2006-2133: CAN MUSEUM BE A GOOD VENUE FOR MANUFACTURINGEDUCATION?Zbigniew Pasek, University of Windsor Dr. Pasek is an Associate Professor at the Dept. of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering at the University of Windsor, Canada. He was previously with University of Michigan. His research interests include manufacturing automation and system design, engineering education, and decision-making processes in organizations. Page 11.305.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Can Museum Be a Good Venue for Manufacturing Education?AbstractA growing gap between technology use and
be one of five departments located within the College ofArchitectural and Environmental Design (CAED) a college that also includes the Architecture(ARCH) and the Construction Management (CM) departments. A great benefit of thisarrangement is that considerable interaction takes place amongst the departments mirroring theinteraction and collaboration that occurs in industry. One of the more successfulinterdepartmental collaborations has been amongst the architectural, construction managementand architectural engineering departments. This exchange of information and studentsencourages greater knowledge and understanding of each other’s disciplines and preparesstudents for a practice that increasingly values such interdisciplinary
platform is for engineering students tohave an opportunity to build non-technical—but highly in-demand—professional skills thatpromote collaboration with others involved in the socio-economic context of engineeringmatters. Conversely, the HEPE approach provides an opportunity for non-engineering students tobecome exposed to key concepts and practices in engineering. This paper outlines the initialimplementation of the HEPE program, by placing the effort in context of broader trends ineducation, by outlining the overall purposes of the program, discussing the course design andstructure, reviewing the learning experience and outcomes assessment process, and providingpreliminary results of a baseline survey that gauges students interests and
one of the few ABET accredited engineering programs in the United States thatexists outside a college of engineering. Housed in the College of Architecture andEnvironmental Design, ARCE resides with the departments of Architecture (ARCH),Construction Management (CM), Landscape Architecture, and City and Regional Planning. Thecollege has a 60 year tradition of collaboration between the engineering, architecture andconstruction disciplines. Several decades ago, all students in the college took a common twoyear curriculum prior to separating into their respective disciplines. Although that model nolonger exists, there is a commitment to interdisciplinary collaboration at the lower division level.ARCE students take three architecture studios side
2. They take a meta-perspective and assess and evaluate their organization’s current situation and behavior. They evaluate all their current practices for sustainability and overall effectiveness. They answer this question: “Are we making healthy choices?” They turn the mirror on themselves and evaluate everything they do as they operate within their organization. They evaluate their interpersonal relationships with colleagues, the quality of their decision making, their problem solving, and how well they interact with others outside their sphere of influence, etc. Everything they do is data for analysis. 3. They forecast the future by examining the trends in their industry. They determine what might impact higher
authentic work in industry. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Towards Effective Implementation of Collaborative Problem Solving in Undergraduate Classrooms: Co-Designing Guidelines for Teaching Assistants Saadeddine Shehab, LuEttaMae Lawrence, Emma Mercier, Anthony Margotta, Elizabeth Livingston, Mariana Silva, Taylor Tuckershehab2@illinois.edu, llawrnc2@illinois.edu, mercier@illinois.edu, margott2@illinois.edu, eliving2@illinois.edu, mfsilva@illinois.edu, tdtucke2@illinois.edu University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignIntroduction This evidence-based practice paper presents guidelines
in class, which highlighted their perceived team role. Thiscan then be reflected upon both during, and at the end of the project.Ultimately, both groups of students presented their project at the end of module ‘StudentConference’. The presentations were PowerPoint based, containing embedded media, eitherfrom existing sources or produced by the students themselves. The conference was asimulated technical conference with a keynote speaker form industry. Page 12.1207.4AssessmentThe module is currently assessed by coursework only, with one of the elements of assessmentbeing an in-class time constrained multi-choice test. The end of module ‘student
college allocates a certain number of fellowships to eachof their departments. This process assists each department in using their own recruitmentprocess in conjunction with their college and university recruitment program to attractgraduate minority students. The IHE must develop an aggressive recruitment, retentionand orientation program. Figures 1a and 1b present an IHE model strategic plan thatprovides a basis for each department to develop and enhance their recruitment programunder the IHE’s main umbrella. Each department within a college can strengthen itsundergraduate recruitment efforts through its association with K-12 and industry involve-ment, particularly for recruitment and retention efforts. In this process, faculty supportand
