outreach.Introduction and BackgroundTo promote K-12 student engagement in science, technology, engineering and mathematics(STEM), it is imperative that science and math teachers effectively link their content material toissues of significance to the students. Transportation issues, in particular those that occur duringtimes of such national emergencies as hurricanes, earthquakes, or war, have recently come to theforefront of national concern. People at all levels, from students in elementary schools to policymakers to research scientists and engineers, have all attempted to comprehend and to mitigate thehuman impact inflicted by disasters such as Katrina and 9/11. Many of the lessons learneddirectly concern the engineering and science communities. How do we
freshmen students with an upper division studentpreferably but not always in their major. The organization provided a mechanism forbuilding community and providing support for incoming freshmen. However, over thecourse of the academic year, participation levels at events decreased as the yearprogressed. After an individual missed an event, they were less likely to attend laterevents.Whether a mentoring relationship works or not in essence boils down to the ability fortwo individuals to “click”. If that bond or connection is made, the mentoring relationshipworks, and if the connection is not made, a relationship may exist but true mentoringdoes not exist. In a one-on-one mentoring structure, the mentee only has the opportunityto connect with the
re-engage after COVID and a prolonged absence from campus and face-to-face instruction.● Most team members reported low and attendance and flagging engagement, a pattern that was not limited to the redesigned courses but rather was reported consistently across Cal State LA.● Attempts at communicating the new grading system that gave the false impression that students could “wait” to engage with the feedback loops. Many students skipped early attempts at demonstrating learning of the learning outcomes, thereby not receiving critical feedback.Key findings from interviews continued:Some key initial errors in implementation included:● Workload varied dramatically depending on implementation and the number of
of instruction. Therefore, in this 2-week summer camp,the first week is designed for exposing the students to various science and engineeringdisciplines and the second week for engaging the students in project type of hands-on activity.The faculty team also recognizes that in order for them to be engaging and meaningful learningexperience for the students, the projects need to be designed and implemented in such a way thatthey demand a spirit of inquiry, critical thinking, applying scientific methods, observation andmeasurement skills, presentation and interpretation of results, and communication skills. Thefaculty team developed several student projects on contemporary research topics of interest tothe Native American Reservations and used
suchas racial and ethnic minority students, low-income students, and first-generation students. Thus,the purpose of our research is to focus on how a sense of belonging is impacted for students inonline learning settings.We seek to answer the following questions through this work: 1. How does the digital divide currently impact a sense of belonging and community in students? 2. What patterns will be revealed when we investigate sense of belonging across different social identities?MethodsPrevious research by Peacock and Cowan (2020) suggested that three factors are responsible forstudents’ sense of belonging when engaged in online learning: interaction/engagement, culture oflearning, and support. Additional factors, identified by
ASEE-NMWSC2013-0004 Impact of a Research Experience Program on North Dakota Tribal College STEM Student Retention Audrey LaVallie1, Eakalak Khan2, and G. Padmanabhan2 1 Faculty, Turtle Mountain Community College, Belcourt, North Dakota (e-mail: alavallie@tm.edu) 2 Professor of Civil Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota (e-mails: Eakalak.khan@ndsu.edu and g.padmanabhan@ndsu.edu respectively)Abstract Recent educational research shows that students who engage in research projects aremore likely to
students’ engagement [27-29].At the intersection of both technology and the environment, it has been demonstrated that theimplementation of microcomputer-based laboratory could improve the interpretation of physicsconcept [30, 31]. Specifically, the use of Arduino-based experiments has been promoted to teachthe concept of electrical resistance [32,33]. A study found that there was a significant increase inthe levels of satisfaction and comprehension among students when Arduino was used in ageotechnical engineering education module [34]. Beyond the positive impacts on learning, theimplementation of our prototype also has the potential to expand undergraduate access to hands-on geophysics and provide a sense of belonging to the larger Earth Science
objectives and an assignment for participants. There were also 5 sessionsduring Fall 2013. Breakout groups within each session promoted interactions among subsets ofthe participants; these were critical for encouraging broad participation, with each breakoutgroup reporting back to the full VCP afterward. Pre-planned topics included (1) Introduction tothe Circuits VCP, (2) Overview of Research-based Instructional Approaches, (3) LearningObjectives and Bloom’s Taxonomy, (4) Student Motivation, (5) Teams, and (6) & (7) Makingthe Classroom More Interactive. The topics for sessions (8) and (9) were developed by our VCPcommunity during preceding weeks: (8) Simulation and Hands-On Learning, Assessing Impact;(9) Great Ideas that Flopped. In addition to
