bibliometric analysis popular in recent years. Forexample, researchers have used bibliometric data to identify emerging technologies [1], identifyfunding and collaboration opportunities [2], and more. All three of the databases mentionedabove are accessible via paid subscription. A university often purchases these subscriptions forthe use of students and faculty. Additionally, while all these databases cover engineering topics, itstands to reason that some databases may cover more of a specific subject area than others andtherefore would be better suited for different individual researchers. For this reason, this workseeks to investigate the overlap in coverage and subject areas between databases.1.1 STEM DatabasesThis study will analyze three of the
level ofcomplexity of the models must be tailored to the learners' current levels of knowledge and skills”(NRC, 1999). Treating these as guidelines, the learning objectives of the course were organized asfollows -1) Developing understanding the process of Engineering Design – understanding the problems,and constraints of design, collecting relevant information about the problem, its scope and resourcesneeded, research and document multiple approaches to the solution of problem and select anappropriate approach for solving the problem2) Developing proficiency in using the SolidWorks Design Suite - present the design ideas bycreating virtual prototypes (3D parts and assemblies) and by means of clear and industry standard 2D-drawings3
support collaboration in learningwill indicate that the machine is not available yet. Also, it environments. Additionally, we will also explore how tocan also be specified that an action expires after a certain integrate low-cost open source electronics to create sensorperiod of time. network grids for environmental data collection.4) Action incompatibility (action context) VII. CONCLUSION Usually, an action is considered as correct if a We have designed a mechanism to develop virtual labsprevious set of actions are executed but, in some cases, an by using a free infrastructure for the development of
AN ENGINEERING WORKSHOP FOR K-12 TEACHERS AND STUDENTS Michael J. Rust1 and Abe Kamal2 1 Department of Biomedical Engineering 2 Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management Western New England College mrust@wne.edu AbstractThis paper describes an engineering workshop developed for K-12 teachers and students. Duringthe workshop, participants compete in a design activity that enables them to role-play asengineers. As a result, the attendees develop basic engineering
Paper ID #45214Fostering Tomorrow’s Black STEM Entrepreneurs: Insights from an InnovativeSTEM Program Promoting Equity-Centered EntrepreneurshipDr. Ebony Omotola McGee, The Johns Hopkins University Ebony McGee, associate professor of diversity and STEM education at Vanderbilt Universityˆa C™s Peabody College, investigates what it means to be racially marginalized in the context of learning and achieving in STEM higher education and industry. In particDr. Shelly Engelman, The Johns Hopkins University Shelly Engelman, Ph.D., is a Research Manager at Johns Hopkins University and also the Director of Research and Evaluation at
demonstration on programming for reading and writing values toand from sensors and motors. A post-survey was conducted to assess students’ engagement and interest inthe workshop through the admissions office. Based on the quantitative assessment of survey data, mostparticipants declared the workshop was extremely interesting. It was not only students but teachers whowere interested in adapting this activity into their curriculum. This collaborative workshop withthe admissions office increased awareness among students and teachers about engineering applications andwhat the institutions have to offer.KeywordsCareer Exploration, Outreach and Engagement, Enrichment, STEM Education, Engineering Workshop,Circuit Analysis, TinkerCad,IntroductionIn today’s
%) ● Innovate (32.2%) 3 ● Industrial Systems (ISE) ● Ambition (88.9%) ● Impact (55.6%) ● Solve Problems (55.6%) 4 ● Civil and Environmental (CEE) ● Ambition (61.1%) ● Solve Problems (44.4%) ● Help People (38.9%) 5 ● Biomedical (BME) ● Ambition (66.7%) ● Team (66.7%) ● Help
Department Oregon Institute of Technology, Wilsonville, OR 07070 E-mail: naga.korivi@oit.eduAbstractIncorporating entrepreneurship into undergraduate engineering programs prepares students withskills for industry innovation, future workforce needs, and their own business ventures. Everyenterprise, whatever size, was once a startup; insights into entrepreneurship thus help employeesunderstand the enterprise they work in. A key method to integrating entrepreneurship inengineering curricula is through experiential learning, such as in capstone project courses, whichprovide project-based learning. However, engineering programs with limited programmaticflexibility and resources may face challenges in
