Education emerged. 12 The number of papers from the American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE) annual conference that included the terms “global” or“international” in their titles has been increasing, as shown in Figure 1. The diversity of thisliterature cannot be fully described here. However, the papers fall into a few general categories: - International experiences via exchanges, study abroad, and service projects - International collaboration via distance models - Developing student skills to work internationally Page 22.751.2 - Assessing global competencyFigure 1. Number of papers in the ASEE Annual
, but has not personalized the socialobligation. At the other end is an individual who believes wholly that engineers should work toserve their community and moreover this individual would act accordingly by working for/withphilanthropic groups such as Engineers Without Borders (EWB) and Bridges to Prosperity.This view of engineering as inherently a service has been echoed in Ethics of Care literature6, 7.Ethics of Care is rooted in the view that moral development is motivated by compassion andcaring for others, in addition to the traditional beliefs of motivation through justice or fairness6, 8.Additionally, views of social responsibly align well with the emerging development ofHumanitarian Engineering as a new pedagogical tool for educating
Special Education, Literacy rd Liz 3 7 years - th Jennifer 5 13 years Science Page 23.1135.3 Table 2: Demographic information for the teacher participantsThe school’s demographics were representative of the state and district averages, and the schoolhad recently been named a STEM school by the district, which meant it was expected tointegrate STEM across all subjects, and provide students increased opportunities for engaging inSTEM activities such as science fairs and university/industry partnerships. Even before
nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural im- pacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable structures, prod- ucts, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change.Mrs. Tanya D
recruitment and retention, engineer identity, PBL pedagogies, engineering design pedagogies, capstone design, learning through service, bringing real world problem solving into the classroom, etc. She also conducts research in cardiovascular fluid mechanics and sustainable energy technologies. She holds a BS and MS in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and a PhD in Biomedical Engineering from the joint program between Virginia Tech and Wake Forest University.Dr. Michael Lamb, Wake Forest University Michael Lamb is Executive Director of the Program for Leadership and Character and Assistant Professor of Politics, Ethics, and Interdisciplinary Humanities at Wake Forest University. He is also a Research Fellow with the
Paper ID #37427Comparing labs before, during, and after COVID in aMeasurements and Analysis CourseBridget M. Smyser (Teaching Professor) Bridget Smyser is a Teaching Professor in the Mechanical & Industrial Engineering department at Northeastern University. She holds a BS in Chemistry from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Her research interests include capstone design and lab pedagogy, , effective methods to teach technical communication, and integrating diversity, equity, and inclusion concepts into engineering
. Encourage development of design skills in problem solving and experimentation, illustrative of various fundamental areas of aerospace engineering.4. Enable students to develop proficiency in written, oral, and graphic communication in the development of formal reports, and informal and formal individual presentations and papers.5. Promote engineering ethics, personal integrity and responsibility and professionalism in the conduct of laboratory activities and individual projects.6. Develop teamwork and leadership skills through laboratory experiences.Because of the number, scope, and diversity of topics and related activities, we sought to spreadthe curriculum over three semesters as opposed to one done elsewhere4. Each course combineselements
examined student groups’ discourse and the changes they made to their designconstructions following testing for evidence of the ideas informing their design decisions. For thewind task, the factors students attended to were coded, with codes such as, “weight of object,”and tracked both across groups and over time. The analysis revealed that some factors, such asweight, were common across all groups and persisted through the design task, while others, suchas air flow, were taken up by a few groups, often after a long series of failures. Importantly, theinitial factors, such as weight, were not abandoned in order to accommodate later factors, butrather factors appeared concurrently later in the task. In contrast, in the water transport task
behaviors and their impact on engineering leadership potential. Meg is a board certified coach with experience in developing students’ leadership and professional com- petencies through teaching and one-on-one coaching. She is most interested in developing student knowl- edge of leadership to impact their successful transition to the workplace.Prof. Andrew Michael Erdman, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Andrew M. ”Mike” Erdman received his B.S. in Engineering Science from Penn State and his M.S. from USC. At Rocketdyne (Pratt & Whitney), he helped design the Space Shuttle. As manager of Reactor Safety Analysis, Experimental Engineering, and Fluid Dynamics Technology at KAPL (Bechtel), he con
Paper ID #37951The Grand Challenges Scholars Program Research Experience: A GreatOpportunity to Cultivate Belonging in a Community of PracticeDr. Olgha Bassam Qaqish, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Olgha B. Qaqish, Ph.D. is an engineering educator and researcher, who has experience working with students at all levels in science, math, engineering, and technology (STEM). Dr. Qaqish is an author of a mathematics textbook: Algebra Essentials.Chloe Grace Hincher, North Carolina State University Chloe Hincher is an undergraduate pursuing a B.S. in Biomedical and Health Sciences Engineering con- centrating in
local communities [2]. What happens to the individuals who are released? Some integrateinto their community; some commit crimes that require reincarceration.The U.S. Department of Education, an entity that funds many educational programs for inmates,defines correctional education as: “a fundamental component of rehabilitative programmingoffered in juvenile justice confinement facilities, most American prisons, and many jails anddetention centers” [3]. Consistent with this definition, prison education is defined in this paper asa subset of correctional education. Thus, statistics on correctional education include prisoneducation information. Inmate education can occur in a prison or another type of correctionalinstitution. Although this paper
