] Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board. (2008, Accreditation criteria and procedures. Canadian Council of ProfessionalEngineers.[2] V. R. Neufeld and H. S. Barrows. (1974, 11). The "McMaster philosophy": An approach to medical education. J. Med. Educ.49(11), pp. 1040-1050.[3] M. Harris and R. Cullen. (2009, 06). A model for curricular revision: The case of engineering. Innovative Higher Education34(1), pp. 51-63.[4] M. Savin-Baden. (2008, 04). Problem-based learning in electronic engineering: Locating legends or promising problems? IntJ Electr Eng Educ 45(2), pp. 96-204.[5] W. E. Eder and V. Hubka. (2005, 02). Curriculum, pedagogics and didactics for design education. J. Eng. Des. 16(1), pp. 45-61.[6] D.A. Kotys-Schwartz, D. Knight, G. Pawlas
spinning. With all the projects completed, it could generate as muchas 3,000 megawatts of power. At the same time there are already hundreds of megawattsof installed solar capacity. The Mojave solar park will become the world’s largest solarinstallation at 553 MW when completed in 20116.It is established that wind blowing over deeper water (offshore) is consistent and strong.So, there is a movement now to use floating wind turbines to avoid anchoring into a deepseabed. Marine innovation & technology’s windfloat can theoretically support giant 5MW turbines. Some projects can put turbines in the water by 2011-2012. Floatingturbines based 10 miles away would be largely invisible removing the complains ofvisual disturbances7. The floating turbines
AC 2011-2913: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A 3D PRINTER WITHRECYCLING SYSTEMR. Radharamanan, Mercer University Dr. R. Radharamanan is currently working as Professor of Industrial Engineering and Director of Mercer Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (MCIE) at Mercer University in Macon, Georgia. He has thirty eight years of teaching, research, and consulting experiences. His previous administrative experi- ences include: President of International Society for Productivity Enhancement (ISPE), Acting Director of Industrial Engineering as well as Director of Advanced Manufacturing Center at Marquette University, and Research Director of CAM and Robotics Center at San Diego State University. His primary research
institute in China. As the think tank foreducation innovation and development in China it employs more than 200 full time researchers.These researchers studies cover almost all the topics in education: namely education policy,education theory, basic education, higher education, vocational education, teacher education,curriculum and pedagogy, international comparative education, psychology and specialeducation, and physical, health, and arts education. CNIER researchers are contributing to theeducation development in China by advising policy-making process, advancing theoreticalinnovation and guiding local practices. CNIER also supports the Future Engineers program, a student science and engineeringcompetition. The Future Engineers national
Page 22.475.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011Development of a Modularized Architecture for Remote-Access LaboratoriesAbstractConducting hands-on experiments in undergraduate laboratory courses with large studentenrollment imposes significant strains on the fiscal, spatial and personnel resources of theeducational institutions. In response to the need for developing laboratory resources that providea practical experience to large engineering classes, remotely shared experimental facilities haveemerged as one innovative solution for educational laboratories with reduced resource needs.Recent research shows that a significant number of remotely-accessible experiments have beendeployed globally
To Develop Interpersonal Skills," Computers in Human Behavior, 11, 2, pp. 223-239, 1995.3. Doherty, P. B., “Learner Control in Asynchronous Learning Environments,” ALN Magazine, Volume 2, Issue 2,October 1998.4. Fulkerth, R. and Stevenson, W. W., “Teaching For Effectiveness In On-Line Courses,” Submitted for Proceedingsof Syllabus ‘97 Conference, Rohnert Park, California, July 1997, and Published on the WWW at URL:http://internet.ggu.edu/~bfulkerth/syllabus.html.5. Mazur, E., “Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual,” Prentice Hall, 1997.6. Project Galileo, “Your Gateway to Innovative Science Teaching Techniques,” Published on the WWW at URL
design an intelligent toy robot to be used bychildren with learning and physical disorders. Based on the idea of having a robot thatreproduces some interesting functionalities of a pet or a small animal4, the goal is to see howinteracting with robots could help autistic children, suffering from communication disorders,short attention span and inability to treat others as people, increase their ability to focus theirattention and to be more opened to their surroundings. This is a very open problem where teamshave a lot of latitude to develop creative and innovative solutions. For example, they can add adevice that generate sounds (see Section IV) and use it to communicate with the child; they canprogram the robot to play some music or to play
