, “Intelligent educational dual architecture for university digital transformation,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, 2019.[27] I. Khuankrue, F. Kumeno, Y. Ohashi, and Y. Tsujimura, “Agent-based Simulation model for identifying failure on students’ project,” 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Man, Cybern. SMC 2017, vol. 2017-Janua, pp. 3113–3118, 2017.[28] C. Wasson, “The State of Systems Engineering Technical Practice versus Discipline: A Survey of INCOSE Chapter Attendees in North America,” in INCOSE International Symposium, 2019, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 591–619.[29] A. L. Marnewick and C. Marnewick, “The Ability of Project Managers to Implement Industry 4.0-Related Projects,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, 2020
teaching methodologies that could bring real-world issues into engineering classrooms6.The results of their research led to recommendations to engineering educators on the importanceof developing interdisciplinary technical case studies that facilitate the communication ofengineering innovations to students in the classroom.Active learning helps students learn by increasing their involvement in the process7. Activelearning techniques help students to better understand the topics covered in the curriculum8.Active learning helps students to be more excited about the study of engineering than traditionalinstruction1. The group work that often accompanies active learning instruction helps studentsdevelop their soft skills and makes students more
interest in their coursework increased dramatically as theyprogressed through the curriculum. Figure 1 below is drawn from the department’s senior surveydata [1] and shows graduates’ average reported interest in their classes for each year of thecurriculum. There is a large increase from the second to third year, with smaller increases fromthe first to second and third to fourth years. While there are likely many reasons for that shift,there was a consistent trend in the associated qualitative feedback of students indicating that theirinterest increased as they started to see a clearer connection between what they were learning andthe kinds of work they were likely to encounter as practicing engineers.Figure 1: Senior Survey Reporting of
with the proprietary software officeto install new software or developing an understanding of the backend of the specific GISsoftware programs in order to make them run as they should. Despite the Office of Technology’sefforts there is no specific designated staff who can work across the range of all the differentaspects of GIS-related technical issues; it has been a complex path to start to develop lines ofsupport for quick problem solving.One of the bigger challenges is the lack of technological infrastructure to store locally-generatedspatial data. Currently, the spatial data generated by students are stored on a shared open drive onour local campus server, and not in any robust spatial data storage location, leading topredictable
, and corporate sponsors and speakers. NOBE also hosts an annualStock Market competition for its members17.Penn State University Park NOBE InitiativesThe NOBE chapter at Penn State University Park grew out of the engineering economy coursewithin industrial engineering. The NOBE students embraced the curriculum overhaul in theengineering economy course and volunteered their time to work with the incoming engineeringeconomy students in an effort to help them understand the importance of developing essentialbusiness skills to complement their technical, engineering education. The complete, updatedengineering economy curriculum can be found in Table A.1 in the Appendix.Engineering Economy Curriculum Overhaul, Stock CompetitionThe complete
3.65 73% 4.19 84% 15% 4.20 <1% propositions Identifying key resources 3.35 67% 3.75 75% 12% 4.30 15% Generating revenue 2.95 59% 3.25 65% 10% 3.30 5% streams Maintaining customer 2.90 58% 3.06 61% 6% 3.20 5% relationships Calculating cost structure 3.05 61% 3.19 64% 5% 3.40 7%Goal 5. Track team development through an assessment plan with metrics for success. This goalwas strengthened by adding a pre-assessment and a mid-program focus group and gathering teamdata as it became available, such as the news
, Z., & Donaldson, A. (2012, October). Work in progress: Enhancing broader communication among courses linked with prerequisites. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2012 (pp. 1-2). IEEE. 6. Carrell, S. E., & West, J. E. (2008). Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors. In National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 14081. 7. Glenn, D. (2011, January). One Measure of a Professor: Students’ Grades in Later Courses. In Chronicle of Higher Education. 8. Ohland, M. W., Yuhasz, A. G., & Sill, B. L. (2004). Identifying and removing a calculus prerequisite as a bottleneck in Clemson's General Engineering Curriculum. In Journal
and creating a valid ship structural model, it ispossible to incorporate its use into general naval architecture courses without the requirement tobecome an expert in structural finite element analysis. The use of MAESTRO in the graduateprogram affords the students greater insight into ship structural response to load effects that arenot always accurately analyzed by current manual methods (simple prismatic beam analysis). Inthe undergraduate program, the students use MAESTRO to develop a structural model as part oftheir senior ship design project. There has been difficulty in the undergraduate program in thedevelopment of a whole ship model, but the software allows the mid-portion of the ship structureto be easily created. In both the
