, sustaining engagement, and addressing common barriers to participation. Recommendations for selecting and leveraging digital tools to support seamless collaboration and communication. 5. Dissemination, Communication, and Impact Assessment: Methods to evaluate students’ performance, focusing on intercultural competencies, collaborative problem-solving, and the quality of deliverables.The TOP 10 typical problems Educators face when designing a COIL experienceThe non-systematic literature mapping allowed the authors to systematically identify 53 distinctchallenges related to designing and implementing Collaborative Online International Learning(COIL) experiences. These challenges spanned various stages of COIL implementation
, 2017 Teaching Systems and Robotics in a Four Week Summer Short CourseAbstractThis paper describes a four-week summer short-course designed to introduce students withlimited hands-on technical experience to the low-level details of embedded systems and robotics.Students start the course using a Raspberry Pi 3 to learn the basics of Linux and programming,and end the course by competing in a capture-the-flag type competition with the web-configurable GPS-guided autonomous robots they designed and tested in the course. Throughoutthe course, students are introduced to programming languages including Python and PHP,advanced programming concepts such as using sockets for inter-process communication
(EAC) of ABET,engineering programs are required to have eleven documented student outcomes[1], commonly referred to as “a through k.” Five of these student outcomesrepresent technical attributes that engineering educators are familiar with teachingand assessing. However, six of these student outcomes are, for many facultymembers, difficult and purportedly subjective to assess. These include: (d) An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) An ability to communicate effectively (h) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal
Reservation by creating culturallysensitive educational opportunities. However, there is concern with the low enrolment in STEMcourses. NA students have not traditionally been drawn to higher level math and sciencecourses. It is essential to offer additional math and science exposure to all students to attract and Page 22.120.2prepare them for math, science and engineering careers. As premier universities of the State,North Dakota State University (NDSU) and University of North Dakota (UND) have alwaysbeen keenly aware of the TCCs positive impact on their communities despite their limitedresources.The two research universities in the State are in a
their interest in engineering. Students were then filtered by academic scores, income,gender, race, and ethnicity to identify those that graduate with engineering degrees at lower ratesthan the average for all other demographics at USAFA. USAFA students are not admitted to acollege, rather they enter without a major and then declare one within their first three semesters.Therefore, none of the students that took Engineering Problem Solving were engineering majors.Pre- and Post-Course SurveysSurveys were designed to explore students’ perceptions before and after the course to discoverthe extent to which their attitudes had been impacted in the following areas:• Interest in declaring an engineering major• Confidence in their ability to succeed as
, 2016) states “understand the basic principles of sustainableconstruction” as one of the 20 Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) for accredited Bachelor ofDegree programs in construction. Therefore, a paradigm shift is necessary to educate students torecognize sustainability as a changing constraint in construction.As construction industry demands for graduates with broader understanding of impact ofconstruction projects on environment and overall quality of life, universities have tried to come upwith innovative ways to teach students with knowledge of sustainability concepts. However, dueto already full construction management curriculum it has been a challenge to equip students withvarious sustainable solutions. One of the solutions to this
newcomers to any environmentbecome full participants in that community. Some argue that participation in academicenvironments—the classroom—merely teaches students to learn to be students; only genuineimmersion in a professional environment can lead to learning to be a professional. 1,2While an increasing number of students gain some experience in summer internships or co-op Page 7.765.1placements, such temporary positions often have a narrow focus, may not engage students in Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2002, American Society for
communication skills. The Industrial Advisory Committeeat Farmingdale State College has set enhanced communications, both written and oral, as their primarylearning outcome.This paper will set out the results of case studies in the field of teaching Construction Management atFarmingdale State College and how they differ based on class size, class make-up, and student maturity(Freshman vs. Senior). We will address the success and failure of each of these situations, including themale dominated population in Construction Management courses and the effect of female students in thecurriculum. We will consider the results of “individual” vs. “team” work assignments and team make-up.Also, we will look at the foundations of “Organizational Behavior in the
