Session 1526 Integrating Drug Delivery throughout the Chemical Engineering Curriculum Stephanie Farrell, Robert P. Hesketh, Mariano J. Savelski, and C. Stewart Slater Department of Chemical Engineering Rowan UniversityAbstract Drug Delivery is a burgeoning field that represents one of the major research anddevelopment focus areas of pharmaceutical industry today, with new drug delivery system salesexceeding 10 billion dollars per year [1]. Chemical Engineers play an
ofproblem-based learning are reflected in every aspect of the learning environment created.Problem-based curriculum should document accomplishments at the upper levels of Bloom'sTaxonomy Triangle. Scholars in the area of cognitive science and educational psychology have Page 22.250.2identified four features that clearly separate a problem-based curriculum from a traditional,topic-based curriculum. Dr. Barbara E. Walvoord is Fellow of the Institute for Educational Initiatives andconcurrent professor of English at the University of Notre Dame. She has been the foundingdirector of four faculty development programs and consultant to more than
offour undergraduate engineering students1, Dr. McNeill, and the program director. The fourstudents had responsibility for a portion of the curriculum, which included HTML/UNIX,Microsoft Office, Team Building, and the Design Project. The curriculum began withfundamental elements of team building, introduction to e-mail, and evolved to specificprogramming functions. The curriculum team determined that the students would complete adesign project devoted to the development of a web page with engineering documentation, adesign notebook, and an oral presentation.THE DESIGN PROJECTAs discussed earlier the basic curriculum was comprised of many individual and team activities.The desire was to have an activity that pulled all these separate activities
offour undergraduate engineering students1, Dr. McNeill, and the program director. The fourstudents had responsibility for a portion of the curriculum, which included HTML/UNIX,Microsoft Office, Team Building, and the Design Project. The curriculum began withfundamental elements of team building, introduction to e-mail, and evolved to specificprogramming functions. The curriculum team determined that the students would complete adesign project devoted to the development of a web page with engineering documentation, adesign notebook, and an oral presentation.THE DESIGN PROJECTAs discussed earlier the basic curriculum was comprised of many individual and team activities.The desire was to have an activity that pulled all these separate activities
Session 2613 Revitalizing Statistics in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum David E. Clough Department of Chemical Engineering University of ColoradoFor many years, the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Colorado hasstruggled with the dilemma of how to provide our undergraduate students with appropriateknowledge and skills in applied statistics. We have attempted, with varying degrees of failure,⇒ traditional “introduction to probability and statistics” courses at the sophomore
objectives including within-class Proceedings of the 2010 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 2 evaluation of student performance, faculty assessment of pre-class preparation, standardizedtesting results (FE exam, ACT scores), senior exit interviews, employer surveys, and studentGPA records[2]. As part of a university initiative to develop methods to evaluate student learningacross-the-curriculum, the faculty of the mechanical engineering department chose to examinethe use of the
Proceedings of the 2007 Middle Atlantic Section Fall Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 1 Spacecraft Systems Engineering Courses for Traditional Engineering Curriculum Chang-Hee Won, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Temple UniversityAbstract Systems engineering is an important skill for future engineers. Systems engineering is amanagement technology that allows engineers to effectively design, develop, and deploy large
already wrestling with 9 primary engineering constraints – this effort was added to the next year’s assessment matrix. (4) More Emphasis Needed in Professional Practice Skills (Outcomes 4, 6-9): Faculty not totally pleased with overall professional skills development in 2008-2009, increased total points in outcomes 4 and 6-9 and moved CENG 4341 to spring semester.The program has always had a structural steel design course to meet local structuraldesign needs (Fig. 1). The faculty realized early that there was a need to cover reinforcedconcrete concepts within the curriculum somewhere to support not only structural needs,but geotechnical, water resources, and environmental design needs. The only place toinclude concrete
time, they gain competitive learning skills during theircompetition. As the cooperative learning techniques improve student accomplishment, enhancesatisfaction and self-esteem, and develop plausible race relations and social skills27, 28, thecompetitive learning approaches enable students to realize that they will be rewarded based ontheir performance comparisons with other teams.This paper presents a two-course robotics curriculum design, implementation, and Page 25.117.2comprehensive evaluations. The robotics curriculum was integrated with a national designcompetition and educational mentoring opportunities, was sponsored by National
Latino/ Hispanic and Asian/ PacificIslander. There were more boys (69%) than girls in the current sample. Figure 2 presents asummary of participants’ demographics.4.2 Camp Curriculum and ActivitiesThe code camp assumes no prior programming experience (“no experience necessary”) andprovides a gentle introduction to programming through MIT APP Inventor, which is aneducational tool that allows students to easily and quickly develop apps and deploy them on anAndroid device or emulator 21,22 . This aspect of the camp is expected to enhance students’perceptions of competence, a key dimension in SDT.The camp is designed such that there is a lecture in the first half of each day, followed byhands-on exercises in the afternoon. The schedule is also
adhesion to physiological surfaces. In addition, she maintains an active research program in curriculum development with a focus on workforce development. She is also the 2007 recipient of the ASEE Sharon Keillor Award for Women in Engineering Education.Taryn Bayles, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Taryn Bayles is a Professor of the Practice of Chemical Engineering in the Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Department at UMBC, where she incorporates her industrial experience by bringing practical examples and interactive learning to help students understand fundamental engineering principles. Her current research focuses on engineering education, outreach and curriculum