incorporateD&I initiatives into engineering education. Similarly, there has been a constant urge to improvethe research to practice cycle on research related to good teaching practices. Looking at thework of going from research to practice gives us insights as to how to do the same translationalwork regarding diversity and inclusion practices specifically. Although some may find thesefindings not novel given the extensive number of informal conversations among educators, thereexists little scholarship looking to understand the challenges or lived experiences of engineeringeducators working to incorporate these different activities and practices like the work by Colceret al. [6]. We seek to understand what makes it difficult for educators to
the Engineering and Computing Education program at the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education (SUCCEED) at Florida Inter- national University (FIU). She earned her B.Sc. in Computer Science and Engineering from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). Kali’s research interests center on exploring the ex- periences of marginalized engineering students, with a particular focus on their hidden identity, mental health, and wellbeing. Her work aims to enhance inclusivity and diversity in engineering education, con- tributing to the larger body of research in the field.Dr. Cassandra J McCall, Utah State University Cassandra McCall, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the
technology programs,3-6 with only one being specific to Manufacturing Engineering.7This paper describes a new Industrial Robotics course for Manufacturing Engineering students atWestern Washington University. The new course is based upon a course that had been part of aManufacturing Engineering Technology program that has recently transitioned to ManufacturingEngineering. The goals of the new course are to both find the right balance between modeling andapplication and be true to the applied nature of the new Manufacturing Engineering program.Therefore, the course is lab intensive to provide students with multiple opportunities to work withindustrial robots. Students complete eleven structured and semi-structured lab activities that in-troduce them
of experience tutoring students and working with schools, and became interested in education through these experiences. Her primary interest is in informal learning environments and educational technologies. She currently conducts research with the Lawrence Hall of Science on their engineering exhibits and works to improve the facilitation and design of the exhibits. Her research fo- cuses on how science center visitors engage and tinker at engineering activities and the impacts of these open-ended tinkering activities in terms of STEM learning and engineering understanding.Ryan Shelby, University of California, Berkeley Ryan Shelby is a joint 2013-2014 Millennium Challenge Corporation-Arizona State University Science
courses, a freshman orientation course, astudent study center; and structured study groups. Significantly, the MEP model originated atCalifornia State University, Northridge (CSUN) and spread nationwide.While these measures have been effective, their impact has reached a diminishing point. Giventhe projected imperative need for increased minority representation in STEM professions, thereis a critical need for new methods to further improve students’ learning and retention. A highlypromising approach is to use an innovative undergraduate education initiative pioneered by theMassachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) called Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate(CDIO)18,19,20 as the basis to redesign curriculum and to implement active and
underrepresented in STEM [Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics] careers—African Americans, American Indians, and Latinos”[5]. The number of underrepresented minority (URM) bachelor degree recipients in engineeringwas 12,903 in 2014, a 10% increase from 2013. “This number represents 13.7 percent of the totalnumber of engineering degrees (93,950) conferred that year” [5]. While ethnic minorities areconsistently underrepresented in STEM [6], Native Americans are especially unlikely to pursueand complete an engineering degree.The 2014 growth was “mainly concentrated with the Latino population, who earned 8,984baccalaureate degrees, while African Americans earned 3,599, and American Indian/AlaskaNatives earned 320” [5]. Only 42% of Native Americans
on the best concept, sketch their best concept, anddescribe it in detail. The objective of this project is to learn and practice an engineering problem,experience a real world problem that some disabled people experience every day, and solve thatproblem so that disabled people can enhance their quality of life, while applying the engineeringdesign process.Literature reviewRowe and Klein used the How People Learn (HPL) in which the method for the HPL is outlinedfor the process (Rowe).2 The learning environment must be knowledge-centered, studentcentered, assessment-centered, and community-centered (Rowe).3 ”According to [How PeopleLearn (HPL)] theory, students learn best when (1) presented with organized information that (2)relates in some
engineers thrive when their habitual mind clashes with the social realities. In addition, I test interventions to nudge engineers to reframe problematic schema-incongruent situations into unique opportunities for cognitive growth, creative performance, and effective teamwork. My work contributes to revealing the science behind multicultural, interdisciplinary technological collaboration and providing actionable guidance for building up the next-generation engineers.Prof. Daigo Misaki, Kogakuin University Daigo Misaki is an Associate Professor at Department of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Kogakuin University. Daigo got a Ph.D. in Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University. Daigo was a visiting Associate Professor at
Paper ID #6120Learning Strategies and Learning Traits Critical to Practicing Engineers af-ter CollegeMr. Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is a graduate student in the Engineering Education Program at Purdue University and the recipient of NSF awards for research in engineering education. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-professional Studies Program and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service
