most direct is related to the AutoCAD class in whichassignment 2 of the CE1030 class has been incorporated in the course syllabus in the final weekof the term.ConclusionsThe results of the use of the 3DPBM show that the 3DPBM model facilitates the progress ofeffective learning 9 mainly because it involves sharing, communicating, and group problemsolving. It also helps students to actively engage in the process of planning, designing, andinterpreting construction related data. Moreover, the model represents an invaluable tool toteach students the notion of cooperative work, which is in line with the advancements of theconstruction industry. The experiment demonstrated that starting the use of the 3DPBM – basedprimarily on project outcomes 8
education in general, Loss satisfaction from those students do not want to change calendars while they are attending RIT and a loss of satisfaction for those students who view college education based on quarters to be a sort of “Badge of Honor,” and Negative impact to student progress through the curriculum during transitioniii. A significant dip in enrollment as has been experienced by some other institutions who have converted calendars.ivHaving considered opportunities and risks associated with all academic programs on aninstitutional basis, it is time to consider pertinent points relative to ET programs specifically.Points of Concern Specific to Engineering Technology CurriculaThe ET curricula at
due to a variety of factors including graduating from an under resourcedhigh school, their test scores, grade point average (GPA), courses taken in high school, etc. Manyof them were underrepresented minority (URM), women, first-generation and low-incomestudents who may need additional academic and navigational support as they transition to andthrough the engineering curriculum. Through an on-campus interview day experience, thesestudents are extended enrollment in the Engineering GoldShirt Program. The program bringsthese scholars together in a cohort, and these students live and learn together in the residence hallon main campus. The program staff advises students in navigating their college experience,creates and implements community
the administration is educated on the ABETrequirement of the institutional support, not just for faculty professional development, but ingeneral. This proved to be very helpful in our case, for a variety of other ways as well, such asallocation of appropriate budget, space allocation, grant support, facilities and infrastructure etc.(not discussed in this paper).Although it is very difficult to clearly attribute the individual impact of all these differentcontinuous improvement initiatives, we find it important to relate these efforts with the overallsuccess of the program in terms of student retention and degree-completion. Working inconjunction with the institutional research team, we presented to the ABET team our EMETprogram student
likely (4) to use this module again. Previous ASEE papers have shared detailedfindings on teacher impact and student learning.1, 2Five online short courses have been developed to provide teachers with the backgroundknowledge needed to insure successful implementation of the instructional modules and toincrease their experience in online collaboration. The courses deliver content through readings,videos and interactive assignments. Participating teachers engage in discussions that focus onstrategies for implementing the modules within their classrooms and in collaboration with otherschools. Three of the short courses; Core Concepts of Systems Engineering, Reverse Engineeringand Home Lighting for Developing Countries were piloted in November and
non-credit courses. The groupcontinued activities in 2002-2003 formalizing its efforts into four case studies detailing theimplementation and effect of innovative assessment techniques in an engineeringclassroom.4 The case studies involve courses taught in Virginia Tech’s Aerospace andOcean Engineering Department.The first case study focused on conceptual knowledge assessment in a required sophomorelevel lecture course. Innovative assessment techniques were implemented to measure theacquisition of conceptual knowledge in student groups as well as individual students usingan exam based format. A comparison of current course performance with past studentperformance revealed that the assessment techniques had a positive impact on students
Paper ID #25235Expanding and Evolving an Innovation ConcentrationDr. Karl D. Schubert FIET, University of Arkansas Dr. Karl D. Schubert is a Research Professor and Director of Research for Innovation and Data Science Initiatives for the College of Engineering and the Sam M. Walton College of Business in the College of Engineering at the University of Arkansas. His academic research focuses on providing Innovation programs for STEM education; and, student, faculty and industry innovation engagement. Schubert also serves as a consultant specializing in innovation, entrepreneurship, technology and organizational opti
