Conference Session

Pedagogical Issues in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Rumpf, Ferris State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

of the trade, with such other traits as good presentation skills and leadershipqualities often determining the difference between who gets a ride on the company’s fast trackand who goes down some corporate cul-de-sac. However, those skills once considered “soft” areincreasingly necessary not just to climb the corporate ladder, but even to access the first rung.Chief among those newly necessary soft skills is the ability to work as a member of a team. Thebig question is how to impart soft-skill lessons, especially in the academic environment whereoutcomes assessment is increasingly more important.In one form or another, though, team projects are an integral part of the manufacturing educationexperience. A large body of work on team dynamics

Conference Session

Middle School Programs

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Courtney A. Peckens, University of Michigan; Jerome Peter Lynch, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

assessed through pre- and post-program surveys. Overall, theprogram was deemed successful through increased comprehension of trigonometric propertiesand a general escalation of interest in engineering.IntroductionRecent studies have shown that minorities are continually less likely to obtain undergraduatedegrees for all engineering majors2. In particular, while recently demonstrating a slight increasein overall diversity, civil engineering continues to attract fewer minority students than otherengineering disciplines3. With today’s aging civil infrastructure, this discipline of engineering isin dire need of increased diversity that will motivate non-traditional solutions to the currentchallenges faced by the field. While various factors cause

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 11: Projects

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gerald Tembrevilla, Mount Saint Vincent University; Andre Phillion, McMaster University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

Engineers for Emphasized the crucial role of experiential learning in World Development (Harrisberger et al., 1976). the future both in the US and developing countries. 3.) Review of Experiential Learning in Engineering Examined models of experiential learning from six Education (Harrisberger et al., 1976). pioneering experiential engineering programs in the US. 4.) Creation of the National Commission on Excellence Investigated the quality of education in the US’ schools in Education in 1981 [5] and universities. 5.) The signing of the Washington Accord in 1989 [6] Outlined a standard of assessment in the professional

Conference Session

Engineering Education Research and Assessment III

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Zhifeng Kou; Sudhir Mehta

instrument are consistent with the averages obtainedusing the NSSE instrument. The CSSE instrument can be used by other instructors to measurethe engagement levels in their classes and compare their engagement levels with the engagementlevels provided in Table 7.This study, similar to Ahlfeldt et al’s7 study, suggests that class size and class level do impactstudent engagement, but only to a small extent. By using several methods of active cooperativelearning, as suggested in the literature,9, 10 even in large and/or lower division classes, studentscan be engaged at a higher level. Ahlfeldt et al7 have reported that by using the problem-basedlearning (PBL) appropriately across the whole university, the student engagement anddevelopment of cognitive

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - WIPS 2: Advising & Mentoring

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University; Linda P. Franzoni, Duke University; Stacy L. Tantum, Duke University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

theend of the first-year, as the survey asks each respondent to complete a post-pre-self-assessmentand a post-self-assessment. Three of the six statements probing resilience are reverse-coded andare denoted as such by “[RC]” following the statement; the quantitative Likert scale is reversedfor these statements. The small number of respondents (N=5) does not support drawingconclusions from statistical analysis through Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests for differences in themeans for each survey statement, so we instead present the data itself. We are unable to presentsurvey results for sub-populations, such as 360 Coach role in EGR 101L (Engineering Designand Communication), student gender identity, or historically marginalized community identity

Conference Session

Assessment and Accreditation in Engineering Management

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David S. Cochran, Southern Methodist University and Meijo University; Makoto Kawada, Meijo University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy, Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering

system purpose. To facilitate thisunderstanding, the system design education simulation is used as part of the course sequence.Collective System Design: Course SyllabusThe course syllabus summarizes course content and learning points. The program defined heresummarizes the learning based on eight years of experience of teaching in Japan and the USA.1. The Assumptions of Traditional Management Accounting. Traditional managementaccounting asserts that the total system cost is reduced by first reducing the unit cost of anoperation. This approach is incorrect in that it does not reduce the system cost (or the cost of theprocess according to Shingo and many others.)  [12]. The key points of this section of the courseare: The application of

Conference Session

Assessment and Evaluation in Engineering Education II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alice Squires, Stevens Institute of Technology; Mike Pennotti, Stevens Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

AC 2007-1099: MEASURING THE VALUE OF COURSE COMPONENTS IN THEONLINE CLASSROOMAlice Squires, Stevens Institute of Technology Alice Squires is the Director for Online Programs for the School of Systems and Enterprises, Stevens Institute of Technology in Hoboken, NJ. Alice also teaches systems engineering as a faculty at Stevens and business and management as a faculty at University of Phoenix. Alice graduated magna cum laude with a Bachelor of Science of Electrical Engineering (BSEE) at University of Maryland in 1984 and Summa cum Laude with Recognition with a Masters of Business Administration (MBA) at George Mason University in 1996. She is concurrently pursuing her doctoral

