college students: Problems and promising practices. 1984, Maryville, CA: Yuba College (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 242 377). “Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education”17. Nora, A., et al., Differential impacts of academic and social experiences on college-related behavioral outcomes across different ethnic and gender groups at four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education, 1996. 37(4): p. 427-449.18. Cohen, A.M. and E.M. Bensimon, Transfer education in American community colleges. 1985, Center for the Study of Community Colleges. (ERIC Document
students totake on other personas, which may create just enough distance between themselves and theactivity to allow them to fully engage without feeling uncomfortably vulnerable.Future WorkAnecdotally, from an instructional perspective, this diversity module has been a highly engagingmethod for incorporating diversity awareness in a technical and professional communicationcourse. The impact of the module has not yet been formally assessed, and future work will seekto assess both the short-term and long-term impact of this module on students’ understanding of,and attention to, diversity issues. Intended short-term assessment includes pre-and post-awareness surveys that highlight familiarity with the language and issues surrounding
with agoal of developing a socio-technical mindset as well as student understanding of the relevance ofsocial justice to their future as engineers. This activity occurs during week four of the quarter aspart of the "Developing Sociotechnical Mindsets" unit, building on earlier discussions of identity,belonging, and engineering decision-making. The primary objective of this activity is to helpstudents recognize how bias impacts innovation while developing their ability to analyze theimpact of engineering decisions on people and communities. Through engagement with real-world examples of bias in engineering, students learn to identify how engineering solutions canunintentionally exclude or harm certain populations. The activity challenges
ofEngineering at Mississippi State University.Co-Author: Lorena Benavides-Riano, originally from Colombia, is a first-year EngineeringPh.D. student at Mississippi State University. In July 2020, she completed her bachelor’sdegree in Environmental Engineering at the National University of Colombia. Aftergraduation, Lorena worked as a research assistant investigating the effects of developmentprojects on environmental parameters and rural communities in Colombia, South America. 1Lorena has also been part of initiatives that promote access to high-quality education,gender equality, and environmental protection. Lorena recently started her doctoral studiesat
for students to transfer into engineering programs. It was also expected that the fellowsbalance their new teaching and administration responsibilities while continuing progress towardscompletion of their dissertations.Fellows Impact Expanded to Students Not on Scholarship: While the fellows teach onlytransfer students on scholarship through this program (‘scholars’) at the research university, theyteach any student who signed up for their research course on the technical/community collegesites. While these courses were intended to be for all students on scholarship at those locations,the range of course requirements needed by each community college student to successfullytransfer to a 4-year. program varied significantly and there was not
-academic factors.With particular focus on the student experience, this research was conducted to (1) identify andultimately reduce systemic barriers caused by subjective policies and practices, (2) improve aninstitutional climate that disproportionately impacts students from disenfranchised communities,and (3) collect more actionable data to improve the overall student experience. Using a phaseapproach that was developed organically, researchers explored the college of engineering’soperations to identify biases in its systems and structures. The data collected and analyzedencompassed academic programs, enrollment, scholarships, advising, first-year experiences, anda host of other student support mechanisms. When collecting data from students
5Colorado. We hope to have an impact on enriching rural high school students’ developmentaland learning outcomes, particularly in ways that contribute to students’ forming an identity as thekind of person who is interested in and engages with science and engineering. The design-basedresearch and evaluation will contribute insights into what programmatic features or infrastructuresupport place-based engineering learning and development, and how. This research project will help us understand how SCENIC’s university-supportedcurriculum and mentoring impacts rural students, school districts, and local communities. Weexpect participating students to gain new knowledge, potentially form new identities, and benefitfrom increased connections to mentors
desired needs;• an ability to communicate effectively;• the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global/societal context; and• a recognition of the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning.The 7 areas listed above are perceived by undergraduate students to be covered at a high level.Nevertheless, a shown in Table 1, one attribute -- a knowledge of contemporary issues -- is ratedat a composite score of ≤ 3.1. Indeed, some individuals believe that gaining knowledge in thisarea should be considered to be the student’s own responsibility.Graduate Student Rating of ABET AttributesThe perceptions of graduate students are shown in Table 2. Here, the respondents indicate that
