University where she was a professor for 24 years and served as the Director of Student Services as well as the Women in Engineering Coordinator. She received her B.S. in chemical engineering from University of Michigan in 1985 and she received her M.S. in 1988 and her Ph.D. in 1991 in chemical engineering both from Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Karen’s educational emphasis includes: critical thinking, enhancing mathematics, engineering entrepreneurship in education, communication skills, K-12 engineering education, and promoting women in engineering. Her technical work and research focuses on sustainable chemical process design, computer aided design, mixed integer nonlinear programing, and multicriteria decision
time of this writing, itis believed that each of these changes is already having a positive impact on the performance ofthe students. While the data to confirm this belief is purely anecdotal, the students do seem to bemore engaged with the class and its format, something that was noticeably absent during the fallsemester. This observation works in the direction of our first objective of this project to improvethe student learning environment. A longer term consideration is that the staff would like toimplement performance testing within the class, such that students must show that they areproficient on specific skill sets at various points during the semester prior to proceeding tosubsequent modules. Second, the staff is considering
could increase the mentee's self-efficacy. More recent research has evenexamined mentoring relationships in STEM + entrepreneurship. For example, Elliott, Mavriplis,and Anis [5] studied the efficacy of peer mentoring on women in STEM who were involved inentrepreneurship programs. They found mentoring to positively affect both retention in theprogram and feelings of community. Our research is unique in that it examines perceptions ofmentoring in the context of STEM + Intrapreneurship from the perspective of the students,faculty, and industry mentors. While the research is unique, it extends the previous researchmentioned above on the efficacy of mentorship.student concerns: analysis of interactions with mentorsTIP students choose industry and
a model that is inherent to our research focus. Finding the “right blend” ofinteractivity is challenging yet ultimately provides the richest learning opportunity for bothinstructors and students 32. Our understanding of interactivity draws from the studies of Moore15 , that there are 3 types of interactions commonly identified: learner-instructor, learner-learner,and learner-content.Our focus on the learner-instructor interaction involves engaging a team of 1-2 faculty and 4-6course assistants who are graduate students at the university. Each course assistant is responsiblefor 20-23 students to aid in class discussions, communicate logistics in class as well as betweenclasses, hold face-to-face meetings, and provide frequent feedback in
change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Prof. James A Middleton, Arizona State University James A. Middleton is Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Director of the Cen- ter for Research on Education
, students first focus on specifications and constraints, then a developing knowledge phase. Each step within design phases consists of a variety of types, ranging from questions for students to answer in multiple-choice or free-response short-answers to creating drawings, or sharing designs with other classmates through the design wall. For example, the fourth activity in the Community Garden project guides students through a series of steps that help students understand ratios through practice and feedback on calculating prices of vegetables from various vendors (Figure 2). This paper presents first steps to understand how log data from the WISEngineering system can provide insight into what kinds of design processes students engage in
intended goals,additional assessment commenced with the 2017 incoming class of students. Data was collectedand analyzed to determine the immediate impact of the CRE on students in the short term,particularly with regards to goals 1 and 2.BackgroundCommon Reading ExperienceThe book selection process begins in the fall of each year to prepare for the next incoming class.Throughout the year, students, staff, faculty, and community members recommend books for theCommon Reading Experience. This list is narrowed down to 25 books, and sent to studentvolunteers, who select two books that sound interesting to them. Based on the student selections,the list is reduced to between eight and twelve books. The student volunteers each receive twobooks to read
organizations, yet the mechanisms ofits influence are less clear, as are the types and extent of involvement that lead to such benefits.Thus, the objective of this review is to further investigate how involvement has been measuredand conceptualized in research studies, with a focus on the differential effects of involvementamongst different student populations.This paper investigates the following research questions: (1) How have forms of involvement beenmeasured and conceptualized in studying the impact of undergraduate students’ out-of-classexperiences on their professional development; (2) what mechanisms have been proposed toexplain the impact of experiential learning in student organizations on students’ professionaldevelopment; and, (3) how do
