Mechanical Design I Engineering and Processes I Technology Sophomore year MECH395 - MECH343 - Statics MECH255 – MECH180 – Strength Mechanical CAD Thermodynamics I of Materials Applications I COOP300 Pre-Cooperative Work Term in the Summer term (Optional) Junior year MECH270 – Fluid Elective I *– MECH530 – Material Elective II* - Mechanics MECH290 Science MECH375 Machine Thermodynamics II Design I COOP400 Cooperative Education in the Spring
AC 2007-1699: USE OF ASSESSMENT SURVEY TO ASSIGN PROJECT TEAMSAND ROLESPromiti Dutta, Columbia UniversityAlexander Haubold, Columbia University Page 12.1526.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Use of Assessment Survey to Assign Project Teams and RolesAbstract:Effective assignment of teams and distribution of tasks within a group is an arduous task.Successful teams display harmony, successfully completed projects, and effective skill utilizationof all members. Weak teams demonstrate ineffective dynamics, poorly completed projects, andunderutilized team members. We propose a method to assign team members and to delegatemembers with equally weighted
better.References1. “The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century”, National Academies Press, 2004.2. Buchanan, R., Downey, G., Faste, R., Giard, J., Kuhn, S., “The Product Design And Innovation Program AtRensselaer Polytechnic Institute”, NSF External Review Committee Final Report, April 15, 2002.3. Newberry, B. And Farison, J., “A Look at the Past and Present of General Engineering and EngineeringScience Programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, July 2003.4. Steiner, M.W., “Using Real-World Multidisciplinary Design Experiences to Prepare Young Engineers to EnterToday’s Workforce,” International Engineering and Product Design Education Conference, Delft, Netherlands, 2-3
AC 2011-2151: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN STUDENT AND FACULTY EX-PECTATIONS FOR A ROBOTICS CAPSTONE DESIGN PROJECTKevin M Sevilla, Virginia Tech Kevin Sevilla is a Ph.D student at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education.Maura J. Borrego, Virginia Tech Maura Borrego is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She is currently serving a AAAS Science and Technology Policy Fellowship at the National Science Foundation. Her research interests focus on interdisciplinary faculty members and graduate students in engineering and science, with engineering education as a specific case. Dr. Borrego holds U.S. NSF CAREER and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and
Paper ID #10109Adventures in paragraph writing: the development and refinement of scal-able and effective writing exercises for large enrollment engineering coursesMs. Rebecca Rose Essig, Purdue UniversityDr. Cary David Troy, Purdue University, West Lafayette Ph.D., Stanford University, Civil and Environmental Engineering (2003) Assistant Professor, Purdue Uni- versity, School of Civil Engineering (2007-present)Prof. Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is Assistant Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He is also an
logistics and transportation systems, supply chain management, healthcare system enhancement, and quality and reliability engineering. Dr. Teng has been appointed by North Carolina Governor Bev Perdue to serve on Governor’s Logistics Task Force. He is also serving as an advisor on the ad hoc Logistics Advisory Group for Charlotte Regional Logistics Network and on the board of Logistics Alliance of the Carolinas.Elizabeth Sharer, Francis Marion University Page 22.198.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011IntroductionAt the beginning of the first semester of the two-semester
job situation has changed or will soon change. What effect will this have on the teamand what can be done?Losing a liaison engineer in the middle of a project can lead to disaster. Identifying, educating,and integrating a new liaison engineer can take months. To minimize the effects of a liaisonchange, it is recommended that a back-up liaison be involved with the team throughout theproject. Alert the project team as soon as you can publicly disclose your change in job status. Ifpossible, it is helpful to be available to the new liaison engineer during a transition phase.The team and I are having communication problems. What can be done?Communication problems need to be fixed quickly or the project will be doomed. Work with thefaculty coach
1992, 1993, and 2001, respectively. She worked with the Engineering Projects In Community Service (EPICS) Program from 2001 to 2003. In Fall 2003, she started a tenure-track assistant professor position in Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. She received a Frontiers In Education New Faculty Fellow Award in 2003. In 2006, she was named the Hood Professor of Electrical Engineering. Her research is in the areas of haptics, human computer interaction, computer vision, and engineering education. In her free time, she enjoys mountaineering, kayaking, and photography.Brian Self, California Polytechnic State University
