Conference Session

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED): Identity, Motivation & Belonging in Experiential Learning

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sophia Vicente, Elizabethtown College; Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College; Kurt M Degoede, Elizabethtown College; Rebecca Holcombe

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education Division (CEED)

Paper ID #46331Exploring Engineering Students’ Learning Experiences After Participatingin a Mastery- and Project-Based Learning InterventionDr. Sophia Vicente, Elizabethtown College Sophia Vicente (she/her) is currently a Postdoctoral Associate with Elizabethtown College and the Greenway Center for Equity and Sustainability. She has over 6 years of experience studying, teaching, and working alongside engineering students and faculty. Sophia is a former Science & Technology Policy Fellow at the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine and with this background, she is passionate about connecting research

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Patten, Temple University; Avi Kaplan; Ruth Ochia, Temple University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

definition, creative idea generation, andconstructive iterative phases of implementing, testing, and improving a solution [3]. It is expected that engineeringstudents will transfer the principles of design thinking they learn in their courses to new situations and problems [4].Yet, decades of research have demonstrated that promoting transfer is very challenging [4–7]. We repeatedly encounterstudents who manifest fixated thinking (e.g., failing to go beyond an initial solution suggested by an advisor as anexample) and who do not apply previously learned design thinking strategies required for identifying and evaluatingdifferent solutions to fit design criteria and end users’ needs. This paper describes a theoretically-informed interventionin a

Conference Session

IED Technical Session: Preparing for the Future Through Projects and Research

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janis P. Terpenny, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Catherine M. Harmonosky, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Amine Lehtihet, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Vittal Prabhu, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Andris Freivalds, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Elena M. Joshi, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Jose A. Ventura, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

versus buy question.IE478 Retail Services Engineering – provides an introduction to retail services operations,process models, and application of information technologies to enhance productivity andprofitability. During the time we were defining and refining our project on Product-basedLearning (spring semester of 2017, prior to official launching), one of the professors in the teamtried some of the elements of it in this senior-elective/graduate-level course. The course had anenrollment of fifty-eight (58) students consisting of roughly equal undergraduates and mastersstudents. The class was divided into 15 teams of 3 to 4 students each. As an instructor, “bundlinggoods and services” was a new topic both from a curriculum and pedagogical

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University; Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University; Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington; Devlin Montfort, Oregon State University; James D. Sweeney, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Press.4. Johri, A., Olds, B. M. & O’Conner, K., (2014) Situative frameworks for engineering learning research. in Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (Eds.). Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. Cambridge University Press. p. 47-66.5. Collins, A. (1988). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology (Technical Report 6899): BBN Labs Inc., Cambridge, MA.6. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399- 483.7. Engle, R. (2012). The productive disciplinary engagement framework: Origins, key concepts, and continuing

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Luciana Debs, Purdue University Programs; Bryan John Hubbard P.E., Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering

Paper ID #29625Faculty Experience in Team Teaching in Construction Management HigherEducationDr. Luciana Debs, Purdue University Programs Luciana Debs, is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management in the School Construction Manage- ment Technology at Purdue University. She received her PhD from Purdue University Main Campus. Her previous degrees include a MS from the Technical Research Institute of Sao Paulo (IPT-SP), and BArch from the University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Prior to her current position she worked in design coordination in construction and real estate development companies in Brazil

Conference Session

Computed Simulation and Animation

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Vivek Venkatesh; Nawwaf Kharma

lendingthemselves to didactic lecture-based instruction accompanied by rigorous problem-solvingexercises [1]. We do not believe that there will be a complete alternative to such an instructionalmethodology. However, the fact that the amount of information in engineering, is increasing atan exponential rate entails that all the relevant the material cannot be covered in lectures.Furthermore, the level of skill required by a practicing engineer is so high, that universities findit difficult to effectively deliver a comprehensive curriculum, in about four years ofundergraduate study. Students, therefore, must be well equipped to acquire an understanding ofthe expanding field of engineering outside of their scholastic environments. There is also an onuson