of scientific research, computer programming, working in alaboratory, critically thinking through a scientific problem, and sharing outcomes throughpresentations at regional and national conferences.Figure 1: Tiered approach to undergraduate research at Pasadena City College; Tier 1: Course- based Undergraduate Research Experiences; Tier 2: Authentic Research with Community College Mentor; Tier 3: Summer URE; Tier 4: Student-led Mentoring using Remote Research Capabilities.The eCURe program was developed with three targeted goals: 1. Increase student success and retention in STEM fields through collaborative and interdisciplinary research projects in basic science. 2. Inspire enthusiasm for scientific
relationship resulted of theinteraction of civil engineers in this environment. Nevertheless the debates about the productiverestructuring, in the need again of a new worker's profile with higher education degree are justincorporate in speech level and not in practice. The research is supported by some data and it ispossible to conclude that, most workers did not complete the 4th year of first degree. This facttakes to the conclusion that the lack perspective for the workers and education increases a littleor nothing his/her professional life has collaborated for the current situation. Other factors join tothis, standing out the education politics presented to adults that in this country is very bellow thestandards of the needs of the work world
in the elementary grades. She is the Vice President for Education for SIAM, the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics and the founder of the blog Grandma got STEM.Dr. Darryl H. Yong, Harvey Mudd College Darryl Yong is currently a professor of mathematics and associate dean for diversity at Harvey Mudd College. His research interests relate to partial differential equations and the preparation and professional development of secondary school math teachers.Ms. Nancy Hankel, Cobblestone Applied Research & Evaluation, Inc. Ms. Hankel is a Research Associate II at Cobblestone and is currently pursuing an Ed.D. from UCLA in Educational Leadership. She manages multiple evaluation projects related to teacher
into shelter speaks to infinite possibilities for theadaptive reuse of the artifacts of industrial capitalism: shipping containers, trains and a vast arrayof other objects (e.g., earth ships) that continue to fill our country with too many things. In orderto approach architecture within a sustainable model for the future it only makes sense to placethese types of design problems into our students’ studio projects and have them face the dilemmaof what to do with this excess of material that would otherwise be destined to the nearest landfill.It is these types of houses that are now finding a market within the hip and affluent segments ofour society in contrast and in response to the endless sea of track homes and vanilla suburbs.Using shipping
mechanical engineering and industrial engineering students as well as for entrepreneurship classes for engineering students. The main research areas of ZLW/IMA are divided into five major fields: - agile and turbulence-suitable processes for knowledge and technology intense organizations - next generation education models for academic institutions and private enterprises - IT supported cognitive processes for heterogeneous and cooperative systems - adaptive mental user models for innovation and technology development - semantic nets and ontologies for complex value-added chains and virtual environments The special research focus of Sabina Jeschke is on cooperation of heterogeneous
need for professional engineering graduate study programs focused on developing engineers who want to remain in industry.3.2 The Need for Professional Engineering Graduate StudiesTo meet this challenge, the National Collaborative Task Force is engaged in a complex projectthat requires a total systems approach. The stakes to enhance the innovative capacity of the U.S. Page 14.1078.3engineering workforce for competitiveness are high. ≠ Advanced degrees for professional engineers: A Professional Masters degree, with a company oriented directed project rather than a research thesis A Professional
function in a global environment. Thechallenge is understanding how these virtual tools might be used for collaboration acrosssilos defined by disciplines, industry practice, as well as language and culture. Page 8.1279.3“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”According to Matt Loeb, Managing Director of Corporate Communications and Strategy,“The Virtual Collaboration/Online Learning Communities initiative is an organization-wide effort to develop an online and collaborative work environment that will enhancethe technical
