Improving Laboratory Safety and the Culture of Safety in Academic Laboratories American Society for Engineering Education Engineering Research Council March 9, 2016 Craig MerlicEarly Laboratory ConditionsModern Laboratory ConditionsDecember 29, 2008 Sheharbano Sangji Accident AftermathRepercussions across• UCLA campus• University of California system• Chemistry departments and universities nationwide• Federal agencies• Professional societies A very tragic accident that truly changed academic safety practices and the academic culture of safety UCLA ResponseUCLA initiated a wide array of changes and activities in response to theaccident, Cal
ASEE 2014 Zone I Conference, April 3-5, 2014, University of Bridgeport, Bridgpeort, CT, USA. Improvement in the Performance of Design-Science Research in Information Systems Christian Bach Remah Alshinina School Of Engineering Computer Science and Engineering University Of Bridgeport University Of Bridgeport Bridgeport, CT, U.S.A Bridgeport, CT, U.S.A cbach@bridgeport.edu ralshini
-Whitney U test reveals that there is nosignificant difference between the medians of PSVT:R (p = 0.755) or SBST (p = 0.662) ofENGR and ENGT students. At the time of data collection for this study, the ENGR and ENGTstudents finished their third and fifth semesters and accumulated, on average, 50 and 80 credithours respectively out of 126 credit hours. For PSVT:R scores, this result further confirmed theceiling effect of this psychometric test [21] because “the test is relatively easy for thispopulation” [15]. For SBST, it could be possible that ENGT students have higher and moreconsistent test scores than ENGR students because they studied SOM course with more cross-sectional views than ENGR students do with STA course.“Is there any significant
assessmentstrategies. This was implemented in a sophomore level Mechanics of Materials course (i.e.,Mechanics of Deformable Solids, ME222 at XXX). We do not claim that the style of assessmentused in the current experiments is unique, but it is uncommon in today’s classrooms.The main goal of these experiments was to determine if a change in assessment strategies wouldlead to better study strategies and thus improved student performance. The results strongly supportthis assertion.2. Modified Course DesignThe course design and methods used in this study were based on a series of informal discussionsand interviews with students, which revealed the following behaviors: 1. Students tend to focus on maximizing partial credit as opposed to understanding. 2
improvements in brailleinstruction. A positive side effect of the project was the MET and CBH students learned fromeach other and developed a much deeper appreciation and understanding for the diversedisciplines. Caryn Schweinsberg, a former CBH Student, stated: “A few years ago, I had theprivilege of participating in an interdisciplinary project … with the engineering studentsinvolving the creation of braille blocks …. The experience and knowledge I gained throughparticipating in this service based project was invaluable. It expanded my team building skillsimmensely, and taught me about the significant impact a multidisciplinary approach can have ona single goal. It also allowed me to gain a very different perspective on problem solving throughthe
Criterion 4“Continuous Improvement:… us[ing] a documented process incorporating relevant data toregularly assess its program educational objectives and program outcomes, and to evaluate theextent to which they are being met. The results of these evaluations of program educationalobjectives and program outcomes must be used to effect continuous improvement of the programthrough a documented plan.”[6] None of the reviewed programs had either of these criteria listedas a program strength. Lack of a documented program assessment process that is part of afeedback loop for continuous program improvement is a systematic problem throughout thecollege’s programs and ranks high among the programs’ faculty and college administration as aproblem to
as variations among instructors inthe Introduction to Mechanical Engineering course. Questions 1 and 2 are not displayed sincethey asked how many sessions students attended and what events / conflicts prevented thestudents from attending more. An additional analysis is being conducted to correlate the numberof attended sessions and the final grades. MECH Math Review Post Survey 3. Overall, the material covered in the Math Review adequately refreshed my skillset? 3.83 4. I feel my math ability has improved since attending the Math Review Sessions
Education), and RCI (Cartagena Network of Engineering). She was the first American woman who has received the title International Engineering Educator of IGIP. Page 25.542.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Engineering Education for the Improvement of Practice: Preparing for Labour Market Claudio da Rocha Brito1, Melany M. Ciampi2, Luis Amaral3, Rosa Vasconcelos4 1 President of Science and Education Research Council 2 President of Safety, Health and Environment Research Organization
