community business adjacent to the estuary that willprevent excess garbage from reaching the river by up-cycling the waste into domestic products.This project aims to embody the cultural identity, values, and assets of the community inestablishing its unique up-cycling solution based on the Waste-for-Life method co-developed bySMSE faculty member and team co-supervisor Dr. Caroline Baillie.[https://www.wasteforlife.org/].Other community partners that have engaged with ExSJ include an afterschool STEM programon the Kumeyaay Viejas Band Reservation; Advancing Students Forward, a bi-national non-profit that provides financial and academic enrichment for students in middle school throughcollege in Colonia Tecolote, Tijuana; and a Blind Community Center
Mechanics CoursesAbstractStudents often find it tempting and expedient to rely on input from outside sources to completehomework problems which, unfortunately, bypasses the type of engagement required for reallearning. Current brain science informs us of the importance of the retrieval process and spacedrepetition. When students passively observe others solving problems, or merely re-copy lecturenotes and solutions, they are not engaging in the necessary retrieval process for their learning toenter long-term memory. And, when students do six to eight hours of homework just one night aweek, they know they are exerting a lot of effort, but may not realize their study practices don'tprovide the necessary spacing to cement new connections in their
thatrange from personal to municipal to national needs [1]. The ability for future engineers to workin multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary environments will be an essentialcompetency [2]. Furthermore, with greater emphasis being placed on understanding the social,economic and environmental impacts of engineered solutions, another essential competency isthe cognitive flexibility to think about the whole system at different levels of fidelity and indifferent time scales [3, 4]. Undergraduate education must train students to not only solveengineering challenges that transcend disciplinary boundaries, but also communicate, transferknowledge, and collaborate across technical and non-technical boundaries. One approach toachieving
faculty and engineers from localcompanies. The team’s goal is to meet the deliverables required by the proposal or statement ofwork. The semester culminates with a formal presentation of results evaluated by a professionalpanel of practitioners and a final report substantiating the results and findings.Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) seniors are tasked to solve multi-disciplinaryproblems based on a statement of work initiated by a sponsoring local company. ElectronicEngineering Technology (EET) projects originate internally in the form of proposals developedjointly by students and faculty with the objective being to design, construct and test a prototypesystem.A quality project requires faculty, sponsors and students to weigh a number of
coursehave helped us understand many of these issues, more detail of which can be found in [7]. Timemanagement was the most common problem identified throughout the semester. The onlinefeedback showed many students were self-aware of the problems that were impacting theirlearning. The instructor often reached out to them or pointed them to university resources.Learning disabilities self-identified in the first-week assessment “Tell me something non-technical about yourself” have included dyslexia, autism spectrum, ADHD, color blindness,PTSD, and mild or profound deafness. The Center for Persons with Disabilities (CPD) providesspecific recommendations for student accommodations and advice on teaching strategies.Learning styles may also impact student
. Through his in- volvement in the UNR PRiDE Research Lab and engagement with the UNR and Northern Nevada STEM Education communities, he studied student motivation, active learning, and diversity; developed K-12 engineering education curriculum; and advocated for socioeconomically just access to STEM education. As a Ph.D. Candidate with the STRiDE Research Lab at Purdue University, Justin’s dissertation research focuses on the study of Intersectionality Theory and the intersectionality of socioeconomic inequality in engineering education, use of critical quantitative methodology and narrative inquiry to understand the complex stories of engineering students from traditionally minoritized backgrounds, and the pursuit of a
outreach programs and curricula have impacted hundreds of thousands of K-12 students nationwide. She is the co- founder and director of Georgia Tech’s K-12 InVenture Prize, a statewide invention competition, open to all students and teachers in Georgia. She earned her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign in 2007, and her Masters and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2009 and 2012. Dr. Moore received the Georgia Tech Teaching Effectiveness Award in 2018.Chalece Arial DelacoudraySunni Haag Newton (Senior Research Scientist) I am a Senior Research Scientist at Georgia Tech's Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC). I work on
