future. The instructor wasable to catch conceptual gaps as they occurred and reduced the probability for students todevelop robust misconceptions. The Take Away Point asked students to identify the content,skill, or piece of knowledge or learning found to be most valuable from the class. This allowedthem to see relevance of content in their daily lives and build stronger connections betweencontent and real world applications. The instructor began to see what students want to do withknowledge from the course. This gave the instructor insight as to how best frame content, whichhad implications of higher student motivation and self efficacy. Near the middle of the semester,a fourth point was added. The Learn about Learning Point asked students to
as well as more recent instances where UPRM engineering professors and their students, actively promoted energy policy changes. Collaborations with Social Sciences professors were vital as well as the creation of a university energy institute. The discussion includes a description of a traditional university-based consulting effort for a state agency that had key participation from graduate students. New courses on energy policy and on social and ethical issues delivered to graduate and undergraduate electrical engineering students are described, including a synchronous web delivery of the policy course to law students. The energy policy entrepreneurship was taken to the real world with the creation and leadership of a multi-sector energy
controversy exercise used the NISP case study as abasis for discussing ethics and sustainability issues. It was hoped that grounding the discussionof ethics and sustainability in this real-world example might be more compelling then discussingethical concepts in an abstract manner. The discussion first touched briefly on microethics,although there were minimal issues of this kind. Thus, the bulk of the discussion revolved aroundmacroethical ideas that related to the situation. This included considerations of environmentalethics, anthropocentric vs. non-anthropocentrism, utilitarianism, etc. Two of the students in theclass had extensive knowledge of ethical issues, based on full ethics courses they had taken aselectives. The majority of the other
Page 7.797.4 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationOnce a client is accepted for full Incubator support, a graduate student is assigned to the client forone year or more in order to perform on-campus research targeted at developing proof-of-concept for the client’s idea. As their work is completed, students can play an enormouslyconstructive role by carrying out theses on subjects that can provide the data on which a smallbusiness can be formed.During all of this interaction, graduate students gain experience in real-world commercializationsituations, and simultaneously provide benefit to the area
reported use of responses that do not include these words.Mixed Methods Research Question: In what ways does the qualitative data gathered via interviews extend and elaborate quantitative and qualitative survey findings regarding how teachers respond to students whose designs were unsuccessful or how teachers used fail words?These questions and hypotheses represent a continuation of a multi-year study in which students’and teachers’ responses to and reflections on design failures in the classroom are investigated aspart of the aforementioned E4 Project.Methods This study has been shaped by both pragmatic and constructivist worldviews. Pragmatismis a “real-world, practice oriented approach.”43 It links thought
of ethical dilemmas may be a promising means ofconstructing experiential learning modules in engineering ethics.Researchers have explored several lesson or activity design approaches for ethics experientiallearning. Spierre et al. [18] and Voss [19], for instance, describe leveraging students’ participationin games or game-like scenarios. Kim et al. [12] and Ochs et al. [20] propose utilizing students’experiences in real workplace environments, such as internships. And Golecki and Bradley [17]describe leveraging the context of a capstone design course. Despite their variety, these approachesshare a common foundation: leveraging students’ personal experiences as a setting for ethicalreasoning, such as through requiring students to evaluate
remain in public education and preparing teachers to design and develop teaching and learning opportunities that encourage students to take risks, inquire across multiple disciplines, and participate in real-world challenges. Liesl received her B.S. in Middle Education and M.S. in Educational Technology, both from Radford University. She received her doctorate in instructional design and technology from Virginia Tech.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Tech Lisa D. McNair is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as co-Director of the VT Engineering Communication Center (VTECC) and CATALYST Fellow at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research