paper is about my response to two problems that emerged. In order to understandthem, and how and why I responded as I did, I provide additional context about the course. Page 22.1631.2Interaction Design involves “designing interactive products to support the way peoplecommunicate and interact in their everyday and working lives [p8]” 26. The learning outcomesfor the course are for students to: 1. carry out user inquiry to understand human needs in particular contexts; 2. construct design sketches and prototypes to manifest design ideas; 3. construct narratives of use so as to communicate use in context; 4. reflect on the
ofemerging technologies, proposes a preliminary matrix through the learning outcomes fromvarious accreditation bodies, and explains the steps required to implement drones intoconstruction education by reviewing multiple industry case studies. The study also identifies thechallenges and effectiveness of utilizing these technologies in classroom education througheducators' perspectives.Keywords: Emerging Construction Technology, UAVs, Student Learning OutcomesIntroductionIn recent years, the construction industry has introduced new advanced emerging technologiessuch as drones, artificial intelligence (AI), information and communications technology (ICT),sensors, and transportive modality technologies. This study focuses on how to utilize andimplement
seeks to improve outcomes for ruraland Appalachian youth, we must focus on both individual students and the broader communitycontext in which they live and go to school.Project OverviewTo focus on individual- and community-level factors, we have undertaken an initiative fundedby NSF titled, “Virginia Tech Partnering with Educators and Engineers in Rural Schools (VT-PEERS).” The goal of our project is to create a sustainable collaborative engagement betweenindustry partners, teachers, and university affiliates to develop a series of culturally relevantlessons activities for classrooms in rural areas of Virginia. Our lessons and activities aregrounded in theory and empirical research on career choice processes and pathways amongAppalachian Youth
devel- oping pedagogical methods and materials to enhance engineering education. Her most recent educational c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27262 research includes the collaboration with Tennessee State University and local high schools to infuse cyber- infrastructure learning experience into the pre-engineering and technology-based classrooms, the collab- oration with community colleges to develop interactive games in empowering students with engineering literacy and problem-solving, the integration of system-on-chip concepts across two year Engineering Science
].Epistemologically, progressive teaching methodologies in sustainability-focused engineeringeducation include experiential learning approaches such as project-based learning, collaborativedesign studios, field research experiences, and real-world problem-solving workshops. Thesemethods actively engage students in hands-on sustainability challenges, encouraging criticalthinking, systems analysis, and interdisciplinary collaboration but all prioritize learning throughexperience, student-centeredness, and community engagement [18-20]. By simulating complexenvironmental and social scenarios, these pedagogical strategies help students develop adaptiveskills, innovative mindsets, and a deeper understanding of sustainable technological solutions.Although claiming
feature was the ability to get a detailed breakdown of the values given bythe hints instead of just a number to compare their work to.ConclusionsAlthough inclusive, it seems that the assignment may yield improved learning compared totraditional homework. More investigation will need to be done on this. The students weresatisfied with the problem generator (as indicated by survey feedback) and offered valuablefeedback regarding potential improvements. Additionally, the instructor was pleased that theassignment is much more robust than other digital homework randomizers in its ability topromote the engagement of each student with the problems by eliminating the easy methods ofcheating.Although a significantly larger amount of work is required to
. This anecdote underlines the impact of the Abby-Net summer schools as they create anenlightening environment where students can engage with each other to gain an understanding oftopics outside their own discipline.To facilitate the exchange of information, participants are divided into peer groups ofapproximately five students, preferably with at least one group members representing each of theE³ domains, i.e., socio-economics, environmental science, engineering, and computer science.The participants approach each stage of the summer school as a group allowing them to developa broader understanding of the issues they are faced with as well as transdisciplinary solutions tothose challenges. The interdisciplinary research proposals, stage (iv
. Page 15.1188.4A recent requirement added to the engineering curriculum is the Engineering-LEAP (E-LEAP)program. E-LEAP is a year-long seminar focusing on the theme of community building inAmerican and in global settings, and the ethical standards of engineering. A paper onsustainability is required, but limited class time is dedicated to specific discussion ofsustainability. The topic is mentioned throughout the course, but limited reinforcement and lackof assessment of student learning of sustainability concepts likely limits the retention.Students may elect to take sustainability-oriented courses to meet their general educationrequirements. However, at this time the sustainability content of general education courses arenot known and thus
