beensuggested as a remedy to socially devoid engineering courses by asking students to work withpeople and apply their engineering skills to real world problems [34]. Other educators focus on aspecific class at a time to find ways of reframing technical content in a way that invites learningabout social and political factors [11, 12]. Our capstone course design is in line with theseapproaches and we contribute to the research with an analysis that aims to understand howtechnical and human-centered mindsets manifested in the students’ experiences.A related set of research endeavors aim to integrate social and ethical considerations withtechnical computing content. Interventions range from modified assignments [9,19] to immersivetheater [32] to role
connect theoreticalprinciples and application to the real world, and 2) it allowed students to think deeper aboutconcepts and the impact of engineering on the sustainability of our river systems.For example, when learning about flow frequency dynamics students are asked to consider theimpact of watershed development on downstream infrastructure sustainability. The topic is firstintroduced through an in-class discussion during a lecture. Students are asked to take a fewminutes (3-5) to discuss the potential impacts with a neighbor or in an online breakout room. Thetopic is re-enforced and assessed through an additional homework question (the homeworkquestion has students to calculate the change in flow from a specific storm and to describe
sustainability, environmental sustainability, social sustainability, economicsustainability, and sustainability methods and metrics [7]. The inclusion of these variousconstructs of sustainability in engineering courses can be evaluated, including FYED coursesthat are common in many programs [8].Instructors are including sustainability in assorted ways in their courses, with differentexpectations for learning outcomes that range from cognitive to affective outcomes. The learningoutcomes below specified in Minster et al [9], are applicable to this FYED course and thesustainability inclusion techniques. ● Defining, applying, analyzing and evaluating principles and tools of sustainable design. ● Defining, applying, analyzing and evaluating basic
Paper ID #37893Developing Habits of Mind through Family Engineering at HomeJubie Tan, State University of New York at Binghamton Jubie is an undergraduate researcher and leader at Binghamton University. She is enthusiastic about improving learning and working environments around the world. On campus, Jubie serves as President of Active Minds Binghamton, a chapter of the national nonprofit dedicated to mental health education and advocacy. Outside the classroom, she enjoys filmmaking, dancing, and hiking. Her research interests include self-regulation, intercultural communication, virtual teams, and organizational
multidisciplinarity of a team drives communication andargumentation decisions. This study investigated how team multidisciplinary (denoted“disciplinary diversity” of the design team) affects the communication strategies employed bysenior-level engineering design students at a large, public university.MethodsContext and Data Collection. This study was conducted on transcripts of student presentationsgiven for the Fall 2019 Senior Design Showcase at a large R1 university in the Mid-Atlantic UnitedStates. The Senior Design Showcase projects were scoped to solve real-world engineeringproblems experienced by industry sponsors. One of the core components of the Senior Designcurriculum is that teams are multidisciplinary (i.e., the teams include students from
navigate the curricular choices available [7], (2) students would need to explore the broaderfields of real-world electrical and computer engineering to building an understanding of theirrelevant career options [7], and (3) student feedback revealed a need and desire for professionalcommunication instruction earlier than the existing junior-level communication requirement [4].The resulting course is a unique fusion of career development, academic planning, professionalcommunications, extended campus orientation, and engineering design [7].ECE Discovery Studio was piloted during 2020-2021 academic year, a year ahead of the officialthreaded curriculum launch. Amid the backdrop of the global pandemic, the course pilot wasrestricted to an online
modeling for a complex world," 2002.[5] P. M. Senge, The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization, Revised and updated. New York: Doubleday/Currency, 2006.[6] N. Bouhrira and J. M. Cruz, "System Factors Affecting Underrepresented Minorities in Doctoral Programs in Engineering: A Literature Review," 2021 2021: IEEE, doi: 10.1109/fie49875.2021.9637208. [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/fie49875.2021.9637208[7] R. Bronson and C. Jacobson, "Modeling the dynamics of social systems," Computers & mathematics with applications (1987), vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 35-42, 1990, doi: 10.1016/0898- 1221(90)90039-M.[8] J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “Motivational beliefs