that already possess? And, if so,what effect does subject selection play in maintaining or addressing these issues? Page 25.986.121. Gibson, K., Technology and technological knowledge: a challenge for school curricula. Teachers and Teaching, 2008. 14(1): p. pages 3 -15.2. Ingerman, Å. and B. Collier-Reed, Technological literacy reconsidered: a model for enactment. International journal of Technology and Design Education, 2010: p. 1-12.3. Carlson, M.P. and I. Bloom, The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem- solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics. Vol. 58. 2005
community colleges, numbersof transfer students, and numbers of associate degrees by e/et discipline, and (2) examining thefraction of e/et baccalaureate graduates who started their education in a community college.As a first step in this large undertaking, the current project is a pilot study that is using apurposeful sample of 35 community colleges and 15 engineering colleges in the U.S. The 4-yearinstitutions chosen for the sample represent a range of type in terms of highest engineeringdegree granted (e.g., doctorate, masters, baccalaureate), control (private or public), and focus(e.g., international research, national research, regional), while the community college sampleincludes both a range of geographic areas, including states with both
appointment as Associate Dean, Dr. Sorby served as chair of the Engineering Fundamentals Department at Michigan Tech. She received a B.S. in Civil Engineering, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics, all from Michigan Tech. Dr. Sorby has a well-established research program in spatial visualization and is actively involved in the development of various educational programs.Tania Jarosewich, Censeo Group LLC c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Spatial Skills Training Impacts Retention of Engineering Students: Does This Success Translate to Community College Students in Technical Education?I
Paper ID #37468Virtual Interview Training: Perceptions and Performance using DigitalHiring ManagersStephanie Jill Lunn, Florida International University Stephanie Lunn is an Assistant Professor in the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and En- gineering Education (SUCCEED) and the STEM Transformation Institute at Florida International Uni- versity (FIU). She also has a secondary appointment in the Knight Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences (KFSCIS). Previously, Dr. Lunn served as a postdoctoral fellow in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of
Engineering from the University of Rhode Island. Page 13.920.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Naval Research, Mentoring and Education -- Faculty Research and Intern Programs at the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock DivisionIntroductionThe Carderock Division of the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC), headquartered in WestBethesda, Maryland, exists as the navy’s full-spectrum laboratory for surface and underseavehicle hull, mechanical, and electrical (HM&E) systems propulsors and logistics under theNaval Sea Surface Command (NAVSEA). The term full-spectrum means performing long
Paper ID #33014Fostering Student Beliefs About Engineering and Mathematics ThroughIntegrated Instruction (RTP)Latanya Robinson, Florida International University Latanya Robinson is a doctoral student pursuing her degree in STEM Education at Florida International University (FIU) and an FIU STEM Transformation Institute fellowship awardee. Her research inter- ests include professoriate interdisciplinary collaboration, K-12 engineering education, and mathematics education.Dr. Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at University of Nevada, Reno. His re- search
Paper ID #47579Challenges and strategies of STEM instructors in adopting active learning:Insights from a hand-search of International Journal of STEM EducationXiaping Li, University of Michigan Xiaping Li is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education Research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests encompass faculty development and instructional change, neurodiverse college student learning experiences and outcomes, GenAI in higher education, and cognitive sciences. She holds a B.S. in Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering and an M.S. in Geological Sciences. ©American Society for
