without removing established content. Theproject did not necessitate removal of other content because of its applicability to the entirecourse and not an individual topic. Furthermore, because the duration of the project lastedapproximately six weeks, students were capable of maintaining focus on new material whilecompleting the project outside of class.Data Collection and Student Surveys The scavenger hunt assignment has been implemented at two different universities(denoted Univ 1 and Univ 2 for data comparison). One is a small public, undergraduate collegein a rural area of the Mid-Atlantic region. The second university is a large, public university in adensely populated city on the West Coast. Two classes of Structural Analysis
the output variable of the same Page 11.387.8statement if flip-flops are used for the variables. In digital design, this refers to theread/modify/write scheme. Usage analysis in each cycle can be used to determine theconstraints for sharing an arithmetic and logic unit or an interconnection unit. We use theclique-partitioning procedure described in [9] to generate the hardware structure of agiven schedule.The three types of data-path components of a design can be allocated separately. Anintegrated approach can also be applied. No matter what method is applied, a generalobservation is that it will only produce an optimal solution for a small set of
, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She has served as the Associate Chair for Under- graduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. She was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program at CU, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is currently the chair of ASEE’s Community Engagement Division and a member of the AAAS Committee on Sci- entific Freedom and Responsibility.She is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and
Paper ID #26350Understanding the Research Practices and Service Needs of Civil and Envi-ronmental Engineering Researchers – a Grounded Theory ApproachDr. Xiaoju ”Julie” Chen, Carnegie Mellon University Xiaoju ”Julie” Chen is a Library Liaison at and a courtesy faculty in Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU). Chen received both her M.S. and Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from CMU. Her research interests are environmental life cycle assessment, uncertainty estimation, and data analysis.Dr. Jessica Benner, Carnegie Mellon UniversityMs. Sarah Young, Carnegie Mellon
, having worked as a software engineer, project lead and manager before becoming Assistant Professor and Department Chair for Electrical Engineering at the Ateneo de Davao University.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Holly M. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education. She is current the Assistant Department Head for Undergraduate Programs and the former Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and practice related to graduate student mentoring. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, was nominated for a Graduate
learned address designing a flexible course structure, preparing for travelabroad, teaching engineering to non-engineers, designing assignments for study abroad, andtraveling with students. Within the context of this case study, educators are guided to establishreasonable expectations for study abroad experiences so that a new program can be rewarding forboth students and faculty.IntroductionEngineering courses can be intimidating to a non-engineer. In fact, they often intimidate ourown engineering majors. Students hear about the hours upon hours of homework, or they hearabout the impossible tests and low averages. While these challenges could deter students,engineering educators know that engineering is full of excitement, novel innovations
peers and the faculty members indicated that thestudent team of this project (team 1) fulfilled their initial goals and objectives of producing lowcost knee prototypes using reverse engineering and additive manufacturing technologies and thisproject was rated as one of the best projects done by the student teams under the AcademicTraining program with an average score greater than 4 (4.2) in the 5-level Likert scale in all fiveABET's student learning outcomes (b, c, d, g, and k) considered for this project. One of theprojects was rated with an average score less than 4.0 (3.6). The overall mean and standarddeviation of the evaluations respectively are 4.1 and 0.36. Table 4: Student teams' assessment results
. The buttons were also spaced far enough apart it wouldbe difficult to accidentally hit the wrong button. Additionally, the buttons were fairly large in sizeand protruded far enough out of the device that they are easy to feel when you have your finger onthe button. Small plexiglass laser cut circles were added to the top of the buttons partway throughassembly to make the buttons protrude more from the surface of the device.Finally, the device itself is fairly large when compared to a standard smartphone. This is partiallyso that the wiring components could all easily fit inside the device, but also so that the game iseasy to hold and fits comfortably between the user’s hands without fear it might slip out. The largersize also allowed us more