understood thestance that many of their professors took in order to keep the barriers up between the technicalengineering classroom and the sociopolitical events that were happening in the world: I feel like it would have broken the teacher-student relationship, which is a bit odd, but I feel like having that barrier definitely helps just to learn from them and separating real life at school especially when it gets crazy out there. -Indian, male, junior, industrial engineering [A] lot of professors choose not to become political, which is a good thing. It doesn't cause any unnecessary conflicts or issues that might arise. It sucks that they don't talk about it and they don't show support for things
Student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University. Her research interests are innovation-based-learning, educational data mining, and K-12 Out- reach. She works for the NDSU College of Engineering as the K-12 Outreach Coordinator where she plans and organizes outreach activities and camps for students in the Fargo-Moorhead area.Ryan Striker P.E., North Dakota State University Ryan Striker is a life-long learner. Ryan has over a decade of professional experience designing embed- ded electronic hardware for industrial, military, medical, and automotive applications. Ryan is currently pursuing a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University. He previously earned
errors, improved student grades, increased studentlearning, and developed students’ ability to communicate clearly and effectively. However, theseexisting studies do not address project-based learning environments. A capstone design courserequires a team of student engineers to research, design, build, and test an engineering solution toaddress a real-world problem, often with an existing client. The capstone design review processpresented in this study was formatted to allow the process to be exportable to projects of varyingscope and team size. The design review consisted of project teammates pairing up andindependently reviewing each other’s products. The review itself required partners to answer aset of questions about each other’s work to
with capacities in three overarching areas: transdisciplinarity;systems thinking; and professional skills. Transdisciplinarity is fundamental to addressing social(or sociotechnical) messes. Narrowly-trained engineers will not have the necessary expertise totackle real problems that pay no heed to disciplinary boundaries. Engineers need exposure to arange of specialties within engineering, and as importantly, need social science knowledge that itnot only complementary to, but also deeply integrated with, traditional engineering knowledge.Take climate change for example. Addressing climate change requires an understanding oftechnical issues as well as public policy and politics.6 Today climate change is considered ahighly partisan issue, but
proctors at the tables, additional 10 volunteers were assigned to delivercompetition materials to the tables at the beginning of each round and to the grading room at theend of each round.At the beginning of the afternoon program, the dean of College of Engineering usually gave awelcome remark and then introduced the speaker of the event. At the state MATHCOUNTS, auniversity professor was invited as the feature speaker. The speaker would talk about their ownresearch and its relationship to the middle school math. The easy-to-understand approach, thefascinating contents, and the connection of math to the real life applications were reallyinspiring. The speech was well received by the students, coaches, and parents. For the first year,a physics
focus on Operations Research at Georgia Tech. She is President of the Health Systems Engineering Alliance (HSEA) Board of Directors. She is an active member of the Institute of Operations Research and Management Science (INFORMS), Dr. Ivy served as the 2007 Chair (President) of the INFORMS Health Applications Society and is a past President for the INFORMS Minority Issues Forum. Her research interests are mathematical modeling of stochastic dynamic systems with emphasis on statistics and decision analysis as applied to health care, public health, and humanitarian logistics.Dr. Jessica T DeCuir-Gunby, NC State University Dr. Jessica T. DeCuir-Gunby is a Professor of Educational Psychology and University Faculty
helped students explore what it might be like to work on aglobal engineering team. Students were placed in small groups, and each person was assigned acountry from a different region of the world (e.g., one team had members assigned Egypt, SouthKorea, the United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia, Colombia, and Indonesia). The students assumed therole of managers of an international team of engineers from their assigned countries and had todetermine how to lead the team effectively. In the first part of the project, each group identifiedquestions they could ask to learn about the cultural and business practices in their countries.Each student then located and communicated with an engineer from their assigned country todiscuss those questions. Students wrote
Systems Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education. Dr. Allam’s interests are in spatial visual- ization, engineering design education, diffusion of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of learning management systems for large-sample educational research studies, curriculum development, and fulfill- ing the needs of an integrated, multi-disciplinary first-year engineering educational environment through the use of active and collaborative learning, real-world application and examples, problem-based and project-based learning, classroom interaction, and multiple representations of concepts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Faculty Pre and Post Reflections
