Mechanical Engineering, MPH in Public Health Education, and BS in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include broadening participation in engineering, the integration of engineering education and international development, and building capacity in low and middle income countries through inclusive technical education.Mr. Christopher Kappes, Virginia Tech c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 International Humanitarian Capstone Design Project Option: A Model for SuccessIntroductionCapstone engineering design is intended to prepare students for new challenges beyond theiracademic curriculum, with a focus on balancing engineering
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: Implementing Project-based Learning into Sophomore Mechanics CourseAbstractThe primary goal of an engineering curriculum is to lay the groundwork for the remainder of thestudents’ training. Traditionally, the curriculum primarily consists of lecture-based courses, withsome hands-on work, mostly through demonstration. In recent years, the curriculum has startedusing more project-based courses. In these updated courses, the theory covered via lecture ismerged with hands-on project work. This integrated approach is designed to not only give thestudents a foundation of the course theory, but to expand on that and give them practical, hands-on
Paper ID #15290Progress and Impact of LEAP: An NSF S-STEM Scholarship ProjectDr. Afsaneh Minaie, Utah Valley University Afsaneh Minaie is a professor of Computer Engineering at Utah Valley University. She received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. all in Electrical Engineering from University of Oklahoma. Her research interests include gender issues in the academic sciences and engineering fields, Embedded Systems Design, Mobile Computing, Wireless Sensor Networks, Nanotechnology, Data Mining and Databases.Dr. Reza Sanati-Mehrizy, Utah Valley University Reza Sanati-Mehrizy is a professor of Computer Science Department at Utah Valley
create power. Students measure various system states about the performance ofthe system. In the Spring 2023 semester, the final project for students was a water filtration system.The final project had students pumping water between various tanks and measuring how clean itwas in real time. Students would use this information to determine if the water should be allowedto leave the system. Figure 1 in the appendix shows teams of students working on each project.The ENGR 111 curriculum has six key features that are fundamental to the learning objectives ofthe course. Each of these features is described in detail below. The difference per feature betweeneach Cornerstone varies.TeamworkIn ENGR 111, students are assigned to teams of 3-4 within the
Paper ID #41622Work in Progress: Project Teams’ Structure Impacting Students’ ProfessionalSkill DevelopmentEmily Buten, University of Michigan Emily (she/her) is a Ph.D. student in the Engineering Education Research program at the University of Michigan and received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Dayton. Her research focuses on individuals’ development from students to professional engineers. She is particularly interested in studying co-op/internship programs, professional skills development, and diverse student experiences in experiential learning settings.Jack Boomer Perry, University of Michigan
laboratory exercise, Remembering the basic facts is essential. Learners in anevaluate a hypothesis and ultimately analyze the results and electrical engineering program must learn the basics ofshare them with their peers in a group presentation. The current flow, mechanical engineers must learn the basics ofstudents are guided through this project by their instructor andthey create written presentations, oral presentations, stress application, Environmental engineers must learn theexperimental designs and final conclusions from the work. Each basics of natural system interactions. These
Paper ID #25238Engineering Design Instruction Using Slack for Project Support and Team-workDr. Jonathan Elliot Gaines, University of South Florida Jonathan E. Gaines is faculty in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of South Florida. He is the Director of First Year Experiential Education and Learning. Through this position, he develops and implements the curriculum for USF’s Foundations of Engineering Lab course. He is also the Principle Investigator for Bulls Engineering Youth Experience (Bulls-EYE Mentoring) a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math based outreach program that uses undergraduate
emergingtechnologies over the next decade has been clearly outlined.1,2,3,4 Engineering education ischanging with its focus shifting from the traditional theory-based curriculum to more team-basedlearning, problem solving with open-ended solutions, hands-on projects, and team-orientedcommunications.5,6,7 Addressing the need for skilled technology workers is a requiredcompetitive and survival strategy for most manufacturers.4 Page 14.36.3Four components of the development process will be addressed and tested in this project: Creating Learning Materials and Teaching Strategies. The project will revise and exchange existing educational materials and
