the delivery and cleaning robots should not collide with one another at anytime. Figure 1: Project schematic.5. Research ProcedureThe research reported in this paper was conducted during the last two weeks (Weeks 3 and 4) ofthe workshop when the participants designed and prototyped their robots for the assigned projects.For the project sessions, the participants were grouped into nine teams, with each team comprisingof approximately two teachers and four students. The nine teams were assigned to two classroomsby a lottery, with one classroom housing four teams and another housing five teams. One of thesetwo classrooms was randomly selected as the treatment group, which included four teams. Theremaining five
Senior 30.30%Fig. 1. Student ClassificationAttendanceForty-nine percent of the students attended all the four sessions of the PDW. Thirty-three percent(33%) attended three sessions, 6% attended two sessions, and 12% attended only one session.Weekly attendance is shown in Figure 2. Due to other commitments including work and courseschedules, some of the students were unable to attend all the PDW sessions. In particular, thePDW had a time conflict with one other senior level CM course. One significant challenge wastrying to find a scheduled time that was most convenient to all interested students. Thursdayafternoons seemed to be the best time for the fall semester, but unfortunately, some CM studentswere still
possibility of helping all individuals achieve their fullest potential.2. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATIONThe above four reports try to address many of the issues regarding the use of IT in education.We will look at their findings in what IT is capable of doing to enhance student leaning.One outcome of the discussion at a break-out session of the 1996 NSF workshop27 was theunderstanding of IT’s ability to • provide access to world-wide resources, • facilitate the accumulation, generation and presentation of data, • provide tools for analysis and modeling of more or deeper and more realistic examples in a short time, • enable enquiry and extend the human capability to visualize, organize and analyze data, • provide immediate feedback
- ing in several.The following provides some of the reasoning for the CEES assessment shown in Table 3. 1. Technical core - Level 3. CEES maintains a science-based approach to engineering education, where students receive a grounding in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and engineering science before embarking on sub-specializations of civil engineering. Through this course sequencing, the students do have an ability in (at least) four areas. 2. Experiments - Level 3. Besides general chemistry and physics labs, six required courses have formal laboratory/field components. In addition, courses that have Sooner City design components use a combination of virtual and real data sets for
field experiences, andreceive in-the-moment pedagogical coaching within the pedagogy course.Critical and constructive reflection on teaching practice, which we assume is needed to helpstabilize student-centered instructional approaches, is scaffolded through course assignments andin-class activities. LAs regularly reflected on (and wrote about) how course readings connect totheir to own experiences both as a student and as a peer educator within the ENES100. Throughboth field note assignments and in-class video analysis sessions, LAs were encouraged to (1)develop detailed descriptive accounts of classroom events, (2) generate multiple plausibleinterpretations of classroom events, and (3) assess the affordances of instructional moves inrelation
and wiring on thebreadboard in real life. Most students did this successfully and some realized very intricateprojects.Overall, these students spent a productive week during a difficult year and emerged with aworking knowledge of electronic hardware and Arduino programming.1. IntroductionThe pandemic has had an enormous impact on daily life, from long-distance travel to access torestaurants, and one significant but less-noted area is in the access to pre-college summeractivities. Educational camps and programs are a big part of many children’s summerschedules, and these were generally not available in 2020.To address this gap, a week-long Arduino workshop was developed to give middle schoolstudents an opportunity to actively engage in fun and
how to create a search strategy, searcheffectively in an engineering database, and use EndNote citation software to manage referencesand cite them in the paper. The second library session taught students how to identify the typicalstructure of an engineering article and read an engineering article efficiently.Eligibility criteria In the Fall semester of 2013, authors of this paper began the research study afterobtaining Research Ethics Board approval (certificate #: 137-0813). A recruitment letter wassent out to all students enrolled in the CCOM 206 class and one of the investigators made anannouncement in each of the second library sessions to seek participants. Students were eligibleto participate if they were either: (1) A Chinese
his Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Kentucky and. His primary research interests include recommender systems, data privacy, data mining, and machine learning. He has served as an associate editor, editorial board member and reviewer of international journals. He also served as a technical program committee member, session chair, and reviewer for many international conferences.Yun Wan, Yun Wan is a Professor of Computer Information Systems in the University of Houston- Victoria. His current research includes electronic commerce and information systems in STEM education. His other research includes text analytics, decision support systems, and enterprise systems development. His research is
conference duringconvocation, training for new faculty, seminars and teaching chats throughout the year, and peerobservation—all through a single commission of faculty, staff, and students. We have organizedour efforts around an institutional teaching model developed by our own faculty for the specificneeds of our institution. In this paper, we describe the development of this model, including itsroots in a teaching workshop and evolution through discussions of the antithesis and exemplar ofexcellent teaching. We provide the results of a survey of our faculty to determine which aspectsof effective teaching they deem most important. We close by illustrating general benefits ofadopting a university-wide teaching model along with specific uses of such
weaknesses, or gaps in contentwere identified that generally fall into one of two categories: 1) Unmet institutional outcomesand 2) Insufficient/incorrect course and curriculum scaffolding.The heritage ME 220 course provided very little scaffolding for the student’s learning.Scaffolding requires instructors and the organization of the course to provide a learning structurethat prepares students to understand new concepts and develop new proficiencies more easily byintentionally developing pedagogical building blocks to more complex concepts andproficiencies [7]. It is widely accepted that proper scaffolding and fading in a course curriculumset students up for success, particularly within and across engineering courses [8] [9]. The lackof scaffolding
knowledge generation,graduate education, and community building activities. This paper defines engineering educationresearch, summarizes its development and early growth within the US, gives indications ofinternational progress, and details those actions necessary by various stakeholders of engineeringeducation research to build the policy case for our field within the academic, government, non-profit, and corporate sectors.Engineering Education ResearchDefinitionRecent decades have seen increasing levels of research on collegiate education within scientificdisciplines by scientists themselves, including by those in physics[1], chemistry[2], biology[3],mathematics[4,5], computer science[6], and the geosciences[7]. Such research might best
venues acceptable(providing the sponsor organizations are deemed acceptable): refereed journal articles, reviewedjournal articles, refereed conference proceedings, reviewed conference proceedings, andconference presentations.[13] However, the “scholarly value” associated with the variouspublishing venues looks something like this, from highest perceived academic value to lowest: Refereed scholarly journal (the more prestigious the better), Refereed professional journal or book, Book chapter, Non-refereed semi-professional periodical or textbook, Conference proceedings, essay collection, Semi-technical general-circulation magazine, General
and 2007, respectively. From 1993 to 1997, he worked for Telefnica of Argentina for four years designing and planning telephony outside plant net- works. Then he worked for five years for Lucent Technologies Power Systems (later Tyco Electronics Power Systems) as a Technical Support Engineer and Sales Technical Consultant in Latin America. For three years, he was also a part-time instructor in charge of ITBA’s telecommunications laboratory. He is currently and Assistant Professor at the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin and his research interests include power electronics, distributed generation, renewable and alternative energy, and analysis of the impact of
analysis from the freshmansurvey responses prior to the start of the project and then mid-way through the project.Table 1. Safety Competency ScaleRating Description CategoryIntuitive Recognizes safety as an important issue, Personal Safety lists generic personal safety elements but not involving technical safety terms. Example may be generic household safety.Medium Personal level Recognizes common hazards (i.e. Safety of flammable) and the need to protect against Others them, example lab
Session Number 3125 Carnegie Mellon’s Multidisciplinary Engineering Design Projects Course Serves a Variety of Students and Project Sponsors John W. Wesner, James H. Garrett, Jr., Eswaran Subrahmanian, Arthur W. Westerberg, Cristina H. Amon Institute for Complex Engineered Systems, Carnegie Mellon UniversityAbstractThe Institute for Complex Engineered Systems (ICES) at Carnegie Mellon University, acontinuation of the former NSF-funded Engineering Design Research Center (EDRC), sponsorsseveral project-based engineering design courses that are open not only to Carnegie MellonCollege of Engineering students, but also to the entire