adaptive learning in courses. Concerning onlineclasses, the report stated that there was a small positive impact on grades when a shift from non-adaptive to adaptive learning was implemented. However, Yarnell et al. [4] did find thatadaptivity at an individual lesson or learning object level yielded higher student outcomes thanthose with adaptivity at a macro level.The purpose of this study was to examine student learning, behavioral engagement, and studentperception when an adaptive learning module is introduced. The following questions guided thisstudy: (i) Which adaptive learning content do students access to increase their learning? (ii) Howdoes behavioral engagement (time spent, frequency) relate to student performance in adaptivelearning
reveals that changes in programs and institutions consistent withthe model, the engineering education community will have evidence that these improvements area consequence of EC2000 rather than the result of other factors that might influence engineeringeducation (such as state performance funding, industry pressures, market competition, orinstitutional initiatives unrelated to EC2000).Based on this conceptual model, the following evaluation questions guide the EC2000 Study: • What impact, if any, has EC2000 had on student learning outcomes in ABET-accredited programs and institutions? • What impact, if any, has EC2000 had on organizational and educational policies and practices that may have led to improved student
life.Evolution of eCURe Tier 4: Remote Undergraduate Research Experiences (R-UREs)Future expansion of eCURe will entail strengthening the partnership between Purdue Universityand PCC. Effective UREs aim to (i) engage undergraduates in following protocol rather thaninterpreting results, (ii) increase duration and intensity of mentoring to strengthen impacts, and(iii) allow student opportunities to integrate evidence from their research to strengthen theiridentity as a scientist, and it takes up to a year within the URE to gain sufficient understanding tomake sense of science practices and concepts in lab [23].A newly established Tier 4 within eCURe will allow community college participants to meet ona biweekly basis with faculty, post-docs, and other
are many approaches that make student learning effective in a givencurriculum. Some of the high-impact activities that improved student learning were [1]: first-yearseminars; learning communities; service learning; undergraduate research; and capstone coursesand projects. On the other hand, high-impact teaching practices include [2]: helping studentsbecome meta-learners; learning-centered course design; using small groups in a powerful way;service-learning/community engagement—with reflection; and being a leader with your students.Kuh [3] has supplied an exhaustive list of ten high-impact activities that were reported aseffective in many studies. These are listed as follows.High impact learning activities [3]: 1. First-Year Seminars and
development of new palladium-catalyzed reactions for the stereoselective synthesis of carbocycles and heterocycles that are common subunits in biologically active natural products. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engaging Students in Authentic Research in Introductory Chemistry and Biology LaboratoriesAbstractEngaging students in research early on in the college experience may help reduce the number ofstudents who drop out of STEM after experiencing one of the gateway courses, such as theintroductory laboratory courses. Typical introductory laboratories do not show students thenature of scientific careers, the application of science in everyday life, and how
: Perspectives on interdisciplinary projects in HondurasIntroductionSustainable community development is complex and dynamic. Engagement in the practicalaspects of this field presents great challenges and opportunities for academic institutions.Addressing the needs of rural communities requires high-levels of interdisciplinary coordinationand integration, as well as the commitment of time to understand the context of particularproblems and the impact of interventions. The challenge and opportunities of rural development,particularly in the developing world, attract faculty and students from higher education, who thenmust address the real constraints faced by engaging in long-term trans-disciplinary projects. Thispanel discussion
and awareness of the impact of climate change on their careerpath.Section 1: BackgroundThe University of Wisconsin-Stout holds the values of polytechnic education, based on the“Wisconsin Idea” – a long tradition that embraces the principle that education should influencepeople’s lives beyond the classroom. We strive to provide students with a learning environmentthat addresses current issues affecting their career path, and raises awareness of how theirknowledge, creative ideas, and communication skills will impact the world we live in. In thisspirit, cross-disciplinary faculty at the university of Wisconsin-Stout engaged studentsin developing a renewable energy system for a local building site. Students learned about thedesign process
