Virginia Tech. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Collaborative Research: Design and Development: The Skillful Learning InstituteIntroductionThe Skillful Learning Institute (SLI) administered a virtual short course experience forengineering educators in order to expand the explicit engagement of engineering students in theirmetacognitive development, this is currently lacking. Metacognition is instrumental for one toindependently assess and direct one’s lifelong learning - a lifelong skill to propel ongoing growthand development. Because of this, metacognition is essential for engineers because it
routes. Positive impacts include the reduction of mosquitos and job creation. Inaddition to considering the social ramifications of construction based on their selected zones,students research a location of their choice and propose technologies for use in that community.They evaluate the social impact of these technologies and incorporate a qualitative analysis intoan overall social impact report. This project gives students the chance to solve a technicalchallenge that is inextricably linked to social factors within the community. By integratingprojects into an earlier course of the engineering curriculum, students learn early on thatengineering requires a broad range of skills, is not always an exact, straightforward process, andthat there is
support. E-mails and flyersalso were sent to local community colleges.After the first year, COMPASS scholars participated in recruitment efforts and visited freshmanseminar sections, which all freshmen and any transfer student with less than 30 hours must attendin the fall semester. A promotional video produced in the fall of the first year was shown duringspring visits to introductory science classes, or by course professors in some cases.The COMPASS program currently has three cohorts of 8, 9, and 10 students. One student fromCohort 1 left in the first semester due to family relocation to another state. He was replaced witha student of the same class year, who has been thriving. A second student from Cohort 1 left forpersonal reasons after two
of linear questions. ◦ Stimulate a free-flowing discussion on these various dimensions and provide a visual reference for everyone in the room. ◦ Have the respondents help us draw conclusions about the impact of their various identities on their interactions and experiences in their engineering studies. What research questions or questions for practice do you have that might be suited to qualitative research and a focus group format? What sorts of interactive activities might you be able to create to help answer those questions? To recruit participants, we posted flyers around campus and asked campus contacts to e-mail student veterans in engineering. The qualification survey
interest in studying leadership began in the teaching of industrial-organizational psychologyclasses to engineering, design, construction, and management students. At the time, the collegebegan an interdisciplinary engineering program with a unique collaborative committee approach.As the only non-engineer, and later the only woman on the committee, the lead author perceivedthis situation to be a unique opportunity. She learned by actively participating and observingboth the successes of the major, and true team leadership. The challenges of the overallcommittee began with successfully meeting ABET 2000 criteria, and expanded to include issuesof student scholarship on senior design projects, and faculty engaging the local level ofpoliticians and
theeffectiveness of immersive (panoramic) videos with hotspots as pre-class materials withinthe flipped classroom approach. This paper presents the implementation of thistechnology in a classic physics experiment on oblique launches, conducted withapproximately 400 first-year engineering students at XXXXXX. These students weredivided into laboratory classes, working in teams of 3 to 4.The paper tests the hypothesis that an immersive video—explaining in detail theexperimental apparatus, the concepts involved, and the experimental procedure throughhotspots—before the class, would promote greater autonomy in modeling and executingthe experiment. The proposal aimed at analyzing: 1. The increase in student engagement with the flipped classroom methodology
-doctoralresearchers, and graduate students in the Department in spring 2019. Prof. Prince providedinsights into overcoming instructor doubts about implementing active learning and provided someupdated materials on evidence for the impacts of active learning to enhance learning in theconceptual domain.For inclusive teaching, the faculty instructor and graduate student researcher consulted withexperts on campus during summer 2019, including Rita Conrad, Interim Director of Teaching andLearning Excellence; Khalid Khadir, Lecturer in Engineering, Global Economy, and GlobalPolicy and Practice; and Fatima Alleyne, Director of Faculty Engagement for Equity andInclusion in Engineering. This diverse group of experts was able to point to inclusive teachingresources
) as well as more individualswho are willing to accept lower financial compensation (i.e., individuals willing to acceptthe care penalty). Using a literature review, the presence of a care penalty in engineeringis described, and an argument is advanced that the “Changing the Conversation”campaign may have been a contributing factor.In conclusion, it is important to raise awareness of the care penalty and to identify waysto financially compensate workers who provide substantial unpriced services such as“caring on the job”. The future of engineering includes STEMpathy, which is the explicitintegration of science, technology, engineering, and math with empathy (i.e., human-centered design, community-engaged design, etc.). Therefore, the “solution
