creation of new knowledge, products, practices or designs, or engagement with the community. Cultural: Faculty activities that help foster a just, equitable, inclusive and culturally competent school and university community.These areas of impact are closely aligned with the mission and vision of the SoE and UD.Formative capacity of proposed document: As mentioned above, a key objective in developinga new P&T document is to create procedures, policies and tools that would aid in theprofessional development of the faculty, such that the P&T document serves as both a formativeand evaluative tool. One way that the proposed document seeks to accomplish this is byspecifically defining the mentoring and coaching
asresearchers to understand departmental transformations and their impacts. The first author is anundergraduate researcher, the second author is an engineering education scholar and the PARmentor in this study, and the third author is the principal investigator of the larger study. Byactively experiencing what they also researched, the first author used the participation to askquestions relevant to the student community. With that in mind, this research was designed toaddress the need to assess the effectiveness of the PFE courses in achieving its goals ofequipping students with professional and problem-solving competencies. We present this work-in-progress study by qualitatively investigating the experiences of current EE students andalumni who are
future direction of the course.Service learning is defined as a teaching method that combines classroom instruction withvaluable community interactions to provide for the mutual benefit of all. At its core, this involvesreflection on how the experience might improve critical thinking skills, increase student civicengagement, help to achieve learning objectives, impact the community or community partner,and/or provide for reciprocity between student and the community [2,3]. The course waschanged to teach all of its course objectives as part of the semester long service-learning project.Students opted into their project of choice from five options, spending half of their semesterdesigning and the other half fabricating deliverables. Service
educational environments (e.g., [1], [2]). One of the student outcomes in the ABET criteriaincludes “an ability to function effectively on a team” and to “create a collaborative andinclusive environment” [3, p. 6]. Creating classroom cultures where students feel included andsupported is crucial for students’ sense of belonging, identities as scientists and engineers,learning, and persistence in STEM [4]–[9]. Through creating inclusive environments in ourclasses, we can help our students learn to engage in effective, respectful, and equitablecollaboration. Even further, we can empower students to examine who has access to, and isincluded in, the scientific community. To that end, we consider investigations of who doesphysics to be a part of physics
. Instead of bemoaning the normative complexity introduced by global science and engineering, ethicists can use the diversity of norms to lead richer discussions of the ethics of science and engineering on the whole. This “windfall” of difference and contrast is something that is cherished in the ethics classroom. The best discussions of ethical issues almost always occur when students (respectfully) disagree. The ethics of science and engineering can also benefit from some disagreement—under the assumption that this is part of a process that is headed towards the convergence and acceptance of norms of research and practice, and not the opposite
curriculumintroducing AMR to upper elementary students (grades 3-5) that integrates interactive tools,aiming to enhance students' understanding of microbiological and public health concepts. Thiscase study assessment focuses on the curriculum's impact on students' ability to understand anddisseminate AMR knowledge, as observed by instructors and classroom observers, and oncurriculum ease-of-use for non-expert instructors. Methods involve interviews and observationsto gather comprehensive data for a qualitative analysis of the course's design and impact.Findings reveal the curriculum's effectiveness in integrating complex scientific topics into earlyeducation, employing a variety of teaching techniques to cater to different learning styles. Thestudy also
for educators and policymakers to enhance AI literacy among kindergarten teachers.IntroductionEducation, one of the industries most significantly impacted by rapid advancements in artificialintelligence (AI), is on the brink of a revolution. Since the introduction of generative AItechnologies in 2022, as demonstrated by ChatGPT and other platforms, the potential of thesetools to revolutionize a range of educational processes has come to light more and more [1]. AIenables a revolutionary change in education by utilizing its powers in data analysis, patternrecognition, and personalized feedback. In addition to improving teaching strategies, thistechnology is changing how students learn, encouraging participation and comprehension [2, 3
organization within the university structure, hiring of studentmentors, recruiting other faculty, recruitment of students, and more. Strategies to overcome someof these issues will be presented.IntroductionA key challenge addressing many universities as well as the current workforce is the attraction ofstudents to the science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields[1], [2]. This challengeneeds to be addressed at all levels of K-12 education. This is important especially due toincreased reliance on technology, and number of trained professionals not keeping up withdemand [3], [4]. As a result, it is imperative that we engage with K-12 students encouragingthem to pursue interests in STEM. STEM summer camps can lessen the impact of
