Session 2457 Department-Level Reform of Undergraduate Industrial Engineering Education: A New Paradigm for Engineering Curriculum Renewal M. S. Leonard, A. K. Gramopadhye, D. L. Kimbler, M. E. Kurz, R. J. Jacob, C. E. McLendon, and S. Regunath Clemson UniversityAbstractThe Roy Report serves as the basis for today's typical industrial engineering curriculum. Thatreport documents a 1966-1967 study led by Robert Roy, Dean of Engineering Science at JohnsHopkins University, supported by NSF and sponsored by ASEE. Unfortunately, few majorchanges have been made to the core
. Page 8.265.4 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education • Provide an effective platform for interactions and collaborations with other units within and outside MIT to achieve shared educational objectives.Meeting monthly, E-CUE membership was organized to include representatives from across theInstitute. E-CUE is chaired by the Associate Dean of Engineering, staffed by the School'sDirector of Education Assessment, includes a faculty representative from each of the School'sdepartments and divisions, and a representative from the Office of the Dean for UndergraduateEducation
Page 8.471.3practices to transfer technology: “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education” § Library and public domain materials available on the World Wide Web § Multinational Corporation utilization of computers and Internet resources in work force training, and exchange/collaboration of projects across the globe § Web-based courses and programs available through the institutions of higher education § Educational materials developed as textbook companions and instructor support, accessible on the web. § Multimedia educational materials available for sale, such as
this Page 9.737.2paper. “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright©2004, American Society for Engineering Education”Criteria for Excellence in a Course Design – The Essential RudimentsThere are at least six Quality Parameters in an instructional course design: 1. Relevant Course Description 2. Student/Faculty Interaction & Collaboration 3. Student Support – Making Learning Meaningful 4. Current Technology Usage 5. Technical Currency in the course 6. AssessmentRelevant Course DescriptionIn a recent review of a Physics course by a newly-hired
this program and by providing meaningful, innovative and exciting opportunities for industry and professionals in the field. • To get academia (faculty, research associates and students) closer to industry, and to explore technology development opportunities in collaboration with international institutions. Page 6.426.3Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education 3 This program also provides a vehicle to Industry and its practitioners to
to working in the academia, Dr Lim worked at Vestas Technology R&D on wind energy for 5 years. She received her BEng and PhD in Electrical Engineering from NUS in 2004 and 2010 respectively. Dr Lim’s teaching philosophy focuses on active learning ranging from problem-based learning, project-based learning, to multidisciplinary collaborative learning, with an emphasis on education for sustainable development. She is an IEEE senior member and Fellow of the Higher Education Academy.Victor WangChee Ming OngYun Mei Elisa AngArturo Molina-Cristobal, University of Glasgow ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Enhancing Engineering Education through Transfer of Learning
plant units, investigating stormwater flooding, and providing turnkey solutions.Dr. Ashish D Borgaonkar, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Ashish Borgaonkar works as an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at the New Jersey Institute of Technology’s (NJIT) Newark College of Engineering (NCE) located in Newark, New Jersey. He has developed and taught several engineering courses primarily in first-year engineering, civil and environmental engineering, and general engineering. He has won several awards for excellence in instruction; most recently the Saul K. Fenster Award for Innovation in Engineering Education. His research focuses on increasing diversity in STEM education and the STEM workforce. He has
, pp 5314–532411. McCuen, R.H. and A.P. Davis, 2010. Sensitivity of BMP system designs to the sustainability objectives defined by predevelopment conditions. Water Resources Impact, Vol 12, No 2, pp 3-4.12. Klotz, L. Johnson, P.W., Leopard, T., Johnson, P., Maruszewski, S., Horman, M., and D. Riley, 2009. Campus Construction as a Research Laboratory: Model for Intracampus Collaboration. ASCE Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice Vol 135, Issue 4, pp. 122-12813. Wadzuk, B.M., M. Rea, G. Woodruff, K. Flynn, R.G. Traver, 2010. Water-Quality Performance of a Constructed Stormwater Wetland for All Flow Conditions. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol 46, No 2, pp
