presentations among graduate/undergraduate students, featuring group research presentations with peer feedback and idea sharing; Facilitating research presentations by external presenters that connect to real-world applications.Several faculty members reported noticeable improvements in the research progress by theirundergraduates following these interventions. Students have become more aware of the practicalimplications of their work and are attempting to address real-world problems using theresults/methods of their studies. The creation of a friendly and supportive research environmentthrough group presentations has fostered creativity. Some faculty also reported improved studentself-confidence through these
influence real-world practices by offering actionable strategies for equity-oriented reform.References[1] AAUP, “Tenure,” AAUP. Accessed: Oct. 08, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.aaup.org/issues/tenure[2] L. Cox and K. Tachau, “Letter to the editor: Top 10 ways tenure benefits students and all Iowans,” Little Village, Jan. 26, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://littlevillagemag.com/letter-to-the-editor-top-10-ways-tenure-benefits-students-and- all-iowans/[3] J. Lockard, “THE TENURE CONTROVERSY,” The Journal of General Education, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 121–135, 1973.[4] A. H. Yoon, “Academic Tenure,” J Empirical Legal Studies, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 428–453, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1111/jels.12120.[5] A. S. Griffith and Z
-Based Learning (IBL), such as Project-Based Learning (PBL) and Problem-BasedInquiry (PBI), and the development of project management and research skills. Establishedconceptually in 2010, PBL and PBI are instructional approaches that cater to the individualismand multiculturalism of a student body. When students have the options to work on relevant,real-world problems in groups over a period of time, a more diverse population is able to developa deeper, more impactful, engaging, and well-rounded education when compared to traditionalstandardized learning approaches [17]. PBI and PBL often require team-based work, however thecommunity of practice established is more influential than teamwork alone [18]. The institutionalstructure that shares the
thoughts into a discussion, attentionwas paid to follow up and call upon those individuals so that listening and acknowledgment wasmodeled for focus group participants. Attention was also paid as to whether a participant wastaking up most of the discussion space, and if so, observation to identify others trying tocomment was done to call on those individuals.Hiring a Graduate Assistant for Program EvaluationAdministrative internships can offer assessment opportunities for graduate students andprofessionals in education, evaluation, and higher education with the results of evaluationprocesses and data contributing to improvement of programming [22]. For the intern, theexperience can provide real-time application and experience, especially if the
], factorseffecting cybersecurity awareness [2], the role of social media for increasing social media riskawareness [3], cybersecurity awareness in online education [4], and education of students toincrease awareness of cybersecurity based on emerging social media [5]. There is a gamification-based cybersecurity awareness course that was created to help people learn about cybersecurityand protect themselves from cybersecurity attacks during regular usage of the internet. The courseis based on self-regulated learning so that students can learn at their individual pace. Gamificationapplies game elements into real-world contexts. This can help people gain and maintain theirknowledge. With lessons gamified, this aimed to encourage students to learn more
sociotechnicalframeworks to inform their design decisions and processes, they can assess multiple aspects ofengineering challenges beyond just the technical and quantitative. While these questions weredeveloped for the content of UVA's FYE program, they could be adapted to the needs of otherinstitutions.Introduction and BackgroundIn recent years, sociotechnical knowledge has become an increasingly prominent area of study inthe engineering education community [1], [2]. Twenty years ago, the National Academy ofEngineers [3] laid out a plan for what the “Engineer of 2020” would be defined by: leadership inmoving the world forward in an ethical, sustainable manner. However, as a more recent surveydemonstrated, ethical and sociotechnical considerations have remained
, meaning that all course content is driven by student questions and requests as they work to address a number of real-world problems related to food design and food process engineering. In the spring semester of the 2019-2020 academic year, Bucknell University students left campus and moved to emergency online instruction in response to the COVID pandemic. Prior to this point, the College of Engineering o ered zero online courses. To support student engagement and progress during the summer of 2020, instructors were encouraged to o er new online summer courses. The author adapted CHEG 442 for online o ering, and noticed that there were two distinct audiences in the course - the upper