Conference Session

Trends in Mechanical Engineering I

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laila Guessous, Oakland University; Qian Zou, Oakland University; Brian P. Sangeorzan, Oakland University; Xia Wang, Oakland University; Gary Barber, Oakland University; Lorenzo M. Smith, Oakland University; LianXiang Yang, Oakland University; David Schall, Oakland University, Department of Mechanical Engineering; Michael A. Latcha, Oakland University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

and math (STEM). Student participants work in teams onautomotive and energy-related research projects in mechanical engineering and also take part inother activities such as industrial research lab and facilities tours, meetings with workingengineers, conferences and seminars. To date, a total of 37 students– more than half of whomwere female - from 30 different universities have taken part in the program since its inception in2006.The purpose of this paper is to present some of the lessons learned from the first four years of theprogram. Some of the planning, logistics, procedures and outcomes will be described andanalyzed based on the results from the pre- and post-surveys conducted to assess the program.We believe that this type of

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Programs

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Huihui H Wang, Jacksonville University; Lee Ann Jerome Clements, Jacksonville University; Cindy Leong; Misha M. Chalkley; Crandall Maines, Jacksonville University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

MEP scholar program. These activitieshave helped to build up and strengthen close connections between scholars and faculty. Theconnections have translated into an improved retention rate and enhancing recruitment of newstudents to STEM programs.KeywordsCo-curricular, Extra-curricular, Undergraduate research, NSF S-STEM MEP. 1. Introduction We are a small predominantly undergraduate institution (PUI) and liberal arts (LIA) privateuniversity. We received this NSF award in July 2014. The award has three goals:1. Improve the enrollment of students in engineering-related degrees;2. Improve enrollment of underrepresented groups in engineering-related disciplines;3. Improve retention through graduation or transfer to an affiliated institution

Conference Session

Promoting Social Sustainability, Cultural Assets, and Assessing Equity and Diversity Index

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leigh S. McCue, George Mason University; Girum Urgessa, P.E., George Mason University; Tehama Lopez Bunyasi, George Mason University; Patrick Willette Healey, George Mason University; Patricia Wonch Hill, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Jaime Lester, George Mason University ; Milagros Rivera, George Mason University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)

holistic perspective on faculty hiring, retention, andpromotion at George Mason University.Who Are ‘STEM’ Faculty?In order to assess equity in STEM startup packages, an initial effort was conducted to identify who,specifically, would be designated as STEM faculty at Mason. This effort was perhaps less intuitivethan one might expect. The National Science Foundation (NSF), for example, does not have adefined list of disciplines it considers to be STEM, though one can intuit such a list based uponeligibility for the Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP), which is included in AppendixA for ease of reference [12]. We cross-referenced the NSF GRFP list to the Department ofHomeland Security (DHS) list of disciplines for which F-1 visa students can

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FPD) Technical Session 1: Tech-Forward Teaching - Digital Tools to Enhance Engagement

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Caroline Cvetkovic, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Madison Christine Fanning, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Shreya Khosla Gustafson, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Sarah Meece, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Divya Bendigeri, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Trisha Patnaik, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FPD)

toinvestigate mass transport and fluid flow in human physiology and bioengineering, utilizing theirpeers’ wide variety of academic backgrounds. Teams formed by combining two previous groups(i.e., 7-8 students total) selected their topics from a given list, including: • Flow through the lungs • Macrocirculation (heart, large blood • Intraocular fluid flow vessels) • Lubrication of joints and transport in • Microcirculation (capillaries, small bone vessels) • Flow through the kidney • External (in vitro) biomedical devices • The lymphatic system

Conference Session

ME Curriculum and Assessment

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michele Miller, Michigan Technological University; Jeffrey Allen, Michigan Technological University; Jason Blough, Michigan Technological University; James P. De Clerck, Michigan Technological University; William J. Endres, Michigan Technological University; Scott A. Miers, Michigan Technological University; Ibrahim Miskioglu, Michigan Technological University; Gregory M. Odegard, Michigan Technological University; Charles D. Van Karsen, Michigan Technological University; Paul J. Van Susante, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

problems.New engineering programs, such as those at Olin College5 and James Madison University6, aretaking a different approach to engineering education by challenging lower division students withcomplex open-ended problems and by infusing project work throughout the four-year curriculum.The large number of mechanical engineering students at Michigan Tech presents challenges toimplementing more project-based courses, but size has advantages too: well equippedlaboratories, a mature industry sponsored capstone design program, and diverse faculty expertise.This paper will describe the process we followed to develop a new curriculum in addition toproviding details about the new curriculum itself.Curriculum Design ProcessIn Fall 2010 an ad-hoc Curriculum