. The selected information may be implemented on Internet by instructors and otherprofessionals. This format of instructional presentation further provides a wider variety of thetypes of information that can be presented (for instance, multimedia and/or interactive delivery). Inaddition, it offers a permanent record of the lecture/discussion that can be retrieved/reviewed by thestudent as well as instructors for further clarification and modification. The innovative WWW-based educational delivery may stimulate students' interests, enhance the effectiveness of students' Page 4.120.2learning, and aid in the dissemination of the developed
the profession to the publicdomain and in its application in engineering education. It suggests that developingengineering curricula that depart the singular notion of professional engineering as that ofapplied science to one with an emphasis on more vocational elements as means to produceengineering as a more attractive course of study and more likely to enhance engineeringprofessional standing in the community as a civic profession.Keywords: Innovative curricula, education research, professional education issuesIntroductionIncreasing demand for professional engineers in an occupational environment of an estimatedshortfall of 20,000 professional engineers in Australia is great current concern 1. The currentnational annual output of 6000
mere economic union. Education andknowledge were recognized as vital for Europe’s development. There were significantdifferences between the existing higher education systems inside the different countries of theunion. It was time to create the mechanisms to allow convergence, making mobility easier forstudents and teachers in order to share knowledge and experiences, increasing innovation andskill acquisition. The Bologna Declaration established a strong commitment between governments aimingat building a common educational area and improving transparency and compatibility. It isimportant to understand that this Bologna Process is the result of multiple reflections andanalyses promoted by national and supranational work groups and
world. Technology design involves theapplication of knowledge to new situations or goals, resulting in the development of newknowledge 5. However, recent research has demonstrated that difficulties of effectively bringingsubstantive math and science content to bear in middle and high school pre-engineering curricula6 . These challenges for relevant math and science integration are even greater at the elementarylevel 7. With little room for new curriculum, there is a need to develop innovative instructionalstrategies that leverage existing inquiry-based science curriculum to support engineeringeducation goals. We suggest graphic-based modeling as a mediating process between inquiryscience and engineering design, providing students with a robust
32 can come together as a team and help these Engineering people, and provide a service. Civil Very direct. Very practical. Fluid and I11 F Director 20 Engineering would say innovative Page 15.732.5Data CollectionData within this study were collected qualitatively via semi-structured interviews. Each expertwas asked seventeen questions related to leadership, change, and synthesis of business andsocietal
, 2010 Enhancing the Learning Experience in a Multidisciplinary Engineering Technology CourseAbstractRapidly changing technology advances demand the revisions of engineering and technologycourses so that they continue to serve students and industry in a relevant way. In a typicalengineering technology department, students from different majors are usually required to takean introductory electrical engineering course. Due to the multidisciplinary background ofstudents, such a course has traditionally been a challenge to teach so as to make it interesting anduseful to all students. Therefore innovative teaching methods have to be employed in order toaccommodate different backgrounds and learning styles.In our
wireless telecommunications field. A co-founder of the National Center for Telecommunications Technologies (now the ICT Center) located at STCC, Mullett also played a principle role in the development of the innovative and long running Verizon NextStep employee training program. The author of two text books, Basic Telecommunications – The Physical Layer and Wireless Telecommunications Systems and Networks, Mullett did both his undergraduate and graduate work in the ECE Department at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst where he also taught the undergraduate sequence of courses in electromagnetics. He has presented at numerous regional and national conferences and also internationally on
strengthening theabilities of professional engineers by enhancing their skills in the areas of leadership,professional and ethical responsibility, and teamwork. The ASCE document The Vision for CivilEngineering in 20256 states that civil engineers must be “entrusted by society to create asustainable world and enhance the global quality of life.” In addition it articulates that “In 2025,civil engineers will serve as master builders, environmental stewards, innovators and integrators,managers of risk and uncertainty, and leaders in shaping public policy.” Academia is challengedin that “Colleges and universities must examine their curricula as they relate to the future civilengineer so advancement toward the vision can be realized. In the U.S., ABET, Inc