Page 8.152.5courses. While the process may seem to add burden to curriculum development, it is felt that it Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society of Engineering Educationsubstantially increases the integration of the curriculum, which can be a problem in manyprograms and is specifically problematic in larger programs like ours.As stated earlier, the first step in the process is to create a thread Description. We are reviewingthe catalogue description and the learning objectives for COMM 2004 Public Speaking to get aninsight into what a Communications faculty might write into a course proposal. The cataloguedescription
appropriate measures of operational performance and factorsinfluencing operations. This study demonstrated that there is significant learning potentialassociated with integrating a Caterpillar Virtual Training Simulator (VTS) into a constructioneducation curriculum. The simulator could be used to demonstrate and reinforce principles suchas material waste, O&M costs, and safety. It could also be used to reinforce concepts such asworkforce training and operational learning curves.IntroductionConstruction equipment simulators have been developed by equipment manufacturers to trainoperators for the stressful and tough construction environments without the need to employ anactual machine. Eliminating machine use saves fuel, mechanical wear, and the
emerging societal changes is not surprising in that higher education plays asupporting role in the preparation of talent and knowledge which is central to scientific Page 24.471.2innovation. Therefore, higher education, in turn, cannot adopt a reactive posture and mustalways seek innovation within itself through the content and style of instruction with which itreaches out to newer generations. The creation of the computational and experimental (ComEx)studios is a good example of an innovative learning assistance tool developed to ensure that themechanical engineering curriculum provides a flexible and enduring preparation for theirprofessional
Paper ID #10198Curriculum Exchange: Studio STEM, Engineering After SchoolDr. Christine Schnittka, Auburn University Dr. Christine Schnittka is an assistant professor in the College of Education and the Department of Curriculum and Teaching with a joint appointment in the College of Engineering. Her current research involves developing and evaluating engineering design-based curriculum units that target key science con- cepts and environmental issues through the contextual lens of problem-based learning. Prior to receiving her Ph.D. in science education at the University of Virginia, Dr. Schnittka was a middle school teacher
not reinforced in the academic program because subjectmaterial is not coordinated across the curriculum. We believe entry-level manufacturing engineerswould be better prepared if their undergraduate classes worked together in an integrated manner.The Manufacturing Enterprise Company (MECO)The MECO approach introduces an actual industrial project into the academic sequence everyyear. The project requires design or redesign, development and process planning, casting andCNC machining to create prototypes, and cell layout and group technology for productionplanning as it moves through various classes over the four semesters. Students in variousmanufacturing courses (see Table 1), usually in work teams, to advance the part from adesign/redesign
thoseassessments. Internally, we were not satisfied with our retention numbers. More important, we Page 3.88.1were convinced that we could help students build a better foundation, especially at the freshmanlevel, and at the same time, motivate them to the challenges and rewards of the engineeringprofession. Additionally, we felt that curricular components were not integrated enough—thatwe did not achieve the kind of integrated knowledge set that engineers need to function in asuperior way in the new millenium. Finally, we had a strong desire to develop a curriculum thatwill be able to adapt to the rapidly changing world in which our graduates must practice
Paper ID #8773Promoting Undergraduate Research in the Electrical Engineering Curricu-lumProf. David Hoe, The University of Texas at Tyler David H. K. Hoe did his undergraduate and graduate studies at the University of Toronto. His professional experience includes positions at General Electric’s Research and Development Center as a Staff Engineer and at the University of Texas at Arlington as a Research Associate and Adjunct Professor. He assumed his present position as an Assistant Professor in the Electrical Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Tyler in August 2008. He teaches classes in Computer
in a university is rooted in research1. On the one hand that is so,because learning to become a researcher is a core objective of University training. However,there are also pedagogic arguments. The understanding of scientific method helps thestudents to develop a generic approach to problem situations. Students who are exposed toresearch during their graduate years will be encouraged to develop a questioning andinquiring mind and will be less likely to accept uncritically and passively the "truth" aspropounded and handed down in the lecture books and by the professional expert2. Severalpublications on undergraduate research in technology education suggest that researchenhances student learning, increases retention, increases enrolment
Session 1221 Collaborative Learning in the Construction Technology Curriculum Erdogan M. Sener Indiana University - Purdue University at Indianapolis Introduction/The Need As is the case for all disciplines, the skills that the workplace requires of engineeringkdmology graduateshave changed over the years in parallel with evolving technologies and soeio-economic requirements. TheNational Science Foundations’s task force on TQM has the following definition for contemporary engineeringeducation ‘: “Quality
