themdevelop successful careers. The process leading to promotion and tenure at an academicinstitution is sometimes fraught with tension and uncertainty. P&T SMARTS eases the processby building a community of support around issues of promotion and tenure, as well as bypromoting strategic thinking on these issues. The only requirement for joining P&T SMARTS isto commit one to two hours a month to reading and other assignments.Experienced faculty members and administrators use their deep understanding of the uniqueissues and challenges that AALANA female faculty face to facilitate discussions during P&TSMARTS gatherings on various issues confronting faculty, engage AALANA faculty in deepdiscussion about smart strategies for attaining
student creators can engage other students tobecome interested in these interdisciplinary topics and research in general. Section 2 provides a brief overview of the training that was provided to the student teamand process they undertook interviewing experts to gather information on PLM. Section 3discusses the origin of PLM and presents the main goals and objectives of this process. InSection 4 the application of PLM in the aviation industry is discussed. Section 5 presentslifecycle assessment in relation to environmental monitoring. Finally, Section 6 concludes thepaper with students' reflections on the co-creation project and future research.2.0 Training Methods, Focus Groups and Communicating with Experts The professional
of emphasis: individual courses; profiles of specific projects; andcapstone design courses. However, multidisciplinary education across all disciplines requires alarger-scale model that can be incorporated into any discipline, a model that is both cost effectiveand scalable, and one that fully engages and benefits faculty. A consortium of 19 US and 5international institutions has come together around such a model, the Vertically IntegratedProjects (VIP) Program. VIP unites undergraduate education and faculty research in a team-based context, with students earning academic credits toward their degrees, and faculty andgraduate students benefitting from the design/discovery efforts of their multidisciplinary teams.VIP is novel because it unites
Standard (definitions of words, phrases, or othersymbology), and Test Method (actionable steps that lead to a specified result) [1]. Thisdemonstrates the wide variety of topics that are addressed by standards documents. Standardsstarted as consensus on units of weights and measures, but today standards are used in a widevariety of professions to ensure the safety of products and materials as well as the reliability ofgoods and services [2]. Due to the potential utility of this information format, academic librariesoften provide some standards to their patrons.Given the vast array of topics addressed by standards, students engaged in research or otherdesign projects in a variety of disciplines may have a need to identify and obtain full
. Guzdial, D. Hagan, Y. B.-D. Kolikant, C. Laxer, L. Thomas, I. Utting, and T. Wilusz, “A multinational, multi-institutional study of assessment of programming skills of first-year cs students,” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 125–140, December 2001. [Online]. Available: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/13514/[24] J. Piaget, The Origins of Intelligence In Children, 01 1952.[25] M. Prensky, “Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1,” On the Horizon, vol. 9, pp. 1–6, 09 2001.[26] T. Clegg and J. Kolodner, “Bricoleurs and planners engaging in scientific reasoning: a tale of two groups in one learning community.” Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 2, pp. 239–265, 11 2007.[27] S. Turkle and S. Papert
(Program Evaluation ReviewTechnique) views. Strong preference was given to the Network view because of the visual appeal tostudents and the instant bird’s-eye view of the entire project. Each task is represented as a box in flow-chart style format and easily communicates the task input and outputs. We customized the taskdescriptors as shown in Figure 1 below: Figure 1. Task parameter descriptors in Network display view (MS ProjectTM)Notice Task 16 has one input task and feeds three other activities. Moreover, the taskparameter “slack” indicates how much delay in task 16 completion date impacts the finalproject deadline. The Critical Path Method identifies all tasks with a current finish date thatwill delay the final project due date
have gained from going through your b. major’s curriculum? 8. Are there any other details you would like to add on before we conclude?Summary of ResultsQuestion 1 aimed to uncover the reasons why participants chose to join and remain on theirrespective engineering teams. A common theme emerged, highlighting two key factors that madethese teams special to each student. Firstly, the camaraderie among team members was highlyvalued, with participants describing the teams as close-knit environments where they formedmeaningful friendships and collaborated with large groups of people. Secondly, these teamsprovided an outlet for students to engage in design work freely, fostering creativity. Participantsexpressed appreciation for the