high GPAs, on average, do well on their projects student groups with more industry work experience, on average, tend to do better in the project’s soft skills, as well as the ability overall to complete their projects successfully peer evaluations of group team work provided no data that related to project success the number of hours worked on the job tended to not have an effect on project successIntroductionThe 2012-13 ABET-ETAC Criterion 5 Curriculum section states that “Baccalaureate degreeprograms must provide a capstone or integrating experience that develops student competenciesin applying both technical and non-technical skills in solving problems.”1. A short search ofASEE Conference papers variously defines the goal
technology, project based and problem- based curriculum (PBL), change from traditional to project organized and problem- based curriculum, development of transferable skills in PBL and project work, and methods for staff development. She is Associate Editor for the European Journal of Engineering Education. She has been supervising more than 20 PhD students and has more than 310 publications. She has been member of several organizations and committees within EER, national government bodies, and committees in the EU. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Interdisciplinary Problem-Based Projects for First-Year
Decide on alternative SUT concept proposals Select a single personal urban mobility solution Define the mechanical, electrical, and controls requirements for the selected concept- vehicle technical specification (VTS) Define the environment or infrastructure to support the selected personal urban mobility solutionFormation of Team 2: members, roles, timingMore than 80 engineering and industrial design students from 28 PACE Institutions undertookthe project in the 2010-2011 academic year, forming seven teams. Each team was composed ofat least one industrial design institution and a maximum of four engineering institutions. Eachteam targeted a specific urban area and developed a sustainable transport
California, Berkeley, and at the University of Minnesota. He currently is the Administrative Director for the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Minnesota, where he has taken a keen interest in the role of student groups in engineering education and implemented and manages the Exceed Lab, an interdisciplinary makerspace for students to design and build engineering projects. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Creating Meaningful Experiences Through Extracurricular Project-Based Experiential LearningAbstractEducators, employers, and students all understand the value of both taking part in extracurricularactivities and the
Education 1It is generally accepted that learners retain much more knowledge from direct experience thanthey do from the standard lecture format [1, 2]. However, with the continuing trend ofengineering curricular contraction (UMR recently adopted a uniform 128 hour engineeringcurriculum which reduced the ME curriculum by five semester hours) it is difficult to introducenew laboratories to complement traditional lecture courses. Hence, to address the need for more“hands on” experiences in ME279, we created a “mini-lab” experience for students that requiredthem to apply what they learned during the first nine chapters of Norman Nise’s controls text [3]in a laboratory setting. This new project format gave the students a chance to augment
products. Additionally, theUniversity benefits by exposing on campus resources to local and regional industry occasionallyresulting in future funding for faculty research.This paper outlines the industrially sponsored senior project program for MET students at PennState Behrend. This includes the roles of the various participants in the project, the limitationsplaced on project scope, and most importantly, the responsibilities of the students. Examples aregiven of typical projects.IntroductionABET requires that a mechanical engineering technology (MET) program must have some sortof capstone experience that pulls together various elements of the overall curriculum[1]. It mustinclude both technical and non-technical problem solving skills. One of
B.S. from the University of Michigan and her Ph.D. from Purdue University, both in chemical engineering. She then transitioned into the engineering education field by completing a post-doctoral appointment at Oregon State University investigating technology-aided conceptual learning. She is currently doing research on team dynamics and students’ changes in engineering self-efficacy in project-based learning.Dr. Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Faculty Director for Engineering Education Research at the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineer- ing (CRLT-Engin) at University of Michigan (U-M). She earned B.S.E.E
