AC 2008-129: BUILDING AN EDUCATION PROGRAM FOR ENGINEERS INDIGITAL FORENSICSDavid Dampier, Mississippi State University Page 13.264.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Building an Education Program for Engineers in Digital Forensics David A. Dampier Jansen Cohoon Department of Computer Science and Engineering Mississippi State University dampier@cse.msstate.edu; jec9@msstate.eduAbstractThis paper describes an innovative laboratory based program that offers life-long learningactivities to working professionals in the law
Paper ID #39278WIP: How Empathy Education Changes Student’s Perceptions of an ”Engi-neer”Mrs. Libby Flanagan, Clemson University Libby Flanagan is a current doctoral student in the Engineering and Science Education Department at Clemson University. She received her B.S. in Biosystems Engineering from the Clemson University Honors Program in 2017, along with a minor in Spanish Language Studies. She completed a two-year teaching appointment with Teach for America in 2019, where she taught 6th-grade math and computer science in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She earned her M.S. in Biosystems Engineering at Clemson University in 2021
Journal of Educational Thought 29, 2 (1995).5. M. Borrego and L.K. Newswander, The Review of Higher Education 34, 61 (2010).6. P. Stock and R.J. Burton, Sustainability 3, 1090 (2011).7. National Science Foundation, Introduction to the IGERT Program, WWW Document, (https://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/igert/intro.jsp).8. V.B. Mansilla, E.D. Duraisingh, C.R. Wolfe, and C. Haynes, The Journal of Higher Education 80, 334 (2009).9. V.B. Mansilla and E.D. Duraisingh, The Journal of Higher Education 78, 215 (2007).10. L.R. Lattuca, D. Knight, and I. Bergom. International Journal of Engineering Education 29, 3 (2013).11. D. Fowler, R. Arroyave, J. Ross, R. Malak, and S. Banerjee. Looking Outwards from the “Central Science”: An Interdisciplinary
outcomes-based education in engineering is analyzed. This analysis pointsto one major discrepancy: on the one hand engineering education implicitly adopts a behavioriststance of focusing on observable outcomes as opposed to internal learning processes especiallywith a view to assessment6. On the other hand behavioral forms of learning such as enforcingstudent behavior go commonly unnoticed14. However there is growing evidence that thesebehavioral forms of learning play an important role in the overall formation of studentcompetence. The paper presents results of an ongoing study into Accidental Competencyformation15 to further explore the impact of these behavioral forms of learning. The concept ofAccidental Competency is then analyzed for its
Asst. Vice Chancellor, International EducationBACKGROUND . .The traditional education of engineers and engineering technologists includes classroom training and hands-on ‘.experience in the form of laboratory exercises and simple design exercises. There is considerable pressure fromindustry to increase meaningful experience through internships during the college training period. The experi-ence gained during such industrial employment has been shown to have a positive influence in a number ofareas. This paper anticipates the extension of internships into a formalized program, where industrial experienceis an integral part of the education of the student.In industry, the environment is changing. Design teams of the future will
into their engineering education research can be impactful. They also highlight that using information from literatureor articles helps inform the perspectives of someone from a different discipline. This promotes their existing linguistic capitalby integrating the vocabulary of discipline-based education research into their knowledge of their discipline background.Participant 6 reflects that this integration is an important component of the L&L space. In this instance, the L&L spacefacilitates introducing a graduate student to a new field (engineering education) and way of thinking about education research -in the context of that field. Finally, the vocabulary to communicate with others in education research is added to this
. (2010). Decision Support Systems – DSS (definition). Downloaded from http://www.informationbuilders.com/decision-support-systems-dss.html17) Ishiyama, J. (2005). The structure of an undergraduate major and student learning: A cross-institutional study of political science programs at thirty-two colleges and universities. The Social Science Journal, 42: 359-366.18) Kunzman, R. (2002). Extracurricular activities: Learning from the margin to rethink the whole. Knowledge Quest, 30: 22-25.19) Li, O., McCoach, B., Swaminathan, H. and Tang, J. (2008). Development of an instrument to measure perspectives of engineering education among college students. Journal of Engineering Education, 97: 47- 56.20) Litzinger, T, Lee, S. H., Wise, J
