entrepreneurialmindset in our young people.1.2 – Fostering an Entrepreneurial MindsetCompanies that compete on innovation are led by people who have an entrepreneurial mindset.An entrepreneurial mindset is built on three primary behaviors: 1) seeking opportunities to solveproblems in the company, for its customers, and its community, 2) focusing on creating value forcustomers and the community, and 3) engaging the marketplace by being in contact withcustomers, suppliers, universities and the community. An entrepreneurial mindset providesinspiration and identity for a firm and its employees (Figure 1). It creates an entrepreneurialculture, encouraging a continuum of activity that is fundamental to helping firms be innovative.Figure 1: Key Components of an
students' perspectives and the resulting impact on student outcomes.Since 2014, a cohort of 8-10 students per year were chosen to participate in the summer program.Following their selection, these students were coached into securing their laboratory placementsabroad. Subsequently, they embarked on a comprehensive immersion into an eight-week summerresearch abroad program. At the end of the program, students had the opportunity to present theirresearch findings at an annual University of Texas system regional conference and share theiradventures while exploring their host institutions and countries. Also, the participants engaged infocus group discussions and completed a survey to provide feedback on their summerexperience.In general, the feedback
productincluded the design elements specified by the middle school students and teacher. CPUT wasalso closely involved in the development of the Phase II and III wind tunnels. UAH studentsappreciated the opportunity to work on an international design project as well as a garnered asense of satisfaction knowing that the wind tunnels could positively impact K-12 students inSouth Africa. Only one UAH student had ever been exposed to an international project prior tothe ALLIES project, while 100% believed that it was important to do so and believed they wouldbe required to work with engineers from another nation during their engineering careers. Theprimary issue encountered by the UAH students regarded difficulty communicating with theCPUT representatives
, 10 students (1 junior Biology; 1 sophomore from EnvironmentalSciences; 2 juniors from Agriculture; 2 freshmen from Computer Science; and 2 sophomores and2 juniors from Engineering) participated in the project during the past academic years. Thesestudents worked together to further the goals of the project, engaging in collaborative research andgaining deeper insights into sustainable agricultural technologies.At the conclusion of their internship, all participating students were required to submit a shortreport reflecting on their experiences, including their research findings and the skills theydeveloped throughout the program. This initiative not only provided hands-on experience incutting-edge agricultural lunar research but also fostered
needs. • We should help our students to prepare themselves to be makers, discoverers or along this spectrum, and we should teach engineering fundamentals as a foundation for careers both in research and in practice. • We should build our education around the way our students best learn, engaging them in their learning, and implementing pilots to understand the desirable balance of classroom, project and digital education. • In view of the speed of scientific and technological development, we should teach students the NEET Ways of Thinking, how to think, and how to learn more effectively by themselves.We should be prepared to embark on a bold change, with widespread impact at MIT andpotentially
about engineering pedagogy. He has not only published articles on engineering education but has also led several workshops on using instructional methodologies that make classroom instruction more engaging and effective.Dr. Darrell K. Kleinke P.E., University of Detroit Mercy Dr. Kleinke has over 25 years of industry experience in the design and development of electro-mechanical systems. As a tenure-track faculty member of the UDM mechanical engineering department, he has adopted a program of instruction which UDM has branded ”Faces on Design”. The guiding principle is that student project work is more meaningful and fulfilling when students have the opportunity to see and experience the faces of real live clients
students at Mbarara University of Scienceand Technology located in the western region of Uganda in Africa. A one-week training programfocusing on communication, technical report writing, and problem-solving was implementedwith an intervention group, while a control group did not receive the training. Quantitativeanalysis involved Shapiro-Wilk and Levene’s tests for normality and homogeneity of variancerespectively, followed by paired and independent t-tests to evaluate the impact of theintervention on students' professional skills. The results demonstrated significant improvementsin communication and report writing skills, while problem-solving skills showed modest gains.Qualitative feedback highlighted the importance of further refining the