approach new problems that are to become relevantas societal and technological landscapes change over time. The majority of entrepreneurshipeducation revolves around case studies 9 or guided role play 10 . While both important as part of alearning experience, it is secondary to preparing students socially and emotionally. In this paperwe start by reviewing previous work, explaining the new course structure followed by presentingsurvey results and concluding remarks.Related WorkGreat work has been done on increasing the efficacy of teaching methods, specifically with focuson generating more self sufficient, self engaged students. These are traits which are important forstudents being successful in the job market or in starting their own enterprise
membranes. Based on data and their own assumptions, students will need toassess the viability of their design and make improvements accordingly. After students havecreated a battery design that meets the deliverables of the activity, they will need to troubleshootone of many possible realistic problems that can occur. This activity attempts to engage studentsin practices typical of real engineering work, including working in teams, designing experiments,learning from failure, and managing uncertainty. Rather than doing measures after students leavethe laboratory, we investigate which engineering epistemic practices they engage in whilecompleting the laboratory. This laboratory looks to leverage and develop ideas from research onindustrially
and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Chair of Electrical Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teach- ing and research interests include electronics, optoelectronics, materials science, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Lord is a fellow of the ASEE and IEEE and is active in the engineering education community including serving as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, on the FIE Steering Committee, and as President of the IEEE Education Society for 2009-2010. She is an
a sample scenarioabout modern challenges in managing electronic waste. Feedback from project advisory boardmembers are integrated in this discussion.BackgroundEngineering programs have an explicit need to define, teach and measure professional skillssince their introduction by ABET evaluation criteria for engineering programs in 2000. Theseskills include ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (3d), understanding of professionaland ethical responsibility (3f), ability to communicate effectively (3g), understanding of theimpact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and cultural/societalcontexts (3h), recognition of and ability to engage in life-long learning (3i), and knowledge ofcontemporary issues (3j). A well
reported“high impact” practices that have been shown to encourage participation and improve thesuccessful completion of STEM degrees have been implemented. [2], [6] Some of thesepractices, including learning communities, early engagement in research, mentoring, academicsupport, and professional development [7], which are core to the SCI-LSAMP program. Weestablished a program based on these theoretical frameworks and best practices to facilitateretention of scholars through the completion of their baccalaureate degrees in STEM. The modelof the SCI-LSAMP program consists of nested communities of LSAMP scholars at their homeinstitutions and across the alliance, research mentors including faculty and graduate students, andresearch scholars who
engineersinto student projects as the assistant director of education outreach in the Mascaro Center for Sustainable Innovation, Pitt’s center for green design.Chris Hendrickson, Carnegie Mellon UniversityAmy E. Landis, University of PittsburghH. Scott Matthews, Carnegie Mellon University H. Scott Matthews is a Professor in the Departments of Civil and Environmental Engineering and En- gineering & Public Policy and the Research Director of the Green Design Institute at Carnegie Mellon University. The Green Design Institute is an interdisciplinary research consortium at Carnegie Mellon fo- cused on identifying and assessing the environmental impacts of systems and helping businesses manage their use of resources and toxic
by computerizedscoring of student work 3 and computer-supported peer review 4, and considerable success hasbeen found by enhancing lecture time using an interactive classroom format and frequent in-classassessment.5,6 When combined with small group work in approaches like peer instruction,regular-in class feedback has been shown to yield significant learning gains as measured byconcept inventories.5Audience response systems have been widely used to provide feedback to the instructor aboutand their impact on engagement and learning has been presented widely. These include handhelddedicated transmitters, often known as clickers 7,8, and web-based response systems that allowstudents to use their laptops, tablets, smartphones, and SMS to