Students working in groups of 5 or more but less than whole class Inquiry-based activities Hands-on projects(Likert Scale choices: Never, 1-2 days a month, 3-4 days a month, 1-3 days a week, Almostevery day)4. In the upcoming school year, how often do you plan to use the following types of student learning activities? Defining a problem when given probable scenarios Engaging in various steps of the engineering design process Communicating solutions in written format Communicating solutions in oral format Communicating solutions by formal presentation Reflecting in a notebook or journal Developing a design portfolio Critiquing their own work Critiquing other students
solution.However, students often come into the design course without mastery of the prerequisitematerial. Faculty then use class time to review this material, reducing the time that can be spenton the objectives of the course such as engineering design, professional correspondence, andimproving technical writing and presentations skills. To solve this problem, we have created aset of online instructional materials that can be used by students in an EnvironmentalEngineering capstone course to ensure that they have mastered the prerequisite material beforeand while engaging on the design project.In this case the students designed a water treatment system to remediate acid mine drainageentering the headwaters of a local river. This design required knowledge
FAMILY EGIEERIG: ITRODUCIG EGIEERIG TO PARETS & CHILDRE Neil J. Hutzler1, Joanne S. Chadde1, David Heil2, and William E. Kelly3 1 Michigan Tech University, Houghton, MI 2Family Science Foundation, Portland, OR 3ASEE, Washington, DC Abstract: The goal of Family Engineering is to engage, inspire, and encourage elementary and middle school students to consider careers in engineering and science through hands-on activities with their parents at Family Engineering Nights. This program is designed to address the United States’ need for an increased number, and greater diversity, of students skilled in math, science, technology and
socialproblems in the world around them will be beneficial to them in future careers. An article in theCornell Chronicle observed, “No longer the ‘me generation’, American engineering students areactively taking on some of the world’s toughest problems…students and professional engineers[are] working to improve the lot of some of the world’s poorest communities, many in thedeveloping world.”3 Helping the impoverished have a better life enables students to look beyondthemselves into the world around them.In order to engage engineering students from many disciplines in a global opportunity, a newvariable credit (1-3) course was developed and is currently in progress during the Winter 2007semester. For all engineering disciplines (chemical, civil
continuous learning and is widely regarded in academiaas a high-impact practice for faculty success. As such, we are strengthening faculty developmentthrough monthly industry-led hands-on training workshops that train them on cutting-edgetechnologies, establishing faculty learning communities via faculty guilds, and designing digitalbadges. The expected outcomes from these activates are that more faculty will engage in acontinuous professional development process to become and remain current with industry trendsto better educate the electronic technology workforce of the future while increasing personalresearch capacity.Increase faculty expertise in cutting-edge software technologiesThe methodology of educating STEM students is evolving almost as
and in learning the professional skills (communications, teamwork, organization, etc.)necessary for success. While most students opted to follow the suggested schedule, about 15% ofstudents instead chose to delay course participation until later in the semester. This varying paceof participation had an unexpected impact on some of the most dedicated students, who found itdifficult to engage in productive discussions online when not all of their classmates wereworking as quickly through the materials.IntroductionSuccessful engineering programs often integrate experiential learning experiences throughout thecurriculum. Cooperative education or internship programs may be the most familiar approach toexperiential learning in engineering; in these
project a context based project.After the introduction of the intervention, data from several semesters have elucidated a higherretention in the course and students have positive perception of the intervention. To the best ofour knowledge, there has not been a context based project based on student’s interest reported inthe literature about CS1 course.BackgroundProject-based learning and problem-based learning are instructional strategies that have beenused in CS1 courses. Vega, et. al (2013) found that project based learning not only increasesengagement among students, but incremental projects also foster student engagement. Ascaffolding set of assignments form the project. Problem based learning in foundationalcomputer science course was