teaming would greatly help students to become better team members and will be investigatedin the future.Figure 5. ME curriculum map showing the details of cooperative learning such as presence of instruction,feedback, team formation, & impact on individual grades.The third row in the Figure 5 indicates the types of team formation methods used with bluerepresenting instructor-formed teams, red indicating student-formed teams, and purple indicatingteams formed with a mix of the two approaches. Mixed approach might either mean thatinstructor forms teams after soliciting student input or the fact that the approach used variesacross years. There is no consistency in the approach to team formation within sections or eventhroughout the curriculum
. In response, many countrieshave actively pursued the development of university-industry outreach initiatives, such as theS&T Centers and ERCs proposed by the NSF in the United States. Still, as Perkmann &Walsh (2007) point out, most current research focuses on the impact of industry-universitylinks on innovation-related outcomes, while the organizational dynamics of theserelationships remain under-explored.This study aims to answer a key question: How do research universities in China engage inindustrial outreach in open innovation paradigms? Drawing on the frameworks of openinnovation and processes of University-Industry Collaboration, we tend to focus on threeprominent types of university-industry outreach institutions: open
University of Portland.Christina Ivler ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering Identity through Litter Pickup as Service LearningAbstractThis Complete Research paper describes the impacts of a service-learning litter pickup project onengineering identity in the first year. Service-learning projects have been shown to increasestudent learning and improve student attitudes toward academics and community engagement. Itwas hypothesized that service learning may also improve students’ engineering identity, asmeasured by recognition, interest, and performance indicators. Students were surveyed before,immediately after, and 10 months after a litter pickup service-learning project that
fortheir concepts. Based on alignment with NCIIA’s E-Team Program and overall feasibility anduniqueness of these concepts, eight concepts were advanced to part two of the course. Selectioncriteria included technology innovation and feasibility, business model and commercial potential,positive social and/ or environmental impact, and team composition, commitment, and expertise.The remainder of the term was focused on prototyping and customer validation of these eightconcepts. Based on the design and schedule of the course, students with concepts not selected toadvance chose one of two paths: (1) join an advancing product team or (2) form an investmentteam to focus on modeling the financials and developing funding proposals for one of theadvancing
future project extensions, and to encourage cross-project and cross-department collaboration.To reduce startup time normally associated with student projects, day-long workshops weredeveloped for the first four weeks that forced intense focus on customer requirements,engineering specifications, and concept development and selection. The workshop structure andformat further encouraged collaboration within and across teams. Lastly, a Wiki-based onlineenvironment was created to support knowledge capture and emergent collaboration.This paper provides an overview of changes to the MSD program in three key areas: coursedelivery, project definition, and communications infrastructure. Attention is given to innovativeapproaches to challenges inherent in
science and technology. David also does public engagement with science andDr. Timothy Duane Reedy, University of Maryland, College Park Timothy Reedy is a lecturer in the University of Maryland’s Science, Technology, Ethics, and Policy (STEP) minor, where he helps students critically explore the social, political, and cultural dimensions of science and engineering. His teaching challenges students to consider the broader implications of technological innovation, encouraging them to reflect on responsibility, power, and impact in their design and decision-making processes. FYEE 2025 Conference: University of Maryland - College Park, Maryland Jul 27TitleWorkshop: Designing Active Learning Activities with
undergraduate STEM education. Core values of thenetwork include promoting student leadership, developing supportive learning communities, and engaging studentsin authentic STEM practices. areas for growth and supporting students along that growth process. Adopting a growth mindset has also been shown to improve persistence through challenges.24 2. Valuing a broad set of metrics of success from day one - often, engineering design courses overtly reward the building of a successful end product. Instead, we wanted LAs to have an expansive notion of what counts as “success” in the Design Course, including aspects such as engaging in authentic design thinking, pursuing a creative but risky idea, and having a
. Anneliese Watt, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Anneliese Watt is a professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. She teaches and re- searches technical and professional communication, rhetoric and composition, medicine in literature, and other humanities elective courses for engineering and science students. Her graduate work in rhetoric and literature was completed at Penn State, and her recent research often focuses on engineering and workplace communication as well as medical humanities. She is currently working in the Engineering Design-focused first-year Biomedical Engineering curriculum.Dr. Alan Chiu, Rose-Hulman Institute of TechnologyDr. Glen A. Livesay, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