Session ETD 525 Improving Engineering Management Graduate Student Success through Advisory Board Partnerships Dr. Saeed D. Foroudastan, Carey Snowden Middle Tennessee State UniversityAbstractThe Engineering Management concentration of the Master of Science in Professional Science(MSPS) degree program at Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU) was designed to provideMiddle Tennessee’s booming manufacturing industry with skilled graduates trained both in bothengineering methodologies–including PMI Project Management, Six Sigma, and leanmanufacturing–and in business
years we have performed several studies about fast remedial courses that try toimprove the spatial abilities of engineering students in the University of La Laguna in Spain. In Page 23.1253.3these courses, different tools have been tried out: classic exercises (views) using pen and paper;online multimedia web-based exercises; sketch-based modelling through a calligraphicinterface25; use of Dynamic 3D apps26; and videogames as a work tool17. The aim is that studentswho take part in these courses will improve their spatial abilities and help them to have a betterunderstanding of the contents of the subject of ‘Engineering Graphics’.Recently
with to simplify repair) 5. Timely (On demand and rapid feedback eliminates errors before they accumulate) 6. Ongoing (Available throughout the course of any modeling project) 7. Consistent (All students receive the same feedback) [1].The rules were continuously updated throughout the term in which they were introduced;students corrected new errors and improved their model quality as they executed their termprojects. Extracts from six team projects will be presented and contrasted with selected pastprojects (subjected to the same validation rules) to demonstrate the efficacy of the approach.Several models published by notable SysML modelers will also be analyzed.Systems Engineering in 2020: A Discipline in FluxAt the time of this
. Upon completion of a lean manufacturing course eachstudent will have the chance to demonstrate his/her knowledge in one of the most important andcontemporary techniques in the operations world. The educational methodology includeslecturing, analysis of cases and results and the study of real business situations that have leadfactories to either success or failure depending on the appropriate implementation of leanthinking. Educating in lean strategies concerns several challenging and interesting educationaltasks such as:1. – The clear understanding of terms, definitions, concepts and policies of Lean Manufacturing.2. - The formulation of recommendations in order to achieve operations improvement.3. - Techniques used to analyze and redesign
AC 2008-611: THE NEW AND IMPROVED CIVIL ENGINEERING BODY OFKNOWLEDGERichard Anderson, Somat Engineering, Inc.Stuart Walesh, S. G. Walesh ConsultingKenneth Fridley, University of Alabama Page 13.1249.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 The New and Improved Civil Engineering Body of KnowledgeAbstractIn January 2004 the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) published the CivilEngineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century report (BOK1)1. Based on the favorablereception of the BOK1 in the civil engineering community, ASCE embarked on a revision of theBOK to take advantage of the comments received and the lessons learned in earlyimplementation of the
following steps5: 4 4 Identify a community need that matches course learning objectives, Form partnerships 4 4 Create and implement solutions 4 Evaluate solutions for continuous improvement, and Encourage reflection.Service learning offers engineering and technology professors a pedagogy that can help theirstudents develop a sense of social awareness and citizenship to meet the challenges of the 21stCentury. It is also a pedagogy that addresses a number of desired student learning outcomesdescribed in the Engineering Criteria 2000. While service learning requires extra work on thepart of the instructor, and the students, the
Page 25.834.5existing coursework of the engineering curriculum. When used as a course component, servicelearning differs from hypothetical design problems and case studies because the deliverable isnecessarily intended for presentation to a beneficiary or implementation in the community.Various service learning initiatives have been highlighted as models for good practice byShuman and colleagues 13, including Engineers Without Borders 14 and Engineers for aSustainable World 15, humanitarian engineering programs 16, and other projects in which studentsconduct design research focused on helping improve the capacity of citizens in the globe’s mostdisadvantaged areas to meet their basic needs 17,18,19. There is ample anecdotal evidence of