dichotomy between the urban and the wild has beenthankfully less influential given the nature of the discipline – the production of spaces in whichwe will live and work. Environmental architecture thus can stand as a potentially importantcorrective to the prevailing green, anti-urban orthodoxy [8]. “Environmental architecture” mayalso represent one of our best hopes for insuring that broader aesthetic, moral and politicalimperatives for the human community do not get lost in our environmental science research toremake the world in a more sustainable form. Environmental architecture and design mustemphasize that turning green does not necessarily just mean reproducing the patterns of naturalsystems in human developments, or only narrowly
students’ professional lives. While, of course,engineers have been involved in high-profile cases, such as Roger Boisjoly of the Challengerdisaster or Jack Gillum of the Hyatt Regency walkways collapse, chances are that the ethicalchallenges our students will face will be of the more mundane, garden variety. These, while oflesser impact, may be a daily occurrence, and having students examine small cases thus may bemore useful to them later in their lives.The CasesOccasionally, while perusing the daily newspaper, one comes across accounts of molasses spills:in 1990, a ruptured tank in Loveland, Colorado, unleashed half a million gallons of steamingmolasses, closing nearby businesses;4 in 2003, a damaged pipeline in Wailuku, Hawaii, leaked50,000
these and other major public issues (privacy, democracy,education).” The Stanford STS description captures another role of STS, facilitatinginterdisciplinary dialogue: “STS provides an arena for dialogue among students of engineering,humanities, natural sciences and social sciences—a common ground where important cross-disciplinary studies transcending the gaps between the technical and non-technical fields are notmerely envisioned but practiced.” Finally, the University of Alberta description captures thenotion of STS examining “science and technology as social and cultural phenomena.”Technological Literacy as Defined by the Engineering Community The definition of technological literacy as it appears on the NAE technological
, mathematician, or engineer whohas made significant contributions to their field of interest, with a particular focus on their impacton engineering practice. Figure 1. Historical Figures Assignment WorkflowThe workflow of this assignment is outlined in Figure 1. Detailed instructions are summarizedbelow:o Select a Figure: (Week 6) Choose a scientist, mathematician, or engineer who has made significant contributions to their field, with a particular focus on their impact on engineering. Students may select someone from any era, but the chosen figures should be well- documented with substantial contributions to engineering.o Research: Conduct thorough research on the selected figure. Use a variety of sources such as books
group mentoring modelwas implemented remotely during this time. All interaction between the mentors and fellowswere conducted virtually including the professional development activities and webinars. Theteam of mentors typically included three or four professors in addition to the community collegeprofessor. As a team, they effectively engaged students who, in addition, supported each other intheir exploration of topics.The fellowship experience continued to be virtual due the ongoing pandemic for its third cohortin 2021. The group mentoring model adopted in the first virtual cohort was modified to includeimportant components from the original mentoring model while adhering to the requirements ofa virtual learning environment. A one on one
Enhance Learning and Teaching (TFLET),” University of Missouri System, [Task Force Report]., Jun. 2021.[3] S. D. Brookfield, “Using the lenses of critically reflective teaching in the community college classroom,” New Directions for Community Colleges, vol. 118, pp. 31–38, 2002, doi: 10.1002/cc.61.[4] A. R. Brown, C. Morning, and C. Watkins, “Influence of African American engineering student perceptions of campus climate on graduation rates,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 263–271, 2005.[5] L. Deslauriers, L. S. McCarty, K. Miller, K. Callaghan, and G. Kestin, “Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom,” Proceedings of the National
for the Course Design Institute and faculty development workshops on Equity in Collaborative Learning, Universal Design for Learning (UDL), and Specifications Grading. As former Director of Undergraduate Research for the UVA School of Engineering and Applied Science, Brian created Starting an Undergraduate Research Experience (SURE), a student-led program to lower barriers to entry in research experiences for 1st-year engineering students. Brian has received the Harold S. Morton Teaching Prize for excellence in 1st- and 2nd-year teaching in engineering, and he is a BMES Fellow. Brian is co-founder and Deputy Editor in Chief of the journal Biomedical Engineering Education. Brian’s science and engineering research
models for thinking about gender and race in the context of engineering education. She was recently awarded a CAREER grant for the project, ”Learning from Small Numbers: Using personal narratives by underrepresented undergraduate students to promote institutional change in engineering education.”Jordana Hoegh, Purdue University Jordana Hoegh, M.S., is a doctoral student in the Department of Sociology at Purdue University. Her research interests include early adult life course and transitions, self and identity, sociology of the family, work and organizations, and social networks. She is currently conducting her dissertation research on the role of motherhood in the career paths of women with engineering