the 2024 Fall-term andincluded updates to integrate experiential learning via videos with embedded questions, in-class hands-on exercises, and problem-solving demonstrations in lectures and tutorials. Thefollowing research questions are addressed: RQ1) What is the students’ experience of the transformations made to the course? RQ2) What is the impact of the changes on students’ perceived workload?This paper presents the initial challenges of the course, the pedagogical transformations madeto address these challenges, and their impact on students’ learning experience. An explanationof course changes is provided, in addition to the methodology used to evaluate the shifts.Finally, results of the transformation are shared, including lessons
Engineering in the Computer and Information Sci- ence department of Gannon University in Erie, PA. His research interests include Engineering Education Research, Requirements Engineering, Project Management, as well as Philosophy of Engineering and Engineering Education. He is regularly involved in supporting the regional entrepreneurial ecosystem, as well as projects that serve the regional community. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Finding Möjligheter: Creativity and Ill-Structured ProblemsAbstractCentered around the concept of Möjligheter, this paper focuses on motivating the rationale forfaculty to 1) add more authentic problems to their design courses, 2) foster more
arise, to when they sleep. Quite simply, it isimpossible for someone not to engage engineering in some manner on a reoccurring basis intoday’s modern world. This is a weighty concept for the profession and the practicingengineer. The relationship of engineering and society dictates that engineers operate in goodfaith to ensure the welfare of society is paramount. As such, engineering ethics are a part of thiscomplex relationship and the education of engineering students should be effective in makingthem more ethically minded. This paper will set up virtue ethics as a needed approach inengineering ethics education and exams four virtues as the hallmarks of an engineer: phronesis,justice, fortitude and honesty.engineering as a valued
student learning Designing more effective learning spaces Fostering high impact experiences Creating engineering experiences for liberal arts studentsThe second part of the exercise asked participants to review the “share” and “learn” items postedby each institution around the room and to then place sticky notes on the items to which theirinstitution would most be interested in contributing. With further general discussion, thereemerged 5 overarching themes that seemed to capture the areas in which participants felt therewas the most interest and opportunity: Diversity and Inclusion Engineering Culture and Identity Community and Collaboration Assessment Teaching ExcellenceAfter lunch, participants
, supports the graduate environment forwomen engineering students, refocuses on the professional school model for Colleges ofEngineering, trains faculty and students for entrepreneurship and creates cross-sectorcollaborations.The construction of such a network, and the objectives and visions WEAAP participants foreseefor the network, represent a culmination of the issues and solutions most emphasized at theworkshop. While the greater impact of the workshop will manifest as its membership andidentity evolve, WEAAP participants continue to take leadership and determine for the futurehow the emergent strategies summarized above, and below, can or should be brought to bear onour efforts to ensure the flourishing of engineering programs
. She graduated from Purdue University with a PhD in Aeronautical and Astronau- tical Engineering and is interested in increasing classroom engagement and student learning.Prof. Richard T. Mangum, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Richard T. Mangum is an assistant professor at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott Campus. He is a PhD candidate in Texas Tech University’s Technical Communication and Rhetoric program. He is interested in helping engineering students discover the relevancy of technical communication in their academic pursuits and future career paths.Dr. Cristi L. Bell-Huff, Georgia Institute of Technology Cristi L. Bell-Huff, PhD is a Lecturer in the Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical
, teamwork is of particular interest in this discussion because it presentsopportunities for engaging with other students in interdependent activity. Research onteamwork in engineering education has focused on both team formation [6] and peerevaluation [7], [8]. Also, there are many other papers that investigated different factors inteamwork. For example, Asio, Cross, and Ekwaro-Osire [9] studied factors such asleadership, conflict, communication and effort that can influence innovation in engineeringstudent design teams. Engineers should expect to work professionally in diverse teams, andthe effect of diversity has also been studied in professional teams. Using age and genderdiversity mixed teams can result in sustaining productivity in
taken hold in the UnitedStates. The authors suggest that youth, particularly ones belonging to under-represented groupssuch as students of color, young women, and low-income students are in particular need oflearning on computer science education as they often lack less access and support (Salmon,2023). The findings of work by Ryoo (2019) reveal that: “(1) demystifying CS by showing itsconnections to everyday life; (2) addressing social issues impacting both CS and students’communities; and (3) valuing students’ voices and perspectives” (p. 1) are useful in motivatingand engaging youth in CS education.Implementing culturally relevant professional development opportunities through research-practice partnerships seems a useful approach to gaining