through peer support, informalacademic networks, and institutional mental health services. However, this support could not beformally obtained in many cases due to stigma or a language barrier. This present study alsoprovides practical strategies that could help improve mental health and academic success bycreating an increasingly supportive and inclusive environment for international engineeringstudents.Keywords: Advisor-student relationships, Mental health, international students, Engineering, MisalignmentIntroduction International students enrich higher education globally, contributing not only from anacademic perspective but also culturally [1]. International students hold a great deal ofimportance when it comes to research and
AC 2008-573: CONTRIBUTIONS OF INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS TOENGINEERING GRADUATE SCHOOLS IN THE UNITED STATESAli Mehrabian, University of Central FloridaDiala Gammoh, University of Central FLoridaAlfred Ducharme, University of Central FloridaAhmad Elshennawy, University of Central Florida Page 13.334.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Contribution of International Students to Engineering Graduate Schools in the United StatesAbstractMany academic institutions in the United States have been looking for more expansion andexposures worldwide. They have been promoting their graduate programs to around the globe tothe students who seek educational
classroom: perspectives from psychology, education and information science,” Proc. 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, Nashville, TN.41. K.R. Most, M.P. Deisenroth, “ABET and engineering laboratory learning objectives: a study at Virginia Tech,” Proc. 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, Nashville, TN.42. R.P. Hesketh, S. Farrell, C.S. Slater, “An inductive approach to teaching courses in engineering,” Proc. 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, Nashville, TN.43. J.W. Bruce, L. Mann Bruce, “Maximizing your productivity as a junior faculty member: being effective in the classroom,” Proc. 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT.44. A.A. Kedrowicz, “Negotiating comfort in difference: making the case for interdisciplinary collaboration
ofengineering. Details of the minor program are discussed. Various equipment related to thediscipline are gradually acquired through internal and external funding, endowments and gifts.Additionally, other related equipment already present on campus is gathered at one centralizedlocation. As a result of the establishment of the lab several research, academic and related projectshave started and are currently in progress. Some of these projects and their implications arediscussed. Vast majority of these projects involve students. Student perspectives on the advantagesof the lab and future potentials are also discussed.Key Words: Minor, Laboratory, Equipment, Projects, Research, Education, Students 1. IntroductionA new AERO (Aerospace Engineering and
teaching practices.Dr. Emily Anna Dare, Florida International University Dr. Emily Dare is an Assistant Professor of Science Education at Florida International University. Pre- viously, she taught at Michigan Technological University from 2015-2018, where she is still an affiliated faculty member in the Department of Cognitive and Learning Sciences. Dr. Dare’s research interests are focused on K-12 STEM education. In particular, she is interested in supporting science teachers’ reform- based instruction while simultaneously understanding their beliefs. As science classrooms shift to more integrated STEM approaches, this is especially critical. Additionally, Dr. Dare has a passion for working with K-12 students to
education ofengineers. Both classes also offer formal training and activities focused on inter/cross-culturalcompetency development.The study reported here is based on survey data collected during multiple offerings of thesecourses over the span of three years, encompassing a total of 79 students. The survey consistedof items from the Global Engineering Competency-Situational Judgment Test (GEC-SJT),Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS), and Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale-Short form(MGUDS-S). These three instruments, together, form a multi-faceted view of a student’spotential ability to perform and adapt in an international work environment. To analyze thesemeasures longitudinally, we compare students’ pre- and post-course scores on each
Session 1302 The CDIO Capstone Course: An Innovation in Undergraduate Systems Engineering Education David W. Miller, Doris R. Brodeur, John E. Keesee Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAbstractIn February 1999, the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT initiated a new three-semester capstone laboratory and space systems design experience taught in the context ofauthentic engineering practice, i.e., Conceive, Design, Implement, and Operate (CDIO). Theobjective of CDIO is to teach the basic concepts and disciplines of engineering in the context
Technologi- cal University, India. He is a certified IUCEE International Engineering Educator. He was awarded the ’Ing.Paed.IGIP’ title at ICTIEE, 2018.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also conducts