accompanied by a set of practice exercises. Theseapplications are currently being tested within the co-requisite model employed by XXX andYYY in spring and summer 2024 for pre-calculus I math. Data on students' motivation andknowledge gains will be collected to evaluate the efficacy of these applications in assistingstudents aspiring to STEM majors. The research utilizes a design experiment approach,emphasizing an iterative cycle of development, refinement, and evaluation, with the goal of bothimproving the applications and understanding their impact on students' STEM outcomes.This research was funded by the National Science Foundation, Grant # xxxxxxxReferences:[1] K.G. Ricks, J.A. Richardson, H.P. Stern, R. P. Taylor, and R. A. Taylor. “ An
difficult to engage in pursuitsoutside of traditional academia with the context of the traditional model of academia and thatfaculty not being positioned to appropriately evaluate products from an “external experience”(Porter & Phelps, 2014).REEFE Path ForwardIn Fall 2018, the REEFE team ran a third iteration of the REEFE program. One graduate studentfrom Purdue worked with the Department of Engineering Design at Rose-Hulman Institute ofTechnology during this time period. We are in the process of recruiting for a fourth iteration ofthe REEFE program for Fall 2019. We hope have one graduate student work with theDepartment of Mechanical Engineering at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. We are working to analyzethe impact of the REEFE program on graduate
Associate Teaching Professor and the Vice-Chair for Undergraduate Education in the Computer Science and Engineering Department at UC San Diego. In addition to research related to Automata Theory and Computability education, she works on projects that support professionalization pathways for students, including industry internships, TA development, and ethics and communication. Her research and teaching have work has been supported by grants and awards from UC San Diego, NSF, and industry partners.Kristen Vaccaro, University of California San Diego Kristen Vaccaro is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science & Engineering at the University of Cali- fornia San Diego, where she is also a member of the Design Lab. Her
tostudent learning that may go unnoticed without careful observation.In our efforts to understand the classroom and school level factors that affect successfulimplementation of EarSketch in computer science classrooms, models were created to explaincertain observed behaviors in the classroom. Using Causal Loop Diagrams (CLD’s), a tool fromsystems engineering and operations research, we have identified reinforcing feedback loops thatcan result in ‘virtuous’ or ‘vicious’ cycles of student learning with respect to programming. Inboth cases, the students appear engaged with the activity, but in some cases, fixation on the artspiece, in this case the music, supersedes the students’ active learning of programming andcomputational thinking practices (the
data between institutions, and promotion ofa sense of belonging in students [3], [13], [14], [16], [17], [18]. Additionally, GE@SF includesshared investment in student support services, physical collaboration and laboratory spaces onthe SF campus; UF faculty engagement and instruction at SF; and high-impact experientiallearning [19], [20]. Details of program structures are discussed below. These structures, whichrequired 4 years of careful collaborative planning between the two institutions, allow SF and UFto establish meaningful relationships, guidance, and support of students two or more years beforematriculation on the UF campus.Academic Transition and Support StructuresTo assist with the academic transition from high school to SF and from
perceived utility and potential impact on academic resourcemanagement. User feedback on the system's ease of use was overwhelmingly favorable,emphasizing TextCraft's user-friendly interface and streamlined process for textbookcustomization. Feedback on the system's effectiveness in meeting the need for finding relevantcourse materials was also largely positive, indicating that TextCraft successfully addresses one ofthe primary challenges faced by instructors and students. Users appreciated various features ofTextCraft, including its user-friendly interface, the relevance of book recommendations, and theinnovative approach to customizable textbook creation. The ability to compare and mergedifferent textbook chapters stood out as a unique benefit
best to be part of a team doing collaborative work online rather than inperson. Faculty also anticipated students might experience loss, grief, and other hardships thatnegatively impact performance and learning; they provided options for students in line with theseverity of the hardship. They communicated this in course policies so students understood theiroptions.Civic virtue. We found examples of civic virtue—typically demonstrated when one participatesresponsively and responsibly in one’s work in ways that show concern—that were content-centered or learner-centered. When faculty took a content-centered approach, they used lowstakes formative assessments to make instructional decisions. Faculty responsively revisitedinformation that was