new function and intended user. For example, one of theinterviewees suggested the value of this online resource for both students and graduates toaccess when planning their professional development towards engineering chartershiprecognition. Although chartered engineering status is not strictly a legal requirement to workas an engineer, it is highly encouraged in the UK engineering profession, particularly whenprogressing to senior management roles.Indeed, the Toolkit’s relevance to the specific UK context seems clear, and the majority ofthe resources were developed by a largely Eurocentric advisory group with experience inworking in global teams with English as the communication medium. This limits the reachand impact on global inclusion
impacts of research experiences on undergraduatestudents, particularly as a way to retain students in STEM, motivate them to pursue STEMdegrees and careers, empower them as learners and help them see the relevance and applicationsof their coursework [5-11]. Prior long-term assessment of our REU program indeed confirmsthese positive impacts [2]. The AERIM REU program also includes a servicelearning/community outreach component, which as prior research has shown, has the doublebenefit of helping the REU participants develop a better understanding of the needs of diversegroups of people, while also providing exciting learning opportunities about STEM for K-12students [12-14].As a result of limitations placed on in-person meetings and on-campus
growth: A guide to alternativegrading practices that promote authentic learning and student engagement in Higher Education.Routledge.[7] R. Talbert. “When is a number not a number?.” Gradingforgrowth.com. Accessed: December17, 2024. [Online.] Available: https://gradingforgrowth.com/p/when-is-a-number-not-a-number[8] N. von der Embse, D. Jesters, D. Roy, and J. Post, “Test anxiety effects, predictors, andcorrelates: A 30-year meta-analytic review,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 227, pp.483-493. 2018[9] D. Lewis, “Impacts of Standards-Based Grading on Students’ Mindset and Test Anxiety,”Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 67-77. June 2022[10] D. Clark. “How to make and use grade trackers
thoughtful design. Questions that encourage deeper thinking, problem-solving, and critical analysis are essential to student engagement and to the success of a virtualsession. To re-conceptualize virtual office hours as more informal settings where student-student,student-content, and student-faculty interactions are enhanced, one engineering instructor and aco-author of this paper, Dr. Krishna Pakala, named them “Happy Hours”. The title of this paperis inspired by an anonymous student comment from the course evaluations.Happy Hours are extra help sessions hosted by an instructor and are held in replacement oftraditional in-person office hours. Happy Hours are held twice a week, on the evenings before anin-person lecture. They are typically held
Paper ID #20403Guiding Principles and Pedagogical Tools for an Introductory Software De-velopment CourseDr. Mark Hoffman, Quinnipiac University Mark Hoffman is a professor of computer science at Quinnipiac University. He joined the University in 2001 following a career in industry and has taught a wide variety of courses including data structures, computer architecture and organization, software development, and the senior capstone project. His re- search interests include communication and critical thinking skills in computer science education, and the impact of technology on work/home boundary management. He received
a less clear topic understanding, leading toconfusion and frustration. Similar to the student engagement definition earlier, there is a student-centered component (the prior knowledge) and an institution- or educator-centered component(new topic knowledge). As we are looking to make an impact at the educator level, we will befocusing our attention on the presentation of the new topic knowledge and how it can more easilytie into the possible prior knowledge students enter the classroom with. Now student engagementis not straightforward to achieve in the classroom. Students can fit the textbook example of beinginvolved in the classroom (i.e. perfect attendance in class), but that does not mean they are engagedwith the content[3]. There are
Paper ID #18669Remaking the Engineering Building: Facility Design Best PracticesMr. Christopher Purdy, SmithGroupJJR Chris Purdy is the Higher Education Practice Director for SmithGroupJJR. With twenty five years of ex- perience focusing on facilities for higher education, he understands the unique requirements of campus architecture including longevity, sensitivity to context, sustainability and student engagement. Chris has special expertise in providing leadership for projects that focus on student STEM education and research. Some of his most notable clients include Michigan State University, Oakland University
disadvantaged school,” Research in Science Education, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 863- 883, 2020.[8] T. D. Sadler, S. A. Barab, and B. Scott, “What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry?,” Research in Science Education, vol. 37, pp. 371-391, 2007.[9] T. Brush, K. Glazewski, S. Shin, and S. S. Shin, “Implementation of a technology-supported socioscientific inquiry unit in high school biology: Impact on student achievement and attitudes,” Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 303–330, 2021.[10] T. D. Sadler and V. Dawson, “Socio-scientific issues in science education: Contexts for the promotion of key learning outcomes,” in Second International Handbook of Science Education, B. J