Conference Session

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL) Poster Session

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jenna Wong, San Francisco State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

creator identify what pieces of information he/she will need togather throughout their recording process.4. Case StudyThis paper’s author is currently developing the YouTube Channel Engineering with Jen(@engineeringwithjen). The channel is part of an educational objective for an NSF CAREERgrant with the mission to expand the knowledge base of structural resilience and new structuralengineering sub-fields. This key objective was tied to technical research and an identified need inthe civil engineering curriculum to create new video material as discussions related to thesesubject matters were very limited. With new design concepts emerging in structural engineering,there has been limited research due to the pace of technological development and

Conference Session

Problem- and Project-Based Learning

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Olewnik, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Laine Schrewe, University at Buffalo; Scott M. Ferguson, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

objectives have been considered, the type of problem used tomeet that objective can be selected. Pasadin [9] identified four types of engineering problems foruse with PBL, including (1) simple problems that reflect specific concepts, (2) complex yetstructured problems with sufficient information for students to resolve, (3) complete but ill-structured problems with insufficient information given (requiring students to search forinformation in order to solve the problem), and (4) complex, ill-structured problems that alsorequire analysis to determine a solution. These problems reflect a progression/range of difficultyand complexity levels that students could be asked to solve. Figure 1. Critical Areas of Consideration when Transitioning

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. Catherine Key, North Carolina Central University; Aileen Reid, University of North Carolina, Greensboro; Eric Saliim, North Carolina Central University; Tanina Bradley

education. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com “Making” to the Future: An Innovative Approach to Undergraduate Science Education S. Catherine Silver Key*#, Tanina Bradley^, Aileen Reid%, and Eric T. Saliim#*Corresponding author. # Department of Biological & Biomedical Sciences, ^Department ofPhysics and Mathematics at North Carolina Central University and % University of NorthCarolina at GreensboroAbstract “Making’ - a hands-on practice of creating technology-based artifacts typically involvesintegrating electronics, programming, or 3D printing. This paper

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maria Chrysochoou, University of Connecticut; Arash Esmaili Zaghi P.E., University of Connecticut; Connie Mosher Syharat, University of Connecticut; Todd Campbell, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

website is still evolving as we seek toimprove the quantity and quality of the information provided there.Sharing Personal ExperiencesAmong the most important tools to support the growth and success of our epistemic communityis the sharing of personal experiences of neurodiversity within semi-structured discussions. Thepractice of sharing personal experiences of neurodiversity emerged as a key part of our effortsfor many reasons. First, this practice empowers neurodiverse individuals (students, staff, andfaculty) to break down the silence and stigma related to neurodiversity, to advocate for changewithin higher education, and to be producers of knowledge (rather than subjects of research)about neurodiverse experiences of higher education. Since

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 5: Assessment

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Laura Melissa Cruz Castro, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Education, 2019 Validation of an Instrument to Measure Student Engagement with a Standards-Based Grading SystemIntroductionThis research paper presents the development and validation of an instrument intended tomeasure the engagement of students with standards-based grading (SBG) systems. Such systemscan complement the use of backwards design [1], [2], a curriculum development strategyintended to improve student learning which is taking hold in engineering education. Increasingly,engineering instructors are working towards more clear identification of intended learningobjectives, alignment of curriculum, and adoption of transparent, informative, and feedback richassessment strategies. Instructors are in essence creating

Conference Session

Diversity and Global Experiences

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

well as faculty advisor for several student societies. She is the instructor of several courses in the CBE curriculum including the Material and Energy Balances, junior laboratories and Capstone De- sign courses. She is associated with several professional organizations including the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning and retention.Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and assistant professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program

Conference Session

FOCUS ON EXHIBITS: Welcome Reception & NEW THIS YEAR! 2018 Best Division Paper Nominee Poster Session Sponsored by Engineering Unleashed

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico

Tagged Topics

ASEE Headquarters

University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program, and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutioniz- ing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two- strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Design and Entrepreneurship