, but they have great freedom to configure their project.Some choose something basic; some choose something impressive (seeFigure 1 for an example student project). This gives them buy-in to what they are doing and presentsthem with the realities of conflicting decisions. Whether complex or simple, their designs are in thecontext of a project, and that is what opens their minds.3.2 Structural LayoutThe first submittal I require is a CAD or clean hand drawing of their structure. This includes a planlayout of columns with dimensions, and an elevation showing story heights. I started including thissubmittal when one of my students asked why there were not beams small enough in the steelmanual. When I saw they had columns at 6’-0 centers both ways
, and becausethey feel that it is important for society. The main comment is respect to the steep learning curverequired to master the software application for structural analysis.Figure 18 shows the results of a survey about teamwork. The survey consists in questions aboutthe group performance resulting in answers of 88% and 92% as ‘always’ for the differentquestions, permitting a conclusion that the students are well prepared for team working and theyused this skill for the projects with positive results. The Program emphasizes this soft skill indifferent courses; therefore, students developed different methods to work together. Also, theProgram is relatively small, and students had previously worked together in other courses. a. Travis
Paper ID #17315Teaching Students How to Create Innovative Design Solutions Within a Prod-uct Development ContextDr. Darren C. Olson, Central Washington University Dr. Olson teaches at Central Washington University, where he is the coordinator of the M.S. program in Engineering Technology. He earned a Ph.D. in Technology Management from Indiana State University, specializing in Quality Systems. He also earned an M.Ed. from Bowling Green State University in Career and Technology Education, and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University. His interests are related to innovative problem solving, technology
.”2,12,13Efforts such as these are well underway in the interdisciplinary field of moral psychology, andare being brought to bear on business1,14 and legal ethics15 via behavioral ethics. With a fewexceptions9, however, these efforts are largely absent from engineering ethics. However, they areincreasingly necessary, given empirical findings regarding the efficacy of engineering ethicseducation specifically and ethics education in general.McGinn found widespread disagreement among engineering students and practitioners regardingwhat constitutes an ethical conflict or issue – criteria that would be used to decide whether aproblem was one appropriately considered in terms of ethics – emblematic of relativism.Additionally, comparing their responses with
hosted two placements each. None of the private or parochial schoolshosted more than 2. In the two semesters prior to enrollment in science methods, teacher candidates wereplaced in large city and fringe rural schools for school-based field experiences. Schools set inlarge suburban and fringe town settings were the intended setting for school-based fieldplacements for science methods. The 8 schools hosting more than two PET were all largesuburban or fringe town settings, with the exception of one. All but 1 of the 26 schools waspredominately white, ranging between 65 and 95 percent [12]. Class sizes ranged between 20and 30 in the traditional public schools to as small as 10 to 20 in the private school settings.Table 1. School-based field
educationalexperience similar to the experience they would receive in a face-to-face delivery mode.AssessmentWhen EGR 105 was delivered for the first time, assessments were conducted to compare theonline course to the traditional face-to-face delivery mode. The semester the online course wasfirst offered, it was also offered in its traditional format by one of the team of developers. Thisprovided a direct comparison between the two delivery modes for the course. The course contentwas nearly identical between the two modes. All the homework and projects were the same ineach section. Each section also followed the same weekly schedule so the concepts wouldfollow the same order. Of course, small changes were made in order for the content developedfor online
ASEE-NMWSC2013-0016 A First-Year Drilling, Tapping and Thread Stripping ExerciseThomas Shepard, Ph.D., University of St. Thomas, thomas.shepard@stthomas.eduMichaela Andrews, University of St. Thomas, andr8926@stthomas.eduCole Harris, University of St. Thomas, harr3489@stthomas.eduAbstractThis paper discusses the development, implementation and assessment of a drilling, tapping andthread stripping exercise used in an introduction to engineering course. The exercise wasdesigned to be a time efficient way to improve hands-on skills that exposed students to variousmechanical engineering concepts such as moments, yield strength, safety factor and