States. The general purpose of these experiences is toimmerse students in clinic environments so that they can leverage primary experience in thedesign and consideration of medical devices. Many of these programs have been inspired by theStanford BioDesign program [1, 2] and typically include needs identification – a recognized bestpractice for BME education [3] – though specific programmatic structure, content,implementation, and outcomes vary depending on aims and resources [4-17]. More recentinnovations involve remote immersions during the COVID-19 pandemic [18], collaborationswith outside community healthcare providers [19, 20], and the use of virtual reality in immersion[21]. A comprehensive survey of the clinical immersion experiences was
encompass extensive activities, from refining thesummer camps for high school students to conducting monthly advisor listening sessions andsurveys to understand and meet student needs. Furthermore, introducing niche areas for eachacademic advisor has fostered their professional growth and contributed to improved studentsuccess.This paper will delve into the comprehensive details of these initiatives. It serves as a valuableresource for institutions seeking to enhance their student support services, providing separateinsights into the spheres of recruitment, retention, and, most importantly, student success withinthe College of Engineering at Tennessee Tech University.1. IntroductionThe importance of student success support for engineering
adopted from Dieter & Smith, 2021 [22], which they could use ordevelop their own tasks relevant to the product/component they were working on. 1. Clearly explain how the product operates. 2. Identify the conditions necessary for proper functioning of the product. 3. Identify the mechanical, electrical, control systems, or other devices that are used in the product to generate the desired functions. 4. Identify the energy and force flows through the product. 5. Identify the spatial constraints for subassemblies and components. 6. Determine what clearance is required if any for proper functioning. 7. If a clearance is present, find out why it is present. 8. Identify the major subassemblies of the product. 9
period, we also were interested to note thatthe younger graduate spoke more explicitly about these. Our broader study seeks to expand thesepreliminary findings through the analysis of further interviews with the stakeholders in thisparticular program and then to expand our study to an advisory board of another program at thesame institution.References[1] D. Keržič et al., “Academic student satisfaction and perceived performance in the e-learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence across ten countries,” PLoS ONE, vol. 16, no. 10, p. e0258807, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258807.[2] M. Menon and J. Poroor, “Grounded Idea Generation: An Analysis Framework for Project- Based Courses,” Procedia Computer Science, vol
develop a better understanding of the technical content, societal andeconomic impact of the proposed solution, while supporting the students’ preparedness andreadiness for the workforce.IntroductionThere are numerous recent scholarly works examined the way in which the Kern EntrepreneurialEngineering Network (KEEN)’s mindset is enhancing the students’ engagement and skills invarious engineering courses, like Material Science [1], or Mechanical Design or StructuralAnalysis [2, 3, 4], or Fluid Mechanics [5, 6, 7, 8] or across engineering curriculum [9, 10, 11, 12,13].In all instances, the authors found that the inclusion of an entrepreneurship education, aspromoted by KEEN, and further support the engineering students’ readiness for the
activities and team projectswith in-person students. The activities created for this project are grounded in the researchliterature on student engagement [1].Active LearningEngineering educators regard experiential learning as the best way to train the next generation ofengineers [4]. Towards this end, it is reasonable to believe that the interaction practiced in activelearning can improve software engineering education at the undergraduate level and betterprepare students for the experiential learning that comes with their capstone projects [3].Active learning is “embodied in a learning environment where the teachers and students areactively engaged with the content through discussions, problem-solving, critical thinking, debateand a host of other
and 2.0 were releasedin 2019 and 2020 respectively. Version 3.0 has been slated for release in 2022 [1]. Version 1.0focused on standards surrounding interoperability, Version 2.0 focuses on configurationportability, and Version 3.0 will focus on application portability. The O-PAS is further brokeninto seven parts as seen in the table below: Table 1. O-PAS Standards O-PAS Subject matter Referenced Standards part Part 1 Technical architecture IEC 62264 (ISA 95) Part 2 Security IEC 62443 (ISA 99) Part 3 Profiles n.a. Part 4 Connectivity framework