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara A. Karanian A., Stanford University; Ateeq Junaid Suria, Mechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; Jonathan Summers

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Paper ID #11383Car Storytelling and Interaction DesignProf. Barbara A. Karanian A., Stanford University Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. , Lecturer, previously visting Professor, in the School of Engineering, in the Mechanical Engineering Design Group, helps teams discover yet to be satisfied customer needs with her proven methods- from a theoretical perspective of both socio-cognitive psychology and applied design thinking - that she has developed and refined over the past few decades. In addition to helping a team uncover this information, the companies she has worked with eventually have an easily deployable tool kit

Conference Session

Mentoring Practices and Project Teams

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shane Paul Lorona, Oregon State University; Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #21911The Two Worlds of Engineering Student TeamsMr. Shane Paul Lorona, Oregon State UniversityDr. Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington Professor of Learning Sciences & Human DevelopmentDr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use

Conference Session

Best of NEE

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Diane Carlson Jones Ph.D, University of Washington; Tamara Floyd-Smith, Tuskegee University; Nanette M. Veilleux, Simmons College; Caitlin Hawkinson Wasilewski, Seattle Pacific University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

whatapproaches have been shown to work well for others; in other words, to consider evidence-basedteaching practices. The engineering education literature has provided such evidence-basedapproaches for introduction to engineering courses1, capstone courses2, and topic-specificcourses.3,4 It has also provided teaching guidelines for approaches ranging from teaching usingactive learning methods5, improving student self efficacy6 and retaining engineering students7. Page 24.977.2This paper summarizes other evidenced-based teaching practices which have recently emerged  from our collaborative research on the role of a student’s connection to community in his

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emmabeth Parrish Vaughn, Austin Peay State University; Lily Skau, Austin Peay State University; Bobette Dawn Bouton, Austin Peay State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. al., who defined empathy as “an individual’s capacity tounderstand the behavior of others, to experience their feelings, and to express that understandingto them” [14]. Within this three-part definition the theoretical constructs of empathy, thecognitive, affective, and behavioral shown in the top half of Figure 1, emerge. The cognitiveconstruct relates to the mental process of empathy; the affective relates to the emotional processof empathy; the behavioral relates to the physical process of empathy. Recently, throughtransdisciplinary dialogs between engineering and social work educators, an empathy modelspecific to engineering was created [13]. This model, displayed in the lower half of Figure 1,proposes that empathy in engineering is a

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 14

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abdullah Umair Bajwa, Habib University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

Fusion deposition modeling FEA Finite element analysis LMS Learning management system PLA Polylactic acid R Revolute S Spherical SoTL Scholarship of teaching and learning STEM Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics TA Teaching assistant 3DP 3D printingReferences[1] T. Trust, R. W. Maloy and S. Edwards, “Learning through making: Emerging and expanding designs for college classes,” TechTrends, vol. 62, pp. 19-28, 2018.[2] K. L. Meyers, A. S. Morgan and B. P. Conner., “3D printing to introduce design in a cornerstone project,” Global Journal of Engineering Education, p. 18.1, 2016.[3] C. Schelly, G. Anzalone, B. Wijnen and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Patricia Ann Maloney, Texas Tech University; Bingbing Li, California State University, Northridge; Meng Zhang, Kansas State University; Weilong Cong, Texas Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

research to accurately determine the effects on K-12 andundergraduate students.The proposed course will cover extrusion-based, liquid-based, and powder-based AM processes.For each technology, fundamentals, applications, and advances will be discussed. Students willlearn solutions to AM of polymers, metals, and ceramics. Two lab projects will be built toprovide hands-on experiences on a variety of state-of-the-art 3D printers. To stimulateinnovation, students will design, fabricate, and measure test parts, and will perform experimentsto explore process limits and tackle real world problems. They will also engage K-12 studentsthrough video demonstrations and mentorship, thus developing presentation skills.Through the project, different pedagogical