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Programs

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

W. Wentzheimer; Jennifer VanAntwerp; Gayle Ermer; Steven VanderLeest

schools followed a trend of ever increasing focus on thedetails of one particular sub-discipline of engineering. Our program emphasizes breadth not onlyacross engineering disciplines, but also uses a solid foundation in the liberal arts that provides thebroad worldview on which effective leadership arises. Our outcome-based assessment of recentyears appears to reflect an industry need for more breadth and thus less depth. While depthprovides good preparation for entry level positions and the first five years or so of a career,contextualization better supports the full career span, which requires continual self-learning andoften has leadership opportunities in technical and non-technical areas.While engineering analytical skills are important

Conference Session

Assessment Issues II

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Vikas Yellamaraju; Richard Hall; Nancy Hubing; Ralph Flori; Timothy Philpot

fundamentalassumption of the model is that conclusions and recommendations should be based on thetriangulation of information gleaned from multiple methodological and measurement tools.The model is meant to serve as a guide for large-scale assessment projects, and also to providesome context for individual experiments. Therefore, any given experiment does not include allaspects of the model, but often an entire project, such as the project reviewed in this paper,encompasses many parts of the model. Figure 1 is a graphical depiction of the LITE learningtechnology assessment model. Figure 1. LITE Assessment ModelAs indicated in the left portion of the Figure 1, learner variables are included in many of ourexperiments. Ability, as

Conference Session

T1C: Developing Foundations in Mathematics

Collection

2019 FYEE Conference

Authors

Jacquelyn Huff, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University; Andrea M. Ogilvie P.E., Texas A&M University; Danisha Stern, Texas A&M University; Sonia Garcia, Texas A&M University; Shawna Fletcher, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

FYEE Conference - Paper Submission

classroom, and engaging her students with interactive methods.Dr. Andrea M. Ogilvie P.E., Texas A&M University Andrea M. Ogilvie, Ph.D., P.E. serves as Assistant Dean for Student Success and Assistant Professor of Instruction at Texas A&M University. Prior to her current appointment, Andrea served as Director of the Equal Opportunity in Engineering Program at The University of Texas at Austin. Her expertise includes: project management, program assessment, university-industry partnerships, grant writing, and student development in the co-curricular learning environment with a special focus on recruiting, supporting, and graduating students from groups historically underrepresented in engineering. Since 2014

Conference Session

Curriculum Innovation & Assessment

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Mark Urban-Lurain; Taner Eskil; Marilyn Amey; Timothy Hinds; Jon Sticklen

2005-1814 Curricular Integration of Computational Tools: A First Step Timothy Hinds, Mark Urban-Lurain, Jon Sticklen, Marilyn Amey, Taner Eskil Michigan State UniversityAbstractCalls for new paradigms for engineering education are widespread.1-3 Yet, major curricularchange is difficult to accomplish for many reasons, including having the necessary faculty buy-in.4 Generally, efforts can be classified as either top-down/structural, in which faculty assess anentire program of study and address needs in each component before implementation begins; orbottom-up/individual, a more traditional

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 4: Supporting Success 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aysa Galbraith, University of Arkansas; Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas; Heath Aren Schluterman, University of Arkansas; Gretchen Scroggin

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

? • Planned Engineering Major?Results and DiscussionCHEM 1103 University Chemistry I at UofA is offered every semester and has a cohort size of1200-1400 students in fall semesters and 300 – 850 students in spring semesters. These are largeclasses (200+) that are taught in large auditoriums. In spring 2018 and fall 2018, Chemistrydepartment had a pilot program where they tested whether small class sizes (30 to 40 students)would improve outcomes compared to large class sizes (200+); they did not find a significantdifference in student outcomes. Since Fall 2017, Chemistry has been using the flipped classroomformat, where students were provided videos on each learning objective to watch before classalong with a reading assignment and short online

Conference Session

Alternatives to Traditional Assessment

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kristen M. Ward, Arizona State University; Yingyan Lou, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Engineers course since 2014 in traditional lecture, blended, and flipped formats, and has conducted research through prior NSF support on concept inventory and flipped classes. She has also been a member of the curriculum committee in the Civil, Environmental, and Sustainable Engineering degree program at ASU since 2016. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Oral Formative Assessment as a Means to Increasing Total Learning and Engagement in a University Engineering Classroom Kristen M. Ward, PhD, Lecturer in Engineering, Fulton Schools of Engineering Yingyan Lou, PhD, Associate Professor, School of Sustainable Engineering and