pilot module for undergraduate engineers and scientists," International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 69-76, 2008.[14] N. Capon and D. Kuhn, "What's So Good About Problem-Based Learning?," Cognition and Instruction, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 61-79, 2004.[15] S. Murphy, I. Hartigan, N. Walshe, A. V. Flynn, and S. O'Brien, "Merging Problem-Based Learning and Simulation as an Innovative Pedagogy in Nurse Education," Clinical Simulation in Nursing, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. e141-e148, 2011.[16] K. S. Scott, "An Integrative Framework for Problem-Based Learning and Action Learning," Human Resource Development Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3-34, 2017.[17] C. McLoughlin, "Computer supported teamwork: An integrative
of Engineering: i) theadvancement of personalized learning, which moves from a generic type of educational style toone with more innovative, engaging, computer enhanced teaching techniques; and ii) theenhancement of virtual reality to create imaginative environments for education andentertainment. CA2VES brings together the academic strength of three of the state’s largesttechnical colleges with significant A2 programs: the 3-D visualization development capability ofthe Southeastern Institute of Manufacturing and Technology (SiMT) at Florence-DarlingtonTechnical College; and the technical, research, engineering, and leadership strength of bothClemson University (CU) and CU-ICAR (International Center for Automotive Research). Thestate’s
Paper ID #13121Work-in-Progress: An Educational Tool to Support Learning Robot VisionDr. Fernando Garcia Gonzalez, Florida Golf Coast University Dr. Fernando Gonzalez joined FGCU as an Assistant Professor in the Software Engineering Program in the fall of 2013. Previously he has worked at Texas A&M International University in Laredo, Texas, the U.S. Department of Energy at Los Alamos National Laboratory in Los Alamos, New Mexico and at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, Florida. Dr. Gonzalez graduated from the University of Illinois in 1997 with a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering. He received his Master’s
usingPillai’s Trace are shown in Table 3. In order to protect individual and institutional privacy, the Page 8.25.4 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationuniversities have been randomly assigned a letter from A – I, and the degrees of freedom relatedto Pillai’s trace have been omitted. Notice that aggregate values are obtained for all nineuniversities as well as a subset consisting of six universities: The subset of six excluded thoseinstitutions for which the LDB did not contain SAT math scores, SAT
AC 2010-1586: ENGINEERING, REFLECTION AND LIFE LONG LEARNINGNora Siewiorek, University of Pittsburgh Nora Siewiorek is a graduate student in the Administrative and Policy Studies department in the School of Education at the University of Pittsburgh where she also received her MS in Information Science. Her research interests include: engineering education and educational assessment and evaluation. Her K-12 outreach activities are organizing a local science fair and a hands on workshop in nanotechnology. Her other research interests are: higher education administration, comparative and international education.Larry Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate
Contributing Factors," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 23, pp. 929-940, 2007.[15] D. C. Woolston, "Improving undergraduate academic advising in engineering: it's not rocket science," in Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual Conference, Boston, MA, 2002.[16] R. H. McCuen, I. A. Gulsah and D. Srikantaiah, "Recommendations for Improveing Graduate Adviser-advisee Communication," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 153-160, 2009.[17] B. W.-L. Packard, J. L. Gagnon and A. Senas, "Navigating Community College Transfer in Science, Technical, Engineering, and Mathematics Fields," Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 36, no. 9, pp
Surface Offset Techniques”, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Western Ontario, 1998.3. LaCourse, D. E., “ Handbook of Solid Modeling”, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1995.4. LOWREY, R. “ Rules for Solid Modeling”, Proceeding of the Autofact, No 12-15, 1990 pp. 2.3-2.36.5. Zeid, I.”CAD/CAM Theory and Practice”, McGraw-Hill, Inc.,1990 Page 8.547.8Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education
position of Chief Materials Scientist at Modern Industries, Pittsburgh (2003 – 2004) and Assistant Manager (Metallurgy Group), Engineering Research Center, Telco, India (1985 – 1993). He has published 45 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences including a 2007 Best Paper Award by the Manufacturing Division of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), three review papers and three book chapters. He has participated in numerous national and international conferences. He is a member of ASM International, TMS, ACerS, ISNT, ASEE and a registered Chartered Professional Engineer. Dr. Manohar’s research interests include mathematical and computer modeling of materials behavior