, vol. 70, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10899995.2022.2037403.[9] H. Ahmed, S. Nasrazadani, and H. Sadat, “Comparison of Thermal Effectiveness and Crevice Corrosion Risk of Fin Geometry on All-Aluminum Microchannel Heat Exchangers,” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol. 105, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.37934/arfmts.105.2.192203.[10] H. Ahmed, H. Sadat, and S. Nasrazadani, “High-Fidelity Conjugate Heat Transfer Simulation of Micro- Channel Heat Exchanger,” Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, vol. 106, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.37934/arfmts.106.1.165181.[11] T. T. Ishitani and S. A. McKitrick, “After transfer: The engagement of community college
learningenvironment. The following list briefly describes the focus of each lesson.Lesson 0- This is an overview lesson and briefly reviews design, projects, teamwork,ethics and the four aspects of the creative process.Lesson 1- This lesson covers the first of the four aspects of the creative process known asthe explorer. Here, students learn how to look at things in a different dimension.Lesson 2- Lesson 2 introduces students to the art of design, defining the problem, projectmanagement, communication, collaboration, and generating concepts.Lesson 3- The discussion in this lesson concentrates on being an artist. Students learnhow to take the raw material and make something new from it, experiment with variety ofapproaches, ask “what if” questions, and break
Paper ID #29146WIP: Exploring Pedagogical Alternatives for Incorporating Simulations inan Introductory Power Electronics CourseMr. Mohamed Khaled Elshazly, University of Toronto Mohamed Elshazly is a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Toronto Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE). He is currently engaged in developing support simulations for teaching introductory power electronics to undergraduate ECE students, as well as providing techni- cal support. Mohamed’s main research interests are numerical simulations and computational materials science, focusing on quantum mechanical
and identity in engineering change after this research experience ● How interaction and communication with graduate student mentors contributes to student sense of belonging.Further, this study raises questions that deserve future study, such as: ● How does mentoring undergrads impact grad students? ● How might training better prepare grad and faculty mentors to supervise REU students? ● Does doing research work contribute to students’ perception of research as a human practice? Given this ability to focus on the nuanced meanings that students draw from theirexperiences, we suggest that this method can better empower students from underrepresentedgroups, whose voices can be buried in large datasets of quantitative
California, Berkeley, is an online degree program where students accesscourse material asynchronously while also engaging in real-time learning activities withinstructors and teaching assistants. Students complete a capstone project that includes a finalreport with an oral presentation delivered live, using online presentation technologies.The Library plays an important role in providing the information resources and training to helpstudents succeed in their capstone. The requirement to engage with the information literacyelements of the program is prominently noted in the technical requirements for the course and isconsidered a foundational element of the program on par with high-speed Internet access, apersonal computer, and general Internet
Effectiveness Assessment process and supports assessment of academic programs and administrative departments. She also designs statistical studies to provide information about student engagement, institutional conditions that enhance student learning outcomes, progression, and retention to provide actionable reports to decision makers to include upper administration, faculty and staff. Dr. Lancey has served as the outside evaluator for several NSF funded grant projects. Prior to this, she held positions at Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Westat, Inc., University of Alabama, and Palm Beach Community College. She presents papers and workshops for faculty and administrators on educational
approach and life cycle management engineering software, to help students to master the arts andscience on how to engage in the product design and development in the 21st century; to help the students toform new perspectives in solving engineering problems and dealing with issues associated with productdesign and development such as team work, time management, and balance between people skills andtechnical skills.Because of the time constraints in the classroom setting, this paper addresses two important componentsrelated to product design: engineering design components and project management components. Theengineering design component consists of mechanical design, electrical and electronic design, and softwaredesign. The project management