assisted in changing the current UNIV 1301 course from a teacherdominated instruction and philosophy course to a more student learning centered,engaging, hands-on, engineering problem solving course that improved student-facultyinteraction and student motivation. Although some basic manufacturing technologies werebe used to build products, a majority of the course included hands-on activities aimed atimproving understanding of the ‘Engineering Design Process’ as part of a semester longteam project. In demand soft skills such as communication, teamwork, and inter-disciplinary engagement were highlighted and encouraged.In this paper some of the tools utilized to assist in the redesign of the ‘Foundations ofEngineering’ course are detailed below:1
separate grant-funded programs or initiatives funded by the National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Agri- culture, National Institutes of Health, and The Kern Family Foundation. These projects have focused on the evaluation of student success, outreach impacts, innovative learning techniques, and STEM-related interventions and curricula.Dr. Carrie A. Obenland, Rice University Dr. Obenland is the Assistant Director for Outreach and Research at the Rice Office of STEM Engage- ment. She as her PhD in Chemistry from Rice University, as well as her Masters. Her graduate work was focused on chemical education. She earned her BS in Chemical Engineering from the
. scheduling and estimating)and soft professional skills (ex. leadership and communication). Various researchers havestressed the importance of nurturing and developing soft skills to enhance the performance andsuccess of graduates. In their CM graduating seniors’ trait assessment study, the soft skillsconsidered included leadership, teamwork, written communication, oral communication, ‘takingcharge’ attitude, sense of urgency, time management, attention to detail, and problem-solving1.Furthermore, character traits such as self-efficacy have had an impact on academic motivationand achievement, as students who have higher self-efficacy are likely to participate, pursuechallenging objectives, work harder, persist and complete tasks successfully 2, 3
situations, exposure to the habitus of others, or interacting with people who originate fromvery different backgrounds, all of which occur with regularity in the college environment [34,35]. Students who report having more experiences with diversity report that it is due to frequentexposure to diverse perspectives in their classes [36].Communication and Repeated ExposureRepeated exposure and time-on-task is one of the most significant predictors of task success [37,38]. The impacts of repeated exposure operate along linguistic and social dimensions. Repeatedexposure in a linguistic context has been referred to as linguistic entrainment or alignment.Entrainment refers to the spontaneous process by which dialogue partners adjust their verbal andnon
institutions that may not have graduate programs in an area toimmerse them into a research program at a research university and thus, increase their awarenessand interest in graduate school in computing, science, technology, engineering, and math (C-STEM) fields. Such undergraduate research experiences have been lauded as to their benefit toenriching undergraduate student experience in research and to further greatly impact theirinterest in graduate school. The REU program shares commonalities with project-based orproblem-based learning in that students were engaged in projects and involved in the process likeexisting members of a research group.Past research (e.g., [1], [2], [6 -13]) lauded undergraduate summer research programs for theirimpact on
theory that providing students with increased opportunities to honetheir skills in these areas in a manner that is continuous throughout their progression through anengineering program should increase their self-efficacy beliefs, valuation of engineeringknowledge and skills, and the extent to which they see themselves as engineers (i.e., engineeringidentity). This should, in turn, increase students’ engagement with curricular and extracurricularengineering related content and activities and ultimately retention, persistence, and the overallquality of learning. Toward this end faculty on this project have developed a set of teachingstrategies grounded in design, problem, and project-based learning [1], [2] and have begunimplementing them in
in problem- AI’s predictive analytics help educators identify students solving abilities [12].who are at risk of falling behind, providing timelyinterventions. A study by The Bill & Melinda Gates Case Study in AR/VR: ClassVR implemented in a middleFoundation [6] found that predictive analytics systems school classroom showed a 50% improvement in studentimplemented in community colleges helped improve student engagement compared to traditional teaching methods,retention rates by 10-20%. Statistics: In a study by the especially in subjects like history and science.Education Advisory Board (EAB), institutions thatimplemented predictive analytics to monitor student progressreported a 15% increase