Preparing the best future engineers through improved teaching methods Genevieve Gagnon PhD Engineering Department University of St.Thomas, St-Paul MNAbstractOur goal will always be the preparation of excellent engineers for the next generation.However, these new students have different behaviors and aptitudes that limit theeffectiveness of traditional teaching methods. This research will focus on how to bestapproach tomorrow’s engineering class with new tools and interactive teachingtechniques. Keeping those students engaged and learning for the long term is a challenge.A variety of interactive teaching
Session 2438 The VisTE Project: Visualization for Improved Technological and Scientific Literacy Eric N. Wiebe, Aaron C. Clark, Miriam Ferzli and Rachel McBroom NC State University, Raleigh, NCABSTRACT: Visualization in Technology Education (VisTE) is a standards-based initiativedesigned to promote the use of graphic visualization among grade 8-12 students to improve theirhigher order thinking, communication skills, and understanding of science, technology,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) topics. By using simple and complex visualization tools,students can conduct
department of Adult and Higher Education at NCSU. Page 13.473.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 EFFECTS OF ACTIVE LEARNING ON STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND RETENTION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERINGAbstract During a five-year period from 2002 through 2006, parallel sections of the introductorysophomore chemical engineering course (“Chemical Process Principles”) were taught bydifferent instructors in the same or adjacent time slots, so that both sections could be given thesame midterm examinations. It usually happened that one section was taught in a traditionallecture-based
AC 2012-4617: USING INSTRUCTION TO IMPROVE MATHEMATICALMODELING IN CAPSTONE DESIGNDr. Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University Jennifer Cole is the Assistant Chair in chemical and biological engineering in the Robert R. McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University. Cole’s primary teaching is in capstone and freshman design, and her research interest are in engineering design education.Dr. Robert A. Linsenmeier, Northwestern University Robert A. Linsenmeier is a professor of biomedical engineering, neurobiology, and ophthalmology, North- western University, and Director, Northwestern Center for Engineering Education Research.Timothy Miller, Binghamton UniversityDr. Matthew R. Glucksberg
selected into the program must havecompleted one year in course work and must be enrolled as full-time students in STEM programduring Fall and Spring semesters. This program is open to US citizens or permanent residentswho are a member of underrepresented minority group as defined by National ScienceFoundation (NSF) standards.North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (NCA&T), was established in 1891and is a public, comprehensive, land grant university committed to fulfilling its fundamentalpurposes through exemplary undergraduate and graduate instruction, scholarly and creativeresearch, and effective public service. NCA&T is a Historically Black College and University(HBCU), located in Greensboro, North Carolina and
speed but an improved torque capacity and torqueresponse. This produced a better speed-torque match to the desired platform performance.Testing revealed that these new motors operated at a much better energy efficiency than theprevious motors at the speed range designed for this project. This influenced our batteryselection and battery cost.UHP-1000-36 battery charger was chosen because it met all requirements. Previously specifiedBMS devices were over specified. This MeanWell charger is capable of 1008 Watts at 36 Voltsand 28 Amps, matching our peak requirements, but having controls that are more effective atlower output power levels.The remote controller is a Nordic Semiconductor NRF24L0 wireless transceiver system havingan Arduino interface
AC 2007-1006: ASSESSING HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS' PRECONCEPTIONS ABOUTARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO IMPROVE LEARNINGGlenn Ellis, Smith CollegeJake Lauer, Smith CollegeKatie Silva, Smith CollegeNetty Nina, Smith College Page 12.267.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Assessing Preconceptions about Artificial Intelligence to Improve LearningI. Introduction Students come to the classroom with preconceptions about how the world works. If their initial understanding is not engaged, they may fail to grasp the new concepts and information that are taught, or they may learn them for purposes of a test but revert