&M University and an Asso- ciate Professor in the Zachry Department of Civil Engineering. His research focuses on solid mechanics and materials science. His speciality is welding physics and the fatigue and fracture behavior of struc- tural weldments under cyclic loading. Results from his research have been incorporated in national and international codes of recommended practice for buildings as well as railway and highway bridges.Dr. Carol L. Stuessy, Texas A&M University Dr. Carol Stuessy has been associated with Texas A&M Univerrsity since 1989 as a professor of science education in the Department of Teaching, Learning and Culture. Her specialties include research design using mixed methods approaches
Engineering Education 19: pp346-353, 2003.8. R. Fries, “An Industry Perspective on Senior Biomedical Engineering Design Courses.” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 22: pp 111-113, 2003.9. T. Martin, S.R. Revale, and K.R. Diller, “Comparison of student learning in challenged-based and traditional instruction in biomedical engineering.” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 35, 2007.10. The Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program Handbook, University of Conn, 2007. 11. J. Dyro, “Clinical Engineering Handbook.” pp 297-298, Clinical Engineering Internship, 2007.12. A. Lozano-Nieto, “Internship Experiences in Biomedical Engineering Technology: An Overview of Students and Prospective Employers Perception,” ASEE Conference, Session
First, C. N. Allan, C. Campbell, and J. Crough, Eds. Singapore: Springer, 2019, pp. 209–230. doi: 10.1007/978-981- 13-6982-7_12.[4] G. Heilporn and S. Lakhal, “Converting a graduate-level course into a HyFlex modality: What are effective engagement strategies?,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 100454, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100454.[5] J. L. Fuqua, F. L. Wachs, P. M. Nissenson, D. M. Barrios, and C. Nguyen, “Assessing the Influence of an Online Video Tutorial Library on Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering Students,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Jan. 25, 2023. [Online]. Available
McKinney [23] noted undergraduatestudents’ increases in graduate education interest, building research skills, and confidence inresearch. Several studies found that students who participated in an REU program appreciatedthe role of the faculty, graduate students, and/or peer mentors [13], [24] - [26].B. Undergraduate Research Experiences for International StudentsThere has been a lack of literature on research experiences of international undergraduatestudents in engineering at a US institution. Most studies in the literature focused on nationalstudents’ international research experiences at foreign institutions [27], [28]. Instead, theliterature documented difficulties in recruiting international students for graduate school [29] anddifficulties
© 2002, American Society of Engineering Education" also significantly affect the number of graduated students, which the society needs and deserves. Introduction In the recent years retention has received an extraordinary amount of attention as it has become a significant issue although the aggregate retention rates in the United States have remained surprisingly constant over the past hundred years (1880 - 1980) 1,2. It is important to mention here that there is no substantial difference between the USA and Canada in terms of published studies dealing with retention of traditional college age students2. The Roman poet Manlius wrote ’ The end depends on beginning’. So the first year is
. Accessed: Apr. 22, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/304379389/abstract/122F338DA92D4B7FPQ/1[16] D. Rice, “The Career Experiences of African American Female Engineers,” in Adult Education Research Conference Proceedings, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2011, pp. 556–563.[17] G. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B. Claar, H. L. Chen, K. Jackson, and S. Sheppard, “An Engineering Degree Does Not (Necessarily) an Engineer Make: Career Decision Making Among Undergraduate Engineering Majors.,” CAEE Res. Brief, pp. 1–2, 2009.[18] D. J. Bayless, “Using Industrial Summer Intern Programs as a Tool for Engineering Education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 465–469, Oct. 1999, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.1999.tb00475.x
Bunyoro-Kitara,the Uganda Christian University, and the stakeholders of our existing projects.Bibliography1. Library of Congress / Federal Research Division / Country Studies / Area Handbook Series / Uganda by theFederal Research Division of the Library of Congress, Available at http://memory.loc.gov/frd/cs/ugtoc.html2.”Fostering Inventiveness in Engineering Education-An International Perspective”,Z. Prusak, 2002.Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference andExposition,3. Background paper on indigenous knowledge for sustainable development: towards a national strategy andframework of Action for Uganda prepared by Dr. Z.M. Nyiira, Dr. C.F. Mugoya and J.N. Muwanga. A paperpresented at the workshops on