Conference Session

Program Evaluation Studies

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Roxanne A. Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology; Christopher J. Cappelli, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

Paper ID #21273An Investigation of Students’ Experiences in a K-12 Invention Program (Eval-uation)Dr. Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology Sunni Newton is currently a Research Associate II at the Georgia Institute of Technology in the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on assessing the implementation and outcomes of educational interventions at the K-12 and collegiate levels. She received her MS and Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from Georgia Tech in 2009 and 2013, respectively.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology

Conference Session

Engineering in High School

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Don Engelberg, Queensborough Community College; Cheryl Bluestone, Queensborough Community College; Amy Bieber, Queensborough Community College; James Valentino, Queensborough Community College; Patrick Wallach, Queensborough Community College; Joseph Goldenberg, Queensborough Community College; Clara Wajngurt, Queensborough Community College; Paul Marchese, Queensborough Community College

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Centers for Exploration and New Discovery) program. QCCTechASCEND was a project funded under that program to encourage high school students(mostly seniors with some juniors) to consider careers in science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM). Located at a large urban community college, the QCC TechASCENDproject put particular emphasis on technology, but attracted participants considering or willing toconsider other STEM fields.Over the course of three school years, from October 2002 through June 2005, nearly 200 highschool students from 22 high schools participated. Each of the seven groups of participants camefor approximately 30 sessions, each two hours long, devoted to hands-on exploration related tooptics in general, lasers, fiber

Conference Session

Curriculum and Assessment I

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Asuman Cagla Acun Sener, University of Louisville; Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville; Olfa Nasraoui , University of Louisville

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

alternative approach where phase 2 and 3 are reversed or flipped such thatinstructors: 1) select the concepts (and write learning objectives), 2) give students structured out-of-class assignments where they initially encounter the concepts and topics on their own, and 3)have students work on activities during class that assess their basic knowledge and facilitateassimilating the concepts and topics by constructing their own knowledge of the topic.2.2 Courses and class formatThis case study includes data from two math courses, calculus II (course 1) calculus III (course2), which were taught at large research university in the Midwest. The enrollment in thesecourses was exclusively engineering students. Both courses were four credit hours and met

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 4: Design Thinking & Entrepreneurship

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Anjali Mulchandani, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of Texas at Austin; Ruben D. Lopez-Parra, Purdue University ; Sydney Donohue Jobe, University of New Mexico; Paris Eisenman, University of New Mexico; Ethan Kapp, University of New Mexico

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

when faced withcomplex problems they have to agentively solve, this shows that these students can successfullydo design work to frame and conceptualize large and difficult problems.There are several limitations to this work. The primary limitation lies in the differing number ofcredit hours between the two courses. This is reflected in students in the CCEE course havingmore accurate calculations when analyzing their data collected in the lab, and having moreprofessional presentation slides. However, these results show that even a 1-credit class allows fornuanced design work from first-year engineers. The sample size for this study is also relativelysmall, limiting universalizing due to small-scale statistics.AcknowledgmentsThis material is

Conference Session

ME Curriculum and Assessment

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher E. Larsen, University of Missouri; Rose M. Marra Ph.D, University of Missouri, Columbia; Nai-En Tang; David H. Jonassen, University of Missouri, Columbia; Robert Andrew Winholtz

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

Paper ID #8462The Goldilocks Continuum: Making the case for an optimal balance of in-structional strategy in mechanical engineering collaborative learningChristopher E. Larsen, University of Missouri Christopher Larsen is currently a student in the doctoral program at the University of Missouri’s School of Information Science and Learning Technologies. He has worked for many years with the Department of Defense as an instructional systems designer, and has written several technical manuals on leadership and small unit tactics. Christopher’s interests include problem-based learning and leadership development.Rose M Marra Ph.D

Conference Session

Curricular Developments in Energy Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Blekhman, California State University Los Angeles; Jason Keith, Michigan Technological University; Ahmad Sleiti, University of Central Florida; Eileen Cashman, Humboldt State University; Peter Lehman, Humboldt State University; Richard Engel, Schatz Energy Research Center; Michael Mann, University of North Dakota; Hossein Salehfar, University of North Dakota