, and we consider how many of the nation’s colleges and universities are caught in the crossfire of these competing goals. In the current climate, students all too often are the losers. Today, undergraduates are aggressively recruited. In glossy brochures, they’re assured that teaching is important, that a spirit of community pervades the campus, and that general education is the core of the undergraduate experience. But the reality is that, on far too many campuses, teaching is not well rewarded, and faculty who spend too much time counseling and advising students may diminish their prospects for tenure and promotion. Faculty are losing out, too. Research and publication have become the primary means by which most professors
public health. M.S. studentswith a complimentary skill set are considered, however, doctoral students arepreferred. Since 2007 students have conducted research in the small rural Bolivian Page 14.913.5communities of Palos Blancos, Sapecho, and San Antonio (located NE of La Paz near 3the Rio Beni River where the Andes begin to meet the Amazon) on topics related to:water supply and treatment, how communities select improvements in sanitationtechnology, the impact that land use has on water supply, and issues of willingness topay and public health. Research publications to date
based on the canons of Aristotelianrhetoric whereby you "tell them what you are going to tell them" (InSPIRESS), "tell them"(undergraduate science and engineering curriculum), "tell them what you told them" (seniordesign experience). As a result the InSPIRESS initiative seeks to communicate a context andpurpose to high school students whereby, they can better understand the purpose of thecoursework in their freshmen and sophomore of undergraduate engineering education. It alsohelps them develop a better understanding of the application of the theories they learn in theirearlier college years to their discipline specific coursework in their junior and senior years ofcollege. High School University
sense of community(5/15/26/36/18%), positively impacted motivation and engagement (11/20/23/33/14%), andbenefited academic integrity in the class (6/12/27/37/18%). The view that the peer oral examprovided for a richer course experience was similarly shared by many (7/16/27/36/13%). Overall,students who completed the questionnaire expressed encouraging support that peer oral exams beoffered in future remote offerings of the same course (6/16/24/36/18%), as well as in-personofferings (12/16/30/31/11%).Disaggregating the response data by gender and running WMW tests reveals female students(8/25/33/17/17%) felt significantly more nervous talking to their peer examiner than did theirmale (37/30/25/8/0%) classmates (z = –3.29, p = 0.0010), and also
organization focuses on how more female students can be encouraged and retained in theirprograms. The integrative approach to training should work well, not only for female students, but for allstudents. This training is designed to engage many traditional players in the engineering community and towork within existing structures to increase gender equity in a variety of current programs. The training methodsand results will be disseminated by a variety of Web-based tools. The Gender Equity Extension Service isunusual in that it brings expertise in both gender studies and research on science and engineering education tobear on the academic preparation of students from middle school to the sophomore year of college. The project
scores for the Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineeringcourse, and provide a summary of translational activities resulting from participation in this site,including information on the number and diversity of students impacted from these activities.Introduction“It is a sad reality that other young students from across the globe are clamoring to be admittedinto engineering schools, yet U.S. students, who spend much of their day talking on cell phonescreated by engineers, driving cars designed by engineers, and surfing the Internet made fasterand more engaging by engineers, are passing us by for other opportunities.” – Geoffrey C.Orsak1.While many educators or workers in STEM disciplines might nod in agreement at that statement,they might
critique the masculine construction andpractice of science itself, 5, 6 and call for a change in the ways science is accomplished.In this paper, we examine how one academic program focused on women in computing(FemProf), attempts to facilitate undergraduate Hispanic women‘s aspiration towards futureentrance into the professoriate. The research questions that guide our analysis are: 1. How do participants engage with the social, cultural, and relational resources that are a part of FemProf as they develop (or do not develop) identities as (present and future) research scientists, and future professors? 2. In what ways do women critique the practice of science in their learning community/communities (if
integratetechnical and professional skills and knowledge in their development as an engineer [1]”. Inaddition, engineering students’ involvement in activities outside of the classroom, such asstudent competition teams, contributes to their achievement of numerous other outcomes;according to Simmons, et al, engagement with these activities enhances students’ “career andprofessional development, communication and leadership development, intellectualdevelopment, personal and social development, academic and social engagement, interculturalcompetence, satisfaction with college experiences, and college belonging and persistence inmajor and college [2]”. Working on a competition team, therefore, contributes to thedevelopment of students’ design and build skills