for, and an ability to engage inlifelong learning. In most of the Engineering Technology (ET) programs, capstone projects aredesigned for students to utilize their technical knowledge, problem solving skills, and projectmanagement skills to develop a product or a system related to their discipline. This paper presentsa methodology of utilizing the capstone course as a vehicle to enhance and assess student’s lifelong learning skills. During the semester long course, one student team signed up to learn thesubject of adhesive technology that is not taught in the current curriculum. The student teamdesigned and built an adhesive test apparatus that can be used for outreach activities. Anotherstudent team was assigned to learn rapid prototyping
Elements” course intheir third year of study. For the last several years, students at the University of Texas at Austintake a redesigned course that combines hands-on projects within a traditional classroom formatof homeworks, tests, and lectures. Integrating projects into the curriculum is part of a larger,multi-faceted departmental effort called PROCEED (PROject CEntered EDucation)1, whichactively promotes projects across the mechanical engineering undergraduate curriculum.PROCEED encourages instruction that integrates course projects in order to advance active,socially constructed learning that draws upon a student’s knowledge of theory and principles.That is, students in PROCEED-based courses are going beyond note taking, homework andtesting
Purdue University and the BSME from the University of New Mexico. Dr. Muñoz has taught numerous thermal-fluids and design engineering courses. He has advised several hundred undergraduates in senior design projects that include hybrid electric vehicles through potable water and waste water treatment systems for Honduras. His research interests include issues of energy systems and engineering design related to global sustainability. Page 15.295.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 DRAFT Community Development & Engineering
question ofwhether students would engage with them in a meaningful and relevant way. However, forstudents to get value from the project, it must spark their interest and motivate them to devotetheir time and energy to it [11]. Furthermore, students should be able to make connectionsbetween the project and their broader engineering experiences [12]. To determine how successfulthe project was in its pilot run, two questions had to be answered. First, how engagement wasgoing to be defined, and subsequently whether the project had engaged students based on thesettled-upon definition. Despite a wide variety of interpretations of the theory, at a high level, there is some agreementabout what constitutes student engagement. As Laird et al. [13] propose
experience and simulate a true project from award until delivery, andmost importantly provide them a reality check of what they will face when venturing into thisevolving construction market. The paper will start with a brief summary of relevant work, followedby the methodology employed, then the results and conclusions.Previous ResearchA few examples has been cited in literature on multidisciplinary learning models related toarchitecture and engineering students. For example, Rangel et al. [4] implemented the IPDmethodology in lectures and architecture studio classes, in order to achieve more efficient learningperformance. The collaborative curriculum and co-work between architecture and civilengineering students showed significant improvement in
at Harvey Mudd College. His research interests include experi- ential and hands-on learning, and integrating mechanical, chemical and quantum devices into circuits and communication links. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Engineering Identity, Slackers and Goal Orientation in Team Engineering ProjectsAbstract -- This research paper will describe the results from a qualitative investigation oflong-running, team-based engineering projects at a small liberal arts college. Long-running,team-based engineering projects are projects in which groups of students perform an engineeringtask over three or more weeks
Session Number: 2102 Dissemination of Innovations from Educational Research Projects: Experience with Focused Workshops P.K. Raju, Department of Mechanical Engineering, pkraju@eng.auburn.edu Chetan S. Sankar, Department of Management, Gerald Halpin, Department of Foundations, Leadership, and Technology, Glennelle Halpin, Department of Foundations, Leadership, and Technology Auburn University, AL AbstractDuring 1996, we formed the Laboratory for Innovative Technology and Engineering Education(LITEE). The
and nanostructure on ionic conduction and surface exchange in ceramic materials. In 2014, he moved to Northeastern University to focus on teaching and developing curriculum in the First Year Engineering program.Prof. Duncan Davis, Northeastern University Duncan Davis is an Assistant Teaching Professor in First Year Engineering. His research focuses on using gamification to convey course content in first year classes. Mostly recently, he has implemented a series of escape room projects to teach engineering to first year students through the process of designing, prototyping, and building these play experiences.Brian Patrick O’Connell, Northeastern University Dr. O’Connell is an assistant teaching professor in the