BS in Civil Engineering from the United States Military Academy and MS and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Michigan.Dr. Chris Swan, Tufts University Chris Swan is an associate professor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Tufts University. He has additional appointments in the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life and the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts. His current engineering education research interests focus on community engagement, service-based projects and using an entrepreneurial mindset to further engineering education innovations. He also does research on the development of reuse strategies for waste materials.Dr. Tanya Kunberger
students in entrepreneurial companies__ 10%_ Employer surveys_______ Other metrics – please describeThe “Other metrics” included such things as research money raised, profits generated forthe university and the number of companies receiving external funding. While thesemetrics indicate that there is some emphasis on using entrepreneurship centers to generatethe economic benefits of entrepreneurial ventures, most of the metrics seem aimed atstudent engagement and satisfaction with the programs. While everyone agrees thatlongitudinal data after graduation may be more important to assess actual impacts, suchdata is not easy to collect. In addition to the usual barriers to successful surveys, there isa reluctance of alumni offices to bother
student typology, and studenttypology as a constructed type.Key words: student engagement, learning outcomes, constructive typology 1. IntroductionStudent engagement is an important concept in research on postsecondary student experience.Student engagement means “the quality of effort students themselves devote to educationallypurposeful activities that contribute directly to desired outcomes” [1] (p. 555). Within theengineering education communities, student engagement is a presumably desired goal to achievein engineering courses and other academic activities. This is evident in the papers published inthe proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education annual conferences. Oursearch in the PEER repository in January 2024 showed
focused on the analysis anddesign of analog and digital electronic circuits and systems including: oscillators, non-linearwaveform generation and waveshaping, power electronics, communication circuits, and digitalgates. There was a strong emphasis on computer-aided analysis and design.The textbook used was an out-of-print electronics textbook coauthored by the course instructor.Since the authors now own the copyright to the textbook and it is undergoing revision for a newedition, electronic copies were made available at no cost to the students for their private use.While a few students own hard copies of the textbook, everyone, including the instructor, usedthe electronic copy exclusively. Each student was provided with a licensed copy of
definitions,retrieved from the EPRA tool [35], are as follows: social justice relates to the distribution of theadvantages and disadvantages in society, including the way in which they are allocated; socialresponsibility is an obligation that an individual (or company) has to act with concern andsensitivity, aware of the impacts of their action on others, particularly the disadvantaged.3. Results and DiscussionRelationships among student responses were explored across three major categories, whichfocused on how the course students were enrolled in affected their (1) sense of belonging inengineering (i.e., feeling included and/or connected to the community of engineering); (2) viewsof the relationship between social justice and engineering; and (3
methodologies that could bring real-world issues into engineering classrooms [9]. Theresults of their research led to recommendations to engineering educators on the importance ofdeveloping interdisciplinary technical case studies that facilitate the communication ofengineering innovations to students in the classroom.Active learning helps students learn by increasing their engagement in the process [10], [11].Active learning techniques help students to better understand the topics covered in thecurriculum [12]. Active learning helps students to be more excited about the study of engineeringthan traditional instruction [1]. The group work that often accompanies active learninginstruction helps students develop their soft skills [13] and makes students
undermining local autonomy throughparticipatory methods [13], [14]. Even well-intentioned NGO workers can also have biasesthat shape how they engage people and projects on the ground [15]. It is not the goal of thispaper to recount the history of problems and successes of NGOs, but to be keep them presentas we develop criteria for engineers to work effectively with NGOs as partners in communitydevelopment. What kind of NGO characteristics make partnerships more effective inleveraging engineering student work for community development?The main goal of a partnership among engineers, NGOs, and communities should be toreduce dependency of communities on foreign expertise while increasing the community'sself-reliance to promote social justice, peace, and
Service learning is considered a valuable approach to apply concepts from the highereducation classroom in real world settings and has become quite common in some disciplines.Engineering educators in the United States are making efforts to incorporate service learningactivities and study their benefits for student learning and engagement. When classroominstruction is augmented with an out-of-class experience that provides a defining hands-onexperience – for many perhaps their first – the classroom experience itself also takes on a newaura of reality and relativity. In contrast to traditional teaching methods, service learningprovides students with an opportunity to interact with community members to constructknowledge and develop solutions to
