Paper ID #19843Responsive Teaching in Undergraduate Engineering CoursesDr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Michigan. He received his Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2014, after which he served as a postdoctoral research fellow at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. Aaron also obtained a master’s degree from MIT in 2010 and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan in 2008, both in aerospace engineering.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of
Pitcher, University of Texas at El Paso Mike Pitcher is the Director of Academic Technologies at the University of Texas at El Paso. He has had experience in learning in both a traditional university program as well as the new online learning model, which he utilizes in his current position consulting with faculty about the design of new learning experiences. His experience in technology and teaching started in 1993 as a student lab technician and has continued to expand and grow over the years, both technically as well as pedagogically. Currently he works in one of the most technically outstanding buildings in the region where he provides support to students, faculty, and staff in implementing technology inside and
within the last30 years. Some commentators note that using current cases is important, especially since ourstudents, on the whole, are relatively young; they may lack the ability to relate to older cases. Ifindeed, as Czech novelist Milan Kundera suggests in his Book of Laughter and Forgetting,history is a process of forgetting [1], this argument makes sense.However, this author firmly believes that students can involve themselves intellectually andemotionally in historical cases, those older than 50 years, that there is valuable information to begleaned from those cases, and that is it possible to discern whether or not we learn from the past.To that end, this paper examines two historical cases: Triangle Shirtwaist Fire (1911) and theDonora
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring early-career professionals’ conceptions of “stretch assignments”: A qualitative study of recent graduates from engineering and non-engineering fields1.0 IntroductionEarly-career engineers often enter workplaces that have not been designed with equity in mind.Beliefs about techno-meritocracies reign, blurring experiences of negative stereotypes, bias, anddiscrimination. Many new engineers learn largely opaque organizational practices and unwrittenrules of advancement as they go—with some having more informational advantage than others.One such practice is a developmental, or “stretch”, assignment. We define stretch assignments asinformally allocated work
Paper ID #21294The Entrepreneurial Engineer: A Quantitative Analysis of Personality Fac-tors in the Social Cognitive Career TheoryLeon Szeli, Stanford University Leon Szeli is a researcher at Stanford University. His research focuses on the intersection of Human Behaviour, Innnovation and Technology. He studied Psychology and Communication Science at LMU Munich as well as Consumer Affairs at Technical University Munich. Currently, Leon is pursuing an Honors Degree in Technology Management at the Center for Digital Technology Management (CDTM) which is funded by Elite Network of Bavaria. Leon worked on multiple
Paper ID #44533Board 228: Comprehending the Complex Context of Community Colleges:STEM Student Success at a Hispanic-Serving InstitutionDr. Lucy Arellano Jr., University of California, Santa Barbara Lucy Arellano is an associate professor of higher education at The Gevirtz School of Education at University of California, Santa Barbara. She has almost twenty years of experience in the field of higher education. Her research focuses on persistence, retention, and degree completion for emerging majority students. Concepts of diversity, campus climates, engagement, and student co-curricular involvement ground her work
truthfully d. Have zero tolerance for bribery, fraud, and corruption in all forms e. Endeavor to be of service in civic affairs f. Treat all persons with respect, dignity, and fairness g. Acknowledge historical, social, and cultural needs of communities h. Consider current and emerging technologies i. Report misconduct to the appropriate authorities Natural and a. Adhere to the principles of sustainable development Built b. Consider societal, environmental, and economic impacts Environment (2) c. Mitigate adverse societal, environmental, and economic effects d. Use resources wisely
regional campuses, however, there are constraintson how those funds get distributed among all campuses. With the benefits come the challengesassociated with regional campus teaching and learning. These challenges are discussed below: 1. Limited Resources: The regional campuses have limited resources when it comes to offering engineering or engineering technology courses. These courses are lab-based courses and must have all the resources to ensure consistency in the type of project being offered. Course coordinators from the central campus are assigned the task to form regional campus teams and discuss the availability of resources to offer the first-year engineering courses. The first-year courses are revised often