brief introduction to objects and classes. • Sustainability issues in ICT, including software and hardware issues impacting nature, the economy, society, and individual well-being.The following sections will focus on the implementation of the flipped classroom format acrossmultiple offerings of ENGG 233.Initial ImplementationInstructional content was posted weekly using an online learning management system. Eachcontent release included several videos developed by the instructors, averaging ten to fifteenminutes in length with embedded quiz questions. While these quizzes were worth very little ofthe overall grade, the weekly deadline provided students with a form of accountability. The videocontent varied depending on the topic, and
necessary to understandglobal and environmental the impact of engineering solutions in a global,responsibilities of the professional economic, environmental, and societal contextengineer, and the need for sustainable (j) A knowledge of contemporary issuesdevelopmentUnderstanding of the principles ofsustainable design and developmentUnderstanding of professional and (f) An understanding of professional and ethicalethical responsibilities and commitment responsibilityto themExpectation of the need to undertake (i) A recognition of the need for, and an ability tolifelong learning, and capacity to do so engage in life–long learningThis table illustrates the similarities between the graduate
educational programs, all of whichhave negative ramifications on their academic progress and sense of belonging. Thisinvestigation uses a critical constructivist theoretical approach to explore how two SELs, whowere tasked with enhancing student engagement and building social networks for first yearengineering students, modified support mechanisms in response to the changing teaching andlearning modalities. Of particular interest is how the SEL program has evolved during thistumultuous time, the mentors’ experiences exploring and developing new ways of connectingstudents, and the impact of the experience on the mentors themselves. The results indicate a shiftin focus solely driven by the mentors, along with a willingness to reframe activities, events
]. Suchinterventions focus on rewriting problem statements so that the engineering work is framed byhow it impacts society rather than as narrow technical problems. In creating the assignment thatis the focus of this paper, we strove to incorporate these concerns by tasking students with thechallenge of framing an engineering problem in a way that considers multiple, differentstakeholder opinions on why the problem matters and how to approach the solution.For intervention assignments to be effective, students must be actively engaged in the classroom.The desire to incorporate sociotechnical thinking in classrooms has strong ties to previousresearch on effectively engaging engineering students by Adams et al [19]. In fields whereknowledge is quickly outdated
curriculum with a mix of enthusiasm and constructivefeedback, noting its positive impact on teaching and student engagement. The structuredscaffolding helped them challenge students while guiding them through complex ideas and tasks.However, some teachers pointed out areas needing improvement, especially for students with 10communication and motor challenges. One teacher mentioned the lack of content-specificcommunication tools, saying, “We don’t have anything about pollinating and bees… Content-specific core boards and visual supports would be helpful.” Others highlighted the need forvisual response options and additional support for fine motor tasks to
attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, thesurvey also asks teachers to give observations on students’ motivation/engagement and onstudent achievement across two high-level PRISM goals, as represented in Table 2. Table 2: Teacher Observations on Student Attitude and Behavior Student Demonstrated Student Achievement Motivation, Interest, and Engagement Facilitate Standards- Based Pedagogy Six Items Six Items Integration of Digital Technologies into the Six Items Six Items ClassroomFor the qualitative piece of our assessment, the sample population consists of
ENGINEERING PROGRAM OUTCOMES Students who graduate with a BSME degree from the Mechanical Engineering program will have (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data. (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. (d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams. (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. (g) an ability to communicate effectively. (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact
multidisciplinary design courses to help students experience the joy of engineering and develop their creative capacities. He has partnered with drama faculty to engage first-year engineering students in the designing, building and operating special effects for student written and directed plays. Currently Marshall is working with the UVA School of Architecture on the design and construction of a modular house for Habitat for Humanity, to be shipped to a low income family in Mississippi that lost its home to hurricane Katrina. The house will incorporate a photovoltaic power system designed and installed by UVA engineering students. Marshall is the former Chair of the Energy Conversion and Conservation