Conference Session

Trends in Engineering Education

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joye Jepson, Antioch University; Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

professional identities. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12(2-3), 95-95-117.12. Carlone, H. B. (2003). (Re)producing good science students: Girls' participation in high school physics. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9(1), 17-17-34.13. Chubin, D. E., May, G. S., & Babco, E. L. (2005). Diversifying the engineering workforce. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 73-73-86.14. Creamer, E. G., Burger, C. J., & Meszaros, P. S. (2004). Characteristics of high school and college women interested in information technology. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 10(1), 67- 67-78.15. Crowe, M. (2003). Jump for the sun II: Can a

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rigoberto Chinchilla, Eastern Illinois University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Paper ID #6367Collaboration between Private Sector and Academia: Are We CompromisingOur Engineering Programs?Dr. Rigoberto Chinchilla, Eastern Illinois University Dr. Rigoberto Chinchilla earned his Ph.D. in Integrated Engineering from Ohio University. He is an associate professor of Applied Engineering and Technology at Eastern Illinois University (EIU) since 2004. His teaching and research interests include Quality Design, Biometric and Computer Security, Clean Technologies, Automation and Technology-Ethics. Dr. Chinchilla has been a Fulbright and a United Nations scholar, serves in numerous departmental and university

Conference Session

ERM: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Loweth, University of Michigan; Sara Hoffman, University of Michigan; Shanna Daly, University of Michigan; Leah Paborsky; Steve Skerlos, University of Michigan

engineering careeradvancement. There may have been aspects of participants’ educational contexts (such as theways that their instructors reproduced and validated dominant engineering norms [48]) thatimplicitly shaped participants’ perspectives as well but that did not emerge as part of this study.Lastly, our identities and expertise as researchers informed how we collected and analyzed ourdata. For example, we used a qualitative interviewing approach for this study in part based on theexpertise available within our research team. A different study design (e.g., using participatoryresearch approaches [49]) might have elicited different perspectives from participants. Inaddition, all members of our research team racially identify as White, which

Conference Session

2-Year College Division: Students and the Pipeline

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Leo Salgado, University of California, Irvine; Sharnnia Artis, University of California, Irvine; Hye Rin Lee, University of California, Irvine; Lorenzo Valdevit, University of California, Irvine

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College

Access and Inclusion for the Henry Samueli School of Engi- neering and Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences at the University of California, Irvine. She is responsible for programs at the pre-college, undergraduate, and graduate levels to facili- tate the recruitment, retention, and overall success of students from traditionally underrepresented groups in engineering and information and computer sciences. Dr. Artis has 18 years of experience working with education and outreach programs in engineering and over 35 publications in STEM education and outreach. Prior to joining UC Irvine, she was the Education and Outreach Director for the Center for Energy Efficient Electronics Science at the University

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Chrysanthe Demetry, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Elizabeth Long Lingo, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

in-depth longitudinal case study data, we find that reform involves anongoing process of wrestling with strategic ambiguity. More specifically, we identify three inter-related micro-processes that inform efforts at reform: 1) negotiations over the what of promotioncriteria and systems; 2) struggles over who controls the formulation of promotion policy andinterpretation of criteria; and 3) decisions over how the change process itself should unfold(externally or internally aligned). This paper makes several new contributions to the field: 1) weintroduce the idea of strategic ambiguity as something that is negotiated and navigated ratherthan something to be eliminated; 2) we provide a more nuanced understanding of the micro-processes that

Conference Session

Ethical Reasoning and Responsibility

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lorraine G. Kisselburgh, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Justin L. Hess, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida; Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Education, 2016 Assessing a Scaffolded, Interactive, and Reflective Analysis Framework for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering StudentsAbstractEducating future engineers to effectively reason through complex ethical decisions encounteredin the design and development of new technologies is a critical and relevant challenge. However,a coherent framework to analyze ethical issues with emerging technologies has not been widelyadopted. Over three years, we developed and tested an innovative approach to teaching ethicalreasoning that integrates a reflexive process of evaluation in a cyber-enabled learningenvironment. We posited that ethics should: be taught as a reasoning process; allow

