). In this example students experiment with a small-scale hands-on solution (segmentation and experimentation strategies), then generalize it (dimensionalitystrategy).b3) Long-term multidiscipline industry-oriented design projects for individuals and teams. Eachof the design projects includes the task, materials, assumptions, constraints, rules, criteria forwinning, etc.Example: Use two mousetraps and a $30 budget to build a mobile platform that can overcomeone speed bump and one large obstacle, move 8 meters and stop.This team project may incorporates all strategies depending on the particular design.b4) Learning to use patent related software to speed-up generation of ideas.There are several US companies that have developed software for
and health sciences, biology [18]; they can also be advanced coursessuch as advanced chemistry, or AP courses [19].Extra-curricular STEM activities were also identified in much of the literature, including both in-school and out-of-school activities, outreach programs, school clubs, STEM hobbies and sciencecentres. These extra-curricular activities increased students’ interest in careers in STEM fields[22], [23], [26]. The structure and format of the learning experiences also played a role indeveloping interest in STEM and outcome expectations of STEM through hands-on activitiesand workshops, as well as content that was relatable to the students [20].In addition, guidance from parents, teachers and guidance counselors/academic advisors played
Maljkovic, University of Toronto Milan Maljkovic is the Assistant Director, Community of Practice at the Troost Institute for Leadership Education in Engineering at the University of Toronto. Milan has several years of experience in the power systems sector. Now, at Troost ILead, he engaMs. Emily Macdonald-Roach ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 We did it! Proud Moments as a Catalyst for Engineers’ Situated Leadership LearningAbstractEngineers’ day-to-day responsibilities include supervision, influence, management, andleadership, yet much of this work occurs on the periphery of their professional attention. Ourstudy aims to make the largely implicit process of
Education with several teaching awards such as the 2004 National Outstanding Teaching Medal and the 2005 Quinn Award for experiential learning.Dr. Jennifer Kadlowec, Rowan UniversityDr. Johannes Strobel, Texas A&M University Dr. Johannes Strobel is Director, Educational Outreach Programs and Associate Professor, Engineering and Education at Texas A&M. After studying philosophy and information science at three universities in Germany, he received his M.Ed. and Ph.D. in Learning Technologies from the University of Missouri- Columbia. He worked at Concordia University, Montreal and has been the director of the Institute of P-12 Engineering Research and Learning at Purdue University. NSF and several private foundations
Management and Environmental Engineering Department. His academic interests lie in the field of discipline-based education. John is a member of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), and the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). John is a past Chair of the ASEE Construction Engineering Division.Dr. Nicholas Tymvios, Bucknell University Nicholas Tymvios received a B.S. and M.S. degree in Civil Engineering from Purdue University in 1999, and 2002 respectively. After working for four years in Cyprus in the construction industry, he was ac- cepted into the Ph.D. program at Oregon State University, where he graduated in 2013 with a degree in Civil
how to effectively teach those concepts to elementary and middleschool students. The remainder of this paper will discuss the history and purpose of NASA’sPre-Service Institute, provide a detailed description of the curriculum, and examine the results ofthe experience.NASA’s Pre-Service Teacher InstituteNASA recognized a need to increase the number of well-qualified teachers and engage more K-12 pre-service teachers in the improvement of mathematics and science teaching. The Pre-Service Teacher Institute (PSTI) was initiated through NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC)several years ago in collaboration with Norfolk State University (Virginia). The basic purpose ofthe program is to provide minority education majors from minority institutions
State University, graduating in May 2018. He holds a B.S. and M.S. in Civil Engineering from the Ohio State University. He has also worked as a construction inspector for the City of Columbus. His research interests include fuzzy logic, 3D modeling, VR, LEED, BIM, horizontal construction, underground construction and history of construction engineering.Dr. Michael Parke, Ohio State University Dr. Parke has over twenty years experience in satellite based earth science research. He has been teaching first year engineering for the past seventeen years, with emphasis on computer aided design, computer programming, and project design and documentation.Dr. Adrian Hadipriono Tan, Ohio State University Adrian H. Tan is a