core science track to theLMU engineering curricula. It differs from a typical biology class in that it treats thescience of biology from the perspective of related engineering applications and due to itslink to the NAE Grand Challenges for the 21st Century.Course Goals In addition to offering the biology course from the standpoint of the engineer, thecourse was designed to provide students with: 1. An opportunity to demonstrate knowledge of biology and engineering; 2. An opportunity to demonstrate effective written communication skills; 3. The opportunity to explore the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental or societal context; 4. An opportunity to demonstrate skills needed to engage in life
organizations. Approximately 300 students are currentlyenrolled in EPICS at Purdue and they are organized into 20 project teams. . With its emphasis onstart-to-finish design of significant projects that will be deployed by the community customers,EPICS addresses many of the program outcomes mandated for ABET accreditation. This paperdescribes the procedures and documentation that have been developed to enhance and evaluatethe students' abilities to: function on multidisciplinary teams; communicate effectively; andunderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context.IntroductionUndergraduate students in engineering face a future in which they will need more than just asolid technical background [1,2,3]. In setting the goals
lessons learned from the initial offering of this course, we havecreated a program that allows students to interact with actual customers through a partnershipwith a non-profit organization that helps people with disabilities in the workplace. We also fosterempathetic design by having students engage in an accessibility simulation we developed to helpour students understand the everyday experiences of people with disabilities and placing thoseexperiences in an historical context. We also use the principles of outcome driven innovation tohelp our students gather focused customer feedback and identify where they can create the mostvalue for their customers in the workplace. Assessment of the impact of these studio courseactivities on empathy and
“Collabora on”, “Project Management”, and “Reflec on”. Some of the criteria proposed by HQPBL are70 similar to the ones proposed by Thomas [28] and others [30, 31]. Based on HQPBL, a PBL experience71 requires mul ple-answer, complex problems that engage students in cri cal thinking. The problems need72 to be authen c, meaning they could have a real-life impact on people and communi es outside the73 school se ng. Students need to share the results of their projects with their peers and present them to74 the public. Public may include experts and people outside the classroom. Teamwork skills are a necessity75 in a professional workplace; therefore, projects should be collabora ve. Collabora on is not only limited76 to students’ team
solutionsin a societal context, 5 – function effectively on teams [5]. II. THE FUTURE DESIGN STUDIOThe goal of FDS is to provide participants with a chance to imagine future technologies, buildprototypes of such artifacts, and deeply engage with the broader impacts and societal interactionsthat might occur in such a technological future. Part of this deeper engagement occurs whenparticipants are faced with how their creation plays out in an imagined world, created on the fly,by a professional improv team trained in how to think critically about sociotechnical interactions.This allows the students to explore the unintended consequences and possibly beneficial uses oftheir imagined technology outside of the initial
learnmaterial and find a multi-faceted approach to be distracting, this method of communication isuseful to reach a broader spectrum of students in the class, raising the total number of studentsactively engaging with the content.Sangster, J. Page 4 The literature on learning styles is something of an outgrowth from the idea of multipleintelligences, exploring not just the media by which students learn best, but the way in which thematerial is organized as well. Research on learning styles tends to take the form of a frameworkfor understanding student differences, with subsequent research exploring implications forlearning outcomes within those frameworks. One
Education, 2012 “OMG! That’s What an Engineer Does?”: Freshmen Developing a Personal Identity as an EngineerAbstractFreshman retention is a top priority in nearly all engineering schools. Increased retentionoptimizes new-student recruitment dollars, decreases students’ time to graduation, impactsschool rankings, and helps to meet industry’s increasing demand for engineers. Most researchersand experts in the field agree on a number of basic tenants in retaining engineering freshmen.Topmost are the tenants of creating community amongst freshmen, bonding freshmen withreturning students, creating opportunities for meaningful interaction between freshmen andfaculty both in and outside of the classroom, helping freshmen
