] making certain identities more salient in differentsocial and professional situations. This results in a different experience for queer students who aremore “visibly queer” and cannot use protective heuristics like passing as cis-gender and/orheterosexual, as discussed in [10].PositionalityCrystal (she/they) is a sixth-year graduate student pursuing a Ph.D. in the Electrical Engineeringdepartment at Stanford University. After being introduced to the field of engineering education in2022 [11], she has been thoroughly investigating the literature as it relates to the intersectionality ofmarginalized identity and career pathways. As a queer Jamaican American first-generation low-income (FLI) alumna from the University of Miami, they were often the
Paper ID #33254”Racing the Sun”: A Narrative Analysis of Engineering Graduate Students’Journeys Navigating Public-Inspired Science WorkMs. Taylor Lightner, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Taylor Lightner is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she serves as a graduate research assistant. In addition, she is a student in the Disaster Resilience and Risk Management Program. Taylor received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Clemson Univer- sity. Her research interests include broadening participation, interdisciplinary interactions, community
–Competitive Design. Cranfield University Press. 7. Agrawal, A. K., & Harrington-Hurd, S. (2016). Preparing Next Generation Graduates for a Global Engineering Workforce: Insights from Tomorrow's Engineers. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. 8. Ing, David. “T-shaped Professionals, T-shaped Skills, Hybrid Managers.” Web blog post. Coevolving Innovations. N.p., 6 Sept. 2008. Web. 9. T-Summit 2015. (2013, August 20). Retrieved January 21 st, 2016, from http://tsummit2014.org/ 10. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. 11. Combustion and Energy Research (COMER) laboratory. Available from: http://comer.syr.edu/ 12
a Masters degreein Data Science in 2014. This is a two-year program covering courses in rigorous Math andprogramming, as well as courses entailing soft skills such as visual storytelling and consultingskills.One of the challenges for faculty on the admission committee in the past few years has beenselecting the best criteria for student admission. Typically, in engineering disciplines theadmission decision is based on students’ performance on courses such as calculus, physics andpre-engineering topics [1]. However, due to the nature of Data Science field the applicants comefrom very diverse undergraduate programs. For instance, some of our top graduating students hadan undergraduate degree in Creative Writing or Healthcare. We have
participation in engineering graduate programs through her engineering education research. Prior to academia, Dr. Godwin worked for many Fortune 100 companies, including Intel Corporation.Dr. John K. Wagner, University of New Mexico Dr. John K. Wagner is a Postdoctoral Fellow for the Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) joint project between the University of New Mexico, Arizona State University, and the University of Oregon. His research interests focus on improving equity in higher education, and the impacts of technology on public opinion and political psychology. Specifically, Dr. Wagner’s research explores how to improve equity and inclusion by measuring latent support for exclusionary practices
Paper ID #37478Facilitating Engineering Faculty Success: Faculty Development ofGraduate Mentoring PracticesHimani Sharma, Arizona State UniversityMiss Amanda Marie Singer, The Ohio State University Amanda Singer is a second-year Ph.D. student in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. She graduated in 2021 from Michigan Tech with a Bachelor’s and Master’s of Science in Environmental Engineering. Her current research interests include engineering identity formation, community college engineering education, and mixed methods research.Dr. Mayra S. Artiles, Arizona State University Mayra S. Artiles
processes.Ms. Jessica C. Pittman, Texas Tech University Jessica C Pittman is a third year graduate student in the Experimental Psychology doctoral program at Texas Tech University. Current interests are in the overlap of cognition and education with a direct focus on note taking.Mr. Nigel Yeo, Texas Tech University Nigel Yeo is a senior student at Texas Tech University, pursuing a degree in psychology. He hopes to attend graduate school and become an occupational therapist in the future. His interests include travelling to new places and exploring the United States. His hobbies are playing tennis and piano.Dr. Ryan C. Campbell, Texas Tech University Having completed his Ph.D. through the University of Washington’s
implementation details for this intervention.2.1 Learning to Read Academic PapersIn terms of how to read scientific papers, there is a small set of research papers related to the topicbroadly in the domain of graduate education, reading groups, literature searches, and focus paperson how to teach this skill. Reading comprehension is a broad topic in K-12 education andhigher-education research but is beyond the scope of this work. As for information on how to readscientific papers, there are some online articles such as “How to (seriously) read a scientificpaper” (Accessed January 10th, 2024 - http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2016/03/how-seriously-read-scientific-paper).From a graduate engineering education perspective, Jenkins et al. [17] in their