disabled individuals andaccessible spaces for them, as many institutions fail to prioritize these efforts due to perceivedlimited impact on their immediate goals. Additionally, institutional practices often focus oncompliance with minimum legal requirements, such as accessibility of the physical environment,like ramps, bathrooms, and elevators, rather than truly fostering inclusive classroom practicesand environments [11].Creating accessible laboratories requires an approach that combines Universal Design forLearning (UDL) principles with individualized accommodations. Accessible spaces includefeatures such as adjustable-height workstations, assistive technologies, and tactile safetymeasures, ensuring that individuals with disabilities can engage
through project or problem-basedlearning (PBL). Most of this section of the rubric draws from the “Ensuring Equity in PBLReflection Tool”[14]. This part of the rubric examines the degree to which students are allowedto exert agency and participate in team-learning environments that reflect real-world contextsand social impacts. The rubric encourages activities that engage every student, ensuring that alleducational experiences are hands-on and relevant to students' lived experiences andsocioeconomic backgrounds.Each of these sections contains specific items, totaling 27, which describe behaviors andpractices ranging from those that perpetuate inequity to those that foster an inclusive atmosphere.For example, under the "Head" section, item 1
students. The curricular efforts consisted ofdeveloping 18 e-learning modules and integrating them into courses in all programs. The co-curricular efforts included developing an entrepreneurially oriented Living Learning Community(LLC) for first-year students, and conducting entrepreneurially focused competitions. A coreteam consisting of the dean and four faculty led these efforts, and other faculty wereprogressively engaged to participate in these efforts. Internal efforts to develop the EM of faculty was not the primary focus from 2011 to 2019,except for training faculty on how to integrate the e-learning modules into courses. However,faculty were encouraged to pursue external opportunities to
Science Research Center at USM to learn about fabricating solar cells.ConclusionBy providing teachers with relevant research experiences, the RET program impacts high schooland community college curricula and classrooms. Teachers develop laboratory experiments andadvanced curricula related to their research in materials sustainability. Teachers and their classesvisit the university for tours, demonstrations, and lectures. Faculty and graduate students visitthe schools to help implement research-based curricula. This program contributes to building theeducated workforce needed to address sustainability challenges of the 21st century. It alsoprovides teachers tools to engage students in the engineering enterprise and encourage them topursue science
displaced the baccalaureate as the terminalengineering degree. These programs put more emphasis on applied skills as opposed to thosemore theoretical in nature. As described by Rita R. Colwell in Science Magazine4, “Most of these innovativeProfessional Science Master’s (PSM) degree programs are interdisciplinary and provide hands-on learning through internships and team projects. They are not intended to displace traditionalprograms. Instead, they aim to engage students with professional goals and then becomescientists uniquely suited to the 21st-century workplace, equipped with a broader scientificknowledge than that acquired with a Bachelor of Science degree and the skills to apply it.” The Council of Graduate Schools has published a
ofengineering expertise in particular served to reinforce this prioritization of product over process,of technical functionality over participatory practice” (p. 37). For instance, in an engineeringexchange development project in Nicaragua, despite conscious planning to create a collaborativeexperience in which students were placed in non-expert roles, the focus on the final productcaused students to not fully engage with the product development process and community needs.Lucena, Schneider, and Leydens [15] raise important questions about the effort to help“underserved” communities: “Is there anything problematic with wanting to help a community?How do engineers listen to a community? If invited, how do engineers work with a community?”Indeed, how do
program assistants and 4 high school mentors. The hours of instruction arefrom 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM each day with a one-hour break for lunch. During the course of the week, thestudents in grades 4-6 work in teams of three using one Lego Mindstorms® kit to build and program acompetitive robot. Students participate in a project based learning environment where there is anemphasis on collaboration, communication and critical thinking. At the end of the one-week session, thereis a team competition to determine the most successful robot. Awards are also given for teamwork,communication and sportsmanship.Historically, the programs have been population by a majority of boys. Some sections of robotics onlyhad one girl in a class of 30 students. As the
. Students are evenmore engaged and connected to the subject when content is relevant and meaningful. TheDepartment of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of South Carolina and alocal school, Beaufort Middle School, have forged an educational partnership aimed atdeveloping and implementing problem-based hands-on activities that can be incorporated withinmiddle school science classes to 1) enhance student learning, 2) increase critical thinking andproblem solving skills, and 3) raise student and teacher awareness of engineering issues andcareers. The goal of this paper is to discuss this partnership and the transfer of a pedagogicalapproach, called EFFECTs, from the collegiate engineering environment to middle schoolscience.What