structure and operating procedures that are found in manybusinesses today. Product development takes place in a stage-gate process with well-defineddeliverables, milestones and reviews. Key elements of this framework included:Organization: The product-development team consisted of 4-5 engineers with a projectsupervisor. The project supervisor (instructor) assigned the team members. The basic projectschedule and primary deliverables are indicated in Figure 1 at the end of this paper. The teamshad access to "consultants" that could be used to provide support with both technical and non-technical issues. Each team was required to present a weekly oral briefing on a specified topic tothe project supervisor.Design Methodology: There was an emphasis on
practical applications began with establishment of EcoleNationale des Ponts et Chaussées in Paris in 1747. Since it was established to train engineers forFrench army, purely technical knowledge with view of military use only was considered the coreof engineering education at the Ecole. A scientific base of military engineering knowledge wasalso delivered to the élèves during limited classroom sessions. Accounts of teaching problemsolving to its élèves are limited to in-filed training/apprenticeship with an experienced militaryofficer.Teaching of creativity and inventiveness is strongly related to the way engineers (also engineeringstudents and in general students showing engineering aptitudes) think in action. How engineersthink as compared to
is in fluid dynamics, active control of structures, and engineering education. He has published several technical papers in these areas. He has served in various capacities in the Aerospace Division of ASEE and the Saint Louis section of ASME. He is also a member of the Academic Affairs Committee of AIAA. In this capacity he has been organizing education sessions at AIAA SciTech Conference. He has attended and participated in various workshops and conferences related to Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) since 2010 and currently a co-PI for a grant from KEEN. In February 2011, he received the Missouri Society of Professional Engineers (MSPE) faculty of the year award. He is the recipient of Outstanding
.” The instructor canbe instrumental in enforcing this philosophy of quality in all respects. Qualitywork should be expected in students’ written laboratory reports, examinations, tests,quizzes, take-home assignments, homeworks, creative drawings, technical topicpresentations, research reports, etc. This can be effectively accomplished byproviding the students with a model report. The model or the format can beinstructor-generated or one that is standard and already available in the system.Even a very diversified student body will be able follow a standardized model,whether it be for a publication or be it for an assignment.Establishing high standards obviously should receive priority billing. Americanindustry now wants the performance
environmental engineeringcurriculum. Hands-on activities in the course were developed to support typical lecture-basedcourses within the civil and environmental majors. These activities also supplement traditionallaboratory exercises that students experience in their civil and environmental engineeringcourses. Figure 1 below illustrates how the field engineering course provides baselineexperiences for the major’s courses which follow (Pocock et al 2000).The Concrete Beam Design, Construction and Testing activity is especially beneficial to studentstaking our course in Concrete Design, required by every civil engineering major. As shown inFigure 1, Concrete Design is a technical design course that directly supports our civilengineering capstone course
majored in engineering technology, and one student majored in each ofthe following areas: computer science, industrial education, and industrial technologymanagement.CMU students earned three credits for successful completion of the exchange program. Thisfulfilled requirements for a technical core course as well as a humanities/social science elective.Students registered for the course, IET 420C, during the first summer session. The course beganwith bi-weekly orientation sessions one month prior to departure. The content of the course isoutlined below. A. Orientation to International Technology 1. Chinese Culture Considerations 2. Chinese Language Considerations 3. History and Background of China 4. Guest
Session 3606 Models for Lighting Design Education Salim A. Elwazani Bowling Green State University IntroductionWhile educators assure the need for equipping architecture and design students withlighting design knowledge,1 the nature of the teaching methods employed in imparting thatknowledge is not easy to define. The mere number and diversified orientations of academicprograms speak for the enormous proportions of such a task. However, lighting educatorsare familiar with one or more methods of instruction that contribute to developing