first-generation and nth-generation immigrants in the American Midwestand West.Author positionalityAuthor 1 (they/them/theirs) is a Ph.D. student at the University of Colorado, Boulder. As adis/abled graduate student interviewing other graduate students with dis/abilities, the first authorfound themselves comparing their own identity and experience to those of the participants.Although the first author has had dis/abilities since early childhood (including an autoimmunedisease and PTSD), they went undiagnosed until after the first author completed theirundergraduate education. After sustaining a TBI during their graduate studies, they had to relearnhow to learn. They realized how different their approaches to learning were before and after
, fault diagnosis and prognosis, and their applications in sustainable manufacturing and renewable energy systems. Page 23.855.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 20132013-6825: Learning Performance Analysis of Engineering Graduate Studentsfrom Two Differently Ranked Universities Using Course OutcomesLin Li, University of Illinois at Chicago Lin Li is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago. He received the B.E. degree in mechanical engineering from Shanghai Jiao Tong University in 2001, and the
research interests include ICT Application in Construction, Occupational Safety and Health Management, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Serious Game, and Building Informa- tion Modeling.Mr. Ryan J Eom, Legend High School Ryan J. Eom participated as a student intern in the research activity at the lean construction lab of the College of Built Environments at the University of Washington. His interests include cognitive studies in engineering and education. Page 26.1524.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The Effectiveness of Augmented Reality (AR) Technology in
programs accredited by theAmerican Council for Construction Education (ACCE) in US institutions. The review provides acomparison of the textbook’s topics and subject areas covered, and their relation to the MEP andspecialty contractor skills and knowledge required by construction management graduates inorder to perform their jobs, whether in a general contractor or a specialty contractor firm. Thepaper also highlights the achievements, as well as the shortcomings of the reviewed MEPtextbooks in supporting the learning objectives of traditional construction management coursessuch as print reading, estimating, scheduling and other related subjects.IntroductionMechanical, electrical, plumbing and related systems (MEP systems) have become one of
Paper ID #37099A Theoretical Review: The Role of Knowledge-Based Symmetry inEngineering Student CollaborationMr. Jack Elliott, Utah State University Jack Elliott is a concurrent M.S. (Mechanical Engineering) and Ph.D. (Engineering Education) graduate student at Utah State University. His M.S. research is in experimental fluid dynamics, his Ph.D. work ex- amines student social support networks in engineering education, and his other research activities include developing low-cost technology-based tools for improving fluid dynamics education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
, regularfull-time jobs less common, unemployment periods longer, and the pay lower for non-Finnishdoctoral graduates. Even though the doctoral degree is more often a requirement in theirpositions and the importance of a doctoral degree for employment is greater—probablybecause of research work and employment in universities and universities of applied sciencesbeing more common for them than for Finns—they are still slightly less satisfied with theirdoctoral degrees in general when satisfaction is viewed as a binary variable. The non-Finnishdoctors also perceive their employment to benefit from factors not related to the doctoraldegree, such as other studies and education, international experience, and activity in socialmedia, more often than Finnish
with various partners. Although no generic template exits, many programs offer some combination of: courses,seminars, and workshops; development of materials such as portfolios and/or web pages;collaboration with partner institutions; experiential activities; mentoring opportunities; andcoverage of contemporary issues in higher education4. In general they promote a more holisticapproach to graduate education. The Ohio State University is typical of a number of institutionscurrently offer, specializations, minor or certificate programs5 which both structure anddocument the accomplishment of the student. Required courses often include teachingeffectiveness and process. They most often covers the topics of theory and practice in