Workforce in industry ─ which is the nation’s primary engineering resource and creativewellspring for the generation, development and innovation of U.S. technology for competitiveness.2.1 What is the Problem that We Want to Fix ?Although the United States has led the world in basic research and research-based graduate education forthe nation’s scientific workforce at the universities for ‘discovery’, inquiry and scientific investigation,the National Collaborative Task Force concludes that research-based graduate education does not meet Page 13.559.4the full spectrum of professional educational needs of the engineer and engineering leader in
robotics butoften lack practical experience and exposure to real-world applications.This paper reports on an on-going collaborative initiative between the Tam Wing Fan Innovation Wingat The University of Hong Kong (or HKU InnoWing) and the Operations Training Department (orOTD) of MTR Corporation (or MTR), a public transport company in Hong Kong. The study identifiesthe challenges and opportunities in bridging this gap and proposes an experiential learning frameworkdesigned to empower college students with practical experience, while simultaneously equipping thestaff from the industrial enterprise with insights necessary for successful technology adoption ,knowledge transfer, and staff competency development required in workplace. Evaluation based
value through strategic collaboration. As Executive Director of the Center for Innovation Strategies, he supports innovation-based learning and entrepreneurship. Paul previously served as Director of Operations and Collaboration Strategy in the Office of Research, Industry Liaison Office. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Implementing Backward Design Approach in Integrated Business and Engineering (IBE)Capstone Project: A NASA Tech Transfer Case StudyThe 21st century presents engineering students with complex, interdisciplinary challenges thatrequire a combination of technical and business skills. This case study examines theimplementation of a backward design approach within a joint
invited papers prepared for a special session of the NationalCollaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform that is focusing on theneed to create a culture of innovation in industry to ensure a strong U.S. Engineering Workforcefor Technology Innovation and Competitiveness. This culture of innovation: is needed to ensurethat the U.S. stays at the top of the game in the industrial world. Creativity is by far one ofAmerica’s most reliable competitive advantages. But what sparks creativity and how does it getengineered into products? Does it come from a fortunate few that miraculously hit on the nextbest thing?In reality, creativity is an on-going process that requires a collaboration of talent, knowledge andexperiences from many
─ AbstractThis is the third of four invited panel papers prepared specifically for the National Collaborative TaskForce Engineer-Leaders Project. The Project concerns the deliberate advancement of professionalgraduate engineering education relevant to the needs of creative engineering practice in industry toenhance U.S. technological innovation and competitiveness. The strength of the innovation and leadershipcapacity of America’s professional engineering base in our civilian, aerospace, and defense industries is acritical asset in our global economic recovery. As with other learned professions, there are progressiveskill-sets and actions that must be learned or developed at the advanced levels of the practice ofengineering. This series of papers
the Page 13.561.3 UK would benefit greatly from the introduction of such a doctorate.” US National Collaborative Task Force During its investigations for engineering educational improvement, the US National Collaborative Task Force also concludes that a new, but distinctive American approach is needed for the post-baccalaureate professional education of engineers and engineering leaders in the United States that supports the American model that the majority of US engineers who are pursuing professional careers do not remain at the universities but enter engineering practice in industry or government service
mechanical engineering, University of South Carolina, and chair ASEE-Graduate Studies Division.Thomas Stanford, University of South Carolina THOMAS G. STANFORD is assistant professor of chemical engineering, University of South Carolina.Joseph Tidwell, Boeing Co. JOSEPH P. TIDWELL is director of JACMET, Arizona State University Polytechnic, and chair ASEE-College Industry Partnership Division. Page 12.604.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Enabling the U.S. Engineering Workforce for Technological Innovation: The Value of Cohort LearningAbstractThis is the second of four
University of South Carolina 8 AbstractThis is the first paper in the panel session of the National Collaborative Task Force for reform ofprofessionally oriented engineering graduate education to make it more relevant to the needs of industryto ensure a strong U.S. engineering workforce for competitiveness. Because the practice of engineeringfor technological innovation is changing and because engineering education cannot meet all of therequirements relevant to the needs and skill sets required for career-long growth of engineers in industry,within the standard four-year baccalaureate curriculum, there is a heightened sense of urgency that majoreducational reform is needed at the graduate level. The