of 2011 10, Waterbotics 7, 13 and MATE 5, 24 all use underwater robotics as part of STEMcurriculum. Within each program, online news articles, videos, and various journal and researcharticles show evidence of increased student engagement and interest in STEM-related areas, inrobotics efficacy and STEM learning in general 8, 13, 19. Most of the evidence from these ROVprograms however, only speaks to the procedures of the activity within STEM, not to valid datafrom reliable instruments supporting the impact the program is making in student interest andperception of technology and engineering.Problem Statement There is limited research on the impact an ROV activity or program makes regardingstudent interest and perception of technology
Paper ID #41622Work in Progress: Project Teams’ Structure Impacting Students’ ProfessionalSkill DevelopmentEmily Buten, University of Michigan Emily (she/her) is a Ph.D. student in the Engineering Education Research program at the University of Michigan and received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Dayton. Her research focuses on individuals’ development from students to professional engineers. She is particularly interested in studying co-op/internship programs, professional skills development, and diverse student experiences in experiential learning settings.Jack Boomer Perry, University of Michigan
based in engineering design.Tricia Serviss, Santa Clara University Tricia is an assistant professor in the Department of English at Santa Clara University, specializing in writing studies, composition, and writing educational practices. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Work In Progress: First-Year Student Signature Project - Design an Infographic on “What is Technical Communication”Abstract:There are a number of concepts and skills that are common to all our university students.Technical writing is one of the most relevant and utilized concepts, thus we have developed aproject-based ‘writing to learn’ infographic design mini-project assignment to engage first-yearstudents
components. As well, design-based projects in development engineering mustconsider cultural settings that are different from those of the engineers providing the design. Thedesign frequently will require a strong attention to the use of technologies and techniques that areeasy to learn and maintain, inexpensive, and allow for minimal use of centralized infrastructuresuch as roads, electricity, internet, communications, or modern supply chains.Running parallel to DE is the trend in higher education for service-learning (SL), one manifestationof experiential education. SL has been defined as, “a form of experiential education in whichstudents engage in activities that address human and community needs together with structuredopportunities for
.[37] Greene, T., Marti, C., & McClenney, K. (2008). The effort-outcome gap: Differences for AfricanAmerican and Hispanic community college students in student engagement and academicachievement. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 513-539.[38] Chickering, A. W., Peters, K., & Palmer, R. T. (2006). Assessing the impact of the Morgan maleinitiative on leadership and excellence (MILE) Morgan State University. MD: Baltimore.[39] Pope, M. L. (2002). Community college mentoring: Minority student perception. Community CollegeReview, 30(3), 31-45.[40] Daloz, L. A. (1986). Effective Teaching and Mentoring: Realizing the Transformational Power of AdultLearning Experiences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.[41] Fleming, J. (1984). Blacks in
Paper ID #29796Faculty Perspectives on the Impact of Virtual Office Hours inEngineering CoursesMs. Brooke-Lynn Caprice AndradeDr. Krishna Pakala, Boise State University Krishna Pakala, Ph.D, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Biomedical En- gineering at Boise State University (Boise, Idaho) where he has been since 2012. He is the Faculty in Residence for the Engineering and Innovation Living Learning Community and the Faculty Associate for Accessibility and Universal Design for Learning. He is also the Director for the Industrial Assessment Center at Boise State University. He served as the
addressparticipation from students across campus, we continue not only to look to participationas the metric of success, but also need to formalize mechanisms for evaluating the impactof this program on student’s disciplinary and interdisciplinary development. Therefore,we are expanding the work done previously in evaluating the Sandbox as a resource forengineering students and are looking more broadly at its potential impact across allcolleges that encompass the university. The goal in this initial evaluation is to establish aprocess by which cross-curricular assessment of such spaces can take place in order toallow academic faculty and administration to evaluate and improve over time the impactof such programming.Student Outcomes Across Disciplines and