/technical resources tothe freshman engineering students. Together, it was agreed that the following topics would becovered in the one-credit course. 1. Wind power physics. 2. Feasibility analysis of wind power generation. 3. Wind turbine principles and wind turbine matching. 4. Instrumentation for wind assessment. 5. Engineering statics and the principles of raising a 50m tower.Each of these topics will be discussed below.Wind Power PhysicsThe tasks assigned to the students as problem based learning exercises are based on the projectgoals and tasks above. Consequently, we include the discussion of wind physics to put theproject tasks in perspective. The students’ responsibility will be to evaluate the potential
together14. First-generation status places an additional burden on students from low socioeconomic (SES)groups: only 23% of low-SES students have parents with college experience, as compared to99.3% for high-SES students 9. Many students struggle to find a balance between the financialcost of college versus finding work immediately to assist their families15.Minority students are underrepresented in STEM fields for a multitude of reasons, one of thembeing a lack of high-quality mathematics and science education in high school16. Most URMstudents attend high schools with poorly qualified instructors, minimal computer equipment, andfew or no Advanced Placement courses17. In addition, URM students are more likely to beplaced in non college-track
Virginia in 2008 and his M.S. in Structural Engineering at UCSD in 2010. Page 22.756.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Graduate Students Mentoring Undergraduate Researchers on a Large-Scale Experimental Research Project - A Case StudyAbstractThe paper describes our strategies and experiences in recruiting, training, advising, andmentoring five undergraduate student researchers for a large-scale experimental research project.Specific discussions focus on the development of student learning outcomes and theestablishment of a recruiting program. For this project
Engineering Education, 2021Systems Thinking Tools in a Graduate Biological Engineering Class - A Work in Progress Author and AffiliationsAbstractWhen technological challenges involve complex systems that include interactions with othercomponents or agents, the system can exhibit unexpected and counterintuitive behavior. Systemsthinking is useful in such cases but is rarely taught in engineering courses that do not explicitlyinclude ‘systems’ or ‘systems dynamics’ in the syllabus. This work-in-progress describes anapplication of systems thinking concepts in an undergraduate and a graduate course inAgricultural Waste Management at North Carolina State University. Two specific systemsthinking tools were introduced to help
, the retention rate and graduation rate ofundergraduate students in STEM fields are typically low and there is room for furtherimprovement. The low retention and graduation rates may be due to not only the rigorouscurriculum of the STEM majors, but also economic and academic difficulties those studentsencounter. Financial support to students alone may not be sufficient to address the problems. The National Science Foundation (NSF) S-STEM scholarship program was established toencourage higher education institutions to develop academic activities to support undergraduatestudents in STEM fields to improve their retention and graduation rates, and further increasingtheir potential of career placement and graduate studies. Our university
. Page 12.1074.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Mobius Microsystems: A Case Study in the Commercialization of Graduate Research in Electrical Engineering AbstractMobius Microsystems is a fabless and intellectual property (IP) semiconductor company foundedby a graduate student (McCorquodale) and his faculty advisor (Brown) and based upon the disser-tation research conducted by the student. The company is presented by the founding researchersas a case study in the commercialization of graduate research in electrical engineering. While aprevious paper by the authors [1] has discussed the internal resources required at the researchinstitution to facilitate
NSF Research Traineeship (NRT) program at Kansas State University is dedicated toenhancing graduate STEM education through a comprehensive traineeship model that integratesan applied curriculum, interdisciplinary research, professional skills development, andmentoring. The NRT at our university has prepared graduate students in STEM, both master’sand doctoral students, to solve the grand challenges in the Food, Energy, and Water (FEW)nexus in rural communities by investigating engineering and socioeconomic innovations toconserve water, create renewable energy, and help rural communities thrive. Since 2018, theNRT at our university has trained 40 diverse, culturally competent STEM leaders to dointerdisciplinary work, and understand their
initiallyguided principally by the top-down approach that aims to initiate changes in the engineeringgraduate education systems, students’ perspectives were actively sought by engaging doctoralstudents from the department in a focus group. Broadly similar interview questions, designed tobetter focus on our research questions and adapted to fit the target group, were asked of doctoralstudents, as presented in Table 3TABLE 2 Mapping overarching research questions: faculty and administrator focus groupTargeted QuestionsRQ1: Current General Advising Support Structures and Expectations 1. Please outline the strategies or initiatives your department employs to foster effective graduate student advising. Specifically, how does your department ensure