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division: Integrating Design Across the BioE/BME Curriculum

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mostafa Elsaadany, University of Arkansas; Raj Rao, University of Arkansas; Loren Hedgecock; Kaitlin Hall

Entrepreneurial Bioengineering. He is active in Engineering Education Research, where he studies different mentoring strategies to ensure the academic and professional success of underrepresented groups, especially first-generation college students. Further, he studies strategies for instilling the entrepreneurial mindset in engineering students as well as innovative approaches to teaching such as using virtual reality.AbstractEntrepreneurial-Minded Learning (EML) is an emerging pedagogy progressively gainingpopularity in the engineering education community. Coincided with project-based learning(PBL), EML illustrates an essential dimension to the instruction of next-generation engineers,equipping them with various perspectives and approaches to

Conference Session

External Factors, Shifting Identity Trajectories, Persistence Analysis of Cultural Models, and Exploring the Experiences of Black University Students

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sylvia L. Mendez, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs; Kathryn Watson, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

deductively. Three themes emerged: (1) parents were highly encouraging, (2) a love ofscience was nurtured in school, and (3) they were eager to engage in and promote scientificinnovation. These findings illustrate the ways in which family, schools, and communityinfluence the STEM career trajectories of international postdoctoral scholars. This knowledgebase can be valuable when seeking to recruit and retain them in the U.S. STEM workforce. Theidentified factors also could be particularly instructive to U.S. primary and secondary schoolteachers and administrators, as well as U.S. higher education faculty.IntroductionUnderstanding the external factors that influence international science, technology, engineering,and mathematics (STEM) postdoctoral

Conference Session

Tree-huggers, Diggers, and Queers--Oh my!

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George Catalano, State University of New York, Binghamton; Caroline Baillie, Queens University, Kingston

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education

and relationships of peoples andorganizations involved in technological development.”1 Harris et al2 describe theirapproach to engineering ethics as bridging the gap between theory and practice usingcurrent case studies available such as Hurricane Katrina and global warming. Fledderman3seeks to provide a text and a resource for the study of engineering ethics and to help futureengineers be prepared for confronting and resolving ethical dilemmas that they mightencounter during their professional careers. Martin and Schinzinger4 provide anintroduction to the key issues in engineering ethics, taking account of both specificorganizational contexts and broader technological trends. Baura5 approaches engineeringethics from an industrial perspective

Conference Session

Teaching and Learning in Online Environments

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eunsil Lee, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University; Jennifer M. Bekki, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

describing theirpatterns of interaction with their online course learning management system (LMS) to identifyfactors in the model (i.e., course characteristics, student characteristics, student LMSengagement) that influence students’ persistence decisions. Detailed information about the modelMOCPE framework and the instrument development process and results follow.Theoretical FrameworkThe hypothesized Model for Online Course-level Persistence in Engineering (MOCPE) isgrounded in four theories of student motivation used to study engineering and online studentpersistence: the Expectancy x Value Theory of Achievement Motivation (EVT) [10], theAttention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction (ARCS) model of motivational design [11],Transactional

Conference Session

Problem- and project-based learning in environmental engineering

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Ross Pfluger, P.E., United States Military Academy; Matthew P. Baideme, United States Military Academy; Katie E Matthew, United States Army; Stephen A. Lewandowski, United States Military Academy; Jeffrey A. Starke P.E., United States Military Academy; Michael A. Butkus P.E., U.S. Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

Engineering Technologies, and Air Pollution Engineering.Major Matthew P. Baideme, United States Military Academy Major Matthew Baideme is an officer in the United States Army and an Instructor at the United States Mil- itary Academy (USMA) in the Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering. He currently teaches Environmental Science and Environmental Engineering Technologies at USMA.Mrs. Katie E Matthew, United States Army Major Katie Matthew was commissioned as a Logistics Officer upon graduation from the United States Military Academy in 2000. She has served and commanded in a variety of units, to include maintenance, supply, and headquarters for combat brigades both stateside and deployed. She received an MBA from