session of the National CollaborativeTask Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform that is focusing its efforts on the deliberateadvancement of professional engineering graduate education to enable a strong U.S. engineeringworkforce for competitiveness and national security purposes.Initiated in 2000 by the ASEE-Graduate Studies Division, College Industry Partnership Division, andCorporate Members Council, the National Collaborative Task Force is a coalition of key leaders frominnovative universities and industry who are working in a unique collaboration to respond to the urgencyfor reshaping the U.S. system of engineering graduate education to better serve the needs of modernengineering practice to strengthen the nation’s capability for
AC 2010-217: STRENGTHENING THE U.S. ENGINEERING WORKFORCE FORINNOVATION: FOUNDATIONS OF PROFESSIONAL GRADUATE EDUCATIONFOR THE NATION'S ENGINEERS IN INDUSTRY - PART II MID-CAREERDEVELRoger Olson, Rolls-Royce Corporation Page 15.1104.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010GSD-2010-1455-Panel Paper #2 Strengthening the U.S. Engineering Workforce for Innovation: Foundations of Professional Graduate Education for the Nation’s Engineers in Industry ─ Part II Mid-Career Development: Organizational Leadership ─ AbstractThis is the second of four invited panel papers prepared specifically for the National Collaborative
-4Almost without exception, the authors have called for changes in the way engineers are educated in aworld of rapidly changing technology. Unfortunately, while the changes have that have resulted havefocused on engineering education in the traditional academic context, the advanced professionaleducation of practicing professional engineers has not received its due.5 The National Collaborative TaskForce was established to address this need. Its mission is to establish high-quality professional graduateengineering education centered on the modern practice of engineering and the engineering method forinnovation that enables the further professional development of engineers in industry. The focus is tofurther the growth of the working professional in
. IntroductionThis is the fourth of four invited papers prepared for the special panel session of the ASEE-National Collaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform. This paperaddresses the importance for federal government and U.S. industry to invest in a nationaldemonstration project with innovative universities across the country to accelerate thedevelopment of professional master of engineering and doctor of engineering programs that meetthe needs of engineers in industry in bolstering U.S. technological innovation for the nation’sfuture economic growth, global competitiveness, and national security.1.1 Benchmarking National StrategiesToday, as the United States competes in the global economy, its industries are facing
15.783.5process OSU determined that not only was the industry moving quickly towards high power andenergy packs, but that consumers were demanding it and interested in all electric vehicleoperation. The desire to satisfy consumer desires and push the technology boundary led the teamto design a vehicle with considerable electric range and all electric performance. Batteries on themarket were barely capable of achieving this goal and none of the available products came in anappropriate pack. A123 offered support far beyond other battery companies and also has asuperior product able to greatly improve the vehicle performance. The collaboration with A123allowed a customizable battery pack from a set of modules, which allowed the team freedom tointegrate the
Lead Stress Engineer, Rolls-Royce Corporation, and a director of ASEE-College Industry Partnership Division. Page 12.605.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Enabling the U.S. Engineering Workforce for Technological Innovation: The Role of Competency Based Learning for Professionals1. IntroductionThis is the third of four invited papers prepared for a special panel session of the NationalCollaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform to enable a strong U.S.engineering workforce for competitiveness and national security. As Fred Gary, former vicepresident of General Electric pointed out
across thenation. In today’s economy of tight university budgets, it is unrealistic to think that universitiescan initiate and sustain high-quality professional graduate programs without external support.Whereas scientific research is the primary focus at many schools of engineering across thecountry, and is supported directly by federal funding, it is now evident that professional graduateeducation does not fit this model of funding. This paper begins the exploration of new fundingschemes in collaboration with industry and government support to sustain the increasingmomentum for the advancement of professional education in engineering practice andtechnology leadership for 21st century universities.Funding Models for EducationThe funding model