of the program in the most appropriate country. As aresult, while it may be field-specific, the program can have great diversity in theacademic level of the applicants, the focus of work, and placement locations. Beingcentrally-administered, like all non-university-centric programs, means that theseprograms put low stress on US university resources. However, the US universities cangreatly benefit – a graduate student may be able to pursue an internship, with externalfinancial support, with an expert in the field, and bring this expertise back to the US.By supporting post-doctoral students, these programs bring a long-term impact bysupporting the work of those people who will end up in high-level industry anduniversity positions.The Whitaker
).Certainly all academic institution types have a role to play in HPC and CI education. This paperis focused on the deployment of a HPC cluster at a Predominantly Undergraduate Institution(PUI). At a PUI the engagement of students in research projects is mostly from theundergraduate ranks which is markedly different from research intensive university. The idea ofundergraduate research (UGR), if unfamiliar, may seem like a stretch, but Kuh3 and others4-5have observed the positive effect of improved persistence in college courses generally and inSTEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) courses in particular, for thosestudents involved in UGR.This paper is in a series of reports about progress of high performance computing at UCO
of the interactiveactivities hindered communication, engagement, and understanding of what was being requestedfrom all participants. Feedback was also provided that communication could be enhanced byensuring that speakers and interpreters were “spotlighted” in the Zoom so all could better followdiscussion.In the next workshop, a number of the interpretation issues were resolved. However, post-eventevaluation revealed that DHH participants continued to express concern about interpretingsubstitution miscues, where vocabulary signed by the DHH participants was voiced with a lowerlevel of sophistication and understanding of the context. This illustrates one of the manyconsequences of the nationwide shortage of skilled ASL interpreters. Following
-on, collaborative learning through solving real-world problems. He directs the operations of the Institute-wide Georgia Tech Capstone Design Expo, which highlights projects created by over 2000 Georgia Tech seniors graduating students on an annual basis. He serves as the faculty advisor for the student organization of over 100 student volunteers who all train, staff, and manage the operations of Georgia Tech’s Flowers Invention Studio – one of the nation’s premier volunteer student-run makerspace, open to all of the Georgia Tech community. Dr. Jariwala’s research interests are in the field of makerspaces, evidence-based design education, and advanced additive manufacturing process. During his Ph.D. studies, he was
, student motivation, and their learning experiences. His projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 WIP: How Traumatic Events Help Shape Social Exclusion in Engineering TeamsAbstractThis Work In Progress (WIP) research paper explores the impact of traumatic events on studentlearning alongside the emergence of team
Reality course taught in the Computer Science Department at the same university, oras part of independent research projects involving electrical and computer engineering students.This reflects the strong educational impact of this project, as it allows students to contribute to theeducational experiences of their peers. During phase IV, the VR experiences are played bydifferent types of audiences that fit the player type. The team collects feedback and, if needed,implements changes.The pilot VR Lab, introduced as an additional instructional tool for the E&M course during Fall2019 and Spring 2020, engaged over 100 students in the program, where in addition to the regularlectures, students attended one hour per week in the E&M VR lab
, Towson University Jennifer L. Kouo, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Special Education at Towson University in Maryland. Dr. Kouo received her PhD in Special Education with an emphasis in severe disabilities and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from the University of Maryland at College Park. She is passionate about both instructional and assistive technology, as well as Universal Design for Learning (UDL), and utilizing inclusive practices to support all students. Dr. Kouo is currently engaged in multiple research projects that involve multidisciplinary collaborations in the field of engineering, medicine, and education, as well as research on teacher preparation and the conducting of evidence-based
established in other countries, RWTH Aachen University is the only university in Germany that has implemented the EWB Challenge into the engineering curricula so far. This paper aims at presenting the process of implementing the EWB Challenge in Germany. In the course of this implementation, the concept was evaluated with the help of a standardized questionnaire; an overview of the results gained from this evaluation is provided in this paper as well. The evaluation served to gain diverse information e.g. about the perception of the challenge in general, its impact on the amount of knowledge gained by the students, and also about the challenge’s potentials for improvement. First analyses show, that the overall quality of the EWB