meet the primary course outcomes. This research also develops and proposesmodifications to existing exercises and projects that allow a system engineer’s role to emerge, orthat includes the use of some of the methods and tools that system engineers use in professionalpractice.IntroductionResearchers have previously made the argument for a system approach to engineering education.In 2008, at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Simo Lehto presentedthe argument that a system approach is necessary to align more closely classroom exercises andprojects to real-world business and activities in Finland. This is necessary because the systemapproach “corresponds closely to the mode of operation and organization of
studio projects. The designprogram is interdisciplinary and utilizes faculty from business, art, and social science disciplines;and employs a variety of innovative instructional methodologies. Student take a design studio class each of six semesters beginning sophomore year thatfeatures 1) moderate instruction over a long period of time in the curriculum , 2) liberal faculty-directed practice in the design studio, 3) real-world application, and 4) collaborative and Page 14.331.6individual design instruction. Students apply their growing cognitive expertise and experience to increasingly morecomplex and sophisticated problems
. (1999). We are teaching, but are they learning: accountability, productivity, and assessment. Journalof Academic Librarianship, 25(4), 304-5.8 Hunt, F., Birks, J. (2004). Best practices in information literacy. Libraries and the Academy, 4(1).9 Malenfant, C., Demers, N. (2004). Collaboration for point-of-need library instruction. Reference ServicesReview, 32(3), 264-273.10 Emde, J., Emmett, A. (2004). Assessing information skills in the real world: the good, the bad and the literate”Brick and Click Libraries: An Academic Library Symposium, 4th Annual 2004, 83-89. Retrieved 21 November2005 from https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/dspace/handle/1808.11 Carr, D. (2005). Information resources in the humanities. Course syllabus. University of
a standardizedevent and take place in more real-world settings. !ReferencesAnsari, D., Smedt, B. D., & Grabner, R. H. (2012). Neuroeducation – A Critical Overview of An Emerging Field. Neuroethics, 5(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9119-3Bembich, S., Clarici, A., Vecchiet, C., Baldassi, G., Cont, G., & Demarini, S. (2014). Differences in time course activation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex associated with low or high risk choices in a gambling task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00464Bunce, S. C., Izzetoglu, K., Ayaz, H., Shewokis, P., Izzetoglu, M., Pourrezaei, K., & Onaral, B. (2011). Implementation of fNIRS for Monitoring Levels of
achieve success on 50% of the embedded indicatorsfor this outcome; however, this is influenced heavily by poor performance on two small examquestions. The weighted approach provides one set of student category data, which we can useto assess the outcome via the group indicator metric. In this case, the indicator is achieved due tothe influence of good performance on homework 1, which carries much more weight than theexam questions. See enclosure 1 for an example of this analysis using real data from one term ofeach course.Table 2. Example of using a weighting approach to determine proportions of students in each performance categoryfor a course outcome as a whole (fictional data). The weighted values are the product of the raw percentages
their notebooks were being used. They found that “few [students] … thought thattheir lab classes successfully taught them the benefit of maintaining a lab notebook.” Moreover,the authors’ later survey of the literature and of college faculty led them to conclude that inundergraduate lab courses “little formal attention has been paid to addressing what is considered‘best practice’ for scientific documentation …[or even] how researchers come to learn thesepractices” [3].At Cornell University, two courses, Interfacing the Digital Domain with the Analog World andEngineering Communications are taught in conjunction. The first course is housed in theApplied Engineering and Physics department, and the second in the EngineeringCommunications Program
],and Engineer Your World [6].However, at the same time, children spend most of their time in out-of-school settings [9]. As aresult, informal learning settings can play a significant role in children’s learning development.Students may learn about engineering during summer and afterschool programs as well as athome when reading books, playing with toys and games, and visiting museum exhibits.Museums and science centers are informal settings that are intentionally designed to promotelearning and interest development [35]. Studies show that these settings are where children beginto develop competencies, skills, knowledge and problem-solving processes that supportparticipation in STEM-related careers [30; 36]. For example, many engineering