where she led a university team to successfully launch their first virtual campus. She began her career working as a computer analyst for the Department of Defense. Dr. Scales presents regularly to the American Society of Engineering Education and serves on Ph.D. graduate committees. She is an affiliate faculty member with the Department of Engineering Education and publishes in the area of instructional technology and distance learning. She holds a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with a concentration in Instructional Technology from Virginia Tech, a M.S. in Applied Behavioral Science from Johns Hopkins and a B.S. in Computer Science from Old Dominion University
transition,providing a deeper understanding of thermal characteristics in crystallization.This paper comprehensively outlines the approach's objectives, methodologies, and outcomes,positioning it as a transformative force in engineering education. By encouraging active exploration,critical thinking, and collaborative discourse, this innovative approach significantly contributes tothe evolution of effective engineering education methodologies, preparing students for thechallenges of a rapidly advancing technological landscape. Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX Copyright 2024, American Society for
interdisciplinary engineering short courses, and develops and implements industry- academia-government collaborations in continuing engineering education. As an associate director of KU Continuing Education, she is responsible for co-developing and implementing strategic initiatives in international partnerships, new program development and university-industry collaborations. She has a doctorate in biochemical engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi.Zachary Gredlics, University of Kansas Zach Gredlics is a Senior Program Manager of Program Development and In-House Courses in the Cen- ter for Engineering and Interdisciplinary Professional Education at the University of Kansas Continuing Education. In this role
Paper ID #7574The Challenge of Change in Engineering Education: Is it the Diffusion of In-novations or Transformative Learning?Mr. Junaid A. Siddiqui, Purdue University, West Lafayette Junaid A. Siddiqui is a doctoral candidate at the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University. In his graduate work he is exploring the systems of conceptual and social challenges associated with educa- tional change for the development of undergraduate engineering education. Before joining the doctoral program he worked for nine years in a faculty development role at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Saudi
.2168- 9830.2008.tb00985.xColston, N., Thomas, J., Ley, M.T., Ivey, T., & Utley, J. (2017). “Collaborating for early-age career awareness: A comparison of three instructional formats”. Journal of Engineering Education 106(2), 326-344. 10.1002/jee.20166Colston, N., Thomas, J., Ivey, T., Ley, T. & Utley, J. (2014). “Engineer-led videos: A broader impacts model”. Proceedings of the 2014 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Fort Smith, AK.Dyer, R. R., Reed, P. A., & Berry, R. Q. (2006). “Investigating the relationship between high school technology education and test scores for algebra 1 and geometry.” History, 54(69.7), 71-7. 10.21061/jte.v17i2.a
like, kind of a sense of like teamwork and collaboration... One of the um... Professor Wilson and us, we were reading some like articles that people pulled last semester about like, initiatives [in engineering] education. And one of the things I was reading about was like, about indigenous professors in like Canada and part of their struggle for the faculty is that they um, the indigenous Professors often feel kind of like overburdened and that they're already working with like a lot of diversity initiatives."Insight 2: The faculty members of Team Y share power-with the undergraduate studentsby legitimizing their contributions. The faculty members have power through legitimacy dueto their status
Proceedings of 2014 Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE Zone 1) Does Self-Regulating E-Learning Assist inSecondary School Preparation for Engineering Education? Richard Millham Surendra Thakur Chan Malan Durban University of KZN e-skills CoLab MMI Foundation Technology Durban, South Africa Durban, South Africa Cape Town, South Africa richardm1@dut.ac.za thakur@dut.ac.za cmalan@iafrica.com Abstract- One of the most prominent issues in engineering education is the proper preparation of prospectiveengineering students in the subjects of mathematics
AC 2009-230: UNDERSTANDING THE CURRENT WORK AND VALUES OFPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS: IMPLICATIONS FOR ENGINEERINGEDUCATIONKevin Anderson, University of Wisconsin, MadisonSandra Courter, University of Wisconsin, MadisonThomas McGlamery, University of Wisconsin, MadisonTraci Nathans-Kelly, University of Wisconsin, MadisonChristine Nicometo, University of Wisconsin, Madison Page 14.1297.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Understanding the Current Work and Values of Professional Engineers: Implications for Engineering EducationKey Words: engineering practice, values, identity; education implicationsAbstractTo better meet the needs of this century’s
