks couldplay a crucial role in retaining women in the engineering profession.Literature ReviewThere are several areas of literature relevant to this work and its specific questions. The key areasto consider are flexibility, bias, and work-life balance. These areas are chosen as the lens throughwhich the results are seen, in order to address the issues that lead to women leaving theengineering workforce after they have
State University. His research interests are in the areas of Nanotechnology, Fiber Optic Communications, Faculty Development, Application of Telecom- munications Technologies in Distance Education, and Social and Ethical Implications of Technology. He is the author of many educational papers and presentations. He has authored/coauthored the following books: • Nanotechnology: Ethical and Social Implications (2012) • Technology and Society: Issues for the 21st Century and Beyond 3E, (2008) • The Telecommunications Fact Book and Illustrated Dictionary 2E (2006) • Fiber Optic Communication: An Applied Approach, Prentice Hall, N.J.(2002) • Technology and Society: A Bridge to the 21st Century (2002) • Technology and
2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference1.2.4 Engineering Mechanics: Statics Studies have indicated that it is critical to ensure that the learning objectives of thespecific subject matter are noted, particularly when initiating active learning in engineeringeducation, it is essential to consider the specific subject matter and learning objectives [9]. As afundamental course in most engineering disciplines, Statics is an excellent common course toexperiment with the strategies of active learning. Statics is concerned with loads on bodies inequilibrium, either at rest or moving with constant velocity. Engineering students in Statics learnto solve increasingly more challenging problems with foundational principles. and the resultingimpact
effect size was also computed to inform issues related to Type II errors orincorrectly concluding a lack of difference between the compared groups [42]. Cohen’s d wasmanually calculated in the paired tests by dividing the mean difference by the standard deviation[43]. The rules of thumb are that Cohen’s d values of 0.2-0.5, 0.5-0.8, and above 0.8 representsmall, medium, and large effect sizes, respectively [44].Limitations: Students self-reported ND, which encompasses a broad range of conditions. Theliterature itself differs in the conditions that are classified as neurodiverse. In addition, formaldiagnosis varies among different demographic groups (e.g., [10]), with particular concerns thatfemales are underdiagnosed ([11]). Combining all
. “Among college experiences, three experiences are significantly related tochange in engineering identity. Students with greater concern for a career where they can workfor social change, students who receive more mentoring and support from faculty, and studentswho experience more negative cross-racial interactions also indicate developing a stronger senseof engineering identity” [19, p. 22]. The notion that a stronger identity as an engineer is formed ifa woman is singled out in class or clubs repeatedly seems counterintuitive. However the studypoints to the fact that as a woman or URM students are singled out the uniqueness of theiridentity is reaffirmed, among those students who persisted. The formation of an undergraduate’sidentity as an
engaging supplemental design process, BID,in a way that enhanced the goals of core standards without distracting from them. In challengingenvironments with novice students, prior experience [9], literature [10], and teacher feedbackfrom summer professional learning [11], led curriculum designers to consider that studentsgravitated to physical design and prototyping activities, whereas early design process activitiessuch as problem definition and conceptual design were considered onerous for students, made itdifficult to maintain student focus, and could result in classroom management issues. Thus, thedesign team had to balance time and effort devoted to teaching core EDP learning standardsagainst the novel BID processes that would set the
computerassisted virtual environment (CAVE) EON Icatcher and EON Professional integrated developmentenvironment (IDE) software. Two groups of graduate students enrolled in the course for twoconsecutive years provided feedback through surveys, discussions, and informal interviews.Students gained practical experience with designing VR systems and VR environments,appreciated the labs, and were excited about their VR projects.IntroductionThe demand for new knowledge content is high in engineering education practice at the graduatelevel. It is expected that the graduate courses lead, or at least reflect, the current state oftechnological developments and scientific discoveries. To stay competitive and current,curriculum designers are under constant pressure to
students, it may be too muchto ask them to understand the full analog-to-digital conversion process that a measurement devicedoes, and our course does not seek to teach such things. However, it can be considered within thescope of our class for the students to offer some justification for what degree to which theirmeasurements are to be trusted.Prior to our study, the lab course in question had for many years utilized a recipe‐based model toguiding students through the experimental procedures in their lab course. However, prompted byreview of ABET outcomes in 2013, faculty in the Mechanical Science and Engineering departmentat the University of Illinois decided that the lab course was failing at teaching students how todesign experiments.A new
assessments 11 . Interview format can range from a very structured set of questionsthat is to be followed explicitly to a nearly unstructured format with few guidelines, depending onthe need and purpose of the research being performed 20 . This approach allows for new ideas to beuncovered and explored based on what the participants say, rather than potential preconceptionsof study authors. The end goal of such a qualitative study is to gain an understanding of theparticipant’s point of view concerning the course and its content 5,13 .MethodologyStudent volunteers were solicited from an introductory cybersecurity course and included bothupper division undergraduate as well as graduate students who participated in the semester longstudy. To help
AC 2012-3147: HYBRID DELIVERY OF ENGINEERING ECONOMY TOLARGE CLASSESKellie Grasman, Missouri University of Science & Technology Kellie Grasman serves as an instructor in engineering management and systems engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology. She holds graduate degrees in engineering and business admin- istration from the University of Michigan and began teaching in 2001 after spending several years in industry positions. She was named the 2011-12 Robert B. Koplar Professor of Engineering Management for her achievements in online learning. She serves as an eMentor for the University of Missouri System and earned a Faculty Achievement Award for teaching.Dr. Suzanna Long, Missouri