consisting of the department head and a select group of ASE facultymembers was formed to develop a plan to address such issues as curriculum modernization,computer application in teaching and learning, ABET 2000 criterion 3 goals (Table 1), and mostimportantly, attraction and retention of students. Three subcommittees were formed with eachgiven the task of revising courses in one of three major curriculum areas: flight mechanics,aerodynamics, and structures. A separate subcommittee was formed to develop the curriculumfor the three new "Intro-to-ASE" courses. Table 1. ABET 2000 Criterion 3 - Program Outcomes and Assessment(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.(b) an ability to design and conduct
smooth migration from any ofthe existing environment to a cloud-computing utility architecture. Optimization of thecloud-computing model can accelerate adoption and is the stage where IT staff canmaximize the real benefits of cloud computing. Real benefits, such as lower operatingand capital expenses, increased business agility and responsiveness, and scalability maybe realized within few days to weeks after migration to cloud. Many cloud vendors havebeen offering cloud computing services to both large and small companies, especiallyeducational institutions. Cloud-hosted services have also become an excellent way forbusinesses to reduce costs through monthly subscriptions. Despite the risk of making thetransition to cloud server and storage
largestnanomechanical device modeled in atomic detail. The Small Bearing was also modeled andsimulated via the NanoEngineer-1 software.Peter Lillehei, "Quantifiable Assessment of SWNT Dispersion in Polymer Composites,"Nanotechnology Entrepreneurship Forum, April 23, 2010.30-32Figure 8: A. NASA Subsonic Fixed Wing Program; (B). NASA Sample #1; (C). NASASample #5A NASA nanoscale initiative sponsored by the Subsonic Fixed Wing program focuses on thedevelopment and characterization of lightweight and multifunctional nanomaterials that willenable cost-effective, aerospace cargo transportation [Figure 8a]. In addition to lightweight,other desirable attributes in this application include radiation protection, electricalconductivity for lightening strike protection
university which too often happens. For sustainable funded high-quality professional graduateprograms [using the model of professional schools of law], the Task Force believes that engagement[service] in the profession of engineering can take many forms to include: (a) Consultancy in engineering practice (b) Integrating Service, the University, and Engineering to real-world needs of society, industry, and the nation for the advancement and betterment of human welfare to improve the quality of life By the deliberate recognition of meaningful unmet needs Conceptualization of new ‘ideas and concepts’ [invention, design, development] that bring about effective solutions to meet these needs [Exploratory
-based contexts such as storytimes at publiclibraries and family-focused drop in programs at community centers. However, an essentiallearning context for young children that can be particularly understudied in STEM education isthe home - the everyday environment where children interact with and explore the world aroundthem with their caregivers, siblings, and other extended family members.The growing body of research on early childhood engineering has investigated a number ofaspects related to young children engaging in engineering tasks and practices. Early work byBrophy and Evangelou [14] illustrated how early learners could access and participate inengineering through block play. More recent work has examined early engineering experienceswith
Sleeswijk Visser [21], whoidentified four distinct stages: (1) designers ‘‘discover’’ a particular user group, (2) designers‘‘immerse’’ themselves in the users’ context, (3) designers ‘‘connect’’ with the users’ experiences,and (4) designers ‘‘detach’’ from the users’ world to leverage their new insights. While this processmay appear linear and transactional, some design traditions, such as co-design, have emphasizedengaging users as partners throughout the design process [22] and have found that designerscontinue to develop and leverage new empathic insights throughout the development of individualdesign solutions [23]. This iterative and user-immersive view might be particularly applicable toengineering educators who regularly interact with their
Real-world situations and Assessment would focus on Maximize the relatability of concerns would be actively real-world topics, using well- assessment tasks invoked in assessment known situations prompts when possible Assessment questions would Assessment would undergo Minimize the complexity of only make simple requests of multiple revisions to reduce requests made of students
student assistants could convey command knowledgeand troubleshoot where needed.For this project, we chose to use Rhinoceros 3D modeling software (henceforth, simply Rhino),because we assessed it to lie between traditional engineering CAD software (e.g., Siemens NX,Autodesk AutoCAD, and SolidWorks) and modeling software dedicated to computer graphicimagery (CGI) applications (e.g., Autodesk Maya and The Foundry’s Modo). We hoped Rhinoalso would enable even novice students to make relatively quick mockups with sophisticatedgeometry, and thereby would encourage early design concept exploration.2Extending Chester’s Domains of CAD Knowledge: Command, Strategic, and EpistemicIn his 2007 article, “Teaching for CAD Expertise,” Ivan Chester makes the case