impacts and challengesEdTech can offer numerous benefits, including enhanced learning experiences and thedevelopment of critical competencies, but also presents unique challenges, such as infrastructurallimitations and the need for training educators on specific technologies. For students, EdTechoffers more hands-on and engaging educational opportunities [14] - [17], supporting thedevelopment of creativity, critical thinking, collaboration, and digital competence amonglearners [25]. EdTech can provide immersive learning experiences that bridge theory and real-world applications [26], thereby enhancing comprehension and retention of complex subjects. Bysimulating real-world scenarios, EdTech can help students acquire industry-relevant skills for
completion of his Ph.D. he began working in the Aerospace Industry where he spent over 10 years as a Stress Analyst/Consultant. At present he enjoys working on Distributed Electric Propulsion (DEP) with his students, designing, analyzing, constructing and flying Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Dr. Nader won a few awards in the past few years, among these are the College of Engineering Award of Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching (2023), Excellence in Faculty Academic Advising for the College of Engineering and Computer Science (2020). In addition, he is also a Co-PI on the NSF-supported HSI Implementation and Evaluation Project: Enhancing Student Success in Engineering Curriculum through Active e-Learning and High Impact
Paper ID #45426Comparison of Teamwork Assessment Methods in Engineering ClassesMr. Adam Barnes, University of Virginia Adam Barnes graduated with a BS and MS in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Tech. He worked in small business and industry for 18 years before returning to Virginia Tech to teach engineering as a professor of practice. He then moved to Charlottesville and began teaching at the University of Virginia in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, where he has now been for 5 years. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Comparison of Teamwork Assessment Methods
human capability, improve safety, and push the boundaries of human-machine collaboration. With experience in software development, research, and my time in the U.S. Air Force, I strive to create technology that not only solves real-world problems but also helps people overcome personal limitations. I am driven by the belief that AI can be a powerful tool for both individual and societal advancement. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 1 Section XXXX AI-Enhanced DOBOT Magician for Classroom Education: Hand Gesture Control for Hazardous
of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), among others.Rattaya Chowdhury Yalamanchili, University of North Texas Dr. Yalamanchili is a Clinical Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. He currently teaches courses in Mechanical engineering (Primarily Design and manufacturing) and in Engineering Management (Project Management, Entrepreneurship, Strategic Management, and Systems Engineering). He has over two decades of experience in Industry both at small startups and large corporations. He has a BTech in Chemical Engineering and an MS and PhD in Mechanical Engineering. He has several patents and publications to his credit
automation, environmental & biomedical data measurement, and educational robotics development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 1 Session 4 Underwater robotics and boats in Embedded Systems and Engineering Technology Education Byul Hur Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Texas A&M University, College Station AbstractEmbedded systems or microcontroller application
currently leveraging AI to tackle simple and longstanding problems in engineering education. With over a decade of industry experience as a Technology Strategist and Technical Lead, he has established himself as a forward-thinking innovator in AI and EdTech. His expertise spans Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA), Machine Learning (ML), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and Prompt Engineering Techniques (PETs) with Large Language Models (LLMs). Taiwo is known for his ability to collaborate effectively within and across organizations to meet project goals and drive transformative results. He excels in leading technical teams, offering strategic IT consultations, and implementing solutions that enhance productivity.Dr
Paper ID #47288BYOE: Teaching and Assessing Troubleshooting Strategies in Circuits CoursesDr. Caroline Crockett, University of Virginia Caroline Crockett is an assistant professor at the University of Virginia in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department. She received her PhD degree from the University of Michigan in electrical engineering. Her research interests include image processing, conceptual understanding, and troubleshooting.Mr. Adam Barnes, University of Virginia Adam Barnes graduated with a BS and MS in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Tech. He worked in small business and industry for 18 years