0 Fa19 Sp20 Fa20 Sp21 Fa21 Sp22 semesterFigure 1: Student enrollment for the Computational and Traditional linear algebra courses, as wellas the added total enrollment, demonstrating the growth of the modernized computational class.Section details the course changes and the means by which they were achieved, whileSection describes their implementation and reception so far. Section provides conclusions and aperspective on the broader impact of this project, and others like it, in the future.MethodsChanges via a Community of PracticeThis project was funded by the Grainger College of Engineering Strategic InstructionalInnovations Program
, she developed a passion for undergraduate education. This passion led her to pursue a career as a lecturer, where she could focus on training undergraduate chemical engineering students. She has been teaching at UK since 2015 and has taught Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics, Computational Tools and the Unit Operations Laboratory. She is especially interested in teaching scientific communication and integration of process safety into the chemical engineering curriculum.Prof. Samira Azarin Samira Azarin is an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at the University of Minnesota. She earned her B.S. in chemical engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technol- ogy in 2006 and went
A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom environment, motivation and learning outcomes. She obtained her certifica- tion as a Training and Development Professional (CTDP) from the Canadian Society for Training and Development (CSTD) in 2010, providing her with a solid background in instructional design, facilitation
wecollected representations of organizational infrastructure, such as faculty workload policies, fromcollege and university web sites. These policies and procedures have been coded for traits relatedto an individual’s access to infrastructure and connectedness to engineering education researchnetworks, with a view to that trait’s impact on strengthening engineering education researchnetworks (see Table 1 for additional detail). These data are analyzed first to document theorganizational landscape and to provide a framework for the analysis of future interviews, whichwill focus on problems of faculty reward structures and diversity in engineering.For our data collection on organizational infrastructure, we targeted all colleges and universitieswith
the Higher Education Program at Virginia Tech. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering edu- cation can become more effective, efficient, and inclusive.Dr. Karl W Reid, National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) Karl Reid is the newly appointed Executive Director of the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), a 30,000 plus student-governed association in Alexandria, Virginia whose mission is to increase the number of culturally responsible black engineers who excel academically, succeed professionally and positively impact the community. Dr. Reid comes to NSBE from the United Negro College Fund where he served as senior vice president of research
methods impact the goal of reducing time to talent. Figure 4: How Can Educators Reduce Time to Talent? [5]Faculty FeedbackASME had the pleasure of presenting the above research findings to 37 faculty and educatorattendees at the 2023 Autodesk Educator Summer Summit. After the presentation, ASME andothers present participated in a discussion/listening session. They also provided insights oncurrent challenges, how Industry 4.0 curriculum can be implemented in their classrooms, and theresources needed for implementation. The central themes were the following: 1. There has always been a focus on grades, scores, and G.P.A.s, and students are afraid of making mistakes and embracing innovation. It is difficult to retrain
, which is directed toward the interactionsbetween cooperating or competing individuals and groups in a community, is on how membersof the engineering profession relate to specific others as part of their work, but not on the widersocietal issues created or amplified by professional decisions. Social ethics, which is directedtoward identifying and responding to the social and political implications of engineeringprojects, focuses on the wider societal impacts of the technical and professional decisions madeby engineers. The COVID-19 pandemic and the corresponding social problems that emergedrepresents an ongoing real world macroethical issue. We hypothesize that the culture ofdisengagement might be most apparent when engineering students are
students. Efforts to broaden participation in engineering haveachieved modest progress as students, especially those from historically marginalized groups,lack structured support towards academic success [1]. First-year, team-based design coursespresent a unique opportunity to foster inclusion through active, collaborative learningexperiences [2, 3].Undergraduate teaching assistants (UGTAs) often play an important role in building communitywithin first-year courses. UGTAs promote student engagement, serve as peer mentors, andimprove students’ perception of a course. Through their work, UGTAs build their own technicalskills, practice effective communication, and gain leadership experience [4-6]. UGTAs oftenreceive training on technical knowledge