toimprove high school students’ understanding of engineering.Keywords: Engineering Design, High School, Engineering Education, Technological LiteracyRationaleAccording to the National Center for Technological Literacy1, “While most people spend 95% oftheir time interacting with the technologies of the human-made world, few know these productsare made through engineering”, or that engineering design is “the missing link that connectsscience and math with innovation”. The National Center for Technological Literacy suggestedthat “The key to educating students to thrive in a competitive global economy is introducingthem early to the engineering design skills and concepts that will engage them in applying theirmath and science knowledge to solve real
and monitoringstudents’ learning by a floating facilitator can be challenging in a typical class, the CL aspects isintegrated to encourage accountability, cooperation and peer-based learning as well asmonitoring and support. CPBL requires the problem to be realistic, if not real, with a scenariothat serves to contextualize and immerse students in the problem.CPBL is underpinned by constructivism7. The model emphasizes participation of studentslearning together in their team as well as in the learning community developed in the learningenvironment of the classroom. Students are engaged to learn through solving an authenticproblem which has a scenario that ties the concepts learn to possible applications in the realworld. The CPBL cycle
modules in similar domains and how to adapt them innew domains.We focused our research around the following three goals: (G1) developing a collaborativemulti-disciplinary research environment for graduate students that utilizes inquiry-based andactive learning methods, (G2) creating a gradual, systematic, and consistent scaffolded researchexperience across four courses, and (G3) requiring a collaborative advanced research experienceto solve real-world problems in the fields of Data Sciences and Information Technology.Metacognition in STEM. Previous studies examined how group activities can impact students’individual metacognition to self-regulate critical thinking [21], [4]. DiDonato found that groupinteractions can contribute to individual
toencourage performance accomplishments, vicarious learning, social persuasion or verbalpersuasion, and emotional arousal in classrooms when researchers observed. In Table 8, “yes”indicated that those strategies were used, and “no” means it was not used in the observed class.For example, in course 1 (C1), instructor provided real world examples, used a positivereinforcement, and the feedback to students is constructive. Table 9: In-class observation of learning strategies Course Total TotalSource Strategies 1 2 3 4 5 7 * * Provides
leasttwo foundational courses in engineering. These courses, Foundations of Engineering I and II,introduce students to the engineering profession, engineering thinking and the engineering designprocess [17]. The course targets both students who lack experience in the “real world” throughthe traditional internship or co-op experience with those who do possess co-op and internshipexperience. This interaction allows the less experienced students to gain insight into work lifefrom a peer in addition to course instructors, guest speakers and the partner companies. For theexperienced student, they gain the opportunity to interact with companies other than those theymay have already worked with. We have found that the inexperienced students often have a
: Applied Mathematics and Partial Differential Equations forupperclassmen in Fall of 2020. The Problem Solving for Engineers course teaches students how toapply mathematics to the real-world including problems encountered in everyday life. Most of thestudents are considered underrepresented.Students were surveyed on their understanding of SHM including the frequency, period and themeaning of a sine wave function. SHM was conceptualized in terms of a mass-spring system usinga Smartphone to measure displacement and acceleration. Survey results indicate that 'hands-on'exercises are necessary to increase the learning effectiveness of freshmen and understanding ofSHM. Student feedback on the hands-on experiment was positive among 94.5 % of the
engineering disciplines. While BAE has excellent representation within this core group ofinstructors, we must still be proactive in bringing awareness to the BAE discipline to both theinstructors and the students.In order to combat the lost contact time, we have proposed a new sophomore level course tointroduce students to the various specialties within our program, to continue practicing theirproblem-solving skills on discipline specific problems, and to grow their engineering intuitionabout realistic and improbable solutions by having them develop solutions to real-world designproblems.Learning theories and instructional systemsLearning is a multidimensional process, incorporating motivational, cognitive, social andaffective components (Lee &
), and paper to bepresented and defended (Figure 3e). Groups of judges (at least 2) evaluate several projectsaccording to a provided rubric. The rubric contains several sections including: originality,relation to Statics, real life applications, quality of poster, paper, oral presentation, answer toquestions. After the showcase is over, al the rubrics from the judges are compiled and the top10% of the projects are awarded first place (Figure 3g).Instruments and AssessmentsTo answer the research questions, two studies were conducted: An initial study and then areplication.Initial StudyThe students included in the initial study were all First Time in College (FTIC) classified assophomore, junior, or senior when they enrolled in Statics during Fall