tracking is done only at the completion of each objective and sent to thedatabase. By only accessing the online database at the end of each objective, the frequency ofinteraction with the server is minimized. This results in a more responsive system when there area large number of users. The information tracking provides the feature for the user to leave at anypoint and return exactly to the next incomplete objective.Another functional use of the database is to regulate administrative privileges depending on thelevel of the user. The user is classified into three levels: administrator, manager, and basic user.Managers are given partial administrative capabilities to supervise small user groups. Thedifference between administrators and managers are
institution.The survey consists of three major sections: (1) the Perceived Stress Questionnaire, a validatedinstrument that assesses an individual's perceived stress level, (2) a section for respondents toidentify and rank major sources of stress, and (3) a section for respondents to identify and rankmajor coping strategies. This work focuses on the three open-ended questions included in thesurvey: (1) “Please elaborate on your sources of stress if you choose”, (2) “Please elaborate onyour coping mechanisms if you choose”, and (3) “What else would you would like to share withus regarding your sources of stress, coping mechanisms, or success at managing stress?”.Survey responses were analyzed using two-cycle inductive thematic coding. Some
at Drexel University, to expand it’s usability for research and education.Mr. Krzysztof W Mazur, Drexel University, Department of Mechanical Engineering & Mechanics Sophomore Mechanical Engineering Student at Drexel UniversityMr. Jay J. Bhatt, Drexel University Jay Bhatt is responsible for building library collections in engineering subject areas, outreach to fac- ulty and students, and teaching information and research skills to faculty and students in Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and related subject areas. He provides individual and small group consultations to students, instructional sessions to specific classes, online research support in both face to face and dis- tance learning programs, and conducts
that are in the public domain orreleased with intellectual property licenses that facilitate the free use, adaptation anddistribution” [22]. These systems and their associated repositories and referatories enableteachers to create, publish, locate and share textbooks and other resources. The COVID crisisaccelerated the move to OER because of how OER can be tightly coupled to virtual lectures anddirect internet availability. When there was no campus bookstore for acquiring textbooks,instructors could get online books to students by providing a URL. If the book was an OER, thecost was zero [23].As OER development has shown, money is not the only reward. Institutional and communityregard can motivate creators. Small granting programs, supported
global partnerships for science, technology, engineering, andand demands global awareness. This shift in mathematics (STEM) using a non-traditionalengineering responsibilities fueled by worldwide approach. The focus of the program is toconnectivity and outsourcing activities imposes strengthen STEM learning in K-7 students 11while also strengthening the academic value of Video vs Graphic…Which One Achieves Highercollege trips. Active curricular participation and Assessment? I confirmed, through studentcollaboration between traveling college students assessment, Gangwer’s finding that 65% ofand K-7
. Jariwala has more than nine years of research experi- ence in modeling, simulation, engineering design, and manufacturing process development, with research focus on design of polymer based micro additive manufacturing process. During his Ph.D. studies, he was also a participant of the innovative TI:GER R program (funded by NSF:IGERT), which prepares students to commercialize high impact scientific research results. Dr. Jariwala has participated and led several research projects from funded by NSF, the State of Georgia and Industry sponsors. At Georgia Tech, he is responsible for enhancing corporate support for design courses, managing design and fabrica- tion/prototyping facilities, coordinating the design competitions
links people and design. Discussions will include how to use this connection to motivate STEM learning and encourage pathways into engineering. The highly interactive workshop will use a varied instructional approach with brief presentations, large and small group discussions, building and testing prototypes and reflections included in the workshop. The facilitator has conducted over 100 presentations and workshops on STEM and engineering education. He is a professional engineering with industry experience in design and a faculty member in engineering education. Participants should be ready for active engagement to cover a lot of material in our brief session
Paper ID #38743Board 208: Achieving Active Learning through Collaborative Online LabExperiencesProf. Julia Yoo, Lamar University Julia H. Yoo, Associate Professor in the Department of Educational Leadership and Teacher Leadership Program Coordinator at Lamar UniversityProf. Selahattin Sayil, Lamar University Selahattin Sayil received the M.Sc. degree from the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, in 1996 and the Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from Vanderbilt University, TN, in 2000. He is currently a Professor in Electrical Engineering aGleb Tcheslavski ©American Society for