provide real world stories and connections for students who are more likely toenter industry than to enter academia. Diverse work experiences, as well as other forms ofdiversity, all contribute to positive experiences for engineering students.For individuals, this model allows pathways that can include more lucrative options, addressingthe issue that student loan debt affects underrepresented graduates at a higher rate.30 The modelcreates a more robust pathway for current engineers to have enriching and satisfying careers, thataddresses and respects the needs of a diverse population of engineers, potentially enticingexcellent candidates into faculty positions. This model makes explicit alternate pathways toachieving personal goals with respect to
engineeringstudents with a mentoring faculty member and, occasionally, a graduate student who is an expertin the area of “innovative design”. The collaborative team works to solve a real-world problemthrough the application of various design techniques. In addition, the collaboration can improveor even identify enhanced design techniques and processes. For example, past research effortsimproved the design method in two areas: 1) the understanding of how to develop and implementprototyping strategies which are effective and efficient [11] - [15] and 2) new methods toenhance ideation based on analogies to biological systems [16]. The sponsor organizationresearch partners take keen interest in the design methodology research; oftentimes adoptingthese techniques
thecustomer requirements, design specifications, and manufacturing processes used to produce it”[22]. The focus of our approach centers on 4 separate phases of how to evaluate and assess theproduct itself; rather than a more specific product assessment [23].The initial phase, Preparation, allows for students to perform research on the selected productthat involves not only technical and design characteristics; but also how its design is influencedby 4 overarching factors: ● Global – how is or how can the product design be influenced by a combination of geographic and/or cultural differences around the world ● Societal – how is or how can the product design be influenced by ergonomics, social pressures, lifestyles in varying conditions
fail. … We needed like the knowledge that if we failed, it wouldn’t be the end of the world. … But since we knew that like as long as we were giving it an honest effort that would like… that’s all that really mattered. So we decided we wanted to do something new and exciting, and yep, that’s how that happened. We’ve learned so much new stuff, because other stuff we can just learn in a textbook, but doing the new lab work stuff, that’s where we learn new stuff. F, 4th yr I feel confident that if I’m given an assignment where I need to learn something, then I could do it. I Dec 2014 can teach myself what I need to know
before returning to school. Dr. Teichert received his PhD from University of Michigan, where he focused on modeling of cyclic loading for batteries in a particular microrobotic application. Dr. Teichert is an assistant professor in Trine University’s, Wade department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, where he teaches dynamics, mechanics of machinery, as well as introductory first-year courses. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Frankenstein Inspired Engineering Design ProjectAbstract In 2018, people all over the world were reading Frankenstein in celebration of its 200thanniversary. There is no doubt that the ideas explored in Frankenstein are still timely
more information, but not extend their tenure at the university.Toward that end, the goal of this paper is to discuss three key topics that can be readily infusedinto existing coursework with minimal disruption: raw materials, process efficiencies, andwastes/byproducts. These three themes are essential to any engineering field or application,whether discussing design, manufacturing operations, management, service operations, or energyproduction, to name only a few. These concepts apply to traditional engineering materials andeven to organic and biological processing, and they extend fully across the engineering spectrum,from product conception to end-of-life. Indeed, these three topics are multidisciplinary in nature.In this paper we will
under a strict timeschedule with well-defined design goals give students more of a “real world” engineeringexperience than what they get through their standard coursework [3]. Moreover, nearly everyinteresting and worthwhile venture in life comes with some element of pressure; competitionteaches students how to handle it [4]. Competitions make students realize what their strengthsand weaknesses are and what areas they have to work on [5]. Besides student competitions alsobenefit other stakeholders like high school teachers and organizing institutions. Page 23.282.2Indeed, there are a variety of competitions ranging from robotics [1] to process
% indirect score 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% TME1023 MCS2023 TIE2063 TIE2093 MCS2323As for the junior/ senior level courses, the students scored the achievement of objectivessignificantly higher than what the direct assessment scores provided.The most significant difference comes from TIE4115, the senior project five-credit course.The students in this course do learn and practice how to solve real-world industrial problems.The course represents the highlight of the BSET program, which might be the reason for thestudents to rank it highly. Page 23.334.19 Graph