evaluative needs and expectations of federally funded grants with regard to accountability and compliance. In addition, she has served as a panel reviewer for NSF proposals for S-STEM and other EHR programs, GAANN, SIP, and EOC with the USDOE, and is currently an AQIP Reviewer and Peer Reviewer for the NCA Higher Learning Commission. As an administrator, Gwen has served Director of Assessment for 6 years and Executive Assistant to the President for one year at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She has also served as Assistant to the President and Provost for Special Projects at a Old Dominion University. Her experience as a Commissioner on the Indiana Commission for Higher Education has allowed her to embrace a
anonymous online survey hosted in Qualtrics wasemailed to 2,003 engineering students (1,873 undergraduate students; 130 graduate students) inthe Batten College of Engineering and Technology at Old Dominion University (ODU) in Norfolk,Virginia. In addition to basic demographic information (e.g., age, gender, race, etc.), surveyquestions were constructed to measure a wide variety of demands and resources that were school-related and personal and were expected to hinder or facilitate success of engineering students. Theanonymous survey took participants approximately 20 minutes to complete. Participants whocompleted the survey had the option to be entered into a raffle for one of five Visa gift cards worth$25.00. Participant survey responses were
questions included questions aboutthe videos they made (length, topic), their grade in the pre-requisite course, and their motivationlevel. Yes/No/Maybe questions included: “Do you have a deeper understanding of contentrelated to the video you made,” “Do you have more confidence in your understanding of thematerial,” “Do you feel you have more expertise on the topic,” “Do you feel that you provideduseful information to students in the pre-requisite course,” and “Do you feel more comfortablereaching out in a mentor role?” Survey results were analyzed for each course and then combinedto be examined in aggregate. “Yes” and “maybe” responses were combined because not allcourses offered the option of “maybe,” but only offered “yes” or “no” as
Technology, vol. 14, no. 5/6, pp. 483-493. Dec. 2005.[42] K. E. Murphy, D. L. Blustein, A. J. Bohling, and M. G. Platt, “The college-to- career transition: An exploration of emerging adulthood,” Journal of Counseling & Development, vol. 88, pp. 174-182. Apr. 2010.[43] N. Mendoza-Denton, “Sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology of U.S. Latinos,” Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 28, pp. 375-395. Oct. 1999.[44] K. Woolard. Double Talk: Bilingualism and the Politics of Ethnicity in Catalonia. Stanford University Press, 1989.[45] C. A. Ferguson, “Diglossia” Word, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 325-340, Jan. 1959.[46] M. Silverstein. Language Structure and Linguistic Ideology. The Elements: A Parasession on
would not be considered developing integrityunless it had a section encouraging people to act. "Myths About the Digital Divide" a talk by Jessamyn West Jessamyn West directly calls people to action by asking them to help bring internet resources to libraries. The presenter clearly asked people in the room to take action during the talk, which is why it was included within this category. Ebola Conference Call This activity was placed under developing integrity because the student is matching the ideals of being well informed and being part of a worldwide community with these same actions. Emerging Technologies in Cancer Research This activity was not included in developing
not surpass the scores of their counterparts in20094. When the results were disaggregated by state, 2015 and 2017 math and science scores forNYS 4th graders decreased from 2009; NYS math and science scores for 8th graders seemedunchanged5.Given these results, there is potential for improvement. The Engineering Ambassadors workedwith students in Grades 6 -12 with the hope that middle and high school students could develop apositive attitude toward math and science, anchors of the STEM program. The Ambassadorsadded the engineering component to math and science learning through hands-on activities andincorporated technological enhancements - for full STEM implementation.The Ambassador program was designed around characteristics of middle
Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Nevada, Reno. His research focuses on the interactions between engineering cultures, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem-solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, an M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engi- neering and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant
AC 2007-225: A DESIGN PROCESS FOR CONCEPTUALLY BASED,COUNTERINTUITIVE PROBLEMSLouis Everett, University of Texas-El Paso Louis J. Everett is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Texas El Paso. Dr. Everett is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Texas and has research interests in the use of technology in the classroom. His technical research interests include robotics, machine design, dynamics and control systems. leverett@utep.edu http://research.utep.edu/pacelabArunkumar Pennathur, University of Texas-El Paso Dr. Arunkumar Pennathur is Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering at UTEP. He holds a PhD in Industrial Engineering from the University of
, Mohammad-Zamry J. and Nor-Farida H. (2011a). “Cooperative Problem-Based Learning (CPBL): A Practical PBL Model for a Typical Course”, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, Vol. 6, Issue 3, Sept 2011, pp 12-20. Page 25.557.162. Ariffin A. H., Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Mohd. Kamaruddin A. H., Mimi Haryani H., Azila A. A., and S Syed Helmi Syed Hassan (2004). A review and survey of Problem-Based Learning Application in Engineering Education, accepted for Conference on Engineering Education, Kuala Lumpur, 14-15 Dis. 2004.3. Syed Helmi Syed Hassan, Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Mohd Salleh Abu, Shahrin Mohammad (2011
effective: positive interdependence amongteam members, individual accountability, face-to-face “promotive” interaction (encouragement,sharing resources), social skills evidenced, and group processing. Page 24.554.2Use of collaborative learning in undergraduate engineering programsProject-based, team-based collaborative learning has increased in undergraduate engineeringeducation worldwide.7 In fact, substantial use of collaborative learning is required forundergraduate engineering programs to be accredited by the Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology (ABET), the overseer of U.S. engineering programs.8 As mentioned,collaborative learning
attaining college degrees.While there has been a steady increase of Black students attaining college degrees since the1980s, the vast majority of these students have received degrees in the social sciences and thehumanities, with an underrepresentation of Blacks in the science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) disciplines2. This disparity is important to note, not only because theSTEM disciplines tend to offer higher incomes and a more stable workforce, but also because theUnited States is currently experiencing an increase in jobs in STEM disciplines that is not beingmatched by job-seeking graduates3. These findings are seen across race, meaning that whilethere are many minority students who could greatly benefit from jobs in STEM
helpful to him. Stan confidently assumesthe role of teacher in line 78, passing judgment on John’s approach as "useless" and explicitlydescribing how he himself has approached the problem. In lines 79, 81, and 83, we see Johnacquiescing to Stan’s teacher role: he uses his speaking turns in the dialogue either to affirmStan’s statements or to ask Stan for more information, but not to initiate new topics.In contrast to TKs, collaborative teaching sequences (CSs) were not marked by cleardifferentiation of group members into teacher and pupil roles. In the CS in Figure 2, forexample, no one individual takes control of the dialogue, and no single teacher or pupil emerges.(Note: slash lines indicate simultaneous speech
elements that are summarized next.2.1 Graduate Interdisciplinary Specialization (GIS) A nineteen-credit Graduate Interdisciplinary Specialization (GIS) was established, in whichEmPOWERment Trainees and other graduate students take a common course in the foundationsof sustainable energy systems (“foundations course”) at the beginning, and a course oninnovating for sustainable energy (“capstone course”) at the end. Between these two courses,graduate students who fulfill the GS also take one course in four out of five thematic areas: (1)energy and environmental systems; (2) data analysis and information systems; (3) energy policy,regulation, behavior, and economics; (4) energy business modeling; and (5) energy technologies,components, and
Reliability Engineer (CRE) and a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Louisiana. Dr. Knapp’s specialization is in information systems & technologies, currently in the area of semantic analysis (a subarea of natural language processing).Roger Seals, Louisiana State University Dr. Seals is Professor Emeritus of Civil and Environmental at Louisiana State University. He obtained both his baccalaureate and master's degrees from the University of Florida and his doctorate from North Carolina State University. He has been actively engaged in teaching, research and curricula development during his tenure at West Virginia University, 1965-1980, and Louisiana State University, 1980
where he teaches and does research in the area of polymer processing, manufacturability, and rapid prototyping/tooling technologies. He received a BS in Chemical Engineering from Carnegie-Mellon University in 1980, and a PhD in Chemical Engineering from the University of Delaware in 1987.Robin Anderson, James Madison University ROBIN ANDERSON is a professor and practitioner in Center for Assessment and Research Studies where she serves as the Associate Director. Previous to serving at James Madison University, Dr. Anderson worked with Blue Ridge Community College and the Virginia Community College System where she coordinated the System's core competency assessments. Dr. Anderson started