professional mentors. This creates challenges in both supporting and assessing the service learning occurring. This paper describes those difficulties and recent efforts to formalize the academic aspects of the program. 10I.B.2. Design of Sustainable Hand-Powered Water a challenge for engineering educators in the Pumps for Burkina Faso United States: re-examine their curricula to findTimothy B. Whitmoyer and David T. Vader
Louisville was building a “STEM pipeline”,15 anoverview of the supply and demand of K-12 technology education instructors throughout theU.S.,14 and an overview of how universities can partner with high schools to deliver pre-engineering curricular programs such as PLTW.16 The fourth article we removed referencedPLTW in the abstract but did not include PLTW students in their investigation.17 The last articleidentified relevant constructs for assessing the impact of PLTW on students’ design processesbut did not utilize these to evaluate PLTW.18Table 2: Criteria for Retaining Literature for Data Analysis Criteria Operationalization Publication Focus Project Lead the Way was one of the primary foci of the paper Data
Engineering Technology program. In 2018, he joined Worcester Polytechnic In- stitute as an Assistant Professor. Dr. Mughal was a recipient of Best Graduate Student Award for the ASU College of Engineering in 2010. In the same year, he received the LRCSI Ray Echols Scholarship, while; he was also a Student Entertainment Chairmen for the American Society for Quality (ASQ)-Northeast Arkansas, Section 1415NEA Student Branch (ASU). He has presented his work in more than 25 confer- ences including prestigious conferences like IEEE PVSC, TechConnect, EMC, etc. all over United States of America. He won 2 first prize awards for oral presentations, both at the Arkansas Academy of Science (AAS) in 2011 and 2012. He has several
development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Dr. Alemdar is currently PI and co-PI on various NSF funded projects. Her expertise includes program evaluation, social network analysis and quantitative methods such as Hierarchical Linear Modeling, and Structure Equation Model- ing. She received her Ph.D. in Educational Policy, with a concentration in Research, Measurement, and Statistics, from Georgia State University.Dr. Michael Helms, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Michael Helms is a Research Scientist at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Science from the Georgia Institute of Technology, where his research focused on improving design creativity.Dyanne Baptiste
Paper ID #27371Education and Building Capacity for Improving Resilience of Coastal Infras-tructureProf. Ismael Pag´an-Trinidad, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Ismael Pag´an-Trinidad, Professor (1982-date) and Chair (1994-date), Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying, University of Puerto Rico at Mayag¨uez (UPRM); Principal Investigator/Program Man- ager of the Educational and Research Internship Program (ERIP) under the UPRM-ERDC (US Army Corp of Engineers) Partnership Agreement (1994-date) awarded the ”Examples of Excelencia in Educa- tion” award in Graduate Category-2018 by Excelencia in Education
, programmed, and tested two robots tocompete in a final end-of-course competition following the established constraints and rules fromthe published game manual. Faculty had the option to include additional constraint requirementswithin game rule criteria. The competition at the end of the course can be tailored to be anofficial VEX event or a stand-alone event for the college course students only. Due to COVIDrestrictions, stand-alone competitions were held. The first year, small elimination typecompetitions were held due to student room space restrictions. The second and third year, asingle competition event was held which included spectator attendance.Despite the pandemic and restrictions imposed, a successful capstone project was provided foreach
the breadth of material that will be useful to them. Page 23.667.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013How do Engineering Students and Faculty use Library Resources? Page 23.667.2 How do Engineering Students and Faculty use Library Resources?IntroductionIn 2011, library staff at a large Research I university began looking for ways to track use oflibrary resources by students, faculty, and staff. Access points tracked in Fall 2011 ranged fromloans and use of digital resources to workshop attendance
designed a survey based on previous research findings including(a) pilot literature reviews5, (b) extensive literature reviews9; 10, (c) small-group interviews withengineering faculty9; 10, and (d) small-group interviews with non-engineering faculty10. Wedisseminated the survey to engineering alumni from a large Mid-Western university. In total,1574 useful responses were received. The data collected were not normally distributed. Webegan data analysis using exploratory factor analysis in order to discover the primaryinterrelationships among survey questions and to identify factors related to the presence andimportance of empathy and care in engineering practice.Survey Design We designed the survey in this study using themes derived from