, forensics and information assurance. To date, scholarships to RIT students total over $800,00.Prof. Margaret B. Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE)Prof. Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Professor Dell is the Faculty Associate to the Provost for Female Faculty and an associate professor in the Manufacturing & Mechanical Engineering Technology department at RIT. Her research interests include: characterization of biodegradable plastics and environmental consideration in materials selection for pro- duction design, the impact of technology paired with active learning pedagogies on student learning, and effective strategies for increasing gender diversity in STEM disciplines.Dr. Carol
digital environmentmeasures student performance by managing four resources: time, safety, personal reputation, andplant output. Decision options will have an impact on time management and then potentialimpacts on the other three metrics. When students hover over a decision choice they can observewhich metrics are influenced by the choice but not the magnitude or the direction of the impact. Reflection prompts are also integrated into the digital immersive environment to assistwith measuring the forms of moral reasoning students are leveraging when making decisions.For instance, one reflection prompt states, “With no one around, the plant could have seriousissues that impact the surrounding communities. How does this influence your decision
of this special session is to provide educators with an overview of specific educationalmethods and tools that they can bring back to the classroom to encourage their students to thinkdeeply about the concepts central to core chemical engineering and materials science courses.Presentations will focus on the use of concept inventories, peer instruction and ConcepTests,repair of misconceptions, and technology-based tools to facilitate active pedagogies. The sessionwill culminate in a panel discussion to address barriers to implementing these methods. Theintent of this session is to create a dialog amongst educators and expand the community ofinstructors interested in increasing engagement of their students in learning core concepts in
participation before student engagement. The site was selectedin a rural community in Peru and in November of 2006, the team of students traveled to meet thecommunity for which the bridge would be constructed. While there, Continental Crossingsperformed a preliminary site survey and worked with community leaders on aspects of the designthat could be modified to best suit the community of Yavina. This participative approach todesign ensured that the community would become fully committed to the project. Byacknowledging the importance of community input, volunteer labor assignments were viewed bythe community as an honor rather than a burden.Preparations: As noted, the bridge crossing in Yavina, Peru was first presented to ContinentalCrossings by the non
how the case study engaged you.6. Rate your satisfaction level with the length of the case study.7. Did the end-of-case-study exercise support the overall objectives of EMSD? (The course objectives were listed in the question).Students were asked to rate each item using a Likert-like scale. The first two questions wererated on a 4-point scale and the others were rated on a 5-point scale. In all cases, the numberreported in Table 3 represents the percentage of students that rated the item in the top two levelsof the scale.One number that stands out in the first column of Table 3 is the low number of participants forthe System Architecture case study. This case study was delivered in a morning class on theMonday after Thanksgiving break, and
only Black and/or woman-identifying student in engineering coursework for the entirety of her undergraduate degree [9].Shortly after starting graduate school, she came out as bisexual, leading to a new era of identityexploration for me. As she became more integrated into the Bay Area queer community, they startedto realize the privileges they had in being “straight passing” that many of her peers did not have. Hergoal is to investigate the different parts of her identity and think about how these have impacted hercareer choices in the past and looking forward to the future. They hope to help provide guidance tothe relevant leadership to make a meaningful improvement in the retention of marginalized graduatestudents.Kevin (he/him) is a fourth
to study engineering students’engineering identity development and how makerspaces and digital badges can contribute to thisdevelopment process. Towards this goal, we interviewed a diverse cohort of eight first-yearengineering students at a large, land-grant, Hispanic-Serving Institution in the U.S. during theFall 2022 semester. Students participated in two one-hour interviews at the start and end of thesemester on topics including their making skills, experiences in the makerspace, participationlevel in groups, perceived recognition as engineers, and feeling of belongingness in theengineering community and makerspaces. This paper presents lessons-learned from the interviewimplementation process, including dealing with disruptions from the