Paper ID #18624Getting ”There”: Understanding How Innovation and Entrepreneurship Be-come Part of Engineering EducationMrs. Elizabeth Nilsen, Purdue University Liz Nilsen is a Senior Program Director at the Purdue Agile Strategy Lab, helping nurture change efforts in engineering education, innovation, and beyond. Previously, she was a Senior Program Officer at Ven- tureWell, where she co-developed and co-led the Epicenter Pathways to Innovation initiative, an effort to engage with a cohort of colleges and universities to fully embed innovation and entrepreneurship in under- graduate engineering education. Her experience
Paper ID #31562Fostering Reflective Habits and Skills in Graduate Engineering Educationvia the Arts and HumanitiesDr. Ryan C. Campbell, Texas Tech University Having completed his Ph.D. through the University of Washington’s interdisciplinary Individual Ph.D. Program (see bit.ly/uwiphd), Ryan is now a Postdoctoral Research Associate at Texas Tech University. He currently facilitates an interdisciplinary project entitled ”Developing Reflective Engineers through Artful Methods.” His scholarly interests include both teaching and research in engineering education, arts & humanities in engineering, interdisciplinary
AC 2008-349: ON ENGINEERING EDUCATION IN THE ARAB GULF STATES:STUDENTS’ ENGAGEMENT THROUGH COOPERATIVE LEARNINGSTRATEGIESWaddah Akili, Iowa State University Page 13.941.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 On Engineering Education in the Arab Gulf States: Students’ Engagement through Cooperative Learning StrategiesAbstractEngineering education in the Arab Gulf States (the Region) faces significant challenges as itseeks to meet the demands on the engineering profession in the twenty first century.This paper focuses on classroom-based pedagogies of engagement, and cooperative learningstrategies in particular. The paper is a follow up to
. Accessibility of the network to the collaborators, other institutions and participating student populations 2. Outreach efforts a. What other institutions have expressed an interest b. What type of reaction have other institutions had Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Regional Conference 462 c. CIBRED Web site usage statistics: To disseminate the CIBRED course model, CI courses, and related materials to other participating high schools and colleges
. Streveler, K. A. Smith, and M. Pilotte, “Aligning Course Content , Assessment , and Delivery : Creating a Context for Outcome-Based Education,” in Outcome-Based education and engineering curriculum: Evaluation, assessment, and accreditation, K. M. Yusof, S. Mohammad, N. A. Azli, M. N. Hassa, A. Kosnin, and S. K. S. Yusof, Eds. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global, 2006.[23] I. Gustavsson et al., “On objectives of instructional laboratories, individual assessment, and use of collaborative remote laboratories,” IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 263–274, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1109/TLT.2009.42.[24] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” J
Paper ID #29471The New Engineering Education in Chinabased on 207 new engineeringresearch and practice projectsDr. Jinlu Shen, Zhejiang University College of Public Affairs, Zhejiang UniversityDr. Tuoyu Li, Zhejiang University Li Tuo-yu, Research Assistant Institute of China’s Science, Technology and Education Policy, Zhejiang University College of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University Research Center on Science and Education Development Strategy, Zhejiang University AddressRoom 1205-3, Administration Building, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province; 310058 P.R. China American
Teams Teams Teams Teams Figure 3. Organizational structure of The Clover 2030 Engineering Strategy (UC-UTFSM)In addition to international partners, UC-Engineering has demonstrated an early concern ofinvolving local stakeholders in both project design and implementation. Part of that is explainedby the agreement with UTFSM to apply for funding as a consortium rather than individually, inorder to work collaboratively in the cultural transformation of more than one institution. Second,the role of the institutional board has been crucial for the viability of some proposals included inthe strategic plan (e.g., creation of an Engineering Education Division in a new UC-Engineeringschool structure). Third, UC