proper guidance for students who may be unfamiliar with large,unstructured datasets 6 . Successful programs (e.g., NASA’s and NOAA’s classroom dataprograms) highlight the importance of scaffolding and context to make the data accessible andengaging.2.2 Project-Based Learning and Data Science EducationProject-based learning (PBL) approaches are known to improve student engagement by centeringlearning around meaningful problems. When students work on projects with real-world impacts,such as analyzing local environmental data or solving community issues, their motivation tends toincrease 3 . In data science education, incorporating real-life projects and real-life data has beenrecognized as a way of making programs more interesting and relevant
accreditationEngineering Criteria 2000 changed accreditation from a “bean counting” exercise to one thatfocused on meeting expectations in a number of areas, including student learning outcomes (a-k criteria).In addressing a-k criteria, faculty looked at the overall program and decided that two criteria inparticular were important to the first year design sequence:(g) an ability to communicate effectively(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in aglobal, economic, environmental, and societal context.BE 1250/1251 and 1252 were enhanced with respect to communication exercises (g) and 1252was enhanced with respect to service-learning (h), in which the students work in teams with acommunity partner to address a critical
physics is responsible for a range of natural phenomena, from stunning landscapes to devastating disasters such as floods, tornadoes, and wildfires. By exploring the relationship between art and science, students can gain a deeper understanding of how the two fields intersect and influence one another. For instance, they can learn how images and videos of natural disasters are both scientifically informative and aesthetically captivating. In addition to scientific goals, many fluid physicists are also driven by a fascination with their subject, which underscores the potential for lifelong learning and engagement in the field. • Effective Communication – Another important objective of this course is to teach students
. His research focus is on biology education including the use of inquiry and tech- nology in the teaching introductory biology lecture and laboratories. He has published articles on the impact of teaching in reformed courses on graduate students.YoonJung Cho, Oklahoma State University Assistant professor in the School of Applied Health and Educational Psychology at Oklahoma State Uni- versity. Her research is focused on students’ achievement motivation and self-regulated learning process as well as teachers’ motivation and its impact on instructional practices, both in traditional classroom setting and online instruction. She published articles on graduate teaching assistants’ professional devel- opment as well as
projects, campus scavengerhunts, themed hands on activities, and strategies for academic and career planning will be used tohighlight student engagement and course improvements.Summary of Related Literature A consistent factor that influences learning is the powerful impact of engagement,defined as the level at which students invest physical, psychological, emotional, and intellectualenergy in educationally related activities [1]. Successful engagement early in a student’s courseof study is critical as early engagement is sometimes insufficient at large universities, wherestudents do not normally feel “belonged” early due to large class sizes or lack of interactionamong students for a variety of reasons [2]. FYS classes have a statistically
the engineer has little contact with what isactually going on in the world outside of engineering. By incorporating service-learning intoengineering courses, a link is established between engineering and improving society. Thislink gives an added appeal to the profession, which translates into diversifying the field. Page 5.542.6Industry has made it clear that they need engineers with a broader outlook, better team skills, astrong ethical sense and a global awareness. Working with the community partners ensures realissues and thus practical experiences. It helps the students realize the broader impact ofengineering and the ethical
the challenges within yourprograms.Keys to Programmatic Success:Learn actionable strategies for building sustainable and impactful programs.Staying Informed:Discover resources to keep up with current trends and policies.Inclusive Pedagogy:Explore ways to integrate inclusivity into your programming and teaching efforts.Call to Action:When you return home, use this knowledge to strengthen your networks and build astrategic plan.In today’s climate, especially under a red administration focused on empowering states,it’s critical to engage your surrounding community.Connect with faith-based organizations, industry partners, community colleges, and otherlocal net works.CoNECD Presentation 2025 Acker Coley Johnson Sims
Quick Takes Session 1Kazerounian, Kazem, Dean & Professor Hesham El-Rewini, Dean & ProfessorSchool of Engineering College of Engineering and MinesUniversity of Connecticut University of North Dakota February 5, 2019What is “Quick Take”?Presentations will be on influencing publicpolicy and enhancing public awareness on engineering education and practice, and could include examples about working with legislators locally or nationally,working with education policy makers (K- 16), innovative engagements with movie and media industry and social mediaWMU-CEAS Innovation DayA Celebration of Entrepreneurship