implementing this research question and assessment plan, we aim to understand theeffectiveness of the integrated curriculum and faculty professional development in preparingstudents for careers in the rapidly evolving field of automated manufacturing and assembly lines.AcknowledgementThe authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the ETEC department chair, FarukYildiz, and the esteemed former Dean of the College of Science and Engineering Technology(CoSET), John Pascarella, for their generous support in funding this crucial professionaldevelopment initiative through the Fred Pirkle endowment fund.References:[1] B. Esmaeilian, S. Behdad and B. Wang, “The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review” in Journal of Manufacturing
Paper ID #39061A Toolkit for Expanding Sustainability Engineering Utilizing Foundationsof the Engineering for One Planet InitiativeDr. Andrew Schulz, Georgia Institute of Technology Andrew Schulz is a postdoctoral researcher at Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems in Stuttgart, Germany. Andrew received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in August of 2022, studying the bio-inspired design of elephant trunks and conservation technology. Andrew is a member of the Engineering for One Planet (EOP) Network and is working to educate the next generation of conservation technology
Paper ID #33241Creative Self-Efficacy of Undergraduate Women Engineering MajorsDr. Christine Delahanty, Bucks County Community College Dr. Delahanty is the Area Coordinator of Science and Engineering, and Professor of Engineering and Physics at Bucks County Community College (Bucks). She worked as an electrical engineer at General Electric Co. for nine years in both military and commercial communication satellite operations. Her research interests include investigating creativity within STEM education as a factor in cultivating diver- sity. She establishes technical, college level, programs of study for modernized
collegecourses by enrolling in Calculus 1 and the Introduction to Engineering design course, earning sixcredits towards their degree. They are also introduced to industry professionals and throughweekly meetings begin to learn about technical, communication, and management skills andthose attributes that lead to leadership roles. Research skills are introduced through engineeringdesign projects, wherein students learn to solve problems as a team. A more detailed descriptionof RAMP has been presented by Tripathy et al. [1], [2]. A goal of this summer bridge program is for students to better understand the culture,curriculum, educational practices, and norms of engineering programs and workplaces and learnto navigate and overcome some of the
and its affiliates is on preserving affordable homeownershipand revitalizing neighborhoods. The population of homeowners served are those most at risk forremaining in their homes and are those in need. Most are at risk and are in need because they aresubsisting on a fixed income, whose buying power continues to fall over time, and who live at orbelow the poverty level. Many also have medical bills that consume much of their income, whichforces them to put off needed home repairs and modifications. This population generally includesbut is not limited to senior citizens, the disabled, families with children, single parenthouseholds, and veterans. Using this as a springboard, the national office administers an annualaffiliate survey 1 at the end
classmates using an ordinal scale of 1-5, where 1 = lowest, 2 =below average, 3 = average, 4 = above average, and 5 = highest. Most significantly, the dataindicates that the mean of all respondents’ abilities is defined as average, despite universityGPAs that were identified in Figure 2 as above average. Respondents rated themselves as aboveaverage in both the ability to work in teams (M=4.15) and the ability to solve problems(M=4.05). Respondents generally rated themselves as average when compared to their peers inmathematics (M=3.78) and science (M=3.68). The frequencies, mean, and standard deviation forself-efficacy are found in Table 8.Feelings of self-perceived ability obtained from the APPLES questions in the survey can bedistinguished from
answer questions and longer case study questionswhich result in the generation of one or more project artifacts. For all three exams, we allow thestudents to bring one 8.5" x 11" information sheet with whatever information is desired. Theshort answer questions are designed to go beyond memorization and recall. The following is anexample of a question asking about the sprint planning process. 1. (5 points) What is the purpose of the sprint planning meeting? How does a team select the user stories to develop in the next sprint? Why might a team skip a story for a sprint?The longer case study questions are based on a description of a small software system. Aquestion may require the student to
on their interests and the availability of the courses that are offered during their senior year.These courses are offered such that graduate students can also take them and therefore provide abroad mixture of undergrad and graduate students from different concentrations within thedepartment and sometimes among various majors in college of engineering. One of the greatadvantage of these courses is the potential diversity among the students which can offer muchwider level of insights and discussions in the class which if guided appropriately can lead tocollaborative learning environment and have the potential to incorporate the concepts of industry4.0 [1] in curriculum. These technical elective courses also provide opportunity for