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 2006-2631: Practical Design of Wharf Extension in South CarolinaAbstractCriterion 3 of ABET 2004-2005 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs requires that allengineering programs seeking accreditation manifest that their graduates have an ability to“function on multidisciplinary teams.” Students should be able to serve as both a team leader anda contributing member of a design team. This paper presents a case study of one heavy marinestructure in the Georgetown, South Carolina. Heavy marine structures typically involve largeand unusual loads from cranes, ships, and cargo; generally are supported upon weak and slopedsoils; and usually require significant design considerations for marine
Department of Education, the Accelerate to Industry (A2i) program, the North CarolinaAlliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate sponsored by the NSF, and other activitiesand workshops offered by the Graduate College. The HBGI program hosts an annual symposiumcovering topics specifically related to Ph.D. students in engineering and the sciences. The A2iprogram hosts a series of workshops promoting "Job Search Strategies" throughout the academicyear and "Industry Immersion Week," involving several days of direct student interaction withour corporate sponsors. At the end of the week, the Graduate College hosts a mini career expofor graduate students only. Each spring the Graduate College sponsors a symposium titled"Preparing Future Faculty
; Systems Leader for Engineering & Operations Technology in Corteva Agriscience. Corteva is the combined agriscience businesses of DowDuPont that was spun off as an independent company on June 1st, 2019.Mrs. Diane Spence, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Proceedings of the ASEE 2019 Annual Conference June 16-19, 2019, Tampa, Florida, USA4TH GRADE ENGINEERING – BUILDING UPON THE CURRICULUM OF SCIENCE,MATH, AND CREATIVITY TO INSPIRE THE NEXT GENERATION OF ENGINEERS (EVALUATION) John C. Oliva Diane K. Spence
, Blackstudents face a higher attrition rate compared to their peers of other races [4]. Given these starkstatistics, the retention of the Black population in graduate and undergraduate engineeringprograms becomes imperative for establishing a diverse and robust workforce [8], [10].The systemic and cultural racial biases inherent within educational institutions contribute to themarked dearth of Black students in engineering doctoral programs. Even as research begins tounravel the experiences of Black Ph.D. students in engineering – from motivations and persistenceto encounters with racial microaggressions – the disparity remains, underscoring the need fordeeper exploration. This group has additional heterogeneity [11], particularly overlooking
researchquestions are as follows: 1) How, if at all, do interactions with advisor(s), faculty, and peers predict skill development (associated with primary funding mechanism) for engineering and physical science doctoral students? 2) Specifically, how do such interactions predict skill development (associated with primary funding mechanism) for the following career-related skills: a) research, b) teamwork and project management, c) peer training and mentoring, and d) communication?Literature Review Graduate students’ professional development is linked to their satisfaction with theiradvisors [14]. Themes related to advisor satisfaction found in Schlosser, et al. [14] includefrequent meetings, meeting availability, educational
Americansearned 1,869 doctoral degrees. This number has increased more than 9 percent from a yearago. Black doctorates now stand at the highest level in history. [1] However, 41.3 percent ofall doctorates awarded to African Americans in 2004 were in the field of education. Thislarge percentage of all African-American doctorates in the field of education has been thecase for decades with only minor fluctuations. There is a serious weakness in minorityparticipation in doctoral programs in the area of science, mathematics, engineering andtechnology.To prepare and train minority students for graduate study in SMET field, the Office ofAdvanced Scientific Computing Research, Office of Science of the U.S. Department ofEnergy created an Alliance for
AC 2008-1701: IMPLEMENTING INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS INUNDERGRADUATE INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING PROGRAMSKaren Bursic, University of Pittsburgh Karen M. Bursic is an Assistant Professor and the Undergraduate Program Director for Industrial Engineering at the University of Pittsburgh. She received her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. Prior to joining the department she worked as a Senior Consultant for Ernst and Young and as an Industrial Engineer for General Motors Corporation. Dr. Bursic has done research and published work in the areas Engineering and Project Management and Engineering Education. She is a member of IIE and ASEE and is a