intense desire to change the way engineers interact with techniciansand practice engineering themselves. His experiences as a student, intern and now practicingengineer cause him to believe that engineers do better work when they have to build andmanipulate real things in the real world, rather than simply abstract representations on paper. Butdoing that requires a willingness to talk with and learn from people who work with their handsand install and maintain the systems designed by engineers. “I’m interested in being in theirworld, getting muddy, getting dirty, touching ball valves. Being hands on helps buildrelationships,” he explained. He thinks his dad would be proud of him for being the better kindof engineer who listens to technicians.FoKs
experiences for undergraduate students that simulate professional “real world”problems creates a natural tension with the obligation to teach course content and skills. Thepressure by employers to produce graduates who are better prepared to work on multidisciplinaryteams is one reason faculty incorporate student project teams into their courses. Yet, mimickingthe professional world may produce performance measures that value product quality overindividual learning in the classroom. Professional settings, which value efficiency and highquality, expect employees to be specialists (depth at the expense of breadth). Educators valuecontent and conceptual mastery with an appropriate balance of depth and breath. Anotherdifficulty with adopting the
well designed robotics program requires students to use a combination of several engineering disciplines (electrical, mechanical, …) as well as both mathematics and science in order to be successful. This is rewarding because it demonstrates to the students the “real-world” aspects of fields that are often only taught from a conceptual, non-applied standpoint. Robotic programs are team-oriented. The social aspects of working as a group to design, implement and compete serve to enhance the experience for most students. Not only are robotic programs fun but they help students identify the rewarding attributes of technology careers.Two examples of robotics programs that have been extremely
connections to real-world applications of course content. Research shows that a focus onautonomy in course projects engages students, specifically their curiosity and motivation.Furthermore, autonomy enhances inclusion in the classroom, as students can explore topics ofinterest while creating content in ways personally meaningful to them. In addition to theemphasis on autonomy and inclusion, the creation of museum exhibits promotes sciencecommunication in new ways for students, which leads to enhanced value creation. Within theclass project, students must create EMEs for a general audience, with a live showcase featuringinterdisciplinary judges from across campus. This work will highlight the EME projectassignment, its ties to the Kern
covered in the middle and high schools are the same;however, the content for the high school was taught at a higher level compared to the middleschool grades. The correlation between the NASA STEM contents and the existing NGSSS-based lesson plans is shown for Grade 6 Math and Science in Table 2.Table 1: NASA-STEM Content with Emphasis on Remote Sensing Module Subjects Type Grades Existing/ Source New Real world/launchpad Engineering, Educational 6-12 Existing NASA (selective videos and Technology, videos eClips discussions
need strong content knowledge andthe ability to change their pedagogy. Research in science education has demonstrated thatteachers who participated in professional development programs with a strong content matterfocus positively influenced the achievement of their students7-9. Other research has shown thatstrong content knowledge is necessary for the development of teacher pedagogical contentknowledge10-12. In terms of student interest and learning in science, achievement has beencorrelated to the use of relevance (to student lives) and real world examples13-14.Positive attitudestowards science have been linked to increased student achievement15 and appear to be related toa deeper level of learning because of increased interest16.Research has
) Page 23.758.13 Figure 7. Pre-reading materials: examples of embedded, practical exercises Figure 8. Pre-reading materials: sample codes expressing OOP concepts (Sierra, 2005)Peer-to-Peer Interactive Discussions. On the first day, the first interactive discussion sectionpairs the students as two-person teams. The two-person teams interact with real-world devices Page 23.758.14and creations, i.e., show-n-tell, relating the topics of the course to everyday life. The instructorleads the discussion on how programming / algorithms play a role in devices and creations withthe groups for 15 minutes. The devices and creations
the existing literature, engineering internships werealso seen as integral to students developing leadership skills and career preparation in this study.Internships have been found to promote career preparation and leadership development instudents by facilitating real world and hands-on experience and application of knowledge [9],[29], [30]. Further research emphasizes the importance of students engaging in non-engineeringOOCAs in order to facilitate interdisciplinary teams that can help students to develop leadershipskills such as interdisciplinary competence [28]. Consider the example of our participant Shelby,whose engagement in a volunteer organization and part-time job at a bagel shop allowed her toengage in activities she was truly