perception of his/her own skills inthis area cannot be relied upon and in fact may also be used as an indicator of teamingskills. Note the difference between the last two entries in Table 2. The students wereasked to assess their own drawing skill (“I have above average drawing skills.”). Thetwo classes responded similarly: 3.33/5.0 and 3.46/5.0 (These are student weightedaverages.) indicating a weak “agree.” However, the instructor’s evaluation of a drawingsamples resulted in a weak “disagree” (2.61) for the four classes. The final and perhapsmost interesting result is then that the “good” team players were also the more realisticcritics of their own work. Note that for the “good” team players the self evaluation oftheir drawing skills and the
relating to howstudents came to experience innovation in more and less comprehensive ways, beyond theirconnections to specific categories.ParticipantsParticipants included 33 engineering students across 13 different majors who had participated inover 40 unique innovation projects. The participants were each enrolled in a large Midwesternuniversity and were targeted to achieve maximum variation along four key factors: priorengineering project experience; academic major, gender, and year in school. Participantsreceived a small cash incentive for their time. Table 2 presents a representation of theseparticipants along the four key factors (based on a student self-report survey). Participants arelisted by a pseudonym they selected.Data CollectionThe
come.” • “A lot of material was covered with little time for examples. Difficult to retain/digest information.” • “Do not feel that I learned as much as I could of because of the fast pace.” • “Not enough time was available to adequately examine some topics. It seemed as if some topics were not covered thoroughly enough due to time constraints. An additional credit hour would seem to allow enough time to fully cover these topics, so long as a large amount of additional topics were not added.” • “Thermo covers a great deal of information in a small amount of time. I think an extra credit hour would be a great addition.” • “I feel that the material that was covered was Extremely Important
. Surveys and coursegrades are important assessment techniques for evaluating the benefit of these alternatives,but there is clearly a need for a quantitative measure of student performance that can beused for inter-campus comparisons. Third, the advent of ABET Engineering Criteria 2000,4which requires all programs to implement an assessment feedback cycle, further amplifies theneed for objective assessment techniques throughout all undergraduate engineering curricula.One of our models in developing the SSCI exams was the Force Concept Inventory (FCI),which spurred recent reform in and debate about the freshman physics curriculum.1, 5 TheFCI is a multiple choice exam covering Newtonian physics. The exam includes carefullycrafted incorrect answers
, and sustainability are madeby the time conceptual and preliminary system design concludes, as is implied in Figure 2. Figure 2. Commitment v/s phases of the system life cycleThere is usually a large commitment in terms of technology applications, the establishment of asystem configuration and its performance characteristics, the obligation of resources, and potentiallife-cycle cost at the early stages of a program. It is at this point when system-specific knowledgeis limited, but when major decisions are reached pertaining to the selection of technologies, theselection of materials and potential sources of supply, equipment packaging methods, and levelsof diagnostics, the selection of manufacturing process, the
Session 2566 The Tinkerer’s Pendulum for Machine System’s Education: Creating a Basic Hands-On Environment with Mechanical “Breadboards” John J. Wood*, Kristin L. Wood** *Department of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University **Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Texas at AustinAbstractThe pendulum of engineering education is swinging from an emphasis of theoretical material to abalance between theory and hands-on activities. This transformation is motivated, in part, by thechanging students entering engineering programs. Instead of a
Paper ID #43931Investigating Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Understanding and Perceptionsof Affective Domain of LearningMs. Anna Li Coffman, University of OklahomaDr. Javeed Kittur, University of Oklahoma Dr. Kittur is an Assistant Professor in the Gallogly College of Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design program from Arizona State University, 2022. He received a bachelor’s degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Master’s in Power Systems from India in 2011 and 2014, respectively. He has worked with Tata Consultancy Services as an
