Advancing Engineering Education and Research Outlook and Strategy for 2019 Miriam Quintal and Otto Katt Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC February 5, 2019Lewis-Burke and ASEE• Lewis-Burke began representing ASEE in October 2017 – 27 policy experts with range of expertise/backgrounds allow multi-layered issue teams with deep expertise in agencies and scientific/education areas – 38 clients exclusively composed of non-profit entities: universities, scientific societies, managers of large federal facilities• Goals of ASEE Advocacy – Conducting outreach to Congress to support funding and sound policy for engineering research and education – Supporting ASEE Councils to enhance advocacy goals of deans and
Carolina A&T State University has implemented anundergraduate research program with support from corporate partnership to enhance this goal.The Intel Undergraduate Research Program involves qualified undergraduate students in hands-on research experience. Key features include a multidisciplinary student cohort that is exposed toa variety of research topics under close mentoring from interdisciplinary faculty. Over itsoffering in the past two years, this program has become a prestigious avenue for obtainingresearch experiences. Students are admitted based on competitive standards that include highGPA requirements and strong recommendations from faculty. Unique aspects of this programinclude active participation from the industry for the initial
world, hands-on experience in the engineering fields. A 2017 thesissupervision clarifies that action learning can be a critical part of undergraduate engineeringlearning [4]. The student researchers approached the project in multiple stages. First, they usedpencils and paper to brainstorm and design the physical dimensions of the device. They came upwith and discarded several iterations before landing on a design that they wanted to take forward.Then, they moved from pencil and paper to the computer and "SolidWorks" CAD (computeraided drafting) software that allowed them to bring their drawings to digital 3D space. Once theywere happy with their initial prototype, printing began. They quickly learned the necessity ofcost-efficient designs and
summer activities.Program Description and Teacher ActivitiesOrientation Week The initial week provided a thorough theoretical and practical orientation to and overviewof the program, including introductions to engineering research as well as expectations of theteachers and mentors. Activities included an overview of the breadth of the research projectsand how the research impacts product and process development that results in electronicproducts. This orientation week also built relationships to create a community across both theteachers and the faculty and graduate student mentors to enhance the learning and experience ofthe program. This was particularly important, since this RET Site was offered on two campusesin two different states
numberof students of 20.The program was hosted from June 9, 2014 to June 28, 2014. Students weredivided into six groups with four students in each group. Each group was supervised by oneSTEM faculty and one Junior or Senior engineering student. Other than the individual groupmeetings, all the participants met with the project administrators, faculty mentors, and studentmentors on the initial meeting, weekly meeting, and end-of-project conference and ceremony.Participants’ parents and family were invited to the end-of-project conference and ceremony.Activity objective 1: Summer Research Program developed to attract engineering majorsto TAMU-K and retain students in engineering majors.Six faculty members and six student mentors were hired to lead
problems8. Stokols etal.2 echo this call: Preparation and practice of collaborative research are essential in formingfuture productive teams. Much of this training revolves around becoming aware (throughexperience) of the factors that foster or inhibit strong collaborations, which requires deliberatereflection as teams succeed or fail in their initiatives.A number of programs have funded educational initiatives that intend to prepare graduatestudents to be future leaders in interdisciplinary research. One of these projects is the IntegrativeGraduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT), supported by the National ScienceFoundation16. Awarded IGERT proposals seek to train the next generation of engineers,scientists, and scholars in disciplinary
AC 2007-2229: INTRODUCING RESEARCH CONCEPTS TO SENIOR STUDENTSIN DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS LABORATORYGukan Rajaram, North Carolina A&T State University Gukan Rajaram is a Post-doctoral research scientist in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from North Carolina A&T State University. His research is in the area of electrode and electrolyte synthesis and characterization for solid oxide fuel cells. He also teaches senior level mechanical engineering laboratory and actively involved in K-12 outreach activities.Devdas Pai, North Carolina A&T State University Devdas M. Pai is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NC A&T State University and