. Page 9.85.1114. Rees, F. (1997). Teamwork from start to finish. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”15. McGourty, J., & De Meuse, K. (2000). The team developer: An assessment and skill building program, JohnWiley and Sons Press.16. Brannick, M.T., Roach, R.M., & Salas, E. (1993). Understanding team performance: A multi-method study.Human Performance, 6(4), 287-308.17. Morgan, Jr., B.B., Glickman, A.S., Woodard, E.A., Blaiwes, A., & Salas, E. (1986). Measurement of teambehaviors in a navy environment (NTSC-TR-86-014). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems
also asked about the faculty best practices: “What otherpractices/tools you would recommend utilizing for the success of your online teaching?”Thesesuggestions are grouped below. Tips for best practices: • weekly assignments should have answers posted the following week, after grading • grouping students for discussions in large classes, have small-group discussions online • use the news forum to present each module and explain misunderstandings • respond to questions quickly Page 23.946.16 • modify the modules or deadlines quickly when the need arises, so be considerate of the students' issues • have some pre-class
exposure especially in design project courses[20]. Others suggest it sometimes takes a little push to evoke interest and ability toconsider such issues that are not central in the disciplinary discourse of one’s field of studies.Watson et al. [21] suggest that increasing the expected level of incorporation of e.g.sustainability factors to the students’ work might promote students to start thinking aboutsocietal issues in more detail. Attempts to measure and assess the students’ abilities toimplement societal considerations, such as sustainability, into their engineering projects havebeen made [21]. However, students seem to tend to focus on technological solution orientedaspects of sustainability at the expense of a wider range of solutions
you now? Use one wordto describe how you feel now.The instructor presents several Powerpoint slides discussing the importance of publication, howto identify reputable journals in students’ fields by introducing impact factor and other metrics,and types of journal articles (e.g., technical paper, technical notes, case studies, state-of-the-artreviews, discussions). These introductions provide students with a general understanding oftechnical writing. Additionally, the instructor raises an example of using ChatGPT in academicwriting, leading to the withdrawal of a paper from a journal.2.1.2 Team ActivityThe instructor asks students to form small groups and spend 5 minutes reading a state-of-the-artreview paper titled “Repurposing Waste Plastics
required to reverse engineer and competitively assess aproduct to determine its design’s strengths and weaknesses[2].In the Sophomore Engineering Clinic, the main goal shifts to technical communication skills.Students are required to effectively communicate results of an assigned topic. The topics areorganized for a small group setting of three to five students, with the intent of multidisciplinaryinteraction within the organized groups. The students enhance their communication skills bywriting various technical documents and performing multiple presentations throughout this year.For the Junior and Senior Engineering Clinic, students are recruited to work on a specific projectin a job fair setting[3]. These projects can last one to four semesters
first-time conference organizers, their solutions, and how to use theexisting infrastructure of the school to reduce staffing requirements.Intr oductionThe number of undergraduate research conferences has exploded in the past decade for a varietyof reasons. Recommendations from academic leaders1,2,3,4 to establish more opportunities formeaningful undergraduate research experiences have increased the need to create venues thatallow students to present their work. Further, quantitative studies5,6 measuring the success ofsuch undergraduate conferences are beginning to appear and the results are spurring moreuniversities to develop similar programs. My research involving a random sample of 50undergraduate research conferences sponsored by
Paper ID #7051A Comparative Analysis of Technology Innovation Centers of Excellence Acrossthe World: Secrets to SuccessDr. Michael J. Dyrenfurth, Purdue University, West Lafayette Michael J. Dyrenfurth is a Professor of Technology Leadership and Innovation in the College of Tech- nology at Purdue University. He is a member of the ASEE and he has served on the Board of the ETD and as program chair for the CIEC in New Orleans (2008). Previously he completed a four year term as Assistant Dean for Graduate Studies in Purdue University’s College of Technology. His scholarship agenda focuses on technological innovation