theirjottings and create field notes. The jottings focused on a combination of direct quotes, asummary of what was being spoken about, and any researcher comments or personal thoughtsthat occurred. We spent three months prior to the design review interacting with the Project Managerand learning about the BioSentinel project and team members to help situate ourselves in theproject landscape. Being familiar with the project allowed us to focus on taking jottings about theknowledge system during the design review (Emerson et al., 2011). The purpose of ourcomments were to reveal aspects that were not explicitly conveyed during the presentation. Anexample of the format of the jottings can be found in Table 1. Nearly all of the discussions
assessment and testing. All of the cars were tested by theinstructor and the winner was declared. A portion of the final project score was based on howwell each car did. The testing was recorded and posted on YouTube for the students to watch.The second project was the Wind Farm project. The project was to design a wind farm to meetthe electrical needs of a campus. Students were given hourly wind data for a year as well aselectricity usage data for a campus. Students analyzed the data and researched specificwindmills on the market in order to design a wind farm for campus. The deliverables for thisproject were a written progress report as well as a final written and oral proposal (detailed in alater section).The faculty members determined that each
Honor Society.Dr. Alejandro Salado, Virginia Tech Dr. Alejandro Salado is an assistant professor of systems science and systems engineering with the Grado Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering at Virginia Tech. His research focuses on unveiling the scientific foundations of systems engineering and using them to improve systems engineering practice. Before joining academia, Alejandro spent over ten years as a systems engineer in the space industry. He is a recipient of the Fabrycky-Blanchard Award for Systems Engineering Research and the Fulbright International Science and Technology Award. Dr. Salado holds a BSc/MSc in electrical engineering from Polytechnic University of Valencia, an MSc in project
participatingstudents, they serve many important opportunities roughly correspondent to those of professionalpractice that we might want to make available to all women (and men). They allow students toengage in real engineering work outside of their regular courses [4]. They provide anopportunity to break out of the boundaries of the core curriculum. Students learn how to generatea production schedule, to adhere to a budget, to raise funds, and to design-test-redesign intricatetechnological equipment – all relevant to developing appreciation for their authentic roles withinthe many different expressions of engineering [5]. And, they provide students with leadershipand followership experiences on projects that matter deeply to the many communities active inthe
single case study maynonetheless provide valuable insights to test theories, as long as the case studypossesses the relevant attributes needed to meet the study objectives.(2) Research Objectives and ObjectsThe primary objective of this single case study is to investigate how to integratecomputing into engineering curriculum and cultivate computational thinking-enabledengineers. Robotics is usually seen as an interdisciplinary activity drawing mostly onmechanics, electrical, sensing, control and artificial intelligence. It thus providesopportunities to integrate programming, engineering design, mathematics, and allareas that benefit from computational thinking (Shoop R, et al., 2016). That’s why thearticle chooses the robotics program as a case
Present design choice4/7,10 Solidworks4/12 Project 2 work4/14,17 Solidworks4/19 Project 2 work day4/21 Solidworks Page 11.1195.74/24,26 Final project test days4/28 Final project presentationsConclusionThe paper described the conversion of ET 002 (Introduction to Engineering Technology) andED&G 100 (Engineering Design and Graphics) to a common course that provides an opportunityto both first-semester engineering and engineering technology students at the Altoona College ofThe Pennsylvania State University (Penn State Altoona) to learn engineering design process,write and present technical reports, and use
based on the ABET a-kcriteria. As has been done at several U.S. universities, we use the tests, final exam, homeworkand laboratory activities as direct methods to evaluate the learning outcomes. The major fieldtest (MFT), exit interview (oral and anonymous questionnaire) and employer and/or employeesurvey are used as the indirect methods to evaluate the learning outcomes. ET 3830, 4340 and4830 are three-credit courses and in each course the author gives two tests and one final exam,Each test and the final exam carry one-fourth of the final grade. There is at least one hands-on orcomputational team project in each class and the project(s) carry one-fourth of the final grade.Students can work independently but are encouraged to work in teams to