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

industry experts in the HFCT field in some of the coursesto provide the latest developments to students. This supports UNCC’s emphasis on academicdiversity. The HFCT program will build on the strong, relevant undergraduate education, andwill foster many partnerships, locally, nationally, and internationally.The program includes an evaluation process, which engages multiple perspectives, uses a widerange of qualitative and quantitative methods, and triangulation procedures to assess andinterpret a multiplicity of information. The focus of the evaluation at the end of each year is onsummative outcome measures based on the stated program objectives plus formative feedbackfor the following year.In addition to supporting the missions of the College and

Conference Session

Computers in Education Poster Session

Collection

2002 Annual Conference

Authors

Masaaki Mizuno

activities by different threads is localized to a small amount ofsynchronization code.* This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under NSF-CRCD Grant #9980321 andDARPA Order K203/AFRL #F33615-00-C-3044. Page 7.193.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationHowever, informal conversations with system designers/engineers at Boeing and 3COM onseparate occasions have revealed that in industry, many programs are written in the form of asequential program or a simple non-preemptive

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Work

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. M. Mizanoor Rahman, New York University; Vikram Kapila, New York University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

kit includes (i) a programmable brickserving as the control center and power station for the robot, (ii) two large motors to render preciseand powerful action by and motion of the robot under program control, (iii) sensors, such as color,touch, ultrasonic, wheel rotation, and gyroscope, and (iv) two wheels, miscellaneous gears, cables,buttons, an LCD screen, and various construction parts and accessories to build the robot structure.The aforementioned robot kit was used for its relatively affordable cost and easy programmingand the base robot of Figure 1 was used for its flexibility in assembly and configuration, easyoperation, and suitability of its functions in explaining the middle school science and math content.Figure 1: LEGO Mindstorms

Conference Session

Engineering in Middle Schools

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Juanita Jo Matkins, College of William and Mary; John A. McLaughlin, McLauglin Associates; Eugene Brown, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Gail Hardinge, College of William and Mary; Nancy West, College of William and Mary; Robert Stiegler, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division; Kirk Jenne, Office of Naval Research

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

AC 2008-2810: EVALUATING A COMPREHENSIVE MIDDLE SCHOOLOUTREACH PROGRAM—THE RESULTSJuanita Jo Matkins, College of William and Mary Juanita Jo Matkins is an Assistant Professor of Science Education at the College of William and Mary. She was a K-12 teacher for 18 years, and the Virginia recipient of the 1995 Presidential Award for Excellence in Secondary Science Teaching. She has written and published several papers and reports on various issues in teacher education, including assessment, gender and multicultural issues in science education.John A. McLaughlin, McLauglin Associates John McLaughlin is a senior consultant in strategic planning, performance measurement, and program

Conference Session

Learn About Assessment

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

James A. Mynderse, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

(each having one course section worthof data). Table 4 reports the percentage of student teams achieving Minimal, Adequate, orExemplary (% M, A, E) levels for each semester (each having one course section worth of data). Table 3. ABET assessment results as UMAE vectors. Table 4. ABET assessment results as % M, A, EThe BSME program at LTU is not large and the small class sizes are further condensed due toassessment of a team project. This is evident in the small number of scores in Table 3 and Table4. From the available data, it appears that from Fall 2019 to Fall 2020 there was improvement inthe team projects across all sub-outcomes. This was likely influenced by improvements in coursecontent (e.g

Conference Session

Assessing with Technology

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Wes Hines; Mary Kocak; Kurt Gramoll

Delivery and Assessment of Teaching Statics over the Internet to Community College Students Kurt Gramoll, Wes Hines, and Mary Kocak Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Oklahoma College of Engineering, University of Tennessee Mechanical Eng. Technology, Pellissippi State Technical Community CollegeAbstractThis paper presents the methods and results of delivering a basic Statics course to PellissippiState Technical Community College (PSTCC) students located in Knoxville, Tennessee over theInternet. All aspects of the course, including textbook, lectures, class meetings, studentdiscussions, homework and tests were

Conference Session

Mentoring Graduate Students, Diversity, and Assessment

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen Thompson, University of South Carolina; Joy Watson, University of South Carolina; Jed Lyons, University of South Carolina

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

AC 2010-1364: MEASURING CHANGE IN ENGINEERING AND SCIENCEGRADUATE STUDENTS’ TEACHING EFFICACY AS A RESULT OFPARTICIPATION IN A GK-12 PROJECTStephen Thompson, University of South CarolinaJoy Watson, University of South CarolinaJed Lyons, University of South Carolina Page 15.862.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Measuring Change in Engineering and Science Graduate Students’ Teaching Efficacy as a Result of Participation in a GK-12 ProjectAbstractIn the 1990s the National Science Foundation (NSF) introduced the Graduate Teaching Fellowsin K-12 Education (GK-12) initiative. The GK-12 program supports the participation of graduatestudents from STEM