Sciences-Courses in Applied Computational Fluid Dynamics and Compressible Flow, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, Vol. 30, Issue 1, pp. 35-49, January 2002.6. Williamson, K., Resources in Technology, Technology Teachers, Vol. 64, Issue 3, pp. 15-19, November 2004.AIMAN S. KUZMARAiman Kuzmar is an assistant professor of engineering at Penn State Fayette, the Eberly Campus. He holds aPh. D. degree from Duke University. He has a Master’s degree from Rice University. His B. S. is from theUniversity of Petroleum and Minerals in Saudi Arabia. All of His degrees are in civil engineering. His industrialexperience includes working as an Engineer for the NCDOT. He is a registered engineer in North Carolina
Paper ID #47674Work In Progress: Torque, Engineering Students, and the Conceptual Shiftfrom External to Internal ForcesMr. Joseph Patrick Coughlin, University of Colorado Denver J. Patrick Coughlin is a doctoral student at the University of Colorado Denver working on Engineering and Engineering Education topics. Patrick taught for nine years in a technology university as an adjunct teacher with interest in early student course work and how students adjust between classes. He is a registered Professional Engineer (PE) in the state of Colorado.Dr. Heather Lynn Johnson Heather Lynn Johnson is a mathematics educator who
and Engineering Education in Illinois.Hannah Dougherty, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Hannah Dougherty is an Academic Advisor and Coordinator of International Programs for International Programs in Engineering in the Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). She coordinates programming for virtual global experiences, faculty-led programs, student organizations and other non-traditional study abroad opportunities while also advising students. She also leads faculty-led programs over breaks and oversees the Global Engineering Ambassador (GEA) program. She holds a BS and a MS from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In 2019, Hannah completed a
;M University - Corpus Christi)James Derek HoganBarbara Szczerbinska (Professor) (Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Designing International Research Experiences to Engage Underrepresented Minority Undergraduates and Introduce Them to Graduate SchoolIn 1991, the Texas A&M University System was funded by the National Science Foundation(NSF) as one of the first six Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation (LSAMP). “Theoverall goal of the LSAMP program is to help diversify the nation's STEM workforce by fundinginstitutions of
Education, 2021 ASEE 2021 Annual Conference & Exposition, 27-30 June 2021, Long Beach, California, USA A Critical Thinking Paradigm for Materials and Manufacturing EducationAbstractEngineering can be broadly defined as the application of scientific principles to the design andmanufacture of useful products. Product complexity is increasing due to rapid advancements inengineering and technology, and continued induction of innovative techniques and products. Keyskills required for successful engineering today include the ability to solve complex and open-ended problems, and independent and critical thinking. Critical thinking (CT) can be describedas objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgement
adaptable whichis one of the demands that industry makes of colleges. Put another way how do schoolsprepare workers cope with technological change? One of us has argued that adaptabilitydepends on a liberal education that has an epistemological basis of the kind proposed byNewman for the enlargement of the mind and has shown how engineering fits into the model[16]. Another way of considering adaptability is to look at it from the perspective of thetransfer of knowledge and skill. For example, a person may be faced with taking a job thatrequires substantially different skills and attitudes to those developed in that person’seducation or their career to date. If the individual can transfer relevant elements of their skillset they may be able to more
increased and prioritized their awareness Perspective taking and Cultural Diversity. The open-ended questions showed that students valued Personal and Social Responsibility and Applying Knowledge to Contemporary Global Context. • Activities that triggered the relevance of an item were class activities, course content, desire to improve their professional skills, immigration to the United States, curiosity, global challenges (e.g. global warming), feelings of inadequacy, real word engineering activity, international academic experience, moving to a new city, religious engagement, job hunt, socialization, and volunteering opportunities. • Goals set by students include volunteering, learning about global
1 Session XXXX Activities to Promote Discussions about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion among International Engineering Graduate Students Marsha Phillips, Lacy White, Mia K. Markey Biomedical Engineering Department The University of Texas at Austin AbstractInternational engineering graduate students often report that they lack knowledge about racialidentity in the US and that they feel left out of diversity conversations in higher education. Likewise