Technologies into the Industrial Engineering CurriculumAbstractIncorporation of powerful “scripting languages” in engineering modeling software is becomingincreasingly common. Unfortunately, while most engineering curricula include one or twoprogramming-related courses at the freshman and/or sophomore level, students generally showweak computer programming skills when they reach the core curriculum courses. This projectseeks to develop an innovative set of classroom modules involving computer programming foruse throughout the Industrial Engineering curriculum. The modules are in response to our beliefthat the main cause of the problem is not the specific material covered in the computerprogramming courses but the lack of
AC 2010-924: TEACHING ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY PUBLIC POLICYWHILE FULFILLING MULTIPLE ABET AND UNIVERSITY REQUIREMENTSTodd Myers, Ohio UniversityBen Stuart, Ohio University-Athens Page 15.1172.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010Teaching Engineering and Technology Public Policy While Fulfilling Multiple ABET and University RequirementsAbstract Public policy often lags behind innovation and laws are generally created in reaction tosocial issues. Elected officials are asked to set public policy for technology, the implications ofwhich are typically outside or beyond their individual training and expertise. Conversely,engineers and
) Knowledge of contemporary issues.To meet the educational outcomes, the programs were planned thematically around issues inTransportation and Environment in the UK; Water Resources in Argentina; Energy Production,Utilization, and Policy in Switzerland, Germany and France; and Energy and Sustainability inNorway and Sweden. For example, in the most recent program, students heard a series ofpresentations on topics such as innovative energy generation and carbon sequestration andtraveled on field trips to sites such as waste-to-energy, hydroelectric, and nuclear power plants.The students were in Stockholm, Gothenburg, Trondheim, Bergan and Oslo as the three-weekprogram progressed. Assessment was based upon required class and field trip attendance, a
to convince the funding agency that what they are proposing is goingto meet the needs of that agency and deliver upon project completion the information andoutcomes that the agency desires.#6: Do believe (as you write) that your idea is innovative, novel, and unique (provided you’veaccrued evidence in #1 & #2)When a PI is really excited about an idea, it shows through in the proposal. Proposals that areenthusiastic, well organized, and thorough yield higher ratings and higher quality commentsfrom reviewers. Writing that is dry is harder for reviewers to read; they are usually extremelybusy and then don’t take the time to provide the most useful comments. In general, when aproposal is bursting to “sell” your proposed idea and it addresses
conferences. Dr. Genis has three U.S. patents. From July 2003 to July 2005, as a team facilitator, he worked on the development of the curriculum for the “Partnership for Innovation in Nanobiotechnology Education” program in collaboration with the University of Pennsylvania and several Community Colleges.David Spang, Burlington County College Dr. David I. Spang holds a PhD degree in Material Science & Engineering and a MBA degree, with a concentration in Innovation & Technology Management, both from Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey. He has over twenty years of experience in the Solid State Materials and Chemical Process Industries in various Research, Process and
University Tom Litzinger is Director of the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education and a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State, where he has been on the faculty since 1985. His work in engineering education involves curricular reform, teaching and learning innovations, faculty development, and assessment. He teaches and conducts research in the areas of combustion and thermal sciences. He was selected as a Fellow of ASEE in 2008. He can be contacted at tal2@psu.edu.Hien Nguyen, Pennsylvania State University Hien Nguyen is a recent doctoral graduate in Instructional Systems at Penn State University. Her interests include cross-cultural collaborative learning
Kazmer, University of Massachusetts, Lowell David Kazmer is a Professor of Plastics Engineering at UMass Lowell where he has previously served as Associate Dean. His academic work is motivated by industry experiences with teaching and research related to engineering education, design, manufacturing, and optimization.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University OLGA PIERRAKOS is an associate professor and founding faculty member of the James Madison Uni- versity Department of Engineering, which graduated its inaugural class in May 2012. At JMU, Dr. Pier- rakos is the Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering Education (CIEE) and Director of the Advanced Thermal Fluids Laboratory. Her interests in engineering