, universities acrossthe United States have adopted online teaching, and students were forced to take all of theirclasses online. This research aims to determine the difference in students' engagement andlearning experience during online classes compared with on-campus classes, the impact of thecurrent COVID-19 pandemic on transportation engineering education, and the impact of usingsimulation technologies on students' outcomes in transportation engineering classes. Weinvestigate online teaching's impact on students enrolled in the transportation engineering lab(CE3601L) offered at Cal Poly Pomona using both students' responses to surveys distributedamong them and students' grades. The results from the statistical analysis models implemented inthis
of academic profession, Dr. Ferdousi developed many undergraduate and graduate curriculum, and served as pro- gram coordinator. Dr. Ferdousi serves as adviser of her PhD students and supervises as chair of doctoral dissertation committees. She also supervises Master’s Thesis and Projects Design in Cybersecurity pro- gram. Dr. Ferdousi’s current research interest mainly focuses on: Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity, Human-computer interaction and usability of digital device interface, Social engineering as scheme to break cybersecurity, Effect of advanced technology such as Internet of Thing (IoT) and Cloud Computing on data security and privacy, Impact of social media on cybersecurity, Gender gaps and
thecourse: 1. At least 50% of the course will focus on the global aspects of energy. 2. Students will demonstrate an understanding of the change of energy sources and uses over time, and will understand energy in a comparative and cross‐national manner. 3. Students will understand how energy issues affect different communities, nations, and regions, including the impact of energy on the economic, cultural, social, and political aspects of these communities, nations, and regions. 4. Students will demonstrate an understanding of the civic complexities and responsibilities of energy choices and policies, including both the commonalities and the differences globally. 5. Students will demonstrate an awareness of
, a crowd threshold phenomenon occurs,and the classroom comes alive with engagement. Having more than 50 students begins to presentlogistical challenges for the instructional team, but the model will scale to any size provided anadequate number of UGTAs are included.ConclusionThe engaged environment has transformed both how and what we teach in the sophomore-levelmechanics courses. This change has had a significant impact on the mindset, motivation, andproblem-solving abilities of the students who
Education, 35(6), 727-742.26. Tinto, V. (2003). Learning better together: the impact of learning communities on student success. HigherEducation Monograph Series, 2003-1, Syracuse University: Syracuse, NY.27. Astin, A. (1975). Preventing students from dropping out. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.28. Astin, A. (1995). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.29. Cohen, N. H. (1995). The principles of adult mentoring scale. New Directions for Adult and ContinuingEducation, Summer, 66, 15-32.30. Girves, J. E., Zepeda, Y., & Gwathmey, J. K. (2005), Mentoring in a post-affirmative action world, Journalof Social Issues, 61(3), 449-480.31. Kuh, G., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J
, Computer Graphics, Materials Science and laboratory courses. Since 2015 she has been actively involved in the University of Miami College of Engineering’s ”Redefining Engineering Education” strategic plan on educational innovation. As part of this plan, Dr. Basalo worked with 2 other faculty members to organize inaugural Senior Design Expo in May 2017, an exposition where over 200 senior students showcased their Capstone projects to the University of Miami community, alumni and industry leaders. Starting in 2016 and through her work with the University of Miami’s Engaged Faculty Fellowship program, Dr. Basalo incorporated an academic service component into the final project for a sophomore-level Measurements Lab course
, highlighting the importance of confidence inone’s quantitative skills in the development of an engineering identity.Finally, a community-service orientation related to volunteering for service projects emerged asan associate of identity at the post-assessment, indicating some shift from a professional identitycentered on intrinsic motivators (such as good feelings about engineering) to extrinsic motivatorssuch as a community service orientation. This is likely a result of the emphasis placed on serviceas part of an engineering career in both first-year courses, particularly the First-Year EngineeringProjects course, in which 60% of the students engaged in client-based service design projects.ImplicationsThe gains in identity during the summer bridge
sophisticated tools that engage students in new forms of thinking, supportexperimentation and advocate for a growth mindset that encourages persistence and the seekingof challenges and learning, all of which represent valuable learning opportunities that align withthe learning outcomes aspired to by engineering schools [3].In this paper, we assessed the impact of integrating making activities into two engineering designcourses on one non-cognitive attribute — implicit theories —. The study presented in this paperfocuses on the integration of making activities into two collaborative project-based-learningengineering design courses that offer students an authentic learning environment where theywork with a real-time client to solve an engineering problem