possible communication mediums necessitated theprogram to identify a narrower subset of these skills to focus on. Therefore, SciComm wascreated with oral communication in mind and trained participants on both verbal and visualdelivery. The program content also touched on presentations across STEM employment sectors,providing a career exploration opportunity as well. The SciComm program was a 2-semester, intensive program funded by NSF (#1645058)designed to provide STEM PhD students scientific communication training paired with real-life,immersive opportunities to put that training into practice. The goals of the program weretwofold: 1. To equip PhD students with training and experience to effectively communicate their research
into practice”. Those whohold this view believe that the application of a “correct” mathematical structural analysis willenable the accurate prediction of the stresses and strains in a structure under load and the designof the structural members can then follow.However, structural analysis is just one component of the design process. Analysis of a structuredoes not occur until after numerous design decisions have been made, many of them based onthe economics of the particular structural problem. Practicing structural engineers know thatgood structural design depends on numerous other factors or types of knowledge apart frommathematical structural analysis. Some examples are:· Rules of thumb· The numerous empirical data and rules associated
expected experiences [5]. Within the workplace,professionals use informal learning for continuing education, seeking help, gathering information,finding support or feedback, collaborating, and gaining further experience in both their career andprivate lives [24, 25]. However, despite research showing the benefits of informal learningopportunities, many individuals and organizations push for formal education over informal ormixed educational pathways [26].Informal Learning Informal education and opportunities in STEM help bridge the gap betweenformal education and real-world experiences and foster continuing education throughout a careerand beyond [27, 28]. Specifically within computer science education (CSEd), active learningtechniques like
acceptable results for different lumped mass and column height (i.e., different columnstiffness) values. Thus, they learnt how models can be calibrated to represent the real system. This REU group strongly felt that with the constant threat that earthquakes provide andthe limited academic courses offered on this subject, there should be an increased emphasis oneducation in this area. By introducing and exciting students of all ages into the area of seismicstudies, they might be encouraged to pursue this area of study further at a university level. Theneed for more research and study in this area is evident with the massive destruction thatcontinues to follow earthquakes all over the world. Important research contributions have beenmade in
understanding of fieldswhich particularly touch upon the origin, nature, purpose and destiny of humanity. So,the Christian is not bound to make his ethic globally acceptable, rather to live and actaccording to his principle (challenge enough). Next, the global ethic is a mirage. World civilizations simply have not heldcongruent ethical views across a broad front. Historian George Marsden notes thatsecular perspectives prove no more sure at providing the sought after consensus: “attempts to extend the empirical model of natural science to other fields of academic inquiry have failed to unite people on the larger questions concerning society and human relationships. Contemporary [secular] academia is just as divided on
discussed real-world examples of of tech, such bias and explored how hiring technology can be improved to process, minimize negative effects. etc. Groups of 3-4 students were assigned Case a different part of a case study studies/ regarding inequities in academia. The Examples four sections were: entrance to (provided) college, entrance to graduate school, 7 on impact 3 4-6 post-doc/faculty hiring, and the
and manufactured their own key chains. Under the supervision of theinstructor, participants learned to design a key chain, develop a method of machining, selecttools, and write a CNC program to manufacture it. They then observed the instructor set up theCNC turning center and machine their own key chains, cut out of 1 inch round aluminum.In the segment survey, participants indicated that the projects were enjoyable and valuable.Mathematics workshops: The mathematics workshops were entitled Tools of Technology in theNew Millennium: Mathematics for the Real World. Participants in each group could participatein eleven one-hour mathematics workshops. These workshops were completely voluntary andwere given at the end of the day’s experimental
student s with the transition to post-secondary education. He is a Co-Director of the NYS STEP Program, IMPETUS which provides economically disadvantaged students the opportunity to pursue their interest in math and science though educational summer camps, workshops, school-year tutoring and mentoring programs. He has helped provide numerous students and teachers with the opportunity to integrate STEM disciplines using real-world problem solving strategies through teacher/coach training institutes.Dr. Matthew K Voigt, San Diego State University Matthew Voigt (He, Him, His) is a mathematics education researcher with focus on calculus and equity in mathematics. He has a PhD in Mathematics and Science Education through