construction project engineer for a construction contractor and as a research engineer for the Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory in Port Hueneme California. His teaching interests include construction equipment, cost estimating and construction process design. His research interests include highway and heavy construction methods, road maintenance methods and innovations in construction process administration.Dr. Natalya A. Koehler Koehler, Franklin University, OH Instructional Design Faculty Franklin University, OHDr. Aliye Karabulut Ilgu, Iowa State University Page 24.1400.1 c
. Ives, Farmville Future?, 2013, National Center for Case Studies in the Sciences.22. Rittenhouse-Olson, K., Is it a Lemon or a Lyme?, 2002, National Center for Case Studies in the Sciences Database.23. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, How people learn. 2000: National Academy Press Washington, DC.24. Chung, J. and S. Chow, Promoting student learning through a student-centered problem- based learning subject curriculum. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 2004. 41(2): p. 158-168.25. Yeung, E., Au-Yeung, S. Chiu, T., Mok, N., Lai, P. “”. . 2003. Vol 40(3). 237–241. , Problem Design in Problem-based Learning: Evaluating Student’s Learning and Self- directed Learning Practice
motivation13, there are still a large number offaculty members who continue to favor “delivering content” using lecture-based approaches.Most faculty development efforts tend to use the “develop-disseminate model” using shortduration workshops. Although some of these efforts have had success4, in most cases they donot result in widespread adoption7. Workshops and presentations at Frontiers in Education andthe American Society for Engineering Education can help make faculty members aware of new Page 24.1020.2practices in engineering education, but the participants in these programs are typically alreadyengaged in pedagogical innovations. Survey data
one decade ago. However, itwas the rise of mobile devices what pushed new dynamics at the classroom which werepreviously inconceivable, modifying the way of both teaching and learning, especially at K12level. Actual mobile devices give the flexibility and the easy-to-use requirements one-to-oneand group interactions always dreamed by teaching innovators. Authors like Murray andOlcese18 link the collaborative possibilities offered by the iPad with the competences neededby students this century, emphasizing the need to use modern learning models. By contrast,technological tools have usually been used in simulation environments, laboratory practicesor as basic tools for creating either work or reports in higher education, regardless the
Paper ID #9381Student Perceptions of Inverted Classroom Benefits in a First-Year Engineer-ing CourseDr. Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University Krista Kecskemety is a lecturer in the Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State Univer- sity. Krista received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering at The Ohio State University in 2006 and received her M.S. from Ohio State in 2007. In 2012, Krista completed her Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering at Ohio State. Her engineering education research interests include investigating first-year engineering student experiences, faculty experiences, and the connection between
of coal plants in the U.S. is influenced by both free market and regulatorymotivations. Coal power continues as cheap electricity generation drives high profits, whileregulatory issues impede improvements and innovation. In the near future, coal will remain a keyenergy source. Thus, the next generation of graduates will need to address these problems.Eventually, coal plants do retire, and given the difficulty of alternative energy sources to meetbaseload demand for power, coupled with the need for cleaner energy, innovation in coal poweris a critical problem for the next generation of engineering and technology graduates to address. Page
for the Council on Undergraduate Research and is the chair of the Commission for Academic Affairs Administrators for the American College Personnel Association. Her research interests include innovative learning opportunities for undergraduate students, the experiences of women leaders in higher education, and collaborative partnerships between academic and student affairs. Korine has earned a bachelor’s degree in English from Monmouth College, a master’s degree in College Student Personnel, and a doctorate in Higher Education Administration, both from Bowling Green State University.Megan A. Shannahan, Michigan State University
Emergency Management Course to Promote Computational ThinkingABSTRACTAt Jackson State University (JSU), an innovative module has been developed and integrated intoan existing “Emergency Management Technology” course. This course module involved fourfaculty members. Faculty from several different departments (Computer Science, English, andTechnology) developed teaching materials for the module. Through this course, students haveopportunities to explore the exciting world of computer science from the perspective of mobilecomputing. This course module is part of a project, Computational Thinking as an Approach toRefining the Critical Thinking and Analytical Reasoning Skills of Undergraduates, sponsored bythe National