illustrate thechallenges and uncertainty Janice faced in understanding and helping the students who weremixing up and not fully understanding the different types of heat transfer, especially at a levelwhere they could apply it.To manage the pedagogical uncertainty of how to help the students understand and apply thedifferent types of heat transfer, Janice tried out various strategies throughout the unit. Thesestrategies included: (1) preparation in the form of spending out of class time to grasp the materialherself and relying more heavily on curriculum materials; (2) informal assessment withindividual white boards, and end of lesson reflections; (3) explicit explanation or directinstruction using videos and small review sessions during bellwork
) analog circuit design (ECEn 340), 2) digital signal processing (ECEn 380), and 3)embedded programming (ECEn 330). During winter semester students practice the conceptslearned during these earlier core courses by constructing an advanced laser-tag system(alternatively referred to as the junior project). Laser-tag is an excellent target because it providesan engaging way to integrate the concepts and practices from very different areas of electrical andcomputer engineering.The goals of this PBL curriculum are to: 1) increase student confidence, 2) provide students witha fun engineering experience, 3) provide opportunities for application of concepts from priorjunior courses 2 , and 4) administer the PBL curriculum so that, in the long term, TA and
know" Slides Font is large/small and slides are Some wordiness, some slides Slide text is appropriate in Readability 0 3 5 wordy have poor clarity amount and size Consistency 0 Slide format changes throughout 3 A few slides are inconsistent
Generation Science Standards. Within the safe realm of a playing space, students canresolve cognitive disequilibrium and progress into the problem solving.26 Furthermore,embedding play within a game grounded by social learning may satisfy players’ motivationalneeds16 to participate in their own learning.11Playing quality educational games can promote 21st century engineering and science learningtogether. Unfortunately, culturally uncommon in U.S. classrooms are opportunities to developand use systems thinking, small-group complex communication, non-routine problem solving,generating questions, re-framing problems, and abstract thinking.29 Extracting contextualrelevancy from instruction weakens the foundation of science education.7 As 21st
lecturer in 2018 to teach design related courses in the mechanical engineering program. He specializes in product design, instrumentation, controls, and automation. Dr. Al-Hamidi founded the Engineering Enrichment Program in 2016, which is currently one of the Center for Teaching and Learning pillars. He received three Transformative Engineering Education grants related to multidisciplinary education in 2018, 2021 and 2022. In 2021 Dr. Al-Hamidi received the Dean’s Achievement Award to recognize his contribution to the campus within that year. In 2015 he received the Association of Former Students AFS Distinguished Achievement Award as a recognition for his commitment, performance and positive impact on Aggie students
implementing aprocess to animate and realistically render the approach, impact, and explosion of the plane, basedon an expert analysis of the crash and FEA data. One of the purposes of this project was todevelop a data pipeline from FEA simulations to 3D animation and rendering programs that canbe extended to other simulations thus bridging the gap between two non-coherent systemscreating scientifically accurate simulations.Introduction Shortly after the attack on the United States Pentagon on September 11, 2001 a team ofinspectors and analysts were called in to assess the damage to the structure and report on how itreacted to the impact of a Boeing 757. Dr. Mete Sozen, a structural engineer at PurdueUniversity, was one of the inspection team
2015 ASEE Northeast Section Conference An Approach for Project Management Software Selection using Analytical Hierarchy Process Prerana Pal Karmokar, Shwetha Krishna Pondicherry and Elif Kongar University of BridgeportAbstractThis paper seeks to explore how considerations of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) can aidmanagement and administration of multinational organizations in solving multiple attributedecision-making problems. The focus of the paper is project management software selectioninvolving a large number of variables and constraints. Informed decision-making is vital for thesuccess of enterprises. The Analytic
. Page 14.824.1413. Hoyt, K. & Hughey, K. (1997) Career Counseling in the knowledge age: Implications for change in school counselor education programs. Journal of Career Development 24(2) 95-102.14. Partin, R. (1990) School Counselor’s time: A Comparison of counselors’ and principals’ perceptions and desires. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American association for counseling and development (Cincinnati, Ohio).15. Creswell, J. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.16. Yasar, S., Baker, D., Robinson-Kurpius, S., Krause, S., & Roberts, C. (2006). Development of a survey to assess K-12 teachers