critical thinking is arduous, andin the case of group-based projects, must be done with the recognition that learning takes placeunder the influence of others, not in isolation.41,42Research impetusEach academy course centered on the development of a product (e.g., a solar water heater),suitable for solving a hypothetical real-world problem. In a typical course, the teacher spent arelatively short amount of time presenting related math and science concepts, and brief hands-onactivities were conducted to reinforce the presented content before seguing into the main project.A key concern among the academy teachers (numbering four by the fall of 2013) was the abilityfor students to complete fully-functioning products with little to no demonstration of
. Finally, we pilot the forcebalance in an undergraduate mechanical engineering lab setting and find that students are able toexplore the setup, understand the load cell functionality, and use the system to measure drag on asphere. The force balance enables students to gain hands-on learning experience related to bothfluid mechanics and statics, and our user study shows that the force balance is durable throughclassroom use. The low cost, robustness, and high adaptability of the system makes it suitable forincorporating in multiple labs or for allowing student project teams to utilize the system in theirown experiments.1 IntroductionAccess to a wind tunnel enables students to gain real world experience with fluid dynamicsconcepts. This is
revisedapproach and preliminary insights from its early application in an undergraduate course.KeywordsGVVGiving Voice to ValuesSituated Ethical Action FrameworkProfessional SkillsEngineering EthicsUndergraduate EducationSTSIntroductionThe mission of the University of Virginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS)is “to make the world a better place by creating and disseminating knowledge and by preparingengineering leaders to solve global challenges” [1]. While parts of this mission are fulfilled inlearning and demonstrating technical skills, the greater challenge is to cultivate professionalskills and curate opportunities to strengthen these skills embedded within undergraduateengineering curricula. Downey explains, “But the big
there aren't many women in engineering… there's a huge problem of attrition [with] women in engineering… on a system level [and] I thought wow, people actually still think that there's not a problem. Student 18, Donnybrook.A faculty member was surprised and disappointed at her peer’s reactions to EDI training that wasprovided to help faculty complete the EDI requirements within Canada’s National Sciences andEngineering Research Council grant applications. the old timers… keep complaining that "what, I should go to a shop and just pick a lesbian and pick a gay man"... [but I think] no, this is not about that… you are not going to pick people based on their [sexuality]… I was [also] thinking are you for real
thestudent survey, though many focused their responses on course content instead. Regardless ofcondition, students most appreciated the real-life applications and connections to other sciencesubjects offered in this course. The online lecture notes were found to be essential, with onestudent claiming “they were how I learned the material, so they were the most valuable to me.”Most students responded positively to the homework assignments being due once a week, thoughmany complained that the homework was “tedious” and involved too much “emphasis oncomputational skill, as opposed to mathematical skill.” As one student noted, “I was just doingheinous calculations, derivatives, and algebra for an hour on a problem, and only 10 minutesengaging with the
course requirement is that allstudents must take the Fundamentals of Engineering exam.The Mechanical Engineering faculty at York College structure the Capstone Design project tosimulate a real-world team engineering experience. Students are evaluated on a diverse set ofcriteria in a manner similar to an employer conducting a performance review. These criteriainclude technical competency, teamwork skills, oral and written communication skills, andproject management skills. The overarching goals for Capstone Design are to help studentsdevelop increased confidence in their engineering abilities and a positive impression of theiroverall educational experience at York College of Pennsylvania.1.2 The Formula SAE projectFormula SAE (FSAE) has been
infuse ethics via a requiredcourse in an engineering class and in the humanities curriculum, respectively [6].Researchers also advocate for particular pedagogies when it comes to teaching engineeringethics. Sarah Pfatticher suggests that we consider “the right balance of structure and flexibility inour curricula to foster the habits of mind appropriate to ethical practice of engineering educationin a globalized world” [7, p. 256]. To this end, she argues that scaffolding the practices andthought processes of ethical decision-making should be part of our curriculum conversations.Other researchers support hands-on projects and teamwork for engaging future engineers inpracticing and applying ethics. For example, William Frey writes about teaching