Page 7.988.1primarily on conducting experiments and analyzing and interpreting experimental data. The Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationfourth skill associated with this outcome, namely the design of experiments, was missing fromboth course outcomes and content.3 Prior to the implementation of outcome #4, typical courseoutcomes and content were as follows:1. Students will develop a general understanding for laboratory procedures utilized in analyzing water and wastewater samples.2. Students will be exposed to full-scale environmental engineering facilities such as water and wastewater
schedules of the classes involved. Instead, the certifiedprofessional trained the students in three of the classes. There were 95 students in the threetrained classes, approximately one half of our total sample size. The remaining students werethen part of the control group. The students in the control group received the training session onthe same day they completed the team performance questionnaire. The performance of the senior design students was measured in two different ways. Onemeasure was the grades that the teams received in their senior design classes. The secondmeasure of performance was generated from the responses to the TEQ questions that dealtspecifically with performance. The average level of performance was obtained by
, Glen Roames, Mike Jensen, Brian Kuritz and Matt Johnson for providing information onthe individual projects.Bibliography1. Marchese, A.J., Hesketh, R. P., Jahan, K. (1997) Design in the Rowan University Freshman Engineering Clinic.Proc. Conf. Amer. Soc. Eng. Edu., Session 3225.2. Schmalzel, J., Marchese, A. J., and Hesketh, R. P. (1998). What's Brewing in the Engineering Clinic? HewlettPackard Engineering Educator, Vol. 2, No. 1., p. 6.3. Marchese, A. J., Newell, J., Ramachandran, R. P., Sukumaran, B., Schmalzel, J. L and Maraiappan, J. L. (1999).The Sophomore Engineering Clinic: An Introduction to the Design Process through a Series of Open Ended Projects.. Proc. Conf. Amer. Soc. Eng. Edu. Session 2225.4. Marchese, A. J., Chandrupatla, T. R
during this semester as observed inFig.3. This is not to say that the author believes that students only give good ratings toinstructors who give easy exams. Rather, the author had particular difficulty in creating examsfor this particular class that were within the reach of the class and also satisfied the author'sopinion of appropriate technical competency. In students’ words, the exams were “too difficult.”Yet, overall the ratings are generally positive.Figure 4 shows that there is a similar trend towards improved evaluations for the remainingSRTE data. Again, there is a dip observed during the Spring 1997 class. It was definitelyobserved that the morale of the Spring 1997 class suffered during the early portion of thesemester and sadly this
) summarizes the parameters involved in the implementation of the project. # TYPE OF ACTIVITY 1 Brainstorming for Design of the Experiment and the Apparatus 2 Meeting Minutes and Progress Reports 3 Prototyping 4 Generation of Technical Drawings for all (Home Made) Components 5 Selection of (commercial) Components and Identification of Suitable Sources 6 Fabrication and Compilation of Notes on Best Approach for Machining 7 Electro-mechanical control system 8 Testing, Calibration, Generation of Data and Measure of Accuracy 9 Generation of the Laboratory Manual for
invited them to discuss whatever came to mind. We asked them tomake space for everyone at the table. One facilitator helped make that space; the other facilitatorrecorded the session and made notes on large poster paper at the table. These notes and thedialogues were analyzed for three overarching themes: (1) engineering is…, (2) understandingdecolonization and (3) barriers to decolonization.Engineering is…Each table group began their discussions within, or by demonstrating the theme, engineering is.The first group began with a discussion on the iron ring ceremony, which engineering students inCanada may choose to attend upon graduation, before entering into the profession. Theceremony had been called to the attention of the CEEA-ACÉG conference
using independent researchfields, now highlighting potential risks and achieved goals. It is aimed to deduce howthese goals can be achieved via educational solutions in various applications. Page 13.568.2 1. Introduction For the future, the nation will need a whole generation with inherent innovationskills, and a workforce equipped with more than literacy in reading, mathematics andscience. Down the road we need a workforce with the capacities of creative thinking andthriving for a ethically sound collaborative culture. If our goal is a research rich learningenvironment or one that is interdisciplinary, it
demonstrated a facility for independent learning, and shall have prepared for continued professional development* Have participated in team design experiences in which the client is distinct from the faculty supervisor(s).* have prepared at least one major individual concept-oriented technical report or paper, and one major client-oriented group project report.* have completed a general engineering science core by the beginning of the junior year, and shall have completed a discipline-specific technical core..* have demonstrated the ability to effectively communicate technical material in writing, one-on-one meetings, and group presentations.* be prepared to practice the profession of engineering using a systems perspective broad enough to