Management dean, university administration, advisory board members, faculty, student rep- resentatives, entrepreneurial mentors, associations with entrepreneurial-based societies • Management housed (e.g., existing department, standalone center, etc.) Community • Alumni exploits and start-ups impact • Innovations • Employment of students in start-ups School per- • Engineering faculty publications in technical entrepreneurship formance • Average number of students enrolled in classes compared to School of Engi- neering enrollment • Tenure of courses • Frequency of courses offered Strategic • Internal resources planning
been an advocate for improving K-12 STEM education. Jill’s research interest lies in the K-12 pipeline to engineering and the ways to bring young people, particularly under represented populations, into STEM careers.Dr. Merredith D Portsmore, Tufts University Dr. Merredith Portsmore is the Associate Director for Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Out- reach (www.ceeo.tufts.edu). Merredith received all four of her degrees from Tufts (B.A. English, B.S. Mechanical Engineering, M.A. Education, PhD in Engineering Education). Her research interests focus on how children engage in designing and constructing solutions to engineering design problems and eval- uating students’ design artifacts. Her outreach work
modeling of physical systems in acoustics and communications networks, model-based systems engineering, engineering education and user-centric design of emerging technology.Dr. Sara Kraemer, Blueprint for Education Dr. Sara Kraemer is an evaluator, strategist, and educator in STEM and education at Blueprint for Education. She has pioneered innovative program evaluation methods that lend themselves to programs, courses, and initiatives that focus on systems-level impacts. She is also a Lecturer in the Interdisciplinary Professional Programs in the College of Engineering a the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she teaches classes on human factors engineering and digital transformation.Emi Aoki, University of
in the first iteration, Summer 2012. Constant comparative methodology was used to concurrently collect and analyze datawhile the subjects were engaged in the activity, which then generated more questions andopportunities for clarification submitted at that time and after they finished the fellowship.22 Asis consistent with a qualitative research approach, a control group was not used to compare thedata, instead the comparisons are within and across the unit of study: the cases. Methods The LINCR URE is of interest for its direct impact on the individual student participantsas well as its broader implications on neuroscience education and research collaborations. Thegoal of the first
improve student performance and help students develop conceptualunderstanding and problem-solving skills [4] - [14].In addition to asking conceptual questions, instructors can ask students to write short-answerresponses after asking conceptually challenging questions. Writing has been shown to improvecritical thinking and learning because it is a way to organize one’s thoughts and focus onunderstanding and communicating specific ideas [31]. Writing-to-learn (WTL) is one evidence-based learning strategy utilized in STEM classrooms where students write brief, low-stakesexplanations where they can practice using content knowledge in writing. WTL has been shownto support the development of conceptual understanding and metacognition [31] - [34
skills. Overall, a well-executed senior project course notonly offers a significant learning experience but also an invaluable one.To ensure that senior project courses remain practical and enriching, faculty have incorporated varioustechniques and approaches over the years. Recognizing the importance of community engagement, manyinstitutions have integrated a service-learning component into their senior project courses [1, 2]. Thisapproach encourages students to consider the broader societal impact of their work. Beyond societalawareness, educators have also aimed to use the senior project as a platform to foster lifelong, self-directed learning skills [3-5].Over the years, educators incorporated activities to foster and encourage development
thatcan paint the evolution of students’ knowledge and skills over time over a set of learningexperiences (Clements & Sarama, 2004; Simon, 1995; Sztajn et. al., 2012; Corcoran, Mosher &Rogat, 2009; Maloney and Confrey, 2010). We use a theoretical framework based on adaptiveexpertise and design thinking adaptive expertise to further advance a design learning continuum(Hatano and Inagaki, 1986; Schwartz, Bransford & Sears, 2005; McKenna, 2007; Neeley, 2007).Project OverviewThis research project has been to explore and understand how open-ended, hands-on makingwork and activities are reflected in the learning trajectories of students and their learning gains inthe product-based learning, undergraduate engineering classroom. The aim is to