development. As for the Impacts of Technology on Society, her technology-optimization focused research includes solar energy and digital manufacturing.Dr. Erin J. McCave, University of Houston Erin is an Instructional Assistant Professor in the Cullen College of Engineering at the University of Houston. She joined the University of Houston after completing a postdoctoral/lecturer position split between the General Engineering program and the Engineering & Science Education Department and a Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University. Erin’s research interests include preparing students for their sophomore year, minority student engineering identity development, and providing mentoring relationships to help foster
attributed to the different teaching modalities. Nevertheless, large-scalestudies are needed for standardizing teaching and learning practices. A comprehensive understanding ofthe differences between different teaching modalities in robotics has yet to be developed. Challengesfaced included network integration, student engagement, teamwork, accessibility, technology,equipment, and robust communication platforms [8-10].With the pandemic-transformed pedagogy, institutions had to switch to an emergency remote teachingmodality. Instructors could not adequately support hands-on technology competency. At the same time,student motivation and engagement depreciated due to limited access to in-person interactions andresources – all of which instigated
Research Scientist/Engineer at NorthWest Research Associates. Jeremy believes that curricula should be student-centered and embedded within an engaged, collaborative community who un- derstand the broader, societal implications of their work. He aims to achieve this through the design of project-based and experiential curricula, including a recent redesign of the Computer Engineering pro- gram. He serves on several committees including the steering committee for the Faculty Senate. He also leads ABET accreditation and coordinates assessment for the Computer Engineering program. Jeremy’s research is in space physics and electrical engineering, including atmospheric electricity, radio wave propagation, and digital signal
working on real-world projects and popular technology. Rapid prototyping serves as an enablerto these, as this provides students with a valuable tool to deliver rapid solutions with relatively littleoverhead and cost risk. This allows students the flexibility to explore and innovate without the burdenof huge resource investments, impacts of failure, and fear of failure. It also allows them to opportunityto hone their skills and fine-tune proven designs, and to develop repeatable, sustainable processes.From a research and operations standpoint, UAF’s ACUASI holds broad-ranging scientific and publicservice responsibilities to local, state, and national agencies. Support of these assets and programs isparamount to the health of ACUASI and UAF, and
would be able to design and build a blower that would move any amount of air.One of the advantages of this project is that almost any reasonable design will work at someminimal level. This is important to build confidence in beginning engineering students who mayhave had little prior exposure to any design and manufacturing process.LogisticsThe preceding sections have focused on the engagement of freshmen students in a capstonedesign project. This section focuses on some of the project logistics.The university typically runs 4-6 sections of the Modeling and Design course each semester.Each section contains approximately 25 students for a total of 100-150 students enrolled in thecourse any given semester. The prototyping machine is housed within
year. Regardless ofmajor, all students taking the introductory sequence are enrolled in the same inquiry-basedsecond-semester general physics laboratory. Consequently, assessing the impact of the sharedlaboratory curriculum takes on added importance to determine if students are learning what weare teaching.8Gender & Pedagogical Issues in Physics Assessment TestsThe impact of gender on undergraduate enrollments and pedagogy have bedeviled the physicseducational community for many decades.9,10 Among all fields of science and engineering,physics continues to have among the lowest representation of females at the undergraduate level.The situation deteriorates at higher levels on the educational and professional ladder.11 Thegender gap in the
written from the perspective of our participatory action team (REDPAR) which wasfunded by the NSF to conduct research with the RED change teams and support the teams byfacilitating a community of practice. The working session described in this paper is an exampleof an activity facilitated during the in-person community of practice gathering that we organizeon an annual basis to encourage propagation of change-making experiences and ideas.This paper reviews results of a group working session involving members of 12 current and pastRED teams, focused on exploring ways in which RED teams are currently attempting to ensurepsychological safety and build conflict resolution capacity for their team members, andproviding them with additional skills for