Special Assistant to Dean for Advanced Manufacturing. He has co-authored one textbook on materials and manufacturing processes that has been adopted by over 50 national and international institutions of higher education. In addition, he has authored or co-authored over 60 papers in journals and conference proceedings, focused on applied research related to design and manufacturability issues, as well as issues related to mechanical engineering technology ed- ucation. Dr. Tomovic made over 20 invited presentations nationally and internationally on the issues of design optimization and manufacturability. He has co-authored four patents, and over 100 technical re- ports on practical industrial problems related to product
been instrumental in acquiring, through various grants, computers, and software for the physics laboratory at FVSU. Some of his funded grant proposals are as follows: 1) Establishing a Nuclear Science and Engineering Minor at Fort Valley State University 2) Establishing an Undergraduate STEM Teaching and Research Laboratory at FVSU 3)Establishing an Interdisciplinary Bioinformatics Laboratory at Fort Valley State University 3) Computer-based Instrumentation Laboratory for Undergraduate Science and Mathematics Programs at the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Fort Valley State University. 4) Developing an Undergraduate Minor in Computer-based Mea- surement and Instrumentation at Fort Valley State
the above examples of ethical dilemmas, has often fallen flat and attimes favored efficiency and raw technical progress over ethical concerns. The ethical challenge appears to be clear: how can we foster and provide meaning and purposefor all individuals, no matter their talent, motivation, or status, given an increasingly materialistworldview and the individual’s shrinking importance within it; that is, given an ethicalworldview based on reason alone? This is the modern ethical conundrum, the moral challengethat confronts the current and probably the next generation. If the supremacy of reason—both within science and in the conduct of human affairs—is anecessary condition for a moral and ethical society in the modern world, it remains
presentations and technical writing are excellent methods to lay theground work for future interactions with their industry peers. However, they cannot replace theactual experience students gain when writing technical reports, participating in design reviewsand daily interaction with other professionals that the co-op experience provides.This improved communication has allowed the capstone sequence at Grand Valley StateUniversity to take on challenging projects. Projects centered on product development, testingand automation have all benefited from the improved skill set that a student gains during co-op.The instances where the students have a capstone project sponsored by their co-op employerallows a much smoother flow of communication. Teams with
of IT or the technical side. All students taking thecourse are required to have a basic introduction to Java. The course is completely online, andstudent-teacher interaction comes primarily from Q&A discussion boards (Piazza) and one liveQ&A session per week (WebEx). The course revolves around a semester-long project in whichstudents develop a mini e-commerce web application complete with the design andimplementation of the web interface, the database, and the application business logic.In this paper, we talk about how the course evolved when the developer joined the educator toteach the course. We focus on six important facets of the experience: (1) the initial conditionsthat allowed the collaboration to be successful, (2) the
1.9 13 38.43185 -75.0578 33.8 7.4 2.1 14 38.43178 -75.0578 33.7 7.4 2.1 Table 1 Results from an autonomous run in Ocean City, MDThe sensors mounted on the boat were acquired from Vernier instruments6, and they collect in-situ data which are saved on the NXT brick. For the run shown in Table 1, data on pH level,dissolved oxygen content, and, temperature were collected on a selected water body in OceanCity, Maryland. The geo-located point data was displayed ARCMAP GIS7 environment, andspatially interpolated using inverse distance weighting (IDW) to generate the graduated color-maps shown in Figure 5. From the Figure, a relationship between
rehabilitation of historic agricultural structures. Her research interests include energy, the en- vironment, and engineering education. For one academic year, she served as interim associate dean for undergraduate education and student services in the College of Engineering. She was involved in OSU’s quarter-to-semester conversion effort at multiple levels over 3+ years: as point person and undergraduate studies chair for her department, as a member of the college-level committees in both the College of Food, Agricultural, and Environmental Sciences and the College of Engineering, and as a Faculty Fellow in the university’s Office of Academic Affairs. She is a second-generation woman engineer; her mother worked as an