College created a pilot job shadow program for women in engineering. Job shadowing is aworkplace-based learning experience that introduces students to career areas and provides theopportunity to spend a day or two observing a professional in the field. The overarching goal ofthe project was to explore the effectiveness of job shadowing by undergraduate womenengineering students as a means of improving interest and persistence in engineering. Shadowparticipants created reflective interest statements, spent a day observing engineeringprofessionals, and reported on their experiences at a panel presentation for their engineeringclassmates. A mixed methods research plan was developed and implemented in order to assessthe impact of the job shadow
AC 2011-2032: SERVICE-LEARNING PARTNERSHIPS: IMPROVING ED-UCATION AND ADDRESSING COMMUNITY NEEDSWilliam C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette William Oakes is the Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University, one of the founding faculty members of the School of Engineering Education and a courtesy faculty member in Mechanical Engi- neering and Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education. He is active in ASEE and has served on the boards of ERM, FPD and CIP and is a fellow of the ASEE and NSPE. He was the first engineer to win the Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the 2005 National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for
theresult of the previous study on the effect of interfaces 5, 7 an improved version of the OpAmpiLab has been developed.The new OpAmp iLab utilizes the complete MIT iLab architecture, as shown in Fig. 3 Lab Server Service Broker Lab Client Lab Experiment LS Web Internet/ Internet/ Device Execution Service Intranet Batched iLab SB Built with Intranet Engine Adobe Flex Switching service
Paper ID #42606Board 306: Improving Retention Rate and Success in Computer Science ScholarsDr. Jung Won Hur, Auburn University Dr. Jung Won Hur is a professor in the Department of Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology at Auburn University. Her research interests encompass computer science education, diversity in STEM, culturally responsive teaching, and emerging technology integration in the classroom.Dr. Cassandra Thomas, Tuskegee University Dr. Cassandra Thomas is an Associate Professor of Computer Science at Tuskegee University. She earned a BS (from TU) and an MS in Computer Science and an Ed. D. in
Using a Technical Autobiography to Improve First Year Engineering Dr. Suzanne Keilson Loyola University Maryland skeilson@loyola.eduThe author has been collecting "technical autobiographies" on the first day of an Introduction toEngineering class for about a decade. This is a primarily undergraduate, liberal arts universityand the course enrolls students from across the university. The class is part of a first yearseminars program and enrollment is capped at 16.The autobiography is as an excellent ice-breaker for the class and has provided some interestinginformation about the prior knowledge and technical background of incoming
authors will discuss the role that specific course information playsin the process and the importance of properly defining learning outcomes. Many departmentsfind they have a list of learning outcomes, but most people do not know what is actually meantby the particular outcome. This paper will detail potential struggles found in incorporating newmethods and will provide strategies utilized to effectively overcome these. In addition, beforeand after showcases will be shown, so that the reader can observe the effectiveness and clarity ofthe newer methods. These showcases include data collection methods, assessment methods, anddefinitions of the process. Both experienced and new personnel working with ABET programswill discover practical, effective
inthe responses to the test anxiety dimension in both semesters and both pre and post-tests. Figure 1: Comparison of Average Responses of Students Enrolled in all Math Courses Table I: Comparison of Average Responses of Students Enrolled in all Math CoursesThe analyses of the pre/post responses of the students in each of the Math courses in which thestrategies for effective engagement were implemented, indicated trends that were similar to theaggregate data. As an example, the analysis for MATH 107 is shown in Fig. 2 and Table II. Thestudents enrolled in FA20 were all incoming freshmen and almost all the students enrolled inSP20 were repeating the course. In both semesters, an improvement in all dimensions wasobserved. This improvement
that course commensurate with the placement test results. • Those completing the program were offered academic scholarships, funded by AMP program. These students were called AMP scholars. Table 3 Students’ Performance in Math Placement Test after Summer Bridge Year of No of AMP % Students who % Students who % Students who did Entrance Scholars improved by two improved by one not improve their levels on placement level on placement math placement 1995 14 35.8 50.0 14.2 1996 13