to opinions and build consensus [5]. While exploring the notion ofcontextual learning, the faculty engaged the local community to build and forge partnerships.Community involvement is seen as one way to help schools produce a more capable work force;by equipping schools to provide students with more relevant, challenging learning opportunitiesin nurturing environments [7]. According to Sanders, partner selection is important and schoolsshould identify community partners and develop partnerships that will help them to achievegoals that support students’ learning. Sanders also suggests that service learning partnerships area popular form of community involvement in schools, helping achieve educational objectiveswhich focus on community and
project-based learning practices.The proposed framework was implemented in one class practicing the inductive teachingapproach with customized instructor’s intervention and formal instruction on effectivecommunication skills. No formal communication skills training or inductive teaching wasoffered to other class. The student learning outcomes (SLOs) and self-reported progress on SLOs for twomajors were examined to offer insight into how students’ perceptions regarding theirprofessional communication skills evolve under different teaching approaches. The project effectively combines quantitative and qualitative assessment methods and toprovide comprehensive insight into the key drivers of effective professional communicationskills
participation on students' leadership identity development. In one such study[7] scholars discussed the some of the challenges to student participation in these non-creditactivities at their institute, and presented some suggestions for enhancing the level of studentparticipation and outcome.Undergraduate ResearchParticipation in undergraduate research, whether as a volunteer or part of coursework, enhancesstudents' ability to apply theoretical concepts to practical scenarios. Engaging in researchprojects promotes innovative thinking and deepens understanding [8]. It also prepares studentsfor higher studies and potential career in academia or research. Some of the benefits ofundergraduate research are improvements in writing and communication skills
to be a problem. Rather, these students expressed concernabout learning concepts and not just memorizing information in order to pass the exam or quiz.The issue of progress and attainment of student goals - primarily, the desire to do well on examsprompted a discussion on the issue of cheating. It would appear that cheating occurs on manylevels.The Learning Community ~How does one attain success as a student? Is the student on a solitary journey or are thereothers who contribute to the learning community? Who are the members of the community andhow does the community impact the student. Is the community created by the physical space orby the individuals in the community?Students had divergent opinions about dorm living. Some students felt
potent with the presence oftechnology. Implementing technology into service learning is a major asset. Kurt (2001)asserted that service learning can be a meaningful way to combine service with academiclearning in a variety of technology courses. Technology savvy students are eager to take onnew roles in service learning. Service learning provides this change, because studentsbecome more aware of their positive impact to the community while working on technicalprojects. “Integrating technology with service learning catches and holds the attention ofstudents who have grown up in the digital age and rely on computers, video games, cellphones and digital music players for their information and entertainment” (Bradford, 2005,p.1). Students are
service learning project in a Renewable Energy Engineering class. Individual Overview: Builds awareness of “big picture” context of the technology Individual Literature Review: Creates expertise in the technology Team Design of Teaching Experiment: Synthesizes learning and creates a product that is of value to the community Utilization of Experiment at Middle School Program: Encourages civic engagement and reinforces learning through teaching of material to othersAssessment of the service learning project was done using a summative survey. Students wereasked to self report the impact of the service learning project on their understanding ofengineering concepts, motivation to work in the field of renewable energy, and commitment
and small groups simultaneously.Increasing student engagement was and is still one of the major on-going initiatives at IndianaUniversity, and this new space is helping to do that. Interestingly, many of our studioworkspaces for the Interior Design and Architectural Technology students are located in parts ofthe building that don’t have windows. This new collaborative classroom has one oversizedwindow, and the feedback was clear that it makes a huge difference, as some of the early surveyfeedback centered around the uniqueness of being in a classroom space with natural light. Wenow know that natural light impacts the working and learning environment in many ways,“Lighting in the classrooms has been the subject of many studies for over a