still on studentengagement, the influence of institutional policies and practices on levels of engagement took amore preeminent role.27 Terenzini and Reason34 showed that students came to college with a variety of personal,academic, and social background characteristics and experiences that both prepared andpredisposed them to engage with the various formal and informal learning opportunities theywere afforded by the institution. Precollege characteristics had a powerful influence on students’subsequent college experiences. However, students both selected, and were selected by,institutions. Therefore, the clusters of precollege characteristics that summarized all the studentsof a college ultimately shaped the characteristics, climates
, Dr. Slaughter was named to the American Society for Engineering Education Hall of Fame and was the recipient of the society’s Centennial Medal. He received the UCLA Medal of Excellence in 1989, was elected to the Kansas State University Engineering Hall of Fame in 1990, received the Roger Revelle Award from the University of California, San Diego in 1991 and was named that institution’s Alumnus of the Year in 1982. Dr. Slaughter, a licensed professional engineer, began his career as an electronics engineer at General Dynamics and, later, served for 15 years at the U.S. Navy Electronics Laboratory in San Diego, where he became head of the Information Systems Technol- ogy Department. He has also been director of the
series of advocacy tips, published by the Women in Engineering Division (WIED) of ASEE and available at wied.asee.org.Prof. Karen J. Horton P.E., University of Maine Karen J. Horton, P.E. is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at the University of Maine, and a licensed professional engineer in the state of Maine. She is a Co-Principal Investigator on a National Science Foundation ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Grant. Prior to her 1997 appointment to the University she was employed as a mechanical engineer at Bath Iron Works in Maine, as a high school mathematics and electronics teacher for the Department of Defense Dependent Schools in Germany, and as a mechanical engineer at the Naval Coastal
]. Interdisciplinary graduate programs stemming from these efforts integrate knowledge from multiple disciplines to prepare students to address complex issues like climate change and disasters in their innovative work; examples include environmental studies, bioinformatics, digital humanities, biomedical engineering, and disaster resilience and risk management. Education scholars have explored how to constructively align learning outcomes in interdisciplinary graduate education[22], [23], [24]; how emerging researchers define and experience interdisciplinarity[25], [26]; and how to evaluate interdisciplinary graduate programs and student development in light of their complexity, especially
Mines Kathryn Johnson is an Associate Professor at the Colorado School of Mines in the Department of Elec- trical Engineering and Computer Science and is Jointly Appointed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory’s National Wind Technology Center. She has researched wind turbine control systems since 2002, with numerous projects related to reducing turbine loads and increasing energy capture. She has applied experiential learning techniques in several wind energy and control systems classes and began engineering education research related to social justice in control systems engineering in fall 2014. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Is Sociotechnical
skillsthey developed as a result of working on it. They were also asked if this project work had anyimplications on their job searches. The questions are included as an appendix.The quantitative measures were taken to characterize the experience levels of the sample, but themajority of the survey data was qualitative in nature. The resulting study was executed from aphenomenological interpretivist perspective,12-13 as the data and conclusions drawn from themare very much a product of the environment in which these TAs and the researchers work.Further, the participants represented a range of perspectives on the TA experience, given thatthey had varying degrees of experience and worked on different aspects of the project.The coding scheme emerged from
weapons for parades, complete last minute advising and textbook pickup, and completeannual Corps wide training. However, the first-year students report 10 days before classes beginto complete initial military training and acclimate into the culture. “Challenge Week” starts onSaturday with freshmen move-in supported by parents of upperclassmen while the first-yearparents participate in a matriculation day fair. There is a table for each organization on campusto include each of the academic schools ending with a presentation by the president and aquestion and answer session with the parents. At the School of Engineering table, as parentsmeet with faculty, the parents are given a document with a picture and contact information for alldepartment
. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder Jacquelyn Sullivan is founding co-director of the Engineering Plus degree program in the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. She spearheaded design and launch of the Engineering GoldShirt Program to provide a unique access pathway to engineering for high potential, next tier students not admitted through the standard admissions process; this program is now being adapted at several engineering colleges. Sullivan led the founding of the Precollege division of ASEE in 2004; was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education, and was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011. She has served on multiple NAE
level – statement of problem Currently, in the ECE Department of the UofU, students may apply for major statusduring any semester in which they complete a set of required classes, see 2. The currentGPA for admission to major status is 2.8 on the classes listed, except for ECE 1020 andCp Sc 1010 in which CREDIT is required. This GPA, however, does not guaranteeadmission. The maximum number of students admitted per year is capped at 75 inaccordance with ECE program resources. Transfer students from ABET engineeringaccredited schools (USU, BYU for instance) will be admitted under the same criteria asUofU students. With the emergence of the spell out USHE program, public colleges inUtah are required to accept transfer credit from other non
trained as an artist, who intends to make a grand sculptural gesture that has never been seen before and yet still make something functional. Caught between opposite requirements, pushed by celebrity culture one way, and pulled by a utilitarian philosophy the other, he may be blind to emergent blooper…function plus unlikely gesture equals a screw-up5.Deyan Sudjic, the architecture critic for the London Times recently wrote extensivelyabout the “push by celebrity culture” to shape current architectural forms. He wrote that architecture has always been dependent on the allocation of precious resources and scarce manpower. As such, its execution has always been at the discretion of those with their