with organizations who discriminate by academic pedigree, and ≠ Making the claim: The degree is Engineering Technology. The career is engineering.The authors sincerely hope that these potentially controversial proposed actions will initiate aserious national discussion within the engineering technology community that will resolveidentity issues for engineering technology.Bibliography 1. Philip Weinser and David J. Brown, “Engineering Technology Education: A National Picture,” Proceedings of the 2008 IAJC-IJCME International Conference, Nashville, TN 2. Edward Kirkpatrick, “Engineering Technology Education to be Studied by Panel of National Academy of Sciences,” Journal of Engineering Technology Vol. 1(1), pp. 9
a viablesolution to educational institutions for the implementation of accreditation requirements that fullysupport the principles of authentic OBE and holistic CQI.Bibliography [1]. International Engineering Alliance, Washington Accord, Learning Outcomes and Engineering Knowledge Specifications retrieved from http://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/Policy/Graduate- Attributes-and-Professional-Competencies.pdf [2]. European Commission and Higher Education, The Bologna Process, http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/higher-education/bologna-process_en [3]. Accreditation Board of Engineering & Technology (ABET) , accreditation criteria, www.abet.org http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation
”, Looking Forward: Innovations in Manufacturing Engineering Education, CIMEC (CIRP International Manufacturing Ed. Conf.) and 3rd SME International Conf. on Manufacturing Ed., pp. 9-12.[3] Ssemakula, M.E., and Liao, G.Y. (2005). “A Hands-on Approach to Teaching Product Development”, Looking Forward: Innovations in Manufacturing Engineering Education, CIMEC (CIRP International Manufacturing Ed. Conf.) and 3rd SME International Conf. on Manufacturing Ed., pp. 189-195.[4] Rainey, P.E., Cheda, A., and Cooper, M. (1995). “An Introductory Electronic Manufacturing Course for Engineering Majors”, Proc. ASEE, pp. 302-310.[5] Groover, M.P. (2007). Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and
Paper ID #37223The Danger of a Single Story: A Critical and Holistic Account ofRachel’s Experience in Computing for Broadening ParticipationMrs. Nivedita Kumar, Florida International University Nivedita is pursuing her Ph.D. in Engineering & Computing Education at Florida International Univer- sity. She has a computer science and engineering background as well as K-12 teaching. She thinks about creating an inclusive learning environment using critical and feminist frameworks in undergraduate engineering and computing classrooms.Dr. Stephen Secules, Florida International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor
Paper ID #44518Storytelling Approaches for Elevating Student Voices in Research and DisseminationDorothy Decontee Gocol, Florida International University Dorothy Decontee Gocol is a first-year PhD student at the School of Universal Computing, Construction, and Engineering Education (SUCCEED) at Florida International University. She is also a Graduate Assistant at SUCCEED, and a Global Ambassador for the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) FY24.Dr. Helen Urpi Wagner-Coello, Florida International University Helen Urpi Wagner Coello is a Postdoctoral Associate and Project Manager for the Voices for Organizing Change in
AC 2008-1177: PUTTING THE ENGINE BACK IN THE ENGINEERFred Cady, (Retired) Montana State University Fredrick Cady is a Professor Emeritus in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Montana State University. He has been involved with ABET accreditation for the Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering programs at Montana State University for 20 years. He is interested in improving the quality of engineering education and has authored four microcomputer textbooks. He has a Ph. D. in electrical engineering from the University of Canterbury, NZ and is a senior member of IEEE.John McLellan, Freescale Semiconductor John McLellan is a applications engineer for the University
improve the global perspectives of engineering students. His dissertation investigates how best to design and operationalize effective global programming strategies within engineering curric- ula. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 lPreliminary Results of an NSF Sponsored Cross Institutional Study for Assessingthe Spectrum of International Undergraduate Engineering Educational Experiences and IDI Results of Short-Term Study Abroad (University of Rhode Island)The paper consists of two parts; in part I we will present the preliminary results of an NSFsponsored Cross Institutional Study for Assessing the Spectrum of International UndergraduateEngineering Educational Experiences in which