areencouraged to continue using the assignment and even to advocate its adoption by otherinstructors in the civil engineering department. There are areas that still need improvement,however. These include improving the manner in which the assignment is introduced andmodeled for students and reducing the grading load on instructors even further.After reflection on how the assignments were graded during the first two terms, the authors havedeveloped a detailed rubric for future use in the course (Table 2). The rubric will be presented tothe students along with the assignment description at the start of the course.Grading load continues to be a concern for the authors, but further consideration of the issue hasled us to consider new pedagogical strategies
Session 1653 The First Year Engineering Course at NC State University: Design and Implementation Jerome P. Lavelle and Mary Clare Robbins North Carolina State UniversityIntroductionOver the past three years the freshmen engineering course in the College of Engineering at NorthCarolina State University has been substantially redesigned. This paper describes the design,implementation and assessment of the new course. This course has undergone substantialchange since 1996, Porter et al. previously reported on what had been implemented prior to19991 . In the
innovative learning, to encourage students to generate creative engineeringdesign, our lab requirements do not specify unique solutions. Instead, we provide a series of directions forstudents’ imaginations. For instance, we point out “GPS brings high cost for tiny sensors due to expensivesatellite communication, what about using neighboring sensors to estimate the patient’s location?” “New issue: If using other sensors, should we use radios or sound? Radio is faster than sound. But slowsound propagation may make it easier to measure early-late difference…” “If using sound, what mathmodel should be used to calculate triangle positions to locate a sensor?” The above level-to-level question-based, non-instructional lab style motivates
thelibrary learning outcomes. Page 22.554.2Introduction & BackgroundIn the past decade there has been an increased impetus for assessment of student learningoutcomes in information literacy settings in general and at our institution.1 Because we regularlysee all first-year engineering students in library instruction, we identified the multi-sectionOrientation to Engineering (ES 1000) course as a good place to begin assessing engineeringstudents’ proficiency in information literacy skills. Many engineering faculty know theimportance of information literacy,2 due in part to the inclusion of information literacy andcritical thinking skills in the ABET criteria for
education. Page 22.622.2Background:Training engineers as entrepreneurs and innovators has been a hot topic in the popular andacademic press for at least the past decade. It is a generally held societal belief that anunderstanding of business principles by engineers along with enhancing entrepreneurialtendencies will lead to a greater number and more successful technical innovations for acompany1 or country 2-4. It is expected that such innovations will lead to economic wealth andjob creation, vital concerns of all societies. As many as 47 US universities now offerentrepreneurship courses to engineers 5. This belief in the value of engineering
defined the direction and scope ofsubsequent education policy and research in terms of gender equity. In 1964, Congress passedthe Civil Rights Act, which, among other things, prohibited racial discrimination in education.As a part of this Act, Congress also commissioned a national study to determine the extent ofracial inequality in terms of access to educational opportunity. With the passage of Title IX, in1972, discrimination on the basis of sex in educational institutions and programs was alsoprohibited, but, unlike the 1964 Civil Rights Act, no research to examine sex discrimination wasincluded in the legislation. In the early 1980’s, national concern about the growing shortage ofscientists and engineers gave rise to policy initiatives
needs. To address these issues, acritical re-evaluation of the term project’s target and structure was performed for the 2014-2015academic year.Revising the Term Project: ModificationsThe course where the engineering education majors learn to develop lesson plans for STEMoutreach activities was normally offered in the fall semester; consequently, the lesson plans usedby the programmers to create their applications were completed before the programming projectwas assigned. In a sense, the completed lesson plans implicitly presented themselves as “deaddocuments” meant to be followed, not as an invitation for suggestions. As a result, the qualitativeportion of the post-activity surveys conducted by the 2013-2014 introductory programmingcohort
. Prior to Intel, he worked on the implementation of software-radio based cellular products as a Senior Software Engineer at Motorola Solutions, Inc. He received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2014.Dr. Gavin Buskes, The University of Melbourne Gavin is an Associate Professor and Deputy Head (Academic) in the Department of Electrical and Elec- trical Engineering at the University of Melbourne, Australia. He teaches a wide range of engineering subjects and has research interests in optimal control, idea generation, prior knowledge and developing professional skills. He also holds the role of Assistant Dean (Teaching and Learning) in the Faculty of Engineering and Information
ideas.Although students didn’t always provide such detailed accounts of their groups’ disagreements,this pattern of students resolving conflicting ideas about specific elements of their designsthrough testing was recurrent within the dataset. While relatively infrequent, there were students who reported negative experiencesworking in groups. Some students reported that they opted not to work in groups wheneverpossible because of a personal preference to work independently (e.g. “I just don’t like workingin groups”). However, students also cited issues with the motivation of their classmates and thedivision of labor among group members as concerns. For example, one 7th grade studentprovided the following account of their experience working in
Paper ID #25686BYOE: Improving Experience with a Metal Detector Project for Electromag-neticsDr. Harold R. Underwood, Messiah College Dr. Underwood received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign (UIUC) in 1989, and has been a faculty member of the engineering Department at Messiah College since 1992. Besides teaching Circuits, Electromagnetics, and Communications Systems, he su- pervises engineering students in the Communications Technology Group on credited work in the Inte- grated Projects Curriculum (IPC) of the Engineering Department, and those who participate voluntarily
the goals of technology education as being “a distinct form of creative activity wherehuman beings interact with their environments, using appropriate materials and processes inresponse to needs, wants and opportunities”5.‘Technical Education’ has existed on the Irish curriculum since its introduction in 18856.Upon its introduction, the goals of technical education were concerned with a vocationalethos where a practical skill sets were widely cherished. The fundamentals behind thedevelopment of technical education in Ireland were simple. In order to promote economicsuccess and progression the development of a workforce with a strong practical skill set wasrequired. However, in line with a global shift coupled with the changing needs of