answer which does not align with more explorative pedagogy. Yet in order tointegrate microelectronics in a way that inclusively introduces the field of microelectronics,provides information about workforce pathways, and teaches the core mathematics conceptsrequires that teachers have a constructivist mindset paired with flexibility and adaptability [5].Research highlights both challenges and benefits in fostering connections between STEMsubjects, particularly engineering and mathematics. While integrating these disciplines canimprove student engagement and problem-solving skills [6-7], challenges include siloedcurriculum structures and teacher training focused on specific subjects [8-9]. Furthermore,effectively linking engineering design
ability to identifyand solve problems,” in ways that it would impact his/her own transformation and growth3.Developing resilience depends on cultivating those skills through exercises that stimulate criticalthinking and strengthen students’ analysis and decision-making capabilities. Well-designedproblem-based courses are likely to encourage learners to think critically about content sincecourses start with problems rather than with a program of lectures and tutorials aimed at teachingstudents a body of knowledge4. Woods et al.5 found that transmitting knowledge was the easiestpart of teaching; it was the task of equipping students with the critical skills they need to succeed
much what I did is I just put toilet paper rolls together and then I just cut out cardboard and showed the concept of the base of it [the device]…”Physical representations, either through software drawings or simple prototypes, played a keyrole in facilitating clear communication among all members of the team as well as providing thestudents with practical, hands-on experiences. To meet the team objective, it was necessary foreach student to communicate to all members of the team, and this practice impacts how pastteam members approach their current careers.Professional Benefits to StudentsAt the time of the interviews, all project team members had graduated and many were employedin careers related to their majors of study. This allowed
judges wereasked to grade the posters in terms of criteria listed in Table 1. Table 1 Criteria for Judging PostersAlong with these criteria, additional elements were introduced in the judging process.These were (a) impact, (b) practicality and (c) creativity. The top three winners werepicked based on these criteria. Figure 2 shows one of the winning projects.Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Page 10.826.5 Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationAssessment of Student LearningAs a result of the poster project activities, the students were
(STEM) [1-2]. To date, 92 students from 64 universities, morethan half of whom were female, have taken part in this program.REU programs are designed around the needs of the undergraduate student participants. Theresearch projects, seminars, laboratory/industry tours, meeting with mentors, networking eventsand other activities are all set up to maximize the positive impact of a research experience on thestudents. After all, numerous studies have shown that active participation in hands-onundergraduate research is one of the most effective ways to attract and retain talentedundergraduate students, to motivate them towards pursuing careers and advanced degrees inengineering and science, to help them feel more connected to their educational
program to broaden theireducation and increase their chances of entering graduate studies, (2) to promote mutual awareness andcollaboration among faculty across the various units and disciplines that offer undergraduate researchprograms, and (3) paves way for new faculty go get involved with research early in their career.This paper will explain some of the exposures of the “Research Experience for Undergraduates” (REU)(as case studies) from different institutions and draw conclusions based on the students’ feedback fromvarious educational institutions. Usually, students will not take any courses towards their academicaccomplishments during the summer when they are engaged in research. They will work 40 hours perweek for the 10-week or 8-week
past as an indication ofthe impact of their scholarly work, increasingly print presents limited information about themuch more dynamic environments of internet based communication platforms such as Twitter,networking sites such as LinkedIn and ResearchGate, or even aggregators such as GoogleScholar.1 In the past ten years researchers have had alternative means to publicize their researchusing social media and other web based tools. A category of tools that measure impacts andstatistics of usage and viewing based on the Social Web are referred to as altmetrics.2 Altmetricspresent an alternative to journal based metrics such as impact factor, Eigenvalues, and other printbased algorithms or measures.3The basic functions of online scientific