AC 2007-204: INTEGRATING CAD/CAM AND COMPOSITE TOOLINGTECHNOLOGIES IN A RESEARCH EXPERIENCEMean-Shang Chen, Central Michigan University Dr. Mean-Shang Chen is currently a professor in the Department of Engineering & Technology at Central Michigan University. He completed his undergraduate studies in mechanical engineering at Taipei Institute of Technology. He also holds an M.S. from South Dakota School of Mines and Technology and a Ph.D. from Kansas State University in that same discipline. He is a licensed engineer in the State of Michigan. His current research interest is in computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided engineering (CAE). He offers a number of courses in these two
Paper ID #6537Cellular Phone Control Application as an Undergraduate Research ProjectDr. Robert Weissbach P.E., Pennsylvania State University, Erie Robert Weissbach is currently an associate professor of engineering at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. From October 2007 through June 2008, he was a visiting researcher at Aalborg University in Aalborg, Denmark. His research interests are in renewable energy, energy storage, power electronics and power systems.Mr. Garrett LoVerde Garrett LoVerde is a senior undergraduate student studying engineering technology at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. He will be
needs in the vastmajority of cases.Of course the analysis offered here relies on a number of simplifying assumptions that make theproblem tractable. For instance, the initial results are generated assuming that the probability ofall sponsored projects under consideration is the same (0.10). Clearly, this is not usually thecase. Funding from some sources is highly competitive resulting in lowered probabilities ofawards. Other proposals may have been requested by longtime research clients and have muchhigher likelihood of approval. Altering the probabilities that proposals will be funded couldeither decrease or increase the variability of the system, depending upon whether there is more orless certainty associated with the awarding of proposals
have lunch gatherings three times a week. XX will be responsible facilitatingthe conversations with visitors. This might include setting the initial theme or steering the Page 24.714.3conversation to the direction that fits to everybody.Digitizers: XX and YY will develop the entire EGR 190 (Digital Circuits) class content andrelated activities. This class that ZZ taught last year will be completely flipped!Reporter: XX will keep the blog updates, take pictures during TD and research, and askquestions, work on the Facebook page and Twitter.Activists: This year’s academic year visits will be planned and developed during the program.XX will lead
apply to solvingproblems in the lab. For example, in solving ill-defined problems, a useful strategy is to startwith a graphical representation of what is known and unknown. Many brainteasers give practicein making assumptions and inferences to reveal more “knowns” than was initially apparent.Case StudiesSeveral cases were discussed based on experiences with graduate students in my research lab. Acommon problem is noisy data. I discussed one particular graph of noisy force data and the stepsthat the student took to investigate and eliminate the sources of noise. Another case involvedhardware that didn’t seem to be operating properly. I described the unusual behavior that caughtthe student’s attention and then the steps we went through to
contactthem. The initial meeting is vital to the success of the project. It is during this meeting that thestudents should fully appreciate that this is a service learning research project and that theirresults will benefit the community. It is the responsibility of the instructor to have focused theproject so that it also supports the course outcomes.The students then propose a plan and schedule to complete the defined tasks. The plan isdiscussed with the instructor and project sponsor and modifications are made, if necessary.Student teams meet with the instructor on a weekly basis where they submit a progress report,review data, and discuss future activities. When necessary, the project sponsor is requested tocome to the weekly meetings. At the end
graduate and undergraduate,involvement. Initial test results show that the system has the desired features and satisfies thedesign criteria. This project provides a valuable contribution to research in a number of fields,including oceanography studies, contaminated environments, and hazardous areas.AcknowledgmentThis project is partially supported by a NASA-IRA grant, contract # NCC5-517.References1. S.G. Hall, R.R. Price, and L. Wei, “Design of an Autonomous Bird Predation Reduction Device,” 2001 ASAE Annual International Meeting, Paper Number: 01-3131, 8 pages.2. B. Ross, “A Robot Boat for Offshore Science,” The Robotics Institute-Carnegie Mellon University, United State, 2002.3. R. Rocca, “Launching the Roboat,” Circuit Cellar
learn about connections between STEMcoursework, research, and the work of the companies. They also are guided in K-12 pedagogyand create web documents based on their research that include complete lesson plans aimed at atarget audience of 5th – 8th grade students.Summer research internships for high school students began in the Program for Women in Scienceand Engineering (PWSE) at Iowa State University in 1986. In the summer of 1997 an auxiliaryprogram, financed by the National Science Foundation in its initial year, began in the College ofEngineering and was called “The Internet Explorers Program.” It extended research internships totwenty high school girls who had completed their junior year with the primary goal of increasingmiddle school