maps. During this discussion, students compared their concept maps andgenerated a new, group concept map based on the ones generated individually.This study was approved as exempt by our university’s Institutional Review Board. There was atotal of 7 sections for the robot design project and a total of 2 sections for the nanotechnologyresearch project. A total of 244 participants across all sections provided informed consent for thisstudy as part of our larger initiative to assess all 3C’s in the FYEP (Figure 2). We selected asubset from each assessment for analysis, also as part of our larger initiative; this subset resultedin 53 participants from the robot and nanotechnology course sections. For the analysis presentedin this work, we pulled
be measure in traditional ways (e.g. persistence,achievement) and non-traditional ways (e.g. well-being).The ever-evolving characteristics of college students demand continuous actualization ofeducational strategies. It is known that most college students nowadays belong to Generation Z,who are technology-natives, ethnically diverse and are on track to become the most educatedgeneration. However, they also struggle the most with their mental health, which is influenced bycontemporary challenges such as mass shootings, money and work stressors, the politicalclimate, and stresses and losses derived from learning within a pandemic. If we honor ourcommitment to support their success, we need to consider these strengths and weaknesses. Aswell as
having ‘Steve Jobs’ as dean of Technology. but “Steve Jobs” doesn't know much about my context. He is not here. It's absentee leadership that brings reputation and brand but brings little to internal management. And sometimes, when he wants to contribute, it is a decontextualized contribution, which does not recognize the reality in which he is giving his opinion, he is not well informed.”Another academic acknowledged that no single leadership style is universally effective: “There is no one-size-fits-all leadership style. A mix of authoritarian, participative, and democratic leadership is necessary, depending on the context. Sometimes, strict adherence to regulations is required, while in other cases
collect and analyze data, and problem-solving focused on real-world ambiguity and complexity. Additionally, innovation-based learning in the form of peerreview—through blinded reviews of class projects and critical evaluations of published work—was integrated to foster critical thinking and exposure to real-world applications of statistics. Thesechanges resulted in greater student engagement, practical learning outcomes, and multiple peer-reviewed publications from course projects.IntroductionStatistics is the backbone of decision-making and problem-solving in virtually every scientific,engineering, and medical field. It informs everything from experimental design and clinical trialsto quality control in manufacturing and predictive modeling in
Villanueva Alarc´on, University of Florida Dr. Idalis Villanueva Alarc´on is Chair and tenured Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering. A PECASE awardee, she has led multiple pioneering efforts in engineering education including multimodal methods in engineering education using sensor technologies and biophysiological tools, hidden curriculum, mentoring, active learning, professional identity, among others. She is a renowned national and international leader in engineering education earning her multiple accolades and honors through professional organizations such as the National Academy of Engineering, IEEE, and ASEE. She integrates her multiple
Knowledge Extraction. Page 14.985.3© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Progress of the EXCEL Program at the University of Central Florida: An NSF STEP Funded ProjectAbstractThe National Science Foundation is currently funding a STEP project at the University ofCentral Florida (UCF) titled “UCF-STEP Pathways to STEM: From Promise to Prominence”.The NSF STEP program seeks to increase the number of students (U.S. citizens or permanentresidents) receiving associate or baccalaureate degrees in established or emerging fields withinscience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The STEP project at
enrolled in non-remedial science, technology, engineering and mathematicscourses each semester. The WHC, founded in 2006, established an administrative and funding structure toprovide talented and motivated science and engineering bound students with opportunities toparticipate in innovative activities and summer research experiences at regional universities andfederal agencies. Although 80% of WHC activities have focused on summer research, the WHChas been engaged in securing external funding to fund scholarships and programs in areasincluding • Engineering and computer science transfer program development • Development and implementation of robotics and innovative science training programs for middle