implications of hands-on software and hardware learning approaches for developing engineering identity and fostering engineering persistence in students. Additionally, she is part of a research team funded by the National Science Foundation that aims to design and develop gamified activities to teach hardware principles at high school and undergraduate levels with a focus on equity principles.Eric Wright, University of Florida PhD student in quantitative research methodology in education at the University of Florida, former eLearning instructional designer and developer. Primary interest is in critical theory approaches to quan- titative research. ©American Society for Engineering Education
engineering andwhat motivated them towards developing equity-minded educational practices for theirundergraduate students. The five faculty participants provided written reflections on how theirlife and professional experiences have informed said practices. From a social constructionismparadigm and using narrative inquiry methodology, a combination of in vivo and descriptivecoding (first cycle) followed by emergent and focused coding (second cycle) were used by thefirst three authors to generate a codebook. The theoretical frameworks of Community CulturalWealth, LatCrit, and Hidden Curriculum guided the data analysis and interpretation process.Two layers of member-checking were conducted amongst the last two authors as well asadditional Latiné/x
and with people. Engineering for peopleincludes practices such as maximizing stakeholder involvement [11], prioritizing problemidentification and framing in the context of stakeholder needs [12], considering societal,economical, and environmental design impacts [13], and considering ethical design impacts [14].Engineering for people includes maximizing stakeholder involvement while also promotingcollaboration among design team members [15] and emphasizing well-being and care [16, 17].Furthermore, engaging students in HCED practices connects to constructivism, experientiallearning, and situated learning [18]. Engagement in HCED can prepare students for a diverse,collaborative workplace and help them to balance technical and subjective design
interests include engineering education that contextualizes engineering sciences and design, exploring engineering boundaries for inclusive pedagogy, and sustainability and bio-inspired design in the built environment.Prof. Gordon D Hoople, University of San Diego Dr. Gordon D. Hoople is an assistant professor and one of the founding faculty members of integrated engineering at the University of San Diego. He is passionate about creating engaging experiences for his students. His work is primarily focused on two ar ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Placating Whiteness in Engineering: Operating Under Fear as a Result of Whiteness and the Urgent Need to Achieve Racial
collaboration platform and evaluatestudents’ perceptions regarding the utility of Miro for performing virtual ideation in collaborativeprojects are evaluated. This study also explores connections between students’ cognitive andemotional engagement while using Miro. Secondary objectives include 1) evaluating students’mastery of (or competence in) subject- and related design-thinking contents when using Miroand 2) interrogating students’ perceived degree of psychological safety in a virtual collaborativeenvironment (in terms of communication, cooperation, engagement, and permittedfailure/experimentation). This study seeks to answer the following research question: How didthe use of Miro impact groups’ virtual collaboration and students’ perception of
- resourced institutions and favor more selective institutions, even when the quality of proposals from different institutional types is equivalent […]”Approximately 5 percent of respondents spoke of the difficulty to find collaborators for researchprojects with compatible research goals and experience in proposal development. Onerespondent spoke of the difficulty of “finding collaborators from institutions that really want tocollaborate and not just use our institution as their ‘broader impact’.”Other issues raised by respondents included issues facing community colleges interested inresearch funding, not yet having the opportunity to apply for research funds, previously failedproposals, and a feeling of discouragement to apply for funding
to campus, the selected participants are involved in team building exercisesfollowed by collaborative hands-on laboratory research experiences in one of many engineeringdisciplines. SEI participants also engage in computer science programming classes, engagingdiscussions about entrepreneurship and engineering disciplines with graduate students, faculty,and invited speakers. Field excursions and tours of the historical campus were also incorporatedinto the schedule to allow participants to become acclimated to the campus. Additional highlightsof LEAD-SEI are the interactive chemistry laboratories, evening fireside chats with industryexecutives, late night laboratory collaborations, and guided site visits to corporations such asGoogle and NASA