Paper ID #40479An Analysis of the Impact of Advances in Generative ArtificialIntelligence on Programming Assignments and CompetitionsMr. Devang Jayachandran, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg Devang Jayachandran is currently a graduate student pursuing a Masters of Science in Computer Science at the Mathematics and Computer Science department in Penn State Harrisburg. Devang received his Bachelor’s of Engineering in Information Science from the National Institute of Engineering, Mysuru, India and then worked at JP Morgan Chase and Co, Bengaluru, India in the field of Natural Language Processing and Document
solelyon engineering technology and data centers, making generalizations about the study difficult.However, this study does shed insight on the impact a non-remedial bridge program can have onstudent perceptions of an emerging field.Conclusions The DCO summer bridge program was largely a success, as a vast majority of studentsfelt more equipped with industry- and college-related success skills. Students found the industrytours, the hands-on experiences, and the community building to be the most meaningful part ofthe program, which we aim to iterate upon in future iterations of the bridge program.Additionally, after the conclusion of the program, students could differentiate the engineeringand engineering technology fields. The more nuanced
engagement among learners.IntroductionIn recent years, technological advancements have significantly impacted how we learn, withmany K-12 education programs incorporating a hands-on, constructivist approach to teachingand learning [1]–[3]. However, as students transition to undergraduate programs, there isoften a lack of continuity in the teaching methods used, leading to challenges inunderstanding and applying the lessons taught, aside from continuing in the discipline.Therefore, there is a need to seek out a teaching methodology that can stimulate themotivation of learners and further learners’ zeal in the chosen field.Experiment-centric pedagogy (ECP) is a hands-on learner-centered teaching technique thatemploys inexpensive, portable instruments
(AERA) and Tau Beta Pi, and the 2018 recipient of the Clemson University Class of ’39 Award for Faculty Excellence. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering (1978) from the University of Vermont, and M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (2002) in Bioengineering from Clemson University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024A work-in-progress narrative literature review exploring the impact ofminority engineering programs on the experiences of Black students in undergraduate engineering programs at predominantly White institutionsIntroductionBackgroundPredominantly White institutions (PWI) have traditionally engaged in the unequal coverttreatment of Black students coupled with fallacious
exams, two on Arduino C++ programming and one on Matlab 5. 3 projects (2 in Fall 2020) that are completed by project teams with weekly deliverables and end of project reports.A secondary goal of the course is to encourage retention of first-year mechanical engineeringstudents through engaging content and community development. Previous work in thedepartment identified retention of first generation students as a significant issue [1]. First-generations students can have several definitions, here we will use the definition of studentswhose parents/guardians have not completed a bachelor’s degree. At the university, only 64.7%of first-generation students who started in Mechanical Engineering graduated from the universitywithin 6 years
engagement is an essentialelement in the design and implementation of an effective learning environment that must bedeliberately stimulated and measured. An engaged student is one who has a realistic plan forlearning and implements that plan at their full potential. According to the authors, reconnectingor integrating the educational process with the student’s values, interests, goals, and aspirations(who the student is) will significantly strengthen the motivational basis for their education andlead to a higher level of engagement, learning, and academic success. Although the mosteffective means of impacting student motivation and success is to address all aspects of who thestudent is, the focus of this paper is on the use of games delivered in a
promote open and honest communication, encourage theexpression of diverse perspectives, and actively work against fear-based deliberations maximizethe potential of individuals and the overall group.Similarly, when students feel free to express themselves without fear, when they are valued andsupported, they are more likely to engage as active participants in their learning environments.They are more likely to engage their studies, take risks, and pursue opportunities that challengethem to grow academically and personally. Conversely, when students feel marginalized,unsupported, or harassed, they are more likely to struggle academically, withdraw from courses,or even leave the field entirely. This not only negatively impacts their personal lives