insufficient time to digest what the data mean and conduct appropriatestatistical analysis of their findings. As they immerse in the details the students may also losesight of the bigger driver for their research and the initial goals and objectives. It is theresponsibility of the mentors to coach students on the process of data interpretation. Some Page 25.1186.14students work on finalizing their reports after the end of the REU program, via emailcorrespondence with their advisors. Future work will also be conducted in an attempt tocorrelate the quality of the final report with eventual publication or conference presentation ofthe results.Table 7
viewpoint than can be obtained by performing research onsite(for a similar reason that sabbaticals are often taken off campus). A clinically-based laboratorywill address current clinical issues in a manner more difficult for an engineering laboratory(which has a different focus). Finally, these courses are a powerful means by which to obtain anexternal assessment of a specific student and the program in general.Both Capstone Research I and II share many of the same procedures. In both courses, thestudent selects a potential research site (with the aid of the faculty advisor if required). This sitemay be near the university, the student’s permanent address, or any other site of interest. Thestudent makes the initial contact with the potential
dwindling research budgets, Special Problems are proving to be a very effective approach for continuing research work at a nice pace.• Teaching becomes even more enjoyable.• Improved interaction with industry: In some cases, this results in funded research work and/or donated equipment.• Publications.V. CONCLUSIONS Although the use of Special Problems and undergraduate students to perform research workwas initially originated by dwindling research budgets, it is proving a very beneficial experienceto both the undergraduate students and this faculty member. Undergraduate students taking theseSpecial Problems have become the best advertisers. Also, it is the experience of this facultymember that the quality of the work
team they will continue with for thelarger research project that follows. Figure 1. Student teams working on their traffic signal models as a warm-up.After completing the traffic signal, the research project is assigned. Weeks five through sevenalso introduce some new programming content as students are engaging with the informationgathering, problem specification, and initial idea generation phases of their project. Startingweek eight, class time is nearly entirely devoted to student work implementing andtroubleshooting their projects. See Table 1 below for more details on how the project integrateswith other course topics and activities.Project DetailsCUREs are differentiated from other course-based engineering design projects (e.g
professor, having taught entrepreneurshipat Carnegie Mellon University (as an adjunct in four schools and departments) for 15 years andat University of Pittsburgh for seven years (teaching a class to researchers called “FromBenchtop to Bedside, what every scientist needs to know). I have been involved inentrepreneurial initiatives and centers at both universities and blog regularly aboutentrepreneurship at NewVenturist27. At CMU, we have worked hard to increase women intechnology and women entrepreneurs. Carnegie Mellon has achieved a five-fold increase ofwomen entering in its prestigious School of Computer Science program, from 7% to 38% over afive-year period. CMU owes much of its success in encouraging women entrepreneurs amongboth its
importance score to rank the importance of thedifferent factors. An optimization code was then executed on the resulting regression tree models toidentify the optimal settings for the important factors. Proceedings of the 2025 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference TheUniversityofTexasatArlington,Arlington,TX Copyright 2025, American Society for Engineering Education 3 Research ResultsAn initial analysis of the data observed that using gas for Heater Fuel was significantly more energyefficient, so Heater Fuel was excluded from the regression tree analysis, in order to uncover patternsdue
). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Workshop Result: Teaching Structured Reviews to Environmental Engineering Researchers Daniel B. Oerther Missouri University of Science and Technology, 1401 North Pine Street, Rolla, MO 65409AbstractAs part of the 2019 biennial conference of the Association of Environmental Engineeringand Science Professors, a pre-conference workshop on the topic of structured reviewswas delivered to 22 participants. The workshop had three objectives, namely: 1) raisingawareness about the process of structured reviews; 2) demonstrating the process ofstructured reviews; and 3
(RET) program and is hosted by the College of Engineering (COE) at Texas A&MUniversity (TAMU). The E3 RET program is an integral part of the COE outreach plan andtargets secondary STEM teachers across Texas. Since each teacher may reach 1000+ students inhis/her career, this initiative can have tremendous impact in encouraging young people intotechnology fields and preparing teachers to equip them for success in their journey. The goal ofthe outreach efforts is to increase the pool of engineering applicants and build a network torecruit partner teachers.Although many RET programs focus on a single research area, the E3 RET program providesaccess to engineering faculty across 12 departments, thus allowing for a better match of researchareas