and Mechanical and Energy Engineering havebeen engaged in a dialogue to mitigate this constraint, by combining a number of required courses in Mathematics. fundamental subjects of a normal mechanical engineering curriculum. • Career/technical electives: These are truly elective courses, chosen by the students. The courses that are offered include a number of courses on energy-related subjects, advanced materials science and technology, mechanics and design practice. A recommended course in this category is a course on Entrepreneurship, offered by the College of Business. C. The Mechanical and Energy Engineering curriculum:Taking into account the programmatic constraints of the curriculum
retreat. Further, the School’s external advisory board was engaged fordetailed conversations about potential philanthropic priorities. A core team was established tolead the development of the strategic plan. This group included faculty, staff, two graduatestudents, two undergraduate students, and one alumna. The group was diverse in terms of age,expertise, gender, ethnic group, role, and other attributes.Stakeholder engagement was an important and intentional aspect of the planning process.School leadership purposely engaged with numerous groups of constituents - faculty, staff,undergraduate students, graduate students, recent alumni, industry partners, advisory boards, andthe College of Engineering Dean’s office. Modes of engagement included
presentation skills? Why or why not? What could be done to improve your oral presentation skills? ABET Criterion 3h: the need for abroad education necessary to understand the impact ofengineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context is met throughCSM’s system and stem courses and many of the junior and senior PE courses. Minimalsupporting evidence is necessary or provided in the supplemental document. ABET Criterion 3i: a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-longlearning is demonstrated based on six data sets including the preparation of “Individual Life-Long Learning Plans” by students, alumni surveys, research activities, student involvement instudent professional groups
COMPARATIVE BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS1. Abstract Overcoming challenges and transitioning from school to work is particularly problematicfor individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, presenting significant issues for both the labormarket and vocational training institutions. Due to the lack of research addressing the careermaturity and distinctive obstacles faced by this population, this paper endeavors to investigateperformance disparities within the machining field. The specific focus is on assessing whetherhearing loss may impact students' machining performance. Considering the essential humancapabilities for perception in machining, especially in industrial settings, encompass a range offaculties
-based approach. A course evaluation is presented to answer the following evaluation questionsAs applied to this course to what degree and in what ways does problem-based service-learning 1. Improve student perceptions of their project management and engineering design skills? 2. Improve student perceptions of their learning in the course? 3. Affect student aspirations in their careers and in their communities? 4. Impact student personal values and potential for future civic engagement?A total of 540 freshman engineering students enrolled during the Fall 2018 semester with 376students fully completing the course evaluation. The purpose of the evaluation was to assess thequality of the service-learning experience for the class in
-saving behaviors of students in Fukushima, Tokyo, andKyoto/ Nagasaki. Students in Fukushima scored lower than those in Tokyo due to two keyfactors. First, Fukushima consistently performed the lowest on Japan’s National EducationalAchievement Test among regions assessed for energy literacy. Second, the economic, social, andeducational disadvantages of a region may reduce community engagement with environmentalissues. These findings highlighted the critical influence of socioeconomic factors on energyliteracy and the necessity for region-specific assessment to address local challenges effectively.In the U.S., only a few state- or region-level comparative analyses have been reported overthe past 15-20 years, but not on a grand scale. One study[14
students improve their oral communication and public speaking skills. The team also did a small exercise to (30 minutes) engage students in a demonstration of some of the simple yet effective tips. Activity 2 – Town Hall The first group presented their views by discussing facts and Meeting Part 1: First numbers to justify their stand. Emphasis was on presenting fact- group presents in favor of based information regardless of their individual feelings about the the topic (2 minutes per team) topic that was assigned. Activity 2 – Town Hall The second group presented their views in
projects outside of school that involved a lot of community engagement, and I feel as though the Innovation Experience helped me sharpen certain skills like collaborative work, idea proposing, and presentation skills.”ConclusionThe INNOV program boosted students’ confidence, risk-taking, and motivation in STEM. Itfostered self-expression, encouraged innovation, and pushed students beyond their comfort zones.Participants recognized the program’s impact on their professional growth and academiccommitment. Lessons learned are now applied to similar student populations to enhance success.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science under Grant No. 2030297.Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or