consensus thatearly-career mechanical engineers need more practical experience and better integration oftechnical and professional skills. There is less clarity on the value of any given technical topic.Even so, handbooks, working engineers, and job advertisements can support development ofuseful technical curriculum content.IntroductionEngineering curriculum evolves gradually over time in response to technological developments,institutional pressures, new pedagogical methods, and shifts in industry demand. Engineeringcurriculum is rarely designed—that is, developed to meet a need by iteratively inventing optionsand selecting the best ones based on evidence.Engineering curriculum has evolved in ways that are inconsistently tied to evidence
several projects funded by the National Science Foundation, including ”Engineering Sustainable Engineers,” which is the focus of this paper.Ms. Madhu Rani, University of Texas, ArlingtonMiss Ketwalee Kositkanawuth Page 25.809.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Integrating Sustainability across the Curriculum: Engineering Sustainable EngineersAbstractEngineering Sustainable Engineers is a program designed to improve student knowledge of andcompetency in addressing sustainability issues in engineering design and problem solving. Three(3
Session 1478 Project-Based Coursework in a Naval Architecture Curriculum Paul H. Miller United States Naval Academy Annapolis MD 21402Abstract Studies have shown the benefits of incorporating design projects into engineeringcourses. These projects allow the students to directly apply the course topics in “hands-on”applications, while also providing the students opportunities to develop group project skills. Inthe small field of naval architecture little has been
per week experience in an engineering-type office setting where studentslearn engineering design through actual practice of handling engineering projects for industryclients. Students manage the acquisition of their technical competencies by learning and applyingthe engineering core concepts in context with their design. 25 hours per week are dedicated todesign execution and 25 hours to technical learning with much synergy between the two.In this program, students transfer into the curriculum with 68 credits and complete an additional60 credits. Students take 8 technical credits per semester and develop their own learningobjectives without taking any formal classes. In former versions of curriculum, students wererequired to submit all
conventional Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference Copyright © 2024, American Society for Engineering Education 2energy resources, the need for education and skills becomes more pronounced to fill the newpositions required for the transition to a green future. This curriculum has been in development atMarshall University for several years, providing the necessary resources to establish aninterdisciplinary core program. Thus, this paper will describe the components of a curriculumdesigned with a unique infrastructure to teach the skills required for understanding the concepts ofgreen energy
: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ahmadfayed/ ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Supplementing Engineering Technology Curriculum Through Space Grants (WIP)1. AbstractIn an Engineering Technology (ET) program with 5 different concentrations, it is not possible to cover thedetailed theory and applications of all high-level classes that are taught in a dedicated single disciplineengineering technology program. Through support from space grant consortia, that are annually fundedby NASA to develop and implement student fellowships and scholarships programs, many researchprojects are tailored to equip students with necessary knowledge and skills that are not normally coveredin regular classes. In this paper, a
university-sponsorededucational research project over the last three years, called the Quality Enhancement Plan(QEP) Phase II. The CE QEP project, which started in the Fall semester of 2010, continuesthrough the summer of 2014. Within the QEP project, the research team uses alternative analysisas the method for developing critical thinking skills. The project includes making several minorrevisions to the curriculum, i.e., interventions, to include discussion of, and exercises in, criticalthinking at four points in the curriculum, spaced approximately one year apart.This paper presents the case for integrating more critical thinking into engineering programs andevaluates one university’s effort to try to enhance an engineering curriculum through a
other curriculum reform and programs [2-7], a major challenge in curriculum redesignis incorporation of adequate courses into the program that assess depth and breadth of knowledgeof technical concepts, demonstration of thinking and problem solving skills, professionalism,awareness of cultural and societal issues and life-long learning. We have undertaken thechallenge of defining our B.S.M.E. program’s outcomes based on EAC 2000 criteria and wentthrough several steps to develop an assessment process and redesigned the curriculum based onthe findings through various surveys and faculty evaluation.Program Educational Objectives and OutcomesThe program educational objectives were defined by considering the various significantconstituencies of the
registered with several top search engines on WWW. The present WWW-based courseware has been accessed approximately 100 times per month. The authors have started to receive e-mails of inquiry on CMCs from almost everywhere in the world. The dissemination of the results of the present curriculum development efforts will be further widespread in the light of the extensive and increasing attention and access to WWW.Integration of Research into EducationAll of the ORNL scientists participating in the present CRCD project are leading researchers invarious technical areas of CMCs. Consequently, they are able to present well-accepted and state-of-the-art research results relevant to the current curriculum. The ORNL scientists as well as UTfaculty members
consider UD during the design process in the future (4.6+/- 0.51) and greatly valued the inclusion of this topic in the bioengineering curriculum (4.8 +/-0.45). Introductory class students reported similarly positive ratings. Overall, students reportedour novel initiatives helped them develop UD skills and increased their appreciation forconsidering these concepts in engineering design and professional practice.IntroductionDefined as the design of products and environments to be useable by all people, to the greatestextent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design, universal design (UD) andits associated principles [1] offer one framework for teaching students how to design productsand environments that are accessible to