information abouta treatment plan or how to take medications can have serious or even fatal consequences. Asengineers are also often involved with projects which impact public and environmentalwellbeing, encouraging engineering students and professionals to think about how best to explainprojects and concepts in a culturally and linguistically appropriate way, as well as how to ask forfeedback, local knowledge, and other collaborative communications is an important skill.At Merrimack College, the science and engineering librarian had been trained in plain languagethrough a Plain Language for Health workshop offered by the Center for Health LiteracyResearch and Practice at Tufts University School of Medicine. She used these skills to create aplain
regulatory changes, including reducingthe time to disposal to 5 years and requiring the ability to maneuver spacecraft in an orbit above400 km. Students were split into 6 groups, each given a different organization with varied rolesand agendas, and asked to read that organization’s public comments to the FCC. Students wereasked to work to understand their organization’s position and why the organization took thisposition. They also assessed how much power their organization had in influencing the FCC’sdecision and how much the organization would be impacted by the FCC’s decision. To end theactivity, students shared through a “jigsaw” activity. This lesson was impactful because of itsdevelopment in collaboration with the Spacecraft Dynamics
, etc.—we haveobserved some consistent trends. Participation in this AP-level CS course has led to a decrease instudent self-efficacy as well as the students’ own assessment of their interest in the field of CS.In contrast with these trends, the research team observed strong reporting of students planning topursue CS-related careers following their high school graduation, with some notable exceptions.Keywordsbroadening participation, computer science education, high schoolIntroductionTo meet the technical workforce needs of domestic industries, significant resources have beeninvested by government, corporate, and non-profit organizations to increase student interest andskills in computer science (CS). Specifically, sizeable effort has been
Association of Collaborative Communities Equipping Youth for STEEAAM Success (ACCEYSS). ACCEYSS is a coalition that helps faith-based and grassroots organizations with curriculum, resources, and funding to close the STEEAAM equity gap in underserved communities. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 NSF CAREER: Effects of Community Cultural Wealth on Persistence of Black and Hispanic Women in the P-20 Computing Workforce Pipeline in Texas This five-year, parallel mixed-methods research study [1], funded by the National ScienceFoundation CAREER award, investigates the influence of community cultural wealth (CCW) [2]on persistence among Black and
his Ph.D. from Northeastern University, Boston, MA, and his M.Sc. and B.Sc. degrees from Shiraz (formerly Pahlavi) University, Shiraz, Iran. He has pioneered the leading edge of research on the use of electromagnetic (EM) fields for geoenvironmental/geotechnical applications. His research includes EM-induced remediation, EM waves’ effect on soil properties, energy geo-storage, wildfire research, recycling and reuse of industrial byproducts, material characterization, power infrastructure vulnerability, liquefaction mitigation, and engineering education, among others. His most recent research focuses on wildfires’ impacts, resilience against them, restoration and remediation post-fire, and recycling waste. Dr. Farid
environments.Dr. Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University Professor with a demonstrated history of working in the design innovation and technology entrepreneurship areas. Skilled in Innovation Management, Applied Research & Product Design, Entrepreneurship, and Training Next Generation Innovators and Entrepreneurs.Dr. Jalil Kianfar, Saint Louis University Dr. Jalil Kianfar is an associate professor of civil engineering at Saint Louis University and a registered professional engineer (P.E.) in the state of Missouri. In addition to his academic experience, Dr. Kianfar has five years of industry experience as a traffic engineer that informs his teaching, research and service. Dr. Kianfar research interests and
focus group questions that can better explore this relationship.AcknowledgmentsThis work has been primarily supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) through NSFAward Number [EEC-1849430 & EEC-2120746]. The opinions, findings, conclusions, andrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) alone and may not reflect theviews or official position of the NSF. The authors would like to acknowledge and extend their sincerethanks to the entire team of the e4usa project for their valuable contributions, collaboration, andsupport throughout the course of this work, without which this project would not have been possible.References[1] M. A. Fox and Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable, Eds., Pan