untilafter tenure to try starting a family to ensure that its impact on their careers is minimal.However, the biological clock is unrelenting. As we delay the time to family, healthconsiderations such as fertility issues and high-risk pregnancies become more of a reality.Although modern medicine can help with some of these problems, it has yet to extend the periodof time to menopause. In addition to these concerns, I began thinking practically: Will I haveenough energy for childrearing as an older parent? Will I be able to enjoy grandchildren?No one can decide for you what alarm clock you will answer. It is an individual choice, andultimately you must live with the consequences of that choice. However, I would like to presentsome guiding principles
, CriticalThinking, and Problem-Solving. This course is offered every semester in large blended face-to-face/online sections to an annual total of 1060 students. After teaching the course for 11 semesters, weidentified several challenges with the data literacy assignments: 1. The assignments did not have students create data visualizations, an important element of communicating about data. 2. The assignments had too many elements, resulting in students focusing on formulaic assignment elements while avoiding doing the critical thinking to make arguments with data. 3. Assignments developed to address the diversity of student backgrounds and experiences were not engaging to students and often required them to research and
his PhD in mechanical engineering from Carnegie Mellon University in 2003. His areas of research interest include engineering education, computational design, and manufacturing.Dr. Anneliese Watt, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Anneliese Watt is a professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She teaches and re- searches technical and professional communication, rhetoric and composition, medicine in literature, presidential election rhetoric and other humanistic studies for engineering and science students. Her current work focuses on engineering design.Mr. Bill Riley, Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College Bill Riley is Assistant Professor of English at Saint Mary-of-the-Woods College near Terre Haute
utilizing their developing engineering skills in the service of others.In total, providing the opportunity to make friends and integrate into a larger community thatshared similar values sums up how EPBEL engaged students. One unique contribution fromthese findings is that EPBEL is an especially impactful engagement activity for students.Relatively speaking, there can be a high barrier of entry into the activity as the peer groupexpects non-trivial minimum levels of dedication that need to be balanced with a difficultcurricular load. However, it is that higher barrier to entry that likely led to such high qualityinvolvement and integration for students, which, in turn, provided an environment ripe forpersistence, social development, and learning
transportation networks, and test hypotheses aboutthe effects of various driver behavioral, land use, and network decision on resulting traffic levelsand future network improvement decisions. As part of the learning experience offered by thiscourse, students have also applied their skills and knowledge gained from classrooms into a real-life service-learning project. The project was to use the learned theory in traffic models andemploy simulation to evaluate traffic operations along an important urban corridor in Hartford interms of existing, future, and future with improvement scenarios. The study results werepresented and communicated to the community public. It is believed that the simulationtechnology-enhanced learning activities can de-emphasize
(engineeringskills, team work, leadership, communication, etc.) The course culminates with student projectpresentations, including a poster, a formal report, and a demonstration of their design project. Wewill describe how the experiences gained in the laboratory provide a foundation for a one-semester mechatronics-based design project.IntroductionThe academic success of engineering students can be positively impacted by introductorymaterial that provides practical hands-on experience with design tools and concepts. Using anobjective ‘Introduction to Engineering’ course as a tool to increase academic performance sawexceptional success as an outreach to underprivileged minority groups in the 1980s1 and hassince expanded to encompass students from all walks
technological gap, the University of Southern Maine has developed a CubeSatdesign competition targeting grade 6-8 and 9-12 students to engage participants in collaborativeSTEM learning. In this program, teams of 1-15 students from school districts across Mainecreate a unique science or technology demonstration mission and use the engineering designprocess to design and build a CubeSat meeting the mission requirements under cost, performanceand time constraints. Teams are judged on their mission success and ability to communicateresults to a broad audience. Teams are provided learning workshops in the design process,computer-aided design, computer programming and fundamental science during the competition.Methodologies, outcomes and assessment tools are