developed in the research portion of the projectincluding: 1) extensions to achieve real-time performance of large scale power plant simulations using UNIXnetwork programming, 2) distributed implementation of advanced controller programming in an architectureof workstation and microprocessor-based controllers, and 3) intelligent control using fizzy logic, neuralnetwork, genetic algorithm, and reconfigurable control techniques. After the presentation of a curriculumdevelopment update, a summary of research activities is presented to complete overview of the project results.BACKGROUND The background for this three year research and curriculum development project was obtained by thesuccessful completion of two major projects initiated in 1989
Page 11.1369.6Work by our research group has conducted investigations extending and exploring theheuristics presented above. One line of work has used eye tracking technology toinvestigate the interaction of graphics, text, and narration. Eye tracking is a particularlypowerful tool to quantify how visual attention is distributed over time and space as alearner interacts with instructional material. By recording eye movements, how muchtime is spent on different learning elements and in what order can be recorded andanalyzed.An initial study by Slyhkuis, et al.43, 44 showed that graphics in a PowerPoint slideattracted visual attention regardless as to its relevance to the content presented in the text.While irrelevant graphics garnered
addition, Hu and colleagues find that students who participate in undergraduate research havegreater interactions and relationships with their faculty, improved writing and communicationskills, and enhanced critical thinking skills [2]. Moreover, summer undergraduate research hasalso been found to support these outcomes, with Lopatto finding that such programs supportnetworking skills and professional development for students [3]. Due to these findings, TheCitadel initiated the Undergraduate Research Office in 2016 and the inaugural The CitadelSURE (Summer Undergraduate Research Experience) program in the summer of 2017. Notethat this program is not quite the same as typical REU programs where students come frommultiple universities to work on one
Paper ID #27762Conceptualizing Entrepreneurial Mind-set: Definitions and Usage in Engi-neering Education ResearchDr. Prateek Shekhar, University of Michigan Prateek Shekhar is an Assistant Research Scientist at the University of Michigan. His research is fo- cused on examining translation of engineering education research in practice, assessment and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and educational programs in engineering disciplines. He holds a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin, M.S. in Electrical Engineering from University of Southern California and B.S. in Electronics and
end researcher support.”33However, adoption of bibliometrics services by the libraries may raise questions about serviceethics, library competencies and capacities to carry such services, and library shift towardauditing function.32Prompted by NIH requirements, medical schools and research centers libraries in the U.S. werethe first to initiate these new types of services. In authors’ opinion, engineering disciplines,ranked second in governmental funding after medicine34 and fourth in number of publications,35are most likely to follow in adopting research assessment. This adoption may likely be rushed bythe NSF requirements for demonstrating “broader impact.” In turn, this would createopportunities for engineering librarians to offer support
twenty years in thermodynamics, solar engineering, graphics, dynamics, machine design, and finite elements methods at the University of the Pacific. He has over fifty referred technical research publications, and conference papers with twelve in the areas of finite element learning modules with two recently accepted referred engineering journal papers covering the results of this NSF research on finite element active learning modules.Dr. Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy Dr. Dan Jensen is a Professor of Engineering Mechanics at the U.S. Air Force Academy where he has been since 1997. He received his B.S. (Mechanical Engineering), M.S. (Applied Mechanics) and Ph.D. (Aerospace Engineering Science) from the
the participants’ motivation were assigned a code based on thedefinition of the motivation construct from the literature. After a transcript was completelycoded, the researcher interpreted the level of motivation for each motivation construct andassigned a rating (e.g., high or low). The researcher provided comments to explain why therating was chosen. Interpretation was based on coded segments as well as overall interviewcontext.Combined AnalysisRather than focusing on the identified motivation constructs themselves, we focused on the waysmotivation emerged in the analysis. We used the coding from the initial data sets but examinedthem broadly for what they could tell us about how effectively the clinical interviews revealedinsights into