of experientialservice-learning projects in their first-year engineering courses. Similar experiences byengineering faculty at other universities confirms that the motivation for faculty to pursueservice-learning pedagogy in their own engineering courses originates from the faculty’s desireto increase student motivation to learn, to enhance students’ ability to solve real world problemsand to engage with community partners.2As a result of implementing service-learning engineering projects in the local community over a3-semester time period, we have confirmed that managing experiential service-learning projectsrequires significant additional efforts by the motivated faculty members. This was not asurprising conclusion. However, building a
feature seemed to shift the balancein the presentations away from more student-centric, academic experiences to include morepractical industry perspectives. Some university students even brought resumes to the HA eventin case their conversations with alumni indicated a possible employment opportunity at acompany.Quotable Comments: “The inclusion of the alumni … also seemed like a good idea. It allowed the kids to see a real world example of an engineer and not just another student.” (university alumni) “I saw a lot of different fields represented by the alumni, and it was interesting to learn about various career trajectories that I hadn't personally considered before.” (university student) “The
, pp. 135–138, 2019.[22] D. Gatchell and R. Linsenmeier, “VaNTH Biomedical Engineering Key Content Survey, Part Two. The 2nd Step in a Delphi Study to determine the core undergraduate BME curriculum,” Am. Soc. Eng. Educ., 2007.[23] B. Versteeg and B. Rodger, “The real world,” Thromb. Res., vol. 164, no. March, p. 96, 2018.[24] J. D. Enderle, K. M. Ropella, D. M. Kelso, and B. Hallowell, “Ensuring that biomedical engineers are ready for the real world,” IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 59– 66, 2002.[25] G. Baura, “Educating for Industry,” IEEE Pulse, no. March/April, pp. 5–9, 2015.[26] T. M. Nocera, A. Ortiz-Rosario, A. Shermadou, and D. A. Delaine, “How do biomedical engineering graduates differ from other
communicating ideas to an audience. Inventioneducation provides a platform for students to identify real-world challenges and devise novel andinnovative solutions, fostering a sense of self-efficacy. Encouraging invention, innovation, andan entrepreneurial mindset helps students become more self-determined and contributes tostudents’ acquiring the skills needed to shape their own future [1].Students’ sense of belonging, psychological safety, and decision-making processes about theirfuture often align with their interests and curiosity, but anxiety can negatively influence theseperceptions. The aim of this study is to examine the constructs of interest and anxiety, withrespect to science and math and specifically to inventing. Prior research efforts in
booklet sent to all first year students before the term begins 6. J. Add diversity inclusion training to the curriculum for new students in College Success courses as well as Student Orientation. This training should not be limited to combating overt discrimination and official judicial procedures but deal also with the issues of combating re-segregation with intellectual respect for others and issues of equity regarding work group roles.4. Classroom practices: A. Incorporate collaborative learning, especially that related to real world situations, into the curriculum. B. Provide clarity and organization to female students to increase their confidence levels. C. Educate
in advocating for social change.” This leads us to ask: how exactly was thatvulnerability and trust achieved, what did it look like, and what were the tangible outcomes? It ischallenging to capture the essence of a community through words alone. Additionally, everyspace, with different students, at a different school, will look unique. To illustrate what ourclassroom community looked and felt like in the first iteration of the Pilot Course, we provideseveral scenarios drawn from our collective recollections of our classroom and demonstrate how,through community, we could be fully witnessed by one another, build real change at ouruniversity, and see a brighter future for ourselves and the world. Scenario # 1: Transparency
students, the most commoncomment was how meaningful they found the project due to the “real world” implications.Knowing that they or another group of students could actually put their proposal into action gavetheir work more weight and value. Students mentioned feeling more confident in their skills andbetter equipped to complete a project that has real applications. One student mentioned thisproject as being the first in their engineering education to ask them to consider finances, climate,and social well-being in addition to calling on their engineering skills.Advice for Implementing a Similar Project:Having outlined our personal challenges and success, we'll now move to offer more universaladvice for those interested in implementing a similar