Paper ID #48943BOARD # 213: Perspectives of Junior Scholars: Calculus Learning Outcomesfrom Middle School Students After Use of an Educational Video Game (Workin Progress)Alex Gonce, Texas A&M University Alex Gonce is an undergraduate researcher at the LIVE Lab at Texas A&M University, where they study Computer Engineering with a minor in Neuroscience. They have worked at the lab for over a year, leading a research team and collaborating on multiple projects focused on gamification in education. In addition to their research, they serve as a Peer Teacher for the College of Engineering, where they support instruction
of clients in the Media, Insurance, and Telecommunication sectors. In addition to his industrial consulting activities, Sriram maintains an active research profile in data science and education research that has led to over 30 publications or presentations. At Rose-Hulman, Sriram has focused on incorporating reflection, and problem based learning activities in the Software Engineering curriculum. Sriram has been fundamental to the revamp of the entire software engineering program at Rose-Hulman. Sriram is a founding member of the Engineering Design program and continues to serve on the leadership team that has developed innovative ways to integrate Humanities, Science, Math, and Engineering curriculum into a
Vermont, and M.S. (1986) and Ph.D. (2002) in Bioengineering from Clemson University.Evan Taylor, Clemson University Evan Taylor is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. His research through the VIPR-GS focuses on model-based systems engineering of ground vehicles. As a senior member of the CEDAR design group, he actively mentors and collaborates with fellow researchers. He plans to propose his dissertation on model fidelity evaluation and model selection in May 2025. He also develops his skills as an educator and community leader through education research and service in Graduate Student Government.Makayla Headley, Clemson University Makayla Headley is a doctoral
Education Systems and Design from Arizona State University (ASU), an M.S. in User Experience from ASU, and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from North Carolina State University.Dr. Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Jennifer M. Bekki is an Associate Professor in and Associate Director of The Polytechnic School within The Fulton Schools of Engineering. Her research aims to understand and address inequities arising from racism and sexism within STEM graduate education.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Polytechnic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona
groups are statistically significant, which meant thatdecreases in students' mental effort correlated with higher performance in the posttest. Inconclusion, the FCA is effective in teaching-learning selected topics in Physics for Engineers, andthe mental effort of students varies when different strategies are being used in the classroom. Werecommend further validating the results of this study by applying it to other disciplines andcontextualizing the lessons.Keywords: Flipped Classroom Approach, Physics for Engineers, Effectiveness, Teaching-Learning, quasi-experimental designIntroduction Physics as an area of science education plays a pivotal role in 21st-century education andglobal industry. In 21st-century education, technological
Engineering course, anon-campus engineering residential community, study groups, and mentors [5].One intervention technique that is prominent in the literature is Supplemental Instruction (SI). SIhas long been recognized as an effective strategy for improving student outcomes in high-riskuniversity courses—those with historically high failure or withdrawal rates [6]. Beyond itsacademic benefits, SI has been shown to support at-risk students, such as those fromunderrepresented or low socioeconomic backgrounds, by fostering a collaborative and supportivelearning environment. Research indicates that SI not only enhances course performance but alsohelps build confidence [7] and enhances social connections among participants [8], potentiallymaking it a
-efficient computing. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Toward a Fair and Unbiased Debugging Evaluation InstrumentIntroductionDebugging skills are critical to the semiconductor industry, as deficiencies can incur significantcosts. The unpredictable nature of debugging tasks has earned it the nickname “The ScheduleKiller” [1] with some electronics engineers spending up to 44% of their time on debugging [2].Despite the critical economic importance of this million-dollar question [3], undergraduate ECEcurricula often omit hardware debugging skills [4], [5]. Instead, it is left to develop indirectlythrough design projects and labs. To help fill this gap, we are developing a circuit debuggingcurriculum