of the physics component of an integrated curriculum. American Journal of Physics, 67(S16). doi:10.1119/1.1907518. Wells, D. (1987). Traditional college students are now a minority. Proceedings of the 1987 College-Industry Education Conference. American Society for Engineering Education.19. Schapps, E. (2005). The role of supportive environments in promoting academic success: Getting Results, Developing Safe and Healthy Kids Update 5. In: Student Health, Supportive Schools, and Academic Success. Center for the Collaborative Classroom, California Department of Education.20. McLaughlin, M.W., & Talbert, J.E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement
AC 2010-1470: INTERACTIVE VIRTUAL TRAINING ENVIRONMENT WITHWEB-CAMERA FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING EDUCATIONHassan Rajaei, Bowling Green State UniversityArsen Gasparyan, Bowling Green State University Page 15.790.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Interactive Virtual Training Environment with Web-Camera for Science and Engineering EducationAbstractWeb-based interactive environments exhibit impressive potentials for educational purposes.Web-based simulation (WBS) offers such a surrounding. Numerous courses in science andengineering can employ WBS techniques to explain and demonstrate complex concepts forstudents through a simple and
AC 2010-1694: BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING IN CONSTRUCTION:CURRENT PRACTICES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTIONENGINEERING EDUCATIONAnthony Mutai, Bowling Green State UniversityStan Guidera, Bowling Green State University Page 15.251.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Building information modeling in construction: Current practices and their implications for construction engineering educationAbstractThis paper reports the findings of research intended to document the current status of adoptionand use of Building information Modeling (BIM) in the construction industry. BIM utilizes 3Dcomputer models, developed using software applications
, segregation has endured betweenprofessional (math, science and engineering analysis courses) and general education (H&SScourses) or “hard” and “soft skills”4 or, in yet other words, technical and social content. In theeyes of Leydens and Schneider, the outcomes-based criteria of ABET EC 2000 have providednew opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration and integration of H&SS (in their case,communication content specifically) approaches into engineering education.5As a counterpoint, Seron and Silbey highlight difficulties for innovative engineering educationinitiatives to align with the instrumentality of ABET requirements.6 Studying efforts at FranklinL. Olin College of Engineering and Smith College’s Picker Engineering Program, Seron
collaborative change management and communities ofpractice in engineering education at the national level, where Mattucci developed a largeprofessional network across the country. In this role he often felt unfamiliar with the actors,priorities, and attitudes within the various contextual domains and the people he was workingwith. This role coincided with the initiation of his mindfulness and awareness practice, which ledto him actively seeking ‘contextual mentors’ to help navigate the systems. This approach ofintentionally seeking contextual mentorship has been ongoing for the last five years. Recently, hebecame more aware of the mentees in his network, and perceiving these relationships through asocial network lens, which has inspired this work, and
similar programsand equip new faculty to become the necessary "change agents" in undergraduate engineeringeducation. A comprehensive evaluation of the UW-Madison EESP over all three years of NSFsupport will be available in August, 1999. UW-Madison is collaborating with Carnegie Mellon,Stanford, and Georgia Institute of Technology to disseminate processes and products from theirrelated programs to accomplish similar objectives. The University of Wisconsin-Madison plansto expand EESP in 1999 to the sciences (Science and Engineering Education Scholars Program,July 18-24, 1999) with support from the CIC institutions (Big Ten plus).AcknowledgementsSpecial thanks to all presenters and workshop leaders especially Lillian McDermott, ElaineSeymour, Karl
studentsprefer a different learning style compared to senior students? Are senior students equipped toutilize the industry techniques that are heavily digital or tactile oriented? Understanding theevolution of student preferences towards these learning styles would provide valuable insights toinstructors and researchers aiming to enhance engineering education by determining when/whereto emphasize a certain pedagogy during the undergraduate engineering experience.This research is a multi-institutional collaboration between Penn State University and theUniversity of Maryland. Freshmen and senior engineering students are included in this study inorder to